Bishop of Tyler Texas

43,917 Views | 421 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Redbrickbear
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

St John Paul II and Benedict were almost enough to convince me to swim the Tiber. Francis reminds me why I did not.
I ask myself sometimes if it's OK to ask St. Joseph for his Happy Death.

He is frustrating to say the least. At some points, he's super strong and direct like abortion and same-sex marriages. Then the next day he appoints Cardinals in superior positions that I wouldn't put in charge of a Bingo night.

There are many Catholics in the Church that want to see Cardinal Sarah from Africa to be named successor, but he's 78. He's got until he's 80 to vote when the time comes.

This dude would have you JUMP across. He is ultra conservative.
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
To piggyback on curtpenn, Irenaeus of Lyons wrote a five book set called Against Heresies between 174 and 189 AD that refuted ALL the heresies that occurred during that time.

He never once address veneration or intercession.
I am not sure why you guys keep looking at outside texts to determine if something is heretical. All that is needed is scripture, not mortal man's opinion.

And in that regard, Busty is right - there is no scriptural support for veneration or intercession. None.

Unfortunately, I think that is what we will continue going back to. We will point to scripture, and you will point to scripture's silence or the writings of third parties. The difference between us all comes down to what we find authoritative. I think your position invites a very slippery slope, but I doubt anyone will be changing their minds on this point. Too much indoctrination.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:



We know based on the revelation of God through Jesus. Because by faith we accept the testimony of the historical resurrection of Jesus given to us by Jesus' apostles, whose testimony is reliably preserved in the New Testament. And because Jesus was resurrected, he was from God, and therefore his word has the authority of God. And Jesus himself gave the stamp of authority to the Old Testament ("every jot and tittle") and to the word from his apostles (John 14:26).

What is the basis for your faith tradition's teaching that the Bible is the inspired word of God? Is it on the same revelation of God through the historical life, death, and resurrection of Jesus? If so, that's our shared starting point. And sola scriptura is the logical outflow from that starting point, as explained above.
"We know based on the revelation of God through Jesus. Because by faith we accept the testimony of the historical resurrection of Jesus given to us by Jesus' apostles..."

Here's the heart of your fallacy right here; if we "knew" then it wouldn't be faith, it would be knowledge. We believe, accept, give intellectual assent to propositional truth, but ultimately we cannot know this side of the grave. I have faith and hope, but no objective proof.
Don't get so hung up on semantics. You can "know" things by faith. Faith is "the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1)

You make a living here with semantics. Ironic. You can believe things by faith and hope for them by faith, but you cannot know.
If all you have to harp on was my choice of the word "know", it would seem to indicate the solidity of my argument.
From St Paul's letter to the Corinthians (you know, Sola Scriptura, and all that): For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

That you choose to argue over believing/thinking over actually knowing tells us all we need to "know" about the solidity of your argument.
It was Sam Lowry who said he "knew" why Scripture was the word of God, and asked how I "know" it is. So I answered in like manner.

That would mean your criticism applies mostly to him, since he started the discussion in that way. So therefore you are really questioning the solidity of his argument. And since you are defending his position, that would also put you yourself under the same criticism.

How's that for turning your own pedantry against you?
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

But you are making the positive assertion that prayer to Mary and the saints was taught, believed, and practiced by Jesus, his apostles, or the first Christians. The onus of showing something is on you, and you failed, even on the grounds of tradition and reason.

Believing positively on something based on the silence of Jesus is a foolish and dangerous way to think. It's what people do to corrupt the faith. And I've shown you more than enough biblical principles as well as common sense reason as to why the practice is wrong, so it isn't an argument from silence, really.
Who was in heaven at that point? No one. One might argue Enoch, Elijah, and Moses, but the most likely were in Abraham's bosom.

There were no saints to ask for intercession. It wasn't until the Church had great martyrs such as Ignatius, Felicity, Perpetua, etc. that suffered under Nero, Trajan, Diocletian, etc. that the Church Militant began requesting intercession from the Church Triumphant.

As mentioned, we have prayers asking for Mary's intercession in the 200's.
By what revelation was it revealed to the Church that these saints were in heaven, able to hear your prayers, and governed their respective "jurisdictions" as assigned to them by the Church?

And by what new revelation did prayers to Mary for her intercession begin in the 200's, since it is not traceable to the teachings, belief, and practice of Jesus, his apostles, and the first Christians, two centuries prior?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Which books of the OT did Jesus quote from or allude to that were removed by Christians?
First Catholics are Christians. We're the original franchise since 33 AD.

To answer your question: None of them.

The New Testament never quotes from Judges, Ruth, Ezra, Ester, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Lamentations, Obadiah, Johan, or Zaphaniah. Should we remove these?
No, the first Christians were not Catholics. There were no popes, bishops, priests, nuns, etc. and as it's been repeatedly shown over and over in this thread, neither Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians believed in or practiced praying to Mary or to saints.

I am not saying to remove OT books that weren't quoted in the NT. I'm asking you to expound on your comment - "Jesus and the apostles quoted from the Septuagint, which contains all 46 books of the OT, but Protestants removed 7 of them. Yet, they claim to be able to interpret scripture with the Holy Spirit." If Jesus or the apostles quoted from a book in the OT that was removed by Protestants, then you'd have an argument. But if you can't name one of those books, then you don't.

Of course there were bishops and priests. You've "shown" exactly nothing re Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians concerning their beliefs or practices concerning Mary or the saints. You have inferred from silence, just as the early Church inferred from tradition and reason.
But you are making the positive assertion that prayer to Mary and the saints was taught, believed, and practiced by Jesus, his apostles, or the first Christians. The onus of showing something is on you, and you failed, even on the grounds of tradition and reason.

Believing positively on something based on the silence of Jesus is a foolish and dangerous way to think. It's what people do to corrupt the faith. And I've shown you more than enough biblical principles as well as common sense reason as to why the practice is wrong, so it isn't an argument from silence, really.
Another lie from you? Show me where I claimed Jesus or his apostles taught or practiced the veneration of Mary or the saints. It is clear that early Christians did. That they are not early enough for you is your problem. I failed nothing. You are just invincibly ignorant.

