Sorry FakeSteak, your 6th-grade debate tactics failed to gain traction ... again.LateSteak69 said:- garbage spewed -Oldbear83 said:Tell me you have no idea what was going on in 2017, without actually saying you have no idea what was going on in 2017.LateSteak69 said:so no. and all of his cronies had the chance too. They tried, and it didn't work.Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Donald Trump Indicted on Seven Counts......
57,239 Views |
663 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Oldbear83
Yes, he is obviously guilty.ron.reagan said:
I've never seen so many dumb *****es in a single thread. The guy is obviously guilty. Your tears are providing me energy.
When the left is equally concern with their obviously guilty party members, I will take note.
Until that time comes, I have enough understanding to realize this is simply politics.
And as I said earlier, she openly flaunts her corruption, because she is untouchable.Doc Holliday said:
They want you know they're above the law.Bringing this back in light of recent news:
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 9, 2023
Get a limited-edition But Her Emails hat and support @onwardtogether groups working to strengthen our democracy.https://t.co/4TiUxjmRNY pic.twitter.com/uSofeNjBxy
This looks photo shopped though, she hasn't looked this good in 25 years, unless she is doing the
Martha Stewart gig now.
What about hillerism!? Let's try T and, I don't know, lock him up?Doc Holliday said:Joe Biden is obviously guilty. HRC was obviously guilty when she took and destroyed classified intel.ron.reagan said:
I've never seen so many dumb *****es in a single thread. The guy is obviously guilty. Your tears are providing me energy.
You enjoy the unequal justice and tyranny. Period.
Waco1947 ,la
Judging by the size and style of the beige suit lapel in the background, that's from some time between 1994 and 1997.Forest Bueller_bf said:And as I said earlier, she openly flaunts her corruption, because she is untouchable.Doc Holliday said:
They want you know they're above the law.Bringing this back in light of recent news:
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 9, 2023
Get a limited-edition But Her Emails hat and support @onwardtogether groups working to strengthen our democracy.https://t.co/4TiUxjmRNY pic.twitter.com/uSofeNjBxy
This looks photo shopped though, she hasn't looked this good in 25 years, unless she is doing the
Martha Stewart gig now.
I'm beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it's clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.
— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) June 9, 2023
For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording… pic.twitter.com/HP7YErumRf
It's rare for someone to admit they only read 3 pages and jumped on twitter to voice their opinion
So this obvious double standard of 'justice' is ok with you ?FLBear5630 said:KaiBear said:Strange how Biden isn't facing similar similiar charges .TexasScientist said:Trump brought this on himself. No one else to blame.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
regarding the classified documents found at Mar-A-Lago. No specifics available yet.
The Biden Administration, Department of Justice, the FBI, and CIA are rotten to the core. If they are not careful, they may get to see what a real insurrection looks like. The Deep State is alive and well. I do not like Donald Trump, but this is a sad day for our country.
Really believe if Obama had held the exact same documents at his house, this current Democratic administration would have filed similar charges ?
Of course he's not! It's his DOJ, you have to really step in it to investigated by your own DOJ!
When Trump had the juice he oet HRC walk and didn't do anything in Hunter. All he did was a heavy handed attempt that ended up in an impeachment trial! . He is getting a lesson in politics. Biden won't think twice of bringing the hammer down. GOP needs better
They should all be prosecuted if there is evidence.KaiBear said:So this obvious double standard of 'justice' is ok with you ?FLBear5630 said:KaiBear said:Strange how Biden isn't facing similar similiar charges .TexasScientist said:Trump brought this on himself. No one else to blame.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
regarding the classified documents found at Mar-A-Lago. No specifics available yet.
The Biden Administration, Department of Justice, the FBI, and CIA are rotten to the core. If they are not careful, they may get to see what a real insurrection looks like. The Deep State is alive and well. I do not like Donald Trump, but this is a sad day for our country.
Really believe if Obama had held the exact same documents at his house, this current Democratic administration would have filed similar charges ?
Of course he's not! It's his DOJ, you have to really step in it to investigated by your own DOJ!
When Trump had the juice he oet HRC walk and didn't do anything in Hunter. All he did was a heavy handed attempt that ended up in an impeachment trial! . He is getting a lesson in politics. Biden won't think twice of bringing the hammer down. GOP needs better
But, apparently for some reason, which may include there was not enough evidence, Trump's DOJ chose NOT to prosecute. There is no quid pro quo in our law. Or, is that what you are saying, that because Trump didn't prosecute Hillary or Hunter he should get a pass??? The Special Prosecutor found 37 items that bear scrutiny.
We have an indictment on the table, that is the issue. What Trump's DOJ is really not relevant to this situation.
