Trans Activisit vs Riley Gaines

28,163 Views | 199 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Jack Bauer
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Count me as angry and confused about this. I am the father of two girl athletes. They both worked so hard their whole lives to compete, improve and win. The amount of sacrifice they made in personal terms is just huge. And the thing that made that possible and rational is that they compete against other females.

To disrespect the hard work and commitment of my daughters by letting a MAN compete is nothing more than an attempt to erase the category "woman" in the name of this weird off-shoot of the sexual revolution. Pretending that the people opposed to this obvious idiocy are the ones using their children for advocacy is the HEIGHT of arrogance and sophistry. This is radically unfair to women. You cannot possibly maintain that you give two hoots about women or their rights and maintain this position.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

I agree. I would not let my daughter participate in any event that included trannies. If all women adopted this policy the trend would crash.
Using your kids for your own activism is selfish. In most sports there isn't any realistic danger for letting your daughter compete. Between this, money, and drugs the future of sports isn't so bright regardless.
You might need to check up on your definitions. Activism is the policy or action of using vigorous campaigning to bring about political or social change. You see many examples of it in the trans community these days. Protecting your children from unfair competition or injury, on the other hand, is not vigorously campaigning for political or social change.

Despite your namesake, your posts are typically ill-thought out and you're on the wrong side of most issues. This little doozy is no different. That being the case, probably a good idea not to be insulting others' reading comprehension when you don't understand pretty basic definitions.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
Do you mean 2024?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
Do you mean 2024?
No, 2020. We wouldn't have this sort of b.s. if Trump had won in 2020.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
I agree that it's insane, but executive orders can be reversed. That's typically one of the first things on a new president's agenda.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Count me as angry and confused about this. I am the father of two girl athletes. They both worked so hard their whole lives to compete, improve and win. The amount of sacrifice they made in personal terms is just huge. And the thing that made that possible and rational is that they compete against other females.

To disrespect the hard work and commitment of my daughters by letting a MAN compete is nothing more than an attempt to erase the category "woman" in the name of this weird off-shoot of the sexual revolution. Pretending that the people opposed to this obvious idiocy are the ones using their children for advocacy is the HEIGHT of arrogance and sophistry. This is radically unfair to women. You cannot possibly maintain that you give two hoots about women or their rights and maintain this position.
The folks that push this, or that are even for this momement, don't give at rats ass about women or womens rights, but they have the gall to try and shame folks looking out for their daughters, sisters, cousins, and friends, trying to keep these grown men out of womens competitions.

You put this much better than I could have.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
I agree that it's insane, but executive orders can be reversed. That's typically one of the first things on a new president's agenda.
Six years of insane policies can do a lot of damage. Women could lose scholarship opportunities, potential Olympic berths, etc. The idea that we should simply grin and bear because it may be reversed in the distant future is not very comforting.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Jack Bauer said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.


HS boys run faster than female Olympic athletes.
I believe around 300 of them can run faster than the top female each year.

Will Thomas was ranked 400th in men's swimming g but "surprisingly" shot up to #1 as a female swimmer.

The womens 100m WR is 10.49
The 2022 texas 3a HS boys winner was 10.92
6a the winner was 10.23, 2nd was 10.42 and 3rd was 10.50

Lol
Even when I laid out in as clear language as possible you are still capable of misunderstanding.
And people provided examples that fit your "clear language."

HS athletes are average athletes. And these average athletes produce better times than professional women.

The women practice and train all day year round to produce their results.

Many of these HS athletes practice for maybe 2 or 3 hours a day. Many of them due to playing other sports do not do specific track training for a large chunk of the year and then still go out and run faster than the professional women.

You cannot get more average than that unless you get to the guy that jogs through the neighborhood and then suddenly want to put him in a sprint against someone who trains for that all day every day. If that is what you are calling "average athlete" you are stretching the term.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Jack Bauer said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.


HS boys run faster than female Olympic athletes.
I believe around 300 of them can run faster than the top female each year.

Will Thomas was ranked 400th in men's swimming g but "surprisingly" shot up to #1 as a female swimmer.

The womens 100m WR is 10.49
The 2022 texas 3a HS boys winner was 10.92
6a the winner was 10.23, 2nd was 10.42 and 3rd was 10.50

Lol
Even when I laid out in as clear language as possible you are still capable of misunderstanding.

These are average males in their sport 7 of 19 in one state were faster than the fastest a woman has ever run.

There is no discussion here. Do I think the USWNT would beat the local men's beer league squad…yeah, for sure. Do I think women can be incredible athletes? Yes, absolutely. Do I think it's a total farce to pretend they are comparable to male counterparts? Lol. Yeah.
The discussion requires reading comprehension. Thankfully almost all women have you beat there.

If you consider 12 year old boy's average compared to the best of the best in their sport I guess you could get to your conclusion but you're a clown so that should be hard to get to your level.
Go look up marathon results to see how the average male stacks up against a trained female. You made up your own argument.
So you provide one specific event and think that proves your point? Look up every other event in track and field. All of those destroy your argument.
FormerFlash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
A friend and I paired up with 3 randoms at the SLC and played games against the 2005 Baylor women's national championship team. I don't know about the 3 other dudes, but neither my friend or I played in high school. In full disclosure, we're both very good players. We played games to 15 and played for 2 hours. They ran plays and substitutions. We ran up and down the court playing pickup like 5 dudes that had never played together. We won every game and the average score was 15-7.
Sic Everyone.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.