While it may be true believing something based on silence may sometimes be dangerous, it may also not be dangerous. The thing is not dispositive in and of itself. You haven't shown anything other than insistence that your own understanding trumps that of the majority of all Christians ever. Satan approved hubris is your fruit.
If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
As you say, early Christians found heresies such as gnosticism, Montanism, docetism, etc., and identified them as heresies. Why then do we find evidence for Marian veneration early on and yet it wasn't classified as heresy?
What do you mean by "veneration"? Veneration in the sense of calling her "blessed" and holding her in high regard would have been completely biblical and therefore would not have been called a heresy. But praying to her for her "intercession" would have. That's why you don't have a single Church father with this belief or practice for centuries. Heresies like gnosticism were so blatanly anti-biblical that early Christians had to fight against them strongly. Beliefs like praying to Mary and saints started to creep in more slowly. But when they did, you did have church fathers speaking out against them - Vigilantius, Lactantius, and Origen were some of these early church fathers/writers. Here is what Origen (248 A.D.) said:

"We judge it improper to pray to those beings who themselves offer up prayers to God, seeing even they themselves would prefer that we should send up our request to the God to whom they pray, rather than send them downwards to themselves, or apportion our power of prayer between God and them." (Origen, Against Celsus, Book V, Chap. XI)
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:



- no one is saying we have to prove Scripture to be the word of God. You're spending too much time and energy arguing against a point that no one is making. - You're basing an entire belief system on something that cannot be proven, only believed. That is precisely the point I am making. You have no proof of anything. Only belief.

- I "rail" against the things that are either unbiblical, or clearly against biblical principles. Praying to anyone other than God/Jesus is one of those. - Requesting intercession is neither unbiblical nor against biblical principles. You beg the question every time you make such a silly assertion.

- where is your evidence that the early church did in fact practice praying to Mary and the saints, as you claim? - Others have already covered this. If you didn't believe them, doubt you'd believe me.

- how do you know those saints are truly in heaven? How do you know they hear you? Who told you they have the "jurisdiction" over the areas they've been assigned? I believe they hear me just as you believe Jesus hears you. Prove for us that Jesus hears you? I prefer "association" to "jurisdiction". It is a more accurate term. Most of the associations are part of history and tradition. There is much we think we know about the lives of early Christians and martyrs. History didn't end with the Revelation of St John.

- you say there's "pushback" on that type of prayer. Would that include you? Because in another thread, you did not see any problem with them, and in fact you defended them. I defended specific phrases that had alternate explanations to the worst case scenarios you created. I do think some go too far in their leanings re Mary which is just a small part of why I am not Roman Catholic. The Bishop of Rome and his role is my greatest difficulty. Regardless, such beliefs are not salvific and are adiaphora.

- Mary isn't a co-anything. Catholic beliefs about her are completely unbiblical, and even extend into idolatry. Some Catholics DO believe she is co-Mediator. There is currently a movement within Catholicism to dogmatize this belief. Pope John Paul II received more than four million signatures from 157 countries urging him to exercise papal infallibility to pronounce Mary as "Co-Redemptrix [co-redeemer], Mediatrix [mediator] of All Graces, and Advocate for the People of God." Past popes have regarded Mary as Co-mediator. During a radio message in 1935, Pope Pius XI gave the title "Co-redemptrix" to Mary. This is what happens when you don't stop the "veneration" of Mary and recognize it as unbiblical - it grows and grows, and when you don't base yourself in sola scriptura, this is what eventuallly happens. Who knows what can happen in future. You have a current pope who is clearly a progressive, and he's inserted progressive bishops into his College of Cardinals. What Catholics believe today, could easily be dogmatized against by a future pope. - I see no problem with Mary as co mediator to the extent she intercedes on our behalf to her beloved Son. From Wikipedia so take it for what it's worth:

Co-Redemptrix (also spelled Coredemptrix; Co-Redemptress is an equivalent term) is a title used by some Catholics for the Blessed Virgin Mary, and refers to Mary's role in the redemption of all peoples.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix#cite_note-1][1][/url]
According to those who use the term, Co-Redemptrix refers to a subordinate but essential participation by the Blessed Virgin Mary in redemption, notably that she gave free consent to give life to the Redeemer, which meant sharing his life, suffering, and death, which were redemptive for the world. Related to this belief is the concept of Mary as Mediatrix, which is a separate concept but regularly included by Catholics who use the title Co-Redemptrix. Some, in particular the adherents of the Amsterdam visions, have petitioned for a dogmatic definition, along with Mediatrix.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix#cite_note-2][2][/url]
The concept was especially common in the late Middle Ages, when it was promoted heavily among the Franciscans, and often resisted by the Dominicans. By the early 16th century the hopes of the concept becoming Catholic doctrine had receded, and have never seriously revived. In more recent times, the title has received some support from the Catholic Magisterium[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix#cite_note-3][3][/url] though it is not included in the concluding chapter of the apostolic constitution Lumen gentium of the Second Vatican Council, which chapter many theologians hold to be a comprehensive summary of Roman Catholic Mariology. As a Cardinal, Pope Benedict XVI suggested that the Marian title caused confusion and did not sufficiently reflect scripture.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix#cite_note-autogenerated1-4][4][/url] Pope Francis has repeatedly suggested the title should not be used.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix#cite_note-autogenerated1-4][4]

[/url]Seems to me you are misrepresenting something. As usual.