I was wrong, Garland did appoint a Special Counsel in January on this same issue. Now, what has the Special Prosecutor found on Biden? Smith believes Trump did something illegal, hence the indictment. What has Hur said? A bit premature on the Biden piece. Will be interesting to see how that plays out.
Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Schumer.
I admitted I was wrong, there is a Special Counsel investigating Biden. I want to see what they find.Oldbear83 said:
Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Schumer.
Ok, Gaetz. Why didn't the GOP investigate and indict Hillary, Hunter or even Joe? They had 2 years of Senate and HOR control? A Special Counsel was a no brainer, easy. Hell, they got one to investigate Trump? If there is so much evidence to indict Hillary and company why wasn't it done?
The only thing I can come up with is that they couldn't prove it. If they could, they would have.
First, there is absolutely no chance that Biden's DOJ will provide the evidence needed for a Special Counsel (and not only should Joe's SC have been appointed long before it was, but where is the one for Hunter?) to dig into Joe's frankly well-known criminal behavior.FLBear5630 said:I admitted I was wrong, there is a Special Counsel investigating Biden. I want to see what they find.Oldbear83 said:
Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Schumer.
Ok, Gaetz. Why didn't the GOP investigate and indict Hillary, Hunter or even Joe? They had 2 years of Senate and HOR control? A Special Counsel was a no brainer, easy. Hell, they got one to investigate Trump? If there is so much evidence to indict Hillary and company why wasn't it done?
The only thing I can come up with is that they couldn't prove it. If they could, they would have.
Let's not forget that the FBI defied a Congressional subpoena in order to defend Ice Cream Joe.
Let's not forget that the first Impeachment of Trump accused him of doing what Biden - on video - openly boasted of doing.
There is absolutely no chance you are anything but a Democrat, because no one but a Democrat believes Joe Biden is innocent.
And once again, it's in no way true to claim Trump had 2 years to go after Clinton/Biden. from the start, RINOs refused to cooperate with Trump's agenda, it's frankly amazing to see how much he accomplished with all the roadblocks placed in his way, and for which TDS'ers falsely blame him.
If you really want the GOP to nominate someone other than Trump, you are doing exactly the worst thing you could do.
Yeah. It is more likely that there was a conspiracy between RINOS and Democrats to get poor Donald?Oldbear83 said:First, there is absolutely no chance that Biden's DOJ will provide the evidence needed for a Special Counsel (and not only should Joe's SC have been appointed long before it was, but where is the one for Hunter?) to dig into Joe's frankly well-known criminal behavior.FLBear5630 said:I admitted I was wrong, there is a Special Counsel investigating Biden. I want to see what they find.Oldbear83 said:
Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Schumer.
Ok, Gaetz. Why didn't the GOP investigate and indict Hillary, Hunter or even Joe? They had 2 years of Senate and HOR control? A Special Counsel was a no brainer, easy. Hell, they got one to investigate Trump? If there is so much evidence to indict Hillary and company why wasn't it done?
The only thing I can come up with is that they couldn't prove it. If they could, they would have.
Let's not forget that the FBI defied a Congressional subpoena in order to defend Ice Cream Joe.
Let's not forget that the first Impeachment of Trump accused him of doing what Biden - on video - openly boasted of doing.
There is absolutely no chance you are anything but a Democrat, because no one but a Democrat believes Joe Biden is innocent.
And once again, it's in no way true to claim Trump had 2 years to go after Clinton/Biden. from the start, RINOs refused to cooperate with Trump's agenda, it's frankly amazing to see how much he accomplished with all the roadblocks placed in his way, and for which TDS'ers falsely blame him.
If you really want the GOP to nominate someone other than Trump, you are doing exactly the worst thing you could do.
Come on, the simplest solution is usually the right one. If they had Congress and the Executive Branch and didn't indict, it was because they couldn't. The evidence was not there. That is a much more probable answer than that there was some vast conspiracy between the Dems and GOP to protect Hillary and Joe. Now who is looking like the tin foil hat zealot?
Garland appointed a Special Counsel against a sitting President of his own Party. Let's see what comes of it.
Funny, Rosenstein appointed Mueller, I guess he was against Trump even though he was nominated by him and wrote the Comey Memo?? You guys ever think that Trump does bad ***** Seems an awful lot of circumstances having to be explained by conspiracy against Donald.
Yep, you're so Democrat you prolly have AOC on speed-dial.
If you knew how to read these kinds of documents you'd know that statement is stupidron.reagan said:
It's rare for someone to admit they only read 3 pages and jumped on twitter to voice their opinion
You are laughable. I have never voted Dem in my life. Just because I won't drink your Trump conspiracy kool-aid I am a Democrat.Oldbear83 said:
Yep, you're so Democrat you prolly have AOC on speed-dial.
At some point, after the 100th time or so, you have to look in the mirror and ask yourself that maybe IT REALLY IS a Trump-issue... Otherwise, there is some REALLY good coordination and collaboration crossing party and international lines going on to get him.