5 D1 male college basketball backup players would embarrass a WNBA team.

Guys from the rec center often dominated our women's team that won a NC.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
I agree that it's insane, but executive orders can be reversed. That's typically one of the first things on a new president's agenda.
Sometimes its very difficult or impossible to reverse Executive orders. Look what happened when Trump tried to reverse Obama's DACA. If liberals get the majority on SCOTUS any EOs done by a liberal POTUS will be as good as a law.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/megan-rapinoe-sue-bird-athletes-sign-letter-opposing-protection-girls-women-sports-act

How precious. Women athletes that have already made their fortunes get to virtue signal.

None of them would have a platform, be famous, or be wealthy if they had to compete against biological males.
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Email this whack job; moorej@sfsu.edu, and let her know your opinion of what those protesters actually did.

How could she call it peaceful? Those activists are full of hate. Just like all the black lives matters were "peaceful". I happened to be inSacramento the night one was happening. We had bottles throw at us as we were trying to get in our hotel. The next meaning going out to assess the damage; Buildings up and down the main square had been broken into and trashed. The state capital had been vandalized and there was graffiti and trash everywhere. Double standards. California is a deplorable mess because of crap like this being tolerated.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/megan-rapinoe-sue-bird-athletes-sign-letter-opposing-protection-girls-women-sports-act

How precious. Women athletes that have already made their fortunes get to virtue signal.

None of them would have a platform, be famous, or be wealthy if they had to compete against biological males.

Literally leaving women behind men..

Megan Rapinoe - ""I'm sorry, your kid's high school volleyball team just isn't that important,"

Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FormerFlash said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
A friend and I paired up with 3 randoms at the SLC and played games against the 2005 Baylor women's national championship team. I don't know about the 3 other dudes, but neither my friend or I played in high school. In full disclosure, we're both very good players. We played games to 15 and played for 2 hours. They ran plays and substitutions. We ran up and down the court playing pickup like 5 dudes that had never played together. We won every game and the average score was 15-7.
Now imagine MCC back in the day when they were winning conference championships and getting pretty deep into the playoffs, you have women out there that literally think Caitlin Clark would dominate these guys, when the fact is she would struggle to get off a shot. There are a ton of folks think she would make in the NBA.

Folks just don't get the chasm of how far apart men and women are physically.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

BearFan33 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/megan-rapinoe-sue-bird-athletes-sign-letter-opposing-protection-girls-women-sports-act

How precious. Women athletes that have already made their fortunes get to virtue signal.

None of them would have a platform, be famous, or be wealthy if they had to compete against biological males.

Literally leaving women behind men..

Megan Rapinoe - ""I'm sorry, your kid's high school volleyball team just isn't that important,"


That guy in the middle is a punk ass for running against the women. I've looked his times before, he is super mediocre for a male sprinter, but here you go, state champ.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

Jack Bauer said:

BearFan33 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/megan-rapinoe-sue-bird-athletes-sign-letter-opposing-protection-girls-women-sports-act

How precious. Women athletes that have already made their fortunes get to virtue signal.

None of them would have a platform, be famous, or be wealthy if they had to compete against biological males.

Literally leaving women behind men..

Megan Rapinoe - ""I'm sorry, your kid's high school volleyball team just isn't that important,"


That guy in the middle is a punk ass for running against the women. I've looked his times before, he is super mediocre for a male sprinter, but here you go, state champ.
They are all super mediocre sprinters. They are from Connecticut.
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At first glance I would think the girl in the blue would be the man of this group, she is probably more male than the Buckley sprinter. Look at her quads, they are no joke.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf said:

At first glance I would think the girl in the blue would be the man of this group, she is probably more male than the Buckley sprinter. Look at her quads, they are no joke.

I don't know about manly but I was just going to say "damn she has great quads!"
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

TXBEAR_bf said:

At first glance I would think the girl in the blue would be the man of this group, she is probably more male than the Buckley sprinter. Look at her quads, they are no joke.

I don't know about manly but I was just going to say "damn she has great quads!"


But how big are her testicles? That's the real question.
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes


A good HS basketball player is just an average guy who is pretty good at basketball.

This is why a HS with 75 students like Texline can have a very good basketball team that can beat some decent 5A schools. An average male who is determined to be good, has the ability to actually be good.

You are talking about non-athletes who don't play sports, sure they wouldn't beat the women. Nobody said they could.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes


It would, I suppose, depend on where you were playing, but guys who regularly play would not have any problem beating any women's teams just like a bunch of college guys wouldn't struggle beating middle schoolers.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes
LOL. Well you are wrong.

Define your definition of average. That seems to be what you are basing your whole argument on.

It sounds like you are basing it on the average person just walking down the street when everyone else is basing it on the average person that plays basketball (more than once a year).