If you want to make the argument that we can't prove Scripture is the word of God, fine. Just go make it in a thread where that's the debate. It isn't the debate here.
Sola scriptura begs this question, so it's necessarily part of the debate. That's what we're trying to get across to you.
It begs the question only if the two parties in the debate don't already agree to the truth of the historical Jesus. That is the shared starting point of the debate. Are you are admitting you don't believe Scripture to be the word of God? Is that a Catholic position?
That's a really insulting question and representative of the divisiveness you continually propound. Satan is still smiling.
Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
Jesus is not diminished. This is not a zero sum game. No one I know or know of suggests that Mary or any saint is Lord or God.
You do not have to suggest that Mary or any saint is God in order to diminish Jesus.
Your opinion of Jesus must be low if you think he is diminished in any way as I work through my Anglican rosary at bed time and recite the Ave along with the Jesus Prayer and Pater Noster.
He is not diminished in of himself. You are diminishing him within yourself by praying to Mary or the saints. Jesus doesn't care for recitations. He said not to pray with vain repetitions (Matthew 6:7). He wants you to pray from your heart, and be open and honest before him..... and praying to HIM, not Mary or the saints.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Which books of the OT did Jesus quote from or allude to that were removed by Christians?
First Catholics are Christians. We're the original franchise since 33 AD.

To answer your question: None of them.

The New Testament never quotes from Judges, Ruth, Ezra, Ester, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Lamentations, Obadiah, Johan, or Zaphaniah. Should we remove these?
No, the first Christians were not Catholics. There were no popes, bishops, priests, nuns, etc. and as it's been repeatedly shown over and over in this thread, neither Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians believed in or practiced praying to Mary or to saints.

I am not saying to remove OT books that weren't quoted in the NT. I'm asking you to expound on your comment - "Jesus and the apostles quoted from the Septuagint, which contains all 46 books of the OT, but Protestants removed 7 of them. Yet, they claim to be able to interpret scripture with the Holy Spirit." If Jesus or the apostles quoted from a book in the OT that was removed by Protestants, then you'd have an argument. But if you can't name one of those books, then you don't.

Of course there were bishops and priests. You've "shown" exactly nothing re Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians concerning their beliefs or practices concerning Mary or the saints. You have inferred from silence, just as the early Church inferred from tradition and reason.
But you are making the positive assertion that prayer to Mary and the saints was taught, believed, and practiced by Jesus, his apostles, or the first Christians. The onus of showing something is on you, and you failed, even on the grounds of tradition and reason.

Believing positively on something based on the silence of Jesus is a foolish and dangerous way to think. It's what people do to corrupt the faith. And I've shown you more than enough biblical principles as well as common sense reason as to why the practice is wrong, so it isn't an argument from silence, really.
Another lie from you? Show me where I claimed Jesus or his apostles taught or practiced the veneration of Mary or the saints. It is clear that early Christians did. That they are not early enough for you is your problem. I failed nothing. You are just invincibly ignorant.

While it may be true believing something based on silence may sometimes be dangerous, it may also not be dangerous. The thing is not dispositive in and of itself. You haven't shown anything other than insistence that your own understanding trumps that of the majority of all Christians ever. Satan approved hubris is your fruit.
If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
Still waiting for you to show where I claimed Jesus or his apostles taught or practiced the veneration of Mary or the saints, btw.
So if you know they didn't, why are you doing it?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
To piggyback on curtpenn, Irenaeus of Lyons wrote a five book set called Against Heresies between 174 and 189 AD that refuted ALL the heresies that occurred during that time.

He never once address veneration or intercession.
What kind of "veneration" are you talking about? "Veneration" in the sense of calling mary blessed and holding her in high regard would not have been considered a heresy by the early church. And as you already showed, "intercession" from Mary didn't begin until 250 AD or so. So how could a book written in 189 have included it?

Vigilantius, Lactantius, and Origen were some of these early church fathers/writers that spoke against praying to Mary and the sains. Here is what Origen (248 A.D.) said:

"We judge it improper to pray to those beings who themselves offer up prayers to God, seeing even they themselves would prefer that we should send up our request to the God to whom they pray, rather than send them downwards to themselves, or apportion our power of prayer between God and them." (Origen, Against Celsus, Book V, Chap. XI)

You gotta be careful with Irenaeus. He was wrong about a LOT of things. It would be a fallacy to say that just because someone like him didn't mention it as a heresy, it means it wasn't one, or wasn't regarded as one.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Aren't God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit one? Isn't that what you believe?

Jesus may be happy when we love his mother - but when we elevate her to the level of idolatry like Catholics do? Likely not so much. The Gospels even showed how Jesus didn't acknowledge the praise that was given his mother, but rather he diverted away from it. (Matthew 12:46-50 and Luke 11:27-288). I'd think Jesus would be more happy if you give all your devotion to him and pray to him, and stop dividing your devotion amongst Mary and the saints and praying to them.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
Would you say she is being worshiped by Catholics?
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
Would you say she is being worshiped by Catholics?
I say what I said before. Depends on what is in the individual's heart.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Calvin had extensive knowledge of Church history. In his work A Treastise on Relics, he argued that prayers to the saints, prayers for the dead, the veneration of relics, the lighting of candles (in homage to the saints), and the veneration of icons are all rooted in Roman paganism. He writes:
Quote:

Hero-worship is innate to human nature, and it is founded on some of our noblest feelings, gratitude, love, and admiration, but which, like all other feelings, when uncontrolled by principle and reason, may easily degenerate into the wildest exaggerations, and lead to most dangerous consequences. It was by such an exaggeration of these noble feelings that [Roman] Paganism filled the Olympus with gods and demigods, elevating to this rank men who have often deserved the gratitude of their fellow-creatures, by some signal services rendered to the community, or their admiration, by having performed some deeds which required a more than usual degree of mental and physical powers.

The same cause obtained for the Christian martyrs the gratitude and admiration of their fellow-Christians, and finally converted them into a kind of demigods. This was more particularly the case when the church began to be corrupted by her compromise with Paganism [during the fourth and fifth-centuries], which having been baptized without being converted, rapidly introduced into the Christian church, not only many of its rites and ceremonies, but even its polytheism, with this difference, that the divinities of Greece and Rome were replaced by Christian saints, many of whom received the offices of their Pagan predecessors.

The church in the beginning tolerated these abuses, as a temporary evil, but was afterwards unable to remove them; and they became so strong, particularly during the prevailing ignorance of the middle ages, that the church ended up legalizing, through her decrees, that at which she did nothing but wink at first........

