Vivek Ramaswamy - GOP Candidate for President

35,402 Views | 366 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by boognish_bear
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The computer screen generals on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?


LOL. Maybe it's time you vatniks should stop boosting pro-RU BS.


"Reds under the bed" is now any politician I don't like is a Russian bot.

You Washington security state goons need some new material


You are fully aware of the useful idiots on Twitter that you share, correct? Truth hurts.

And the conspiracy theories you fall for over and over again...


Conspiracy theories like Trump was a Russian agent?

Buddy your side has been spreading conspiracy theories for decades.

Remember all the lies your side told to get us into the Iraq war disaster?

It's time your side took a time out


LOL! Uh huh, as you continue to share RT-funded grifters and vatniks.
Swamp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

bear2be2 said:

Doc Holliday said:

FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Vivek is an extremely smart guy.

He handles interviews better than any candidate I've ever seen.

Super impressed by the guy
Look up how he made his money and the Alzheimer Drug...
He responded to that. He didn't make any money off of it.

He's also made very successful drugs that have saved lives.


He really didn't address the charge, which is that he bought a failed drug for pennies on the dollar, got his mother to doctor the data to create an IPO on it and drive up the stock prices until it inevitably crashed when everyone found out, by God, the failed drug still doesn't work.

And saying I didn't make any money off that doesn't really mean anything. You're taking a liar's word for it.


People will look the other way for alot of things if they like the person. Hunter is guilty and should be on trial. That is beyond a doubt. Vivek didn't do anything wrong, so he pushed a failed drug with doctored data. We would all do it. He didn't make any money, we can find, so what's the harm. Pence didn't do what Trump wanted so no crime, what's the problem? See a pattern?
Just what this country needs in the aftermath of Covid and the collapse of confidence in the healthcare/medical industry. /s A guy that made his fortune with some questionable market pump n dump manipulation on a triple failed pharma product. Most of the rest of elected Washington & the top administrative state "inside" trades with impunity on the stock market, so why not Vivek?

IMO we probably won't hear much about this from the MSM unless he becomes the presumptive nominee (unlikely}. Vivek's fortune is 'Standard Operating Procedure' in the Kleptocracy that now governs us. A guy that is so smooth, articulate, and quick on his feet can be a powerful political force, but my gut says 'no thanks'.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The computer screen generals on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?


LOL. Maybe it's time you vatniks should stop boosting pro-RU BS.


"Reds under the bed" is now any politician I don't like is a Russian bot.

You Washington security state goons need some new material


You are fully aware of the useful idiots on Twitter that you share, correct? Truth hurts.

And the conspiracy theories you fall for over and over again...


Conspiracy theories like Trump was a Russian agent?

Buddy your side has been spreading conspiracy theories for decades to get us into wars, conflicts, and spend tax payer money on "freedom fighters" in the 3rd world.

Remember all the lies your side told to get us into the Iraq war disaster?

It's time your side took a time out
Lies ia strong word. Iraq no doubt has designs on WMDs. The move may have been pre-mature, the execution overkill, but Iraq did use WMDs. They definitely used Chemical and I would not rule out Biological. The clumsy way it was handled, should be scruitinzed, but there were WMDs in Iraq. I know that sensors picked that stuff up over there and some of the facilities the Engineers blew were definitely. So, I disagree with you on this WMDs.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swamp said:

FLBear5630 said:

bear2be2 said:

Doc Holliday said:

FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Vivek is an extremely smart guy.

He handles interviews better than any candidate I've ever seen.

Super impressed by the guy
Look up how he made his money and the Alzheimer Drug...
He responded to that. He didn't make any money off of it.

He's also made very successful drugs that have saved lives.


He really didn't address the charge, which is that he bought a failed drug for pennies on the dollar, got his mother to doctor the data to create an IPO on it and drive up the stock prices until it inevitably crashed when everyone found out, by God, the failed drug still doesn't work.

And saying I didn't make any money off that doesn't really mean anything. You're taking a liar's word for it.