Go to a gym, outside court, etc. where people play basketball regularly and do not get winded after 5 minutes of game time and they would dominate even WNBA players. True the average guy that does not work out, never plays, is over weight, etc. would struggle just because they are out of shape but NO ONE here is talking about that type of average guy (except maybe you).
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Biden admin is looking to change Title IX to prevent outright bans of transgender athletes. And of course, this will result in school districts allowing any trans who wants to compete against women to do so, as the school district will look to avoid being on the wrong side of the law on this.

It is when we see this kind of executive order insanity that a vote against Trump in 2020 looks really short-sighted.
I agree that it's insane, but executive orders can be reversed. That's typically one of the first things on a new president's agenda.
Sometimes its very difficult or impossible to reverse Executive orders. Look what happened when Trump tried to reverse Obama's DACA. If liberals get the majority on SCOTUS any EOs done by a liberal POTUS will be as good as a law.
Liberals won't have a SCOTUS majority any time soon.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes


It would, I suppose, depend on where you were playing, but guys who regularly play would not have any problem beating any women's teams just like a bunch of college guys wouldn't struggle beating middle schoolers.

Quote:

1)"You have some people who believe men are stronger and faster" so I can understand if an athlete is born male but identifying as a female and compete as one, 2) "some females will feel a particular way about it," Clinton Baker said.

"The cream rises to the top," Baker added. 3) "Athletes now will tell you if you put UConn women on the court with men, UConn men might lose." It's all in the spirit of competition, hard work and heart."
This is a quote from someone involved in the Connecticut track fiasco a few years ago. The delusion is very strong no doubt with those that favor biological men to be able to compete with women.

Quotes 1) Men are stronger and faster than women. Not some people believe they are.
2) Some females would be right not to want to compete with the men. They are the ones who are right.
3) We see this delusion with the rabid Caitlyn Clark fans, NO the UConn women would hardly be able to score against the UConn men, much less beat them.
If you see an exhibition where high level men are having a close game with high level women, the men aren't trying. We see this in NBA/Celebrity basketball games where they let the celebs score.

Saw this when "Justin Beiber" was playing in a NBA/Celeb exhibition, and they let Beiber win the MVP.



Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

cowboycwr said:

ron.reagan said:

Jack Bauer said:

There are two ways to solve this

1) ALL women boycott an event with a biological male
2) Have a group of average men declare womanhood and dominate the WNBA, World Cup, Olympics, Tennis, etc.

Riley Gaines is the definition of heroic.
Average male athletes on the same tier as the females would certainly dominate just about every sport. But obviously average males would get dominated by top tier female athletes.
Wrong. Look at that college swimmer. He was ranked in the 400s of all college male swimmers and then completely dominated females.

One could probably grab 5 average guys at a basketball court anywhere in the US and beat every WNBA team. Now get 5 average male college players and they would dominate every game.
I can tell you never have actually played basketball. 5 average guys would be shooting at 10% and worn out in the first 5 minutes


It would, I suppose, depend on where you were playing, but guys who regularly play would not have any problem beating any women's teams just like a bunch of college guys wouldn't struggle beating middle schoolers.

Quote:

1)"You have some people who believe men are stronger and faster" so I can understand if an athlete is born male but identifying as a female and compete as one, 2) "some females will feel a particular way about it," Clinton Baker said.

"The cream rises to the top," Baker added. 3) "Athletes now will tell you if you put UConn women on the court with men, UConn men might lose." It's all in the spirit of competition, hard work and heart."
This is a quote from someone involved in the Connecticut track fiasco a few years ago. The delusion is very strong no doubt with those that favor biological men to be able to compete with women.

Quotes 1) Men are stronger and faster than women. Not some people believe the are.
2) Some females would be right not to want to compete with the men. They are the ones who are right.
3) We see this delusion with the rabid Caitlyn Clark fans, NO the UConn women would hardly be able to score against the UConn men, much less beat them.
If you see an exhibition where high level men are having a close game with high level women, the men aren't trying. We see this in NBA/Celebrity basketball games where they let the celebs score.

Saw this when "Justin Beiber" was playing in a NBA/Celeb exhibition, and they let Beiber win the MVP.





The next question to people like this is why there are even sports segregated by men and women and why aren't you working to remove that?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't defeat biology, you are a giant, awkward, ungraceful dude.



nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What an asinine position to take. The UCONN men's team would beat the women's team by 100. They would win by 50 if you deducted two points every time they dunked.
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

What an asinine position to take. The UCONN men's team would beat the women's team by 100. They would win by 50 if you deducted two points every time they dunked.


I really don't think the women's team would break 20.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

nein51 said:

What an asinine position to take. The UCONN men's team would beat the women's team by 100. They would win by 50 if you deducted two points every time they dunked.


I really don't think the women's team would break 20.

This is one of the fastest women in the world and she looks like she is standing still next to these men.

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

nein51 said:

What an asinine position to take. The UCONN men's team would beat the women's team by 100. They would win by 50 if you deducted two points every time they dunked.


I really don't think the women's team would break 20.
They would have to shoot lights out from 3 point land.

They would get outrebounded 20x1 and would score zero points in the paint.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.