......Thus St. Anthony of Padua restores, like Mercury, stolen property; St. Hubert, like Diana, is the patron of sportsmen; St. Cosmas, like Esculapius, that of physicians, etc. In fact, almost every profession and trade, as well as every place, have their especial patron saint, who, like the tutelary divinity of the Pagans, receives particular hours from his or her protgs.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
Would you say she is being worshiped by Catholics?
I say what I said before. Depends on what is in the individual's heart.
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?" (Jeremiah 17:9).

There are many who will convince themselves they are not worshiping Mary in their heart, but they really are. Could someone ever not be worshiping Mary in their heart, yet bow to her statue, pray to her for intercession, sing hymns to her, celebrate festivals for her, have pictures and statues of her all over their house, or fervently rush to any area where an apparition of her was reported? Or believe she was sinless, was bodily assumed to heaven, and should be prayed to for intercession, which sounds like someone from the bible we all know? Or believe Pope Pius IX when he wrote:

"For God has committed to Mary the treasury of all good things, in order that everyone may know that THROUGH HER are obtained every hope, every grace, and ALL SALVATION. For this is his will, that we obtain everything through Mary." (Pius IX, Ubi Primum, 1849)

By our actions, our heart is revealed.
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is not my place to make a determination of what is in a person's heart when they are praying. That is for God, and God alone.

However, as I have said before, if I see someone break out a rosary and start to pray, "Idol Worshipper" is not the first, or even 10th, thought that comes to mind.

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
Matthew 7:1
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

It is not my place to make a determination of what is in a person's heart when they are praying. That is for God, and God alone.

However, as I have said before, if I see someone break out a rosary and start to pray, "Idol Worshipper" is not the first, or even 10th, thought that comes to mind.

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
Matthew 7:1
If by saying "Do not judge" Jesus meant for us not to never discern wrong beliefs and practices in others, then that would defeat the whole purpose of evangelizing, which Jesus charges his followers.

You are not to determine someone's heart when they pray, sure....but what if they're praying not to God, but to someone else? Can you not discern the idolatry in that?

When a Catholic prays the rosary, they are praying to Mary, not God. For every one praise of God in the rosary, there are TEN praises to Mary. Even the beads they use have pagan roots. They are used to keep track of the number of prayer repetitions. Jesus himself told us to not use vain repetitions when we pray, as the pagans do (Matthew 6:7). They are directly disobeying Jesus. They are also calling Mary "our life" and "our hope", and refer to her as "holy queen". There is a "Queen of Heaven" in the bible, and it's a pagan goddess. If someone does these things, how can their "heart" be anything else but idolatrous? If it's not at least your tenth thought, then there is truly something wrong with your discernment, if you are a believer.

There is so much about praying the rosary that is at the very least unscriptural, if not outright pagan idolatry. You aren't "judging" them by discerning this. If you are a believer in Jesus, then you should tell these people the truth, not out of "judgement" but to warn them.
90sBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are asking me to judge someone based on their personal prayers to God. I WILL NOT insert my thoughts, beliefs and especially judgement on someone else's personal prayers to God without the knowledge of what is in their heart mind and soul.

My final post on this topic.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

You are asking me to judge someone based on their personal prayers to God. I WILL NOT insert my thoughts, beliefs and especially judgement on someone else's personal prayers to God without the knowledge of what is in their heart mind and soul.

My final post on this topic.
But they're NOT praying to God. That's the whole topic!!
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Vigilantius, Lactantius, and Origen were some of these early church fathers/writers that spoke against praying to Mary and the sains. Here is what Origen (248 A.D.) said:

"We judge it improper to pray to those beings who themselves offer up prayers to God, seeing even they themselves would prefer that we should send up our request to the God to whom they pray, rather than send them downwards to themselves, or apportion our power of prayer between God and them." (Origen, Against Celsus, Book V, Chap. XI)

You gotta be careful with Irenaeus. He was wrong about a LOT of things. It would be a fallacy to say that just because someone like him didn't mention it as a heresy, it means it wasn't one, or wasn't regarded as one.
I'm glad you brought this quote up again. By divine providence, I was listening to a podcast that addressed this very quote.

When you go to the original source, Origen is refuting a claim that Celsis, a pagan philosopher, that Christians worshippd God that they should also worship the stars, moon, and planets.

Origen is stating in this quote that we only worship God, not the objects in the sky. Here is what Origen really believed about intercession:

For we indeed acknowledge that angels are ministering spirits, . . . and that they ascend, bearing the supplications of men, to the purest of the heavenly places in the universe, or even to supercelestial regions purer still; and that they come down from these, conveying to each one, according to his deserts, something enjoined by God to be conferred by them upon those who are to be the recipients of his benefits. . . . For every prayer, and supplication, and intercession, and thanksgiving, is to be sent up to the Supreme God through the High Priest, who is above all the angels, the living Word and God. And to the Word Himself shall we also pray and make intercessions, and offer thanksgivings and supplications to Him, if we have the capacity of distinguishing between the proper use and abuse of prayer. . . .

And it is enough to secure that the holy angels of God be propitious to us, and that they do all things on our behalf, that our disposition of mind towards God should imitate as far as it is within the power of human nature the example of these holy angels, who again follow the example of their God; ... (Contra Celsum, V, 4-5)

What specifically did Irenaeus get wrong?
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

You are not to determine someone's heart when they pray, sure....but what if they're praying not to God, but to someone else? Can you not discern the idolatry in that?
At this point, I and others have stated many times that praying does NOT equal worshiping. To pray means to ask. Please substitute "pray" for "ask for intercession." After this many times of being told the same thing, this is disrespectful and rude. Quite frankly, there may be no need to continue the conversation if you are not willing to meet us on this point, I'm done with this discussion.