People will look the other way for alot of things if they like the person. Hunter is guilty and should be on trial. That is beyond a doubt. Vivek didn't do anything wrong, so he pushed a failed drug with doctored data. We would all do it. He didn't make any money, we can find, so what's the harm. Pence didn't do what Trump wanted so no crime, what's the problem? See a pattern?
Just what this country needs in the aftermath of Covid and the collapse of confidence in the healthcare/medical industry. /s A guy that made his fortune with some questionable market pump n dump manipulation on a triple failed pharma product. Most of the rest of elected Washington & the top administrative state "inside" trades with impunity on the stock market, so why not Vivek?

IMO we probably won't hear much about this from the MSM unless he becomes the presumptive nominee (unlikely}. Vivek's fortune is 'Standard Operating Procedure' in the Kleptocracy that now governs us. A guy that is so smooth, articulate, and quick on his feet can be a powerful political force, but my gut says 'no thanks'.




I agree with all that
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The computer screen generals on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?


LOL. Maybe it's time you vatniks should stop boosting pro-RU BS.
Rubbish. Just because someone doesn't believe that America should get bogged down in a war over territorial dispute of a non-NATO country doesn't mean they're "pro-RU".

I thought libs were all for America NOT being the world's police. When did democrats become war hawks?
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The computer screen generals on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?


LOL. Maybe it's time you vatniks should stop boosting pro-RU BS.
Rubbish. Just because someone doesn't believe that America should get bogged down in a war over territorial dispute of a non-NATO country doesn't mean they're "pro-RU".

I thought libs were all for America NOT being the world's police. When did democrats become war hawks?


Lol who said I was a lib? Or anything else?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

Rawhide said:

Bear8084 said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The computer screen generals on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?


LOL. Maybe it's time you vatniks should stop boosting pro-RU BS.
Rubbish. Just because someone doesn't believe that America should get bogged down in a war over territorial dispute of a non-NATO country doesn't mean they're "pro-RU".

I thought libs were all for America NOT being the world's police. When did democrats become war hawks?


Lol who said I was a lib? Or anything else?
Didn't say you were a lib. I said libs, as in general.

If I called you a lib, I would've siad YOU libs
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Redbrickbear said:


Vivek is smooth. Perhaps too smooth. Like what he says, but then again, he's too much of a smooth talker.
So was Obama. He won two elections and was very effective in advancing the progressive cause, despite having accomplished nothing of substance in life.

If Vivek has actually done stuff. If he really believes the things he's saying, he could be very effective undoing the Obama legacy.

His success so far in the primary makes complete sense. And if Trump ends up getting issued an orange jump suit, Vivek has a chance to win.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:


Quote:

I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.

no, someone is making stuff up with their head in the sand. How can you reject out of hand the idea they want to take the whole of Eastern Europe after they invaded the largest country in Eastern Europe from three sides?

Nobody here has said Russia has only two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in. It is manifestly obvious, cold hard data, that Ukraine is methodically chewing up the Russian war machine - thousands of tanks, thousands of weapons systems, hundreds of thousands of Russian troops, etc.....while at the same time growing its military with increasing numbers of better equipment and better trained soldiers. They've actually achieved fire superiority over the vaunted Russian artillery corps and are methodically chewing thru what is arguably the strongest line of fortifications ever constructed.

It would be completely irrational to discontinue our modest support to them. They winning and that is a substantial benefit to us on multiple levels.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The "computer screen generals" on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?
look at the chaotic argument you just made. On one hand, you say the USA caused the war, provoked poor Russia into it with one shenanigan after another, that Russia has neither the ability nor the intention to restore hegemony over Eastern Europe. On the other, you say the region is in Russia's sphere of influence, that it is inevitable mighty mother Russia will restore its rightful place as the dominant power in Eurasia, even though such is decidedly NOT in our interest. Then, you define every military policy we've conducted of the last 25 years as a disaster (even though that is demonstrable nonsense) which displaced or killed millions of "brown people" (even though that is also demonstrably not just untrue on both counts, but actually the opposite of what happened).