Based on the Trump experience, if the choice is having to buy anything Trump tells me and supporting Facist, Democrat isn't looking bad. Hell, my Grandfather drove freight locomotives and was a Dem, if it was good enough for him.
What's your excuse for lapping up the Trump is a victim, Trump is the future vomit?
Trump didn't want war with Iran and this is retaliation.
General Milly falsely claimed that Trump wanted to attack China. Trump cleared his name by proving it was Milly who wanted war.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 9, 2023
This is the real reason they want to take out Trump, and will stop at nothing to do so. pic.twitter.com/N0a3yWHvuy
Please read the indictment rather than rely on the circus showmen who claim to have read it and then tell you what you want to hear. https://t.co/3oGMPbllHX pic.twitter.com/DVCpxOO6HI
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 9, 2023
What's your excuse for sitting by and letting everyone else in DC break the rules/laws and only agreeing to place those rules on Trump?FLBear5630 said:You are laughable. I have never voted Dem in my life. Just because I won't drink your Trump conspiracy kool-aid I am a Democrat.Oldbear83 said:
Yep, you're so Democrat you prolly have AOC on speed-dial.
At some point, after the 100th time or so, you have to look in the mirror and ask yourself that maybe IT REALLY IS a Trump-issue... Otherwise, there is some REALLY good coordination and collaboration crossing party and international lines going on to get him.
Based on the Trump experience, if the choice is having to buy anything Trump tells me and supporting Facist, Democrat isn't looking bad. Hell, my Grandfather drove freight locomotives and was a Dem, if it was good enough for him.
What's your excuse for lapping up the Trump is a victim, Trump is the future vomit?
Biden had classified docs they found in his garage. He just got undeniably exposed in bribery with Burisma for $5 million. His pedophile crack smoking son is off limits.
If you think this country can survive unequal application of law then you're in for a surprise.
Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
[ edited to reflect the tone and character]FLBear5630 said:You are laughable. I have never not voted Dem in my life.Oldbear83 said:
Yep, you're so Democrat you prolly have AOC on speed-dial.
[ various insane rants ... ]
Democrat isn't looking bad. Hell, my Grandfather drove freight locomotives and was a Dem, if it was good enough for him.
What's your excuse for not buying my lies?
Go play with Hunter or Schiff all you want, it won't make anyone believe you are anything but a shill and a cretinous hypocrite.
I don't have to vote for Trump to defend him against these clearly persecutorial attacks.
Everyone knows that if they can do this to the Orange Blimp, they won't hesitate to go after DeSantis, Scott or any other Conservative who dares to stand in their way.
Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
Isn't there a special counsel appointed on the Bidens?Doc Holliday said:Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
We have enough info already to impeach him and charge him for crimes.Osodecentx said:Isn't there a special counsel appointed on the Bidens?Doc Holliday said:Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
So why the special treatment?
Your analysis sucks, as usual. It's not the fact that Clinton did something similar. It's the fact that a Clinton did something similar, but the feds, instead of prosecuting her for it, didn't do a damn thing about it.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
In other words, it's the unequal application of the law that you should have a problem with, but of course you won't because of your severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
he showed classified docs to someone with no clearance? that fat ******* is a traitor.
night night, keep your butthole tight!
night night, keep your butthole tight!
Ya'll wanna play with fire, then by all means go ahead and lock him up.Waco1947 said:What about hillerism!? Let's try T and, I don't know, lock him up?Doc Holliday said:Joe Biden is obviously guilty. HRC was obviously guilty when she took and destroyed classified intel.ron.reagan said:
I've never seen so many dumb *****es in a single thread. The guy is obviously guilty. Your tears are providing me energy.
You enjoy the unequal justice and tyranny. Period.
So because the Dems do it, the Repubs should have?LateSteak69 said:so no. and all of his cronies had the chance too. They tried, and it didn't work.Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Nah.
Buddy James Comey and Andrew McCabe leaked classified docs to WAPO. Are they not traitors?LateSteak69 said:
he showed classified docs to someone with no clearance? that fat ******* is a traitor.
night night, keep your butthole tight!
Everything ya'll accuse Trump of we have proof many others have done worse...so either they get the same treatment or you get to call yourself a fascist.
Bingo.Forest Bueller_bf said:Yes, he is obviously guilty.ron.reagan said:
I've never seen so many dumb *****es in a single thread. The guy is obviously guilty. Your tears are providing me energy.
When the left is equally concern with their obviously guilty party members, I will take note.
Until that time comes, I have enough understanding to realize this is simply politics.
Appointment of an independent special counsel removes supervision of the AG.Doc Holliday said:We have enough info already to impeach him and charge him for crimes.Osodecentx said:Isn't there a special counsel appointed on the Bidens?Doc Holliday said:Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
So why the special treatment?
Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives. Why don't they impeach Biden? Could it be they don't have the votes?
You don't believe Trump is a serious candidate in the sense he will most likely be the Republican nominee - just like HRC was in 2016?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
You know better. There's no excuse for a double standard as between Democrat and Republican candidates. I could care less about Trump personally, but let's not pretend the double standard here isn't a real concern and a dangerous precedent.
Or, perhaps - a functioning government does not prosecute the leader of the opposition party for process crimes.FLBear5630 said:Yeah. It is more likely that there was a conspiracy between RINOS and Democrats to get poor Donald?Oldbear83 said:First, there is absolutely no chance that Biden's DOJ will provide the evidence needed for a Special Counsel (and not only should Joe's SC have been appointed long before it was, but where is the one for Hunter?) to dig into Joe's frankly well-known criminal behavior.FLBear5630 said:I admitted I was wrong, there is a Special Counsel investigating Biden. I want to see what they find.Oldbear83 said:
Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Schumer.
Ok, Gaetz. Why didn't the GOP investigate and indict Hillary, Hunter or even Joe? They had 2 years of Senate and HOR control? A Special Counsel was a no brainer, easy. Hell, they got one to investigate Trump? If there is so much evidence to indict Hillary and company why wasn't it done?
The only thing I can come up with is that they couldn't prove it. If they could, they would have.
Let's not forget that the FBI defied a Congressional subpoena in order to defend Ice Cream Joe.
Let's not forget that the first Impeachment of Trump accused him of doing what Biden - on video - openly boasted of doing.
There is absolutely no chance you are anything but a Democrat, because no one but a Democrat believes Joe Biden is innocent.
And once again, it's in no way true to claim Trump had 2 years to go after Clinton/Biden. from the start, RINOs refused to cooperate with Trump's agenda, it's frankly amazing to see how much he accomplished with all the roadblocks placed in his way, and for which TDS'ers falsely blame him.
If you really want the GOP to nominate someone other than Trump, you are doing exactly the worst thing you could do.
Come on, the simplest solution is usually the right one. If they had Congress and the Executive Branch and didn't indict, it was because they couldn't. The evidence was not there.
What is the benefit of an impeachment that is DOA in the Senate?Osodecentx said:Appointment of an independent special counsel removes supervision of the AG.Doc Holliday said:We have enough info already to impeach him and charge him for crimes.Osodecentx said:Isn't there a special counsel appointed on the Bidens?Doc Holliday said:Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
So why the special treatment?
Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives. Why don't they impeach Biden? Could it be they don't have the votes?
Because they hate Trump. They will watch Trump get destroyed while doing nothing and love every minute of it.Osodecentx said:Appointment of an independent special counsel removes supervision of the AG.Doc Holliday said:We have enough info already to impeach him and charge him for crimes.Osodecentx said:Isn't there a special counsel appointed on the Bidens?Doc Holliday said:Then why hasn't Biden been indicted for insanely corrupt crimes we have proof of?Porteroso said:Doc Holliday said:Trump is his own worst enemy. He didn't have the balls to go scorched earth while democrats obviously do.LateSteak69 said:didn't t**mp have every opportunity to take down HRC?Doc Holliday said:She did something MUCH worse than what Trump is being accused of.ron.reagan said:
When your only defense is that a Clinton did something similar you are probably on the wrong side of history.
Joe Biden committed bribery in a pay to play scheme. Not a peep from your bleeding heart leftoid ass.
You love that they're taking down Trump and not applying the law to themselves. It makes you giddy.
Is upholding the rule of law really going scorched earth? I thought it was the norm. Maybe not for politicians, sure, but again, normally.
Trump is banking on his political following to keep him out of trouble, and you have bought into it. I have sways said that while running for office, if a serious candidate, you should more or less be immune to immediate prosecution. Once Hilary secured the nomination, for example.
However if you are running for the position you recently lost, to an elderly man with dementia no less, you should not be immune to prosecution. If politicians running for office were always immune, they would run for office every chance.
Probably what Trump will try. And if he was the sitting President, I'd be against it. If he was trying for President the first time, I'd be against it. But he cannot evade justice forever.
Nobody should be able to. Only the true zealots of the country think their dear leader should be above the law. Stupidity knows no bounds.
If you think the application of law isn't biased or fair then you're bat**** crazy. Either be against Biden like you are with Trump or shut the f up.
So why the special treatment?
Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives. Why don't they impeach Biden? Could it be they don't have the votes?
Politics isn't dem vs GOP. Hasn't been for a long time. Its about protecting the ruling class.
Those that like Desantis, do you not realize they will treat him exactly the same as Trump or worse?
If you think this helps, you're not seeing the big picture.
If you think this helps, you're not seeing the big picture.