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

When a Catholic prays the rosary, they are praying to Mary, not God. For every one praise of God in the rosary, there are TEN praises to Mary. Even the beads they use have pagan roots. They are used to keep track of the number of prayer repetitions. Jesus himself told us to not use vain repetitions when we pray, as the pagans do (Matthew 6:7). They are directly disobeying Jesus. They are also calling Mary "our life" and "our hope", and refer to her as "holy queen". There is a "Queen of Heaven" in the bible, and it's a pagan goddess. If someone does these things, how can their "heart" be anything else but idolatrous? If it's not at least your tenth thought, then there is truly something wrong with your discernment, if you are a believer.
Quite frankly, I expected better from you on this. You possess a great deal of knowledge and to resort to this sophomoric claims that I would expect from a small town Baptist preacher that doesn't know any better. These statements of "beads of pagan roots" and "repetition of prayers" are almost embarrassing for you.

I'll address Matthew 6:7 to help others better understand. Jesus, in Matthew 26:44:

So, leaving them again, he went away and prayed for the third time, saying the same words again.

Whoa, Jesus is repeating prayers. He must not have read what he said in Matt 6:7

In Thessalonians 5:17 - St. Paul urges us to "Pray without ceasing."

Same thing, maybe Paul was still blind and couldn't read Matt 6:7.

In Rev 4:8, Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under its wings. Day and night they never stop saying: "'Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty,'

The angels here have no excuses. They have eyes all around, they should have most certainly read Matthew 6;7.

Maybe there's a logical explanation. In Matthew 6:7, Jesus is addressing the pagans that believed that they could wear down there gods like in 1 Kings 18 when the worshipers of Baal tried to call down fire when their babbling of prayers.

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

There is so much about praying the rosary that is at the very least unscriptural, if not outright pagan idolatry. You aren't "judging" them by discerning this. If you are a believer in Jesus, then you should tell these people the truth, not out of "judgement" but to warn them.
Do you even know what the rosary is? Seriously. Once again, I would have expected you to at least understand what the rosary is comprised of if you were going to comment about it so authoritatively.

The rosary stated around the 12th century. The monks and other religious would memorize and pray all 150 of the Psalms. Of course, most lay people could not read, some pious people would repeat the Our Father "Pater Nostra" 150 times like the monks prayed the Psalms.

Traditions states that sometime around the 14th century, our Blessed Mother appeared to St. Dominic and gave him the structure of the rosary. The beginning of each rosary starts with the Apostle's Creed, an Our Father, 3 Hail Mary's (for an increase for the virtues of Faith, Hope, and Love), and a Glory Be prayer. Next 5 decades of Hail Mary's are prayed.

Now each rosary covers a specific mystery. The three original mysteries are the Glorious, Joyful, and the Sorrowful mysteries. Today is Friday. Most Catholic pray the Sorrowful mysteries on Fridays. (It's my favorite mystery.)

The Sorrowful first decade is the Agony in the Garden. We say an Our Father followed by 10 Hail Mary's. While saying these prayers, we contemplate on Jesus' suffering in the Garden of Gethsemane.
The Sorrowful second decade is the Scourging at the pillar, preceded by the Our Father followed by another decade. We dwell upon his brutal scouring which according to the the Shroud of Turin, 120 lashes with a Roman flagellum.
Third Sorrowful mystery is the Crowning of Thorns: Our Father, decade, and the contemplation of the spitting, punching, mocking, and pressing or beating the CAP of thorns onto Christ's head.
4th Sorrowful mystery is the Carrying of the Cross on the Via De La Rosa. Another Our Father, decade with the imagining of what it was like to carry a nearly 100 lb beam of wood for nearly a mile up hill to Golgatha. He fell three times. It's possible the third fall dislocated his shoulder, nearly paralyzing necessitating Simon of Cyrene carrying his cross.
5th Sorrowful mystery - Our Father, final decade while praying about the excruciating pain of having a nail driven thru the median nerve of the wrist and feet. The cruciform position of the body making exhaling extremely painful to the point where the lungs fill up with fluid and the heart gives out.

Finally we finish the rosary with a Glory Be.

When the monks and others replaced the 150 Psalms with 153 Hail Mary's (50 from each mystery (Sorrowful, Joyful, and Glorious). This allowed them to contemplate on the life of Jesus rather than just the Psalms.

The rosary is "scripture (Jesus's life) on a rope".

Anyone can pray the rosary. Not just Catholics. It's a universal prayer dwelling on the life of Jesus.

Our Easter Rite Catholics implore the Jesus prayer. "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner." They repeat this with their breathing. {inhale]"Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God," {exhale} "have mercy on me, a sinner." I do this every day for a bit. It's very peaceful. I try to remember to do this when I approach the altar for the Eucharist every Sunday and Friday.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
Ave Maria

Hail Mary, full of grace,
the Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou amongst women,
and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary, Mother of God,
pray for us sinners,
now and at the hour of our death. Amen

The Magnificat (Book of Common Prayer, Rite 1)

MY soul doth magnify the Lord, * and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
For he hath regarded * the lowliness of his handmaiden.
For behold, from henceforth * all generations shall call me blessed.
For he that is mighty hath magnified me; * and holy is his Name.
And his mercy is on them that fear him * throughout all generations.
He hath showed strength with his arm; * he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.
He hath put down the mighty from their seat, * and hath exalted the humble and meek.
He hath filled the hungry with good things; * and the rich he hath sent empty away.
He remembering his mercy hath holpen his servant Israel; * as he promised to our forefathers, Abraham and his seed, for ever.

Luke 1:46-55 KJV

And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: For, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; And holy is his name. And his mercy is on them that fear him From generation to generation. He hath shewed strength with his arm; He hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from their seats, And exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things; And the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath holpen his servant Israel, In remembrance of his mercy; As he spake to our fathers, To Abraham, and to his seed for ever.