No, your argument is that Russia is the innocent victim in this drama, despite the fact it mobilized and conducted the largest full scale invasion of a European country since WWII. That Russia is simultaneously a weak and vulnerable nation we manipulated into invading the largest nation in Europe, and a great power with which we can reason, despite the fact it is increasingly obvious that it is what we've always known it to be - a kleptocratic autocracy of the third world kind with nuclear weapons that is intent on restoring the Warsaw Pact by oafish bullying and threats, or else!. Your argument plainly holds that appeasing an expansionist Russia is the surest path to peace, despite the plain and repeated lesson of history that appeasement makes war more likely to occur on a grander scale.

And all that is said in the shadow of the greatest truth of all, the one that undermines every plank of your platform - we would not be having this conversation if Russia had not started the war.

And that's before we get to the China card. If Chinese troops show up in Ukraine, it pretty much vaporizes your argument from the first keystroke to the last. I mean, seriously, the conversation goes like this:

POTUS: "Gen. Whiterock. I want to start a war with China. What do you propose.?
Gen. Whiterock: "Sir, I want to pull 200 Bradleys and a dozen M1-Abrahms out of storage in the Arizona desert and give them to Ukraine. Then, if that doesn't do the job, I want to send a few dozen M777 arty pieces and a couple of HIMARs systems with 200mi range. If we need to do more, we can always send $60-70b worth of financial assistance to the Ukrainians to keep the trains running on time and get Nato partners to dump all their antiquated Warsaw Pact weaponry into the mix. I'd call that a highly inflammatory anti-China policy, sir.
POTUS: "I don't know, General. Might not be enough. What else?"
Gen. Whiterock: "Well, sir, if we could get State Dept to persuade the Finns and Swedes to join NATO, it'd sure be a big slap to Sino-sensitivities.
POTUS: "Good idea. Run with it. Make sure the Poles and Germans do the same with all their obsolescent equipment. Get it to Kiev ASAP."
Gen. Whiterock: "Yes, sir!" (snaps a salute, and runs off slathering at the prospect of sending millions of American kids to war with China, with visions of sugar plums at all the dangly bits he can add to the list....a few Patriot systems to protect Ukrainian cities, some night vision gear, field hospitals, etc.....Oh the joys of jingling China's chain. Life is good!)





FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

By what measure is Ukraine 'soverign', by what measure is it a 'democracy'?

1. Under martial law
2. Banned all oppositional parties
3. Banned all oppositional media
4. Not allowing its male population to leave.

If that's democracy, so is Iran, China and North Korea.

What happened?

Get the picture...





I'll likely have a larger response later, but Doc's comment here once again shows a fundamental ignorance of both Ukrainian and world history.

If those things disqualify a country from calling itself a democracy, the US isn't one either. If you were to poll American men above the age of about 93, you'd find that almost every one of them was either drafted or enlisted in one military branch or another to avoid being drafted. If, God forbid, we ever have another world war, we could find ourselves in that position once again.

Mandatory military service is nothing new. And you don't have to live in an authoritarian state to subject to it.
Zero political and media opposition is not democracy no matter how much you pretend it is.

Maybe Ukrainians should be allowed to vote?

I'm tired of being told "If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, they'll take the whole Eastern Europe!" by the same people who've said for last 15 months that Russia only has two more weeks of missiles left and that Ukraine is kicking their teeth in.

Somebody is lying.
Admire your patience attempting to educate those who can't comprehend how we got into WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo War, Iraq War ( twice ) and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately our current leadership doesn't know either, or at least doesn't care.



Judging by the kind of push back you guys get on sic'em365 most Baylor alumni don't care either.
No, we care a lot. It's why we advocate for supporting Ukraine.

The disastrous foreign wars that Washington has gotten us into over the past 25 years are just forgotten like a fart in the wind.
Disastrous? Expensive, for sure. Poorly executed, it could certainly be argued in many cases. Failed to achieve strategic objectives? Some, for sure. But disastrous? All of them? Unserious assertion....

Sitting at home from their computer screens in Waco and DFW they are ready to spend trillions more on wars in God knows where if the talking heads in the media tell them its needed.
There are a few of us here with direct experience in foreign policy/national security/military execution, and as best I can tell we are in general agreement in support of Ukraine. The most outspoken voices for the con argument seem to be computer screen generals. Apologies in advance if I've mis-interpreted anything,






The "computer screen generals" on here you dislike want to prevent any more stupid wars and useless blood shed.

