Oldbear83 said:
And there it is again, that arrogance which - deliberately it appears - ignores the point.
All the popes are sinners, just like the rest of us.
How then is a pope therefore qualified to rule on a doctrine not specifically set out in Scripture?
Your anger serves no good purpose, brother.
There is no anger here. I actually feel sorry for you.
How would any sinner be able to rule on doctrine? Your premise is illogical.
Scripture says otherwise,
Matt 16:18-19 -
"And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and
whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."
John 21:1517 -
Jesus Reinstates Peter
When they had finished eating, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?"
"Yes, Lord," he said, "you know that I love you."
Jesus said,
"Feed my lambs."Again Jesus said, "Simon son of John, do you love me?"
He answered, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you."
Jesus said,
"Take care of my sheep."The third time he said to him, "Simon son of John, do you love me?"
Peter was hurt because Jesus asked him the third time, "Do you love me?" He said, "Lord, you know all things; you know that I love you."
Jesus said,
"Feed my sheep."
Just because the pope is a sinner doesn't mean that he can rule on doctrine. Papal infallibility a negative protection from error, not a positive inspiration like a prophet or apostle.
How did sinful men rule at the Council of Nicaea confirm the Divinity of Christ (
homoousios) in spite of the Arians?
How did sinful men rule at the Council of Constantinople confirm the Divinity of the Holy Spirit in spite of the Macedonians?
Your sinner men premise fails at the beginning.