For the Sola Sciptura or more Protestant among us, what do you make of "from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed"? What in the Ave is blasphemous or heretical?

curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

You are not to determine someone's heart when they pray, sure....but what if they're praying not to God, but to someone else? Can you not discern the idolatry in that?
At this point, I and others have stated many times that praying does NOT equal worshiping. To pray means to ask. Please substitute "pray" for "ask for intercession." After this many times of being told the same thing, this is disrespectful and rude. Quite frankly, there may be no need to continue the conversation if you are not willing to meet us on this point, I'm done with this discussion.

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

When a Catholic prays the rosary, they are praying to Mary, not God. For every one praise of God in the rosary, there are TEN praises to Mary. Even the beads they use have pagan roots. They are used to keep track of the number of prayer repetitions. Jesus himself told us to not use vain repetitions when we pray, as the pagans do (Matthew 6:7). They are directly disobeying Jesus. They are also calling Mary "our life" and "our hope", and refer to her as "holy queen". There is a "Queen of Heaven" in the bible, and it's a pagan goddess. If someone does these things, how can their "heart" be anything else but idolatrous? If it's not at least your tenth thought, then there is truly something wrong with your discernment, if you are a believer.
Quite frankly, I expected better from you on this. You possess a great deal of knowledge and to resort to this sophomoric claims that I would expect from a small town Baptist preacher that doesn't know any better. These statements of "beads of pagan roots" and "repetition of prayers" are almost embarrassing for you.

I'll address Matthew 6:7 to help others better understand. Jesus, in Matthew 26:44:

So, leaving them again, he went away and prayed for the third time, saying the same words again.

Whoa, Jesus is repeating prayers. He must not have read what he said in Matt 6:7

In Thessalonians 5:17 - St. Paul urges us to "Pray without ceasing."

Same thing, maybe Paul was still blind and couldn't read Matt 6:7.

In Rev 4:8, Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under its wings. Day and night they never stop saying: "'Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty,'

The angels here have no excuses. They have eyes all around, they should have most certainly read Matthew 6;7.

Maybe there's a logical explanation. In Matthew 6:7, Jesus is addressing the pagans that believed that they could wear down there gods like in 1 Kings 18 when the worshipers of Baal tried to call down fire when their babbling of prayers.

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

There is so much about praying the rosary that is at the very least unscriptural, if not outright pagan idolatry. You aren't "judging" them by discerning this. If you are a believer in Jesus, then you should tell these people the truth, not out of "judgement" but to warn them.
Do you even know what the rosary is? Seriously. Once again, I would have expected you to at least understand what the rosary is comprised of if you were going to comment about it so authoritatively.

The rosary stated around the 12th century. The monks and other religious would memorize and pray all 150 of the Psalms. Of course, most lay people could not read, some pious people would repeat the Our Father "Pater Nostra" 150 times like the monks prayed the Psalms.

Traditions states that sometime around the 14th century, our Blessed Mother appeared to St. Dominic and gave him the structure of the rosary. The beginning of each rosary starts with the Apostle's Creed, an Our Father, 3 Hail Mary's (for an increase for the virtues of Faith, Hope, and Love), and a Glory Be prayer. Next 5 decades of Hail Mary's are prayed.

Now each rosary covers a specific mystery. The three original mysteries are the Glorious, Joyful, and the Sorrowful mysteries. Today is Friday. Most Catholic pray the Sorrowful mysteries on Fridays. (It's my favorite mystery.)

The Sorrowful first decade is the Agony in the Garden. We say an Our Father followed by 10 Hail Mary's. While saying these prayers, we contemplate on Jesus' suffering in the Garden of Gethsemane.
The Sorrowful second decade is the Scourging at the pillar, preceded by the Our Father followed by another decade. We dwell upon his brutal scouring which according to the the Shroud of Turin, 120 lashes with a Roman flagellum.
Third Sorrowful mystery is the Crowning of Thorns: Our Father, decade, and the contemplation of the spitting, punching, mocking, and pressing or beating the CAP of thorns onto Christ's head.
4th Sorrowful mystery is the Carrying of the Cross on the Via De La Rosa. Another Our Father, decade with the imagining of what it was like to carry a nearly 100 lb beam of wood for nearly a mile up hill to Golgatha. He fell three times. It's possible the third fall dislocated his shoulder, nearly paralyzing necessitating Simon of Cyrene carrying his cross.
5th Sorrowful mystery - Our Father, final decade while praying about the excruciating pain of having a nail driven thru the median nerve of the wrist and feet. The cruciform position of the body making exhaling extremely painful to the point where the lungs fill up with fluid and the heart gives out.

Finally we finish the rosary with a Glory Be.

When the monks and others replaced the 150 Psalms with 153 Hail Mary's (50 from each mystery (Sorrowful, Joyful, and Glorious). This allowed them to contemplate on the life of Jesus rather than just the Psalms.

The rosary is "scripture (Jesus's life) on a rope".

Anyone can pray the rosary. Not just Catholics. It's a universal prayer dwelling on the life of Jesus.

Our Easter Rite Catholics implore the Jesus prayer. "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner." They repeat this with their breathing. {inhale]"Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God," {exhale} "have mercy on me, a sinner." I do this every day for a bit. It's very peaceful. I try to remember to do this when I approach the altar for the Eucharist every Sunday and Friday.

Thank you for taking the time to do this. Have to admit almost sprayed some coffee on my keyboard this morning with "to resort to this sophomoric claims that I would expect from a small town Baptist preacher that doesn't know any better". Exactly right and so true.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

It is not my place to make a determination of what is in a person's heart when they are praying. That is for God, and God alone.

However, as I have said before, if I see someone break out a rosary and start to pray, "Idol Worshipper" is not the first, or even 10th, thought that comes to mind.

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
Matthew 7:1
If by saying "Do not judge" Jesus meant for us not to never discern wrong beliefs and practices in others, then that would defeat the whole purpose of evangelizing, which Jesus charges his followers.

You are not to determine someone's heart when they pray, sure....but what if they're praying not to God, but to someone else? Can you not discern the idolatry in that?

When a Catholic prays the rosary, they are praying to Mary, not God. For every one praise of God in the rosary, there are TEN praises to Mary. Even the beads they use have pagan roots. They are used to keep track of the number of prayer repetitions. Jesus himself told us to not use vain repetitions when we pray, as the pagans do (Matthew 6:7). They are directly disobeying Jesus. They are also calling Mary "our life" and "our hope", and refer to her as "holy queen". There is a "Queen of Heaven" in the bible, and it's a pagan goddess. If someone does these things, how can their "heart" be anything else but idolatrous? If it's not at least your tenth thought, then there is truly something wrong with your discernment, if you are a believer.

There is so much about praying the rosary that is at the very least unscriptural, if not outright pagan idolatry. You aren't "judging" them by discerning this. If you are a believer in Jesus, then you should tell these people the truth, not out of "judgement" but to warn them.
Matthew 7 is a warning against hypocrisy and not an injunction against judgement per se. Too many miss this point - "For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you". You should take that to heart.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

John Calvin had extensive knowledge of Church history. In his work A Treastise on Relics, he argued that prayers to the saints, prayers for the dead, the veneration of relics, the lighting of candles (in homage to the saints), and the veneration of icons are all rooted in Roman paganism. He writes:
Quote:

Hero-worship is innate to human nature, and it is founded on some of our noblest feelings, gratitude, love, and admiration, but which, like all other feelings, when uncontrolled by principle and reason, may easily degenerate into the wildest exaggerations, and lead to most dangerous consequences. It was by such an exaggeration of these noble feelings that [Roman] Paganism filled the Olympus with gods and demigods, elevating to this rank men who have often deserved the gratitude of their fellow-creatures, by some signal services rendered to the community, or their admiration, by having performed some deeds which required a more than usual degree of mental and physical powers.

The same cause obtained for the Christian martyrs the gratitude and admiration of their fellow-Christians, and finally converted them into a kind of demigods. This was more particularly the case when the church began to be corrupted by her compromise with Paganism [during the fourth and fifth-centuries], which having been baptized without being converted, rapidly introduced into the Christian church, not only many of its rites and ceremonies, but even its polytheism, with this difference, that the divinities of Greece and Rome were replaced by Christian saints, many of whom received the offices of their Pagan predecessors.

The church in the beginning tolerated these abuses, as a temporary evil, but was afterwards unable to remove them; and they became so strong, particularly during the prevailing ignorance of the middle ages, that the church ended up legalizing, through her decrees, that at which she did nothing but wink at first........

......Thus St. Anthony of Padua restores, like Mercury, stolen property; St. Hubert, like Diana, is the patron of sportsmen; St. Cosmas, like Esculapius, that of physicians, etc. In fact, almost every profession and trade, as well as every place, have their especial patron saint, who, like the tutelary divinity of the Pagans, receives particular hours from his or her protgs.

Jean Calvin wasn't above advocating burning at the stake as punishment for perceived heresies, btw. So why quote from Calvin - Sola Scriptura and all that?
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:



We know based on the revelation of God through Jesus. Because by faith we accept the testimony of the historical resurrection of Jesus given to us by Jesus' apostles, whose testimony is reliably preserved in the New Testament. And because Jesus was resurrected, he was from God, and therefore his word has the authority of God. And Jesus himself gave the stamp of authority to the Old Testament ("every jot and tittle") and to the word from his apostles (John 14:26).

What is the basis for your faith tradition's teaching that the Bible is the inspired word of God? Is it on the same revelation of God through the historical life, death, and resurrection of Jesus? If so, that's our shared starting point. And sola scriptura is the logical outflow from that starting point, as explained above.
"We know based on the revelation of God through Jesus. Because by faith we accept the testimony of the historical resurrection of Jesus given to us by Jesus' apostles..."

Here's the heart of your fallacy right here; if we "knew" then it wouldn't be faith, it would be knowledge. We believe, accept, give intellectual assent to propositional truth, but ultimately we cannot know this side of the grave. I have faith and hope, but no objective proof.
Don't get so hung up on semantics. You can "know" things by faith. Faith is "the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1)

You make a living here with semantics. Ironic. You can believe things by faith and hope for them by faith, but you cannot know.
If all you have to harp on was my choice of the word "know", it would seem to indicate the solidity of my argument.
From St Paul's letter to the Corinthians (you know, Sola Scriptura, and all that): For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

That you choose to argue over believing/thinking over actually knowing tells us all we need to "know" about the solidity of your argument.
It was Sam Lowry who said he "knew" why Scripture was the word of God, and asked how I "know" it is. So I answered in like manner.

That would mean your criticism applies mostly to him, since he started the discussion in that way. So therefore you are really questioning the solidity of his argument. And since you are defending his position, that would also put you yourself under the same criticism.

How's that for turning your own pedantry against you?
You haven't turned anything. All you've managed is to demonstrate the Chief of Pedantics position on this thread is fully owned by you.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

You are asking me to judge someone based on their personal prayers to God. I WILL NOT insert my thoughts, beliefs and especially judgement on someone else's personal prayers to God without the knowledge of what is in their heart mind and soul.

My final post on this topic.
But they're NOT praying to God. That's the whole topic!!
The "whole topic" is that requesting intercession is not the same as praying to God.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
Would you say she is being worshiped by Catholics?
I say what I said before. Depends on what is in the individual's heart.
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?" (Jeremiah 17:9).

There are many who will convince themselves they are not worshiping Mary in their heart, but they really are. Could someone ever not be worshiping Mary in their heart, yet bow to her statue, pray to her for intercession, sing hymns to her, celebrate festivals for her, have pictures and statues of her all over their house, or fervently rush to any area where an apparition of her was reported? Or believe she was sinless, was bodily assumed to heaven, and should be prayed to for intercession, which sounds like someone from the bible we all know? Or believe Pope Pius IX when he wrote:

"For God has committed to Mary the treasury of all good things, in order that everyone may know that THROUGH HER are obtained every hope, every grace, and ALL SALVATION. For this is his will, that we obtain everything through Mary." (Pius IX, Ubi Primum, 1849)

By our actions, our heart is revealed.
Your actions here reveal plenty about your heart.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Which books of the OT did Jesus quote from or allude to that were removed by Christians?
First Catholics are Christians. We're the original franchise since 33 AD.

To answer your question: None of them.

The New Testament never quotes from Judges, Ruth, Ezra, Ester, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Lamentations, Obadiah, Johan, or Zaphaniah. Should we remove these?
No, the first Christians were not Catholics. There were no popes, bishops, priests, nuns, etc. and as it's been repeatedly shown over and over in this thread, neither Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians believed in or practiced praying to Mary or to saints.

I am not saying to remove OT books that weren't quoted in the NT. I'm asking you to expound on your comment - "Jesus and the apostles quoted from the Septuagint, which contains all 46 books of the OT, but Protestants removed 7 of them. Yet, they claim to be able to interpret scripture with the Holy Spirit." If Jesus or the apostles quoted from a book in the OT that was removed by Protestants, then you'd have an argument. But if you can't name one of those books, then you don't.

Of course there were bishops and priests. You've "shown" exactly nothing re Jesus, his apostles, nor the first Christians concerning their beliefs or practices concerning Mary or the saints. You have inferred from silence, just as the early Church inferred from tradition and reason.
But you are making the positive assertion that prayer to Mary and the saints was taught, believed, and practiced by Jesus, his apostles, or the first Christians. The onus of showing something is on you, and you failed, even on the grounds of tradition and reason.

Believing positively on something based on the silence of Jesus is a foolish and dangerous way to think. It's what people do to corrupt the faith. And I've shown you more than enough biblical principles as well as common sense reason as to why the practice is wrong, so it isn't an argument from silence, really.
Another lie from you? Show me where I claimed Jesus or his apostles taught or practiced the veneration of Mary or the saints. It is clear that early Christians did. That they are not early enough for you is your problem. I failed nothing. You are just invincibly ignorant.

While it may be true believing something based on silence may sometimes be dangerous, it may also not be dangerous. The thing is not dispositive in and of itself. You haven't shown anything other than insistence that your own understanding trumps that of the majority of all Christians ever. Satan approved hubris is your fruit.
If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
Still waiting for you to show where I claimed Jesus or his apostles taught or practiced the veneration of Mary or the saints, btw.
So if you know they didn't, why are you doing it?
Caught in your lie and can't get out, can you? Too funny, spin meister.
curtpenn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

If it was believed and practiced by an "early" group of Christians, but it was NOT taught, believed, or practiced by Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians, then it does not have authority. Remember that heresies like gnosticism were abound that predated the practice of praying to Mary, and those heresies were shunned for the reason that it did not trace back to Jesus, the apostles, and the first Christians. So why should the practice of praying to Mary be any different?
To piggyback on curtpenn, Irenaeus of Lyons wrote a five book set called Against Heresies between 174 and 189 AD that refuted ALL the heresies that occurred during that time.

He never once address veneration or intercession.
I am not sure why you guys keep looking at outside texts to determine if something is heretical. All that is needed is scripture, not mortal man's opinion.

And in that regard, Busty is right - there is no scriptural support for veneration or intercession. None.

Unfortunately, I think that is what we will continue going back to. We will point to scripture, and you will point to scripture's silence or the writings of third parties. The difference between us all comes down to what we find authoritative. I think your position invites a very slippery slope, but I doubt anyone will be changing their minds on this point. Too much indoctrination.
It is possible to change. I was raised Southern Baptist, baptized at 7 and had perfect Sunday School attendance for 10 straight years. Very active for decades and spent a couple of summers in my Baylor days as an Interim Music & Youth Director. Met my wife of 41 years at Prestonwood (pre mega church days). Wasn't really looking for a change, but grew tired of the Paige Patterson wing of the SBC. Tired enough to leave FBC, Dallas for Park Cities Baptist. Saw what happened to wonderful Godly men such as Russel Dilday as well as the changes made at Baylor re board selection in order to avoid the threat of the Fundamentalists (talk about unintended consequences...). Just happened to enroll our children in St John's Episcopal School, Dallas, when I was in my 30s because we couldn't tolerate DISD schools in our neighborhood. One thing led to another and we were confirmed in the Episcopal Church when I was 42. Still there after 26 years even though I despise the direction of the national church and am aware of many heresies. Heresy aside, I fully believe the properly understood orthodox Trinitarian teachings of the Anglican way to be a true via media between Protestant and Catholic and in fulfillment of Jesus' prayers for unity. And we have better music.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
I would say Mary is worthy of honor. There are many Bible quotes saying that humans are worthy of honor. I think it's a safe assumption that Jesus honored Mary the same way any good Jewish son would honor his mother. You could say Jesus' miracle of turning water to wine was at her request.

Worthy of worship is a different matter.
Agree with you here. Didn't mean to suggest otherwise.

And the passage of her encouraging him to turn the water to wine is one of my favorites, and one I find most humorous in all of scripture. I love how she simply tells him, "they have no more wine," the implication being she knows (and has seen, privately) that he can do something about it. He knows exactly what she wants him to do, saying, "Woman, what would you have me do? My hour has not yet come." And despite his reluctance, she doesn't even respond to him, simply saying to the servants, "Do whatever he tells you," knowing that he is going to do what she wants. It's a hilarious interaction between a mother and son. Many of us can relate to the mother-son dynamic.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90sBear said:

It is not my place to make a determination of what is in a person's heart when they are praying. That is for God, and God alone.

However, as I have said before, if I see someone break out a rosary and start to pray, "Idol Worshipper" is not the first, or even 10th, thought that comes to mind.

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
Matthew 7:1
Idol worshipper? Probably not. In error? Absolutely.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

Mothra said:

Coke Bear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Those who divide the honor, glory, and praise that is due Jesus and give it to someone else, and those who promote it, they are the one dividing themselves from the body. Satan smiles at that.
This statement does not make logical sense. We give glory and honor to God and the Holy Spirit. This is dividing between two other persons.

Jesus doesn't get jealous or upset when we love His mother. It makes Him