Oldbear83 said:

---

The definition of ad hominem:

ad hominem
[ad hmnm]
adjective
adverb

ad hominem (adjective)
[ol]

(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining:
"an ad hominem response"

[/ol]

---

Yes, thank you for proving my point.

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

The definition of ad hominem:

ad hominem
[ad hmnm]
adjective
adverb

ad hominem (adjective)
[ol]

(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining:
"an ad hominem response"

[/ol]

---

Yes, thank you for proving my point error.

---

Corrected.

Oldbear83 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

The definition of ad hominem:

ad hominem
[ad hmnm]
adjective
adverb

ad hominem (adjective)
[ol]

(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining:
"an ad hominem response"

[/ol]

---

Yes, thank you for proving my point error.

---

Corrected.

---

Seriously... are you guys really this dumb?

Folks, you see why I have to call out people's intellectual shortcomings? You can't have rational conversations with these people. My God.

" I just proved his statement was false above, and he admitted it. That is if you care to read, or even know how to read, I think that makes YOU the moron."

Sorry guys I really wanted to take a hiatus and let you guys get back to constructive conversation. And I do hope you understand why I want to respond. I think I would like BTD to explain why he thinks that I lied and how I admitted it. Once he explains it I will have a better understanding of either how I lied or why he believes I lied.
What would help me is if anyone who has been keeping up with this give and take could point out to me what I said which may appear to be false.

BUDOS said:

---

" I just proved his statement was false above, and he admitted it. That is if you care to read, or even know how to read, I think that makes YOU the moron."

Sorry guys I really wanted to take a hiatus and let you guys get back to constructive conversation. And I do hope you understand why I want to respond. I think I would like BTD to explain why he thinks that I lied and how I admitted it. Once he explains it I will have a better understanding of either how I lied or why he believes I lied.
What would help me is if anyone who has been keeping up with this give and take could point out to me what I said which may appear to be false.

---

You posted a list of traits that you charged me with, and I got you to admit so far that the first item on your list was not true, and knowingly so on your part. That is a lie, that's bearing false witness.

Seriously, is this that hard to understand?

Now how about #2 on your list, which I addressed in my previous post to you. What say you?

BUDOS said:

---

" I just proved his statement was false above, and he admitted it. That is if you care to read, or even know how to read, I think that makes YOU the moron."

Sorry guys I really wanted to take a hiatus and let you guys get back to constructive conversation. And I do hope you understand why I want to respond. I think I would like BTD to explain why he thinks that I lied and how I admitted it. Once he explains it I will have a better understanding of either how I lied or why he believes I lied.
What would help me is if anyone who has been keeping up with this give and take could point out to me what I said which may appear to be false.

---

And I'm afraid to ask, but I have to - you do know that me calling you a liar is NOT an ad hominem, right? Or do you join your fellow marian idolatry deniers (curtpenn, OldBear) in their failed comprehension?

Consider this a test of your intelligence and rationality, and it'll tell me whether I'm wasting my time with you or not.