2024

1,134,209 Views | 11101 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by FLBear5630
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Had dinner Monday evening at home with wife and our mayor who is a single black female, mid50's, not partisan political at all. Special ed teacher. Never held office. Father had a couple terms on the council. She served one term on the council the challenged a sitting mayor and won big on a platform to fix potholes and is doing exactly that.

With some mixed feelings she is going to vote Trump. She can put up with the theater because he gets stuff done that matters…

The neverTrumpers could be missing something big because they believe it best to double down on the Romney class that has greased the skids for the progressive agenda that got us into this mess and is offended that ordinary people are outraged about it.

JR you are engaging in garden variety class snobbery and don't even realize it (just like Romney).
Romney is self made. Trump is not!
Pretty narrow distinction. Neither of them started off poor; one of them had a $2m head start. One of them sneers at the poors; the other praises them.

And most notably, one of them has actually won a presidential election.

"MAGA ethos...." Class snobbery at its worst.

Have you ever had a business that had customers? ....that had to understand how ordinary people think, the thought process that drove decision making, then craft marketing appeals to them to influence their behavior in a market (rather than judge how stupid they were for not being a millionaire yet).....
yes, one start off with $2M which wasn't much back then. The other started off with $440M. Have I ever had a business with customers? Yes, I ran global business development for a $15B public company. I was responsible for 10,000 people. Customers all over the world and I was all over the world with them. Additionally, did a start up and had customers everywhere. So, yea, I kinda think I I know. How about you? Have you ever owned a business with customers?
yes. quite a bit smaller local service business after leaving government.. annual sales of 7 digits, which I doubled in a 10 year period. Now manage a region with 8 digit sales numbers for a family owned manufacturing business with sales of 9 digits. What the two have in common is experience working directly with customers to understand and attend to their wants/needs (regardless whether or not they were right in their reasoning). I participate in our commercialization process precisely because of my understanding of how to resolve the conflict between the conceptual things ("perception is reality") which drives the marketplace versus the concrete & steel of production (what can be made) and the black & white of regulation & liability issues (what can be claimed). I am always amazed at how hard it can be two get those three realms to communicate in the same language.

That is the gate you and many others fail to clear on the Trump phenomenon. You don't even try to understand it. In your case, you think leadership of executive teams to achieve quarterly metrics gives you special insights into the world of politics. Not. The. Same. You are not alone. That is the bias of most donors. What that thinking misses is that the percentage of people with true wealth is very, very small. Matters of principle are all most people have. And there are no monthly statements on that. it's a worldview. You can either appeal to it, or deride it. Latter is very small-mind thinking, as it alienates a far, far larger universe of voters you need if you are to attend to the things important to you. but oh no. That involves getting inside the mind of a Wal-Mart shopper with a GED. Way easier to ridicule those folks out of the public square. Because, you know...you know better.

You can't win calling your customers (or voters) stupid. If you really are that much smarter than them, then you should be able to lead them around by the nose. If you can't/aren't, then it's you who are the stupid one. In most cases, it's not inability. It's unwillingness to even try. Ridicule affords status (at least in the mind of thse who engage in it).

Success in business is not a particularly good indicator of success in politics. You know nothing, Jon Snow.




I don't want to be in politics. Never have. I do get the Trump deal. We have a bunch of ignorant people (MAGA and always Trumpers) who just don't understand he knows NOTHING about the middle class, moreover, he couldn't care less about them. He is in it for him and him only. If people cannot recognize that, well I guess one of the reasons they are middle class. He is nothing more than a Queens Con-Man! I just do my thing the best I can regardless of politics. As far as the Wally World shopper is concerned, I have always found it very interesting that the Walmart Shopper will be the first to jump on let's bring back jobs to Merca. However, those are the same people who insist on the lowest price possible, which Wally does. Moreover, these folks do not seem to understand that to get the price they want, it has to built or manufactured in Asia as we cannot get to the cost here in Merca. How much do you think you iPhone would cost if it was built in Merca and not by Foxconn in Asia? 3 times as much, easy. Trust me, I was in that business.

Gotta be smarter than the cow, JR. A cow is an exceedingly dumb animal, but if you throw a rope on one and try to force their best interest upon them, they will use superior physics to drag your ass all over the pasture. But a single old man who knows what he's doing doing can get a hundred of them to walk into the pens where they can be crowded into a squeeze chute and.....well, I don't know if you've ever worked cattle but let's jsut say you don't need a sonogram to determine gestation on a cow.

Trump has figured out how to get the Wal-Mart voter to turn out en masse for him. And also weaned away the Hispanic vote (which he's now winning in several polls). And large parts of the black vote. And he's winning independents in most polls. Romney couldn't do that. McCain couldn't do that. Dole couldn't do that. etc......

If Romney was so smart, why didn't he win in 2012? Why is he virtue posturing in the wilderness now? (Because he thought the Wal-Mart voter was a liability and shunned them). Democrats never, ever, NEVER step away from their crazies and try to marginalize them. The NEVER do what you are doing now. They figure out how to use them to win.