The keyboard warriors you advocate for want to see a shooting war in Eastern Europe that drags the whole damn continent into a blood bath…one that could turn nuclear…or even global if China got involved.

And as far as "national security experts"….you wonkish sh*t heads have failed in a spectacular fashion over the past 25 years. Wasting trillions of dollars, getting thousands of American young men killed or wounded, displacing & killing millions of 3rd worlders, and in general making a mess of things globally.

Maybe it's time you boys sat down and shut your mouths for a while?
look at the chaotic argument you just made. On one hand, you say the USA caused the war, provoked poor Russia into it with one shenanigan after another, that Russia has neither the ability nor the intention to restore hegemony over Eastern Europe. On the other, you say the region is in Russia's sphere of influence, that it is inevitable mighty mother Russia will restore its rightful place as the dominant power in Eurasia, even though such is decidedly NOT in our interest. Then, you define every military policy we've conducted of the last 25 years as a disaster (even though that is demonstrable nonsense) which displaced or killed millions of "brown people" (even though that is also demonstrably not just untrue on both counts, but actually the opposite of what happened).

No, your argument is that Russia is the innocent victim in this drama, despite the fact it mobilized and conducted the largest full scale invasion of a European country since WWII. That Russia is simultaneously a weak and vulnerable nation we manipulated into invading the largest nation in Europe, and a great power with which we can reason, despite the fact it is increasingly obvious that it is what we've always known it to be - a kleptocratic autocracy of the third world kind with nuclear weapons that is intent on restoring the Warsaw Pact by oafish bullying and threats, or else!. Your argument plainly holds that appeasing an expansionist Russia is the surest path to peace, despite the plain and repeated lesson of history that appeasement makes war more likely to occur on a grander scale.

And all that is said in the shadow of the greatest truth of all, the one that undermines every plank of your platform - we would not be having this conversation if Russia had not started the war.

And that's before we get to the China card. If Chinese troops show up in Ukraine, it pretty much vaporizes your argument from the first keystroke to the last. I mean, seriously, the conversation goes like this:

POTUS: "Gen. Whiterock. I want to start a war with China. What do you propose.?
Gen. Whiterock: "Sir, I want to pull 200 Bradleys and a dozen M1-Abrahms out of storage in the Arizona desert and give them to Ukraine. Then, if that doesn't do the job, I want to send a few dozen M777 arty pieces and a couple of HIMARs systems with 200mi range. If we need to do more, we can always send $60-70b worth of financial assistance to the Ukrainians to keep the trains running on time and get Nato partners to dump all their antiquated Warsaw Pact weaponry into the mix. I'd call that a highly inflammatory anti-China policy, sir.
POTUS: "I don't know, General. Might not be enough. What else?"
Gen. Whiterock: "Well, sir, if we could get State Dept to persuade the Finns and Swedes to join NATO, it'd sure be a big slap to Sino-sensitivities.
POTUS: "Good idea. Run with it. Make sure the Poles and Germans do the same with all their obsolescent equipment. Get it to Kiev ASAP."
Gen. Whiterock: "Yes, sir!" (snaps a salute, and runs off slathering at the prospect of sending millions of American kids to war with China, with visions of sugar plums at all the dangly bits he can add to the list....a few Patriot systems to protect Ukrainian cities, some night vision gear, field hospitals, etc.....Oh the joys of jingling China's chain. Life is good!)








Chinese troops showing up in Ukraine is a far cry from providing aid...
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


So is Vivek a Soros plant? Vivek says all the right things and is right in line with MAGA. Something just doesn't seem quite right.

The George Soros scholarship at a time when Ramaswamy's income was $500,000+ should be troubling to most everyone. I still do not trust him.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:


So is Vivek a Soros plant? Vivek says all the right things and is right in line with MAGA. Something just doesn't seem quite right.

The George Soros scholarship at a time when Ramaswamy's income was $500,000+ should be troubling to most everyone. I still do not trust him.

Vivek accepted a $50k scholarship at age 24 from Paul Soros (George's brother) to attend law school.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.