It is amazing to see how exceedingly bright people can be so blind when they step into politics. Never fight with your base. Never. EVER. It's a guaranteed loss. Every. Time.

Remember our discussion on Lara Trump?
I'm already getting texts from her. The program to fire up the base is underway. She was an excellent choice as DC/GOP. If you can't figure out why.......
yes, I remember. Laura Trump, huh? Grifters gonna grift!. Trump and the rest of his grifting family has blown up the Republican Part of which I used to be a member.


Scott is wildly popular with grassroots. And election integrity means we will be raising money to litigate to protect the wins.

Solid steps that were not done before…..

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/lara-trump-to-tap-scott-presler-to-lead-rncs-legal-ballot-harvesting-5608493?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2024-03-17&src_cmp=mb-2024-03-17&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbeMgcBIF25To7bwC8GZWBiBNufRzRx4RN%2FWJiaPigFE%3D


This is what they're trying to exploit. Trump campaign has historically excelled at drawing out the low-propensity voter. Moving those ops in-house could help the party do better, too.

Trump is making sure the GOP does what the donor class thinks it's too good to do - organizing the grassroots of the party.



sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whatever else can be said about her, she's tough. And here, she's saying what needs to be said.

Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Realitybites said:

Quote:

The very nature of citizenship and the community we call the United States is that we are in this together and take care of each other. I know people who are on Social Security and barely able to extend existence?

So do you support completely defunding USAID and the Ukraine war and redirecting that money to Social Security?
Not a binary choice.
Thank you
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Pence chooses the "empire" over the nation.

Not surprising for a GOP career politician.

The Defense industry must get paid …everything else is a lower priority including the American people.

And "American leadership" in the world is really a euphemism for DC ruling class control and interventionist wars in the 3rd world hell holes


4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

boognish_bear said:



Me fail context??


he isnt wrong..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
the big, big difference is Biden (I'm no fan) did not start and insurrection, so the idiocy for Trumps to use "bloodbath" is just another reason he cannot be President .
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




Pence chooses the "empire" over the nation.

Not surprising for a GOP career politician.

The Defense industry must get paid …everything else is a lower priority including the American people.

And "American leadership" in the world is really a euphemism for DC ruling class control and interventionist wars in the 3rd world hell holes



No, he chooses pragmatic instead of crazy and out of control and wanna be dictator.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
Really? Trump after all the Jan 6th stuff says that comment. "if I don't get elected… it's going to be a bloodbath for the countrythat will be the least of it." Trump? And that is not fair game for the media??

You know, I wish the media would ignore it. Trump WANTS the media to spin this stuff so he can play the victim. I can't believe you back this clown...
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.


Joe Biden said the Republicans were going to pit black people back in chains...what do u call that?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

sombear said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
for Trumps to use "bloodbath" is just another reason he cannot be President .
You've gone full on r*tard
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

sombear said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
the big, big difference is Biden (I'm no fan) did not start and insurrection, so the idiocy for Trumps to use "bloodbath" is just another reason he cannot be President .



LOL

Oh come on.

You really want 3-4 million illegals into the country every year for another 4 years ( at least ) instead ?

Trumps an idiot , but words at his traveling stage show isn't going to have even 1 % of the impact.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot




Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot





Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
He's making asses out of his critics, some of whom have even disassociated themselves from this go-around.

Also showing the number of Republicans defending their own Stockholm Syndrome, reflexively criticizing one of their own for having the audacity to be enough of a threat to Democrats to invite patent smears, rather than criticizing the lying MF'ers doing the smearing.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
You're smarter than that. He knows they're out to get him. He's willing to fight them rather than give into their BS. And he's winning.....
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
You're smarter than that. He knows they're out to get him. He's willing to fight them rather than give into their BS. And he's winning.....



Trump is an undisciplined idiot who is routinely abhorred by his subordinates. By those who know him best.

The old fool constantly confuses his political rallies as some kind of comedy show. Never realizing that stupid ' red meat' comments that thrills his loyal base ; in turn upsets the millions of undecided voters .


Trump is going lose ….badly.


And maybe it's for the best .


J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.


Joe Biden said the Republicans were going to pit black people back in chains...what do u call that?
Quote?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
why do you think that is?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
for Trumps to use "bloodbath" is just another reason he cannot be President .
You've gone full on r*tard
btw, little Peety... ****** is really not a good choice of words. You have won, little fella, you have surpassed Little Johnny and Old as the most mentally challenged on this site. Keep it up LP!
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
He's making asses out of his critics, some of whom have even disassociated themselves from this go-around.

Also showing the number of Republicans defending their own Stockholm Syndrome, reflexively criticizing one of their own for having the audacity to be enough of a threat to Democrats to invite patent smears, rather than criticizing the lying MF'ers doing the smearing.
No, he is an idiot , moron and a terrible human.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
why do you think that is?




Because Trump is blinded by is own ego.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
why do you think that is?




Because Trump is blinded by is own ego.
any chance you two old farts have some diminished vision on this question?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Jack Bauer said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.


Joe Biden said the Republicans were going to pit black people back in chains...what do u call that?
Quote?
Sweet Jeezus can you be any more poorly informed....

KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..



Of course it is .


But Trump can never figure it out ….how 90 % of the media is out to get him .
why do you think that is?




Because Trump is blinded by is own ego.
any chance you two old farts have some diminished vision on this question?



Congratulations


You actually made a post under 200 words.


Even Jinxy would be impressed .
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
He's making asses out of his critics, some of whom have even disassociated themselves from this go-around.

Also showing the number of Republicans defending their own Stockholm Syndrome, reflexively criticizing one of their own for having the audacity to be enough of a threat to Democrats to invite patent smears, rather than criticizing the lying MF'ers doing the smearing.
No, he is an idiot , moron and a terrible human.
Actually, he's proving that the Establishment Media are idiots, morons, and terrible human beings (not coincidentally woke Democrats) for suggesting that the use of the word "bloodbath" is somehow a threat to civil order.

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
He's making asses out of his critics, some of whom have even disassociated themselves from this go-around.

Also showing the number of Republicans defending their own Stockholm Syndrome, reflexively criticizing one of their own for having the audacity to be enough of a threat to Democrats to invite patent smears, rather than criticizing the lying MF'ers doing the smearing.
No, he is an idiot , moron and a terrible human.
Actually, he's proving that the Establishment Media are idiots, morons, and terrible human beings (not coincidentally woke Democrats) for suggesting that the use of the word "bloodbath" is somehow a threat to civil order.


Depends on who uses the term, their history and the context.

He just didn't say it would be a bloodbath, he specifically said it would be a bloodbath if he doesn't win. After Jan 6th, that is fair game to delve into the meaning. The implication is if he doesn't get his way, there will be violence. You don't think that is a legitimate discussion point in an election???
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL you are completely missing the point. The context of his comments are clear, as is the wild-assed spin of the alphabet media and a lot of elected Democrats, including some senior ones. Musk has been posting about it this AM. That Tweet I posted above has 46m views, swamping the viewership of the establishment media. So the take home story here is not Trump's choice of words. It's even beyond the blatant bias of the EM. It's the meanness of it. Vicious. Destructive.

Here's another analytically significant development. You're seeing blacks and hispanics focusing in on what illegal immigration is doing to their interests, changing THEIR communities in ways they do not like. Nothing unusual about that. Peoples all throughout history have reacted thusly when facing similar circumstances. The only odd thing is how the ostensibly worldly and well-educated elites can't connect the dots they themselves have put on the chart.

#2 on Apple/iTunes. Amazing. If Dems don't put a squash on the emerging dynamic, the election could get quite far out of hand for them. Listen to the lyrics. In places it sounds positively Tea Party-esque in paean to First Principles.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Whiskey Pete said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

J.R. said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.
We call that either tone deaf or just stupid. And some of you want him to be Pres.
I won't vote for Trump, but this comment is the least of my concerns. And it's not as if Biden doesn't say even dumber things.
for Trumps to use "bloodbath" is just another reason he cannot be President .
You've gone full on r*tard
btw, little Peety... ****** is really not a good choice of words. You have won, little fella, you have surpassed Little Johnny and Old as the most mentally challenged on this site. Keep it up LP!
lol... Go pound sand, you clown
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:





LOL


Cute editing .



You are right....it was cut down to change the context
always is. Unerring how often that is the case. From the "fine people" hoax to the "bloodbath," it's just one unending lie after another, from a societal institution that is supposed to report news as it happens.

It was a stupid thing to say, and it is not crystal clear. Yes, he was talking about the auto industry, but then he says, it will be a bloodbath if he's not elected, and that (assuming auto industry) "will be the least of it."

Do I think he was talking about a bloodbath as in another insurrection? Of course not. But it was a dumb thing to say, and as usual, he just couldn't stick to script. For that reason, it's fair game for the media.

It was a stupid thing for the media to spin…..
ur right . the boogey man media made him say "bloodbath". Again, I know he meant it relative taxing every car (is that conservative for you RWJS...no, raising inflation.). He is an idiot
He's making asses out of his critics, some of whom have even disassociated themselves from this go-around.

Also showing the number of Republicans defending their own Stockholm Syndrome, reflexively criticizing one of their own for having the audacity to be enough of a threat to Democrats to invite patent smears, rather than criticizing the lying MF'ers doing the smearing.
No, he is an idiot , moron and a terrible human.
Actually, he's proving that the Establishment Media are idiots, morons, and terrible human beings (not coincidentally woke Democrats) for suggesting that the use of the word "bloodbath" is somehow a threat to civil order.


Depends on who uses the term, their history and the context.

He just didn't say it would be a bloodbath, he specifically said it would be a bloodbath if he doesn't win. After Jan 6th, that is fair game to delve into the meaning. The implication is if he doesn't get his way, there will be violence. You don't think that is a legitimate discussion point in an election???
really? Really?!! Really.. SMH

He was very specific that it would be alot of lost jobs in the auto industry aka a blood bath for the sector if he doesnt win.. there was no hidden meaning to delve into..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
First Page Last Page
Page 114 of 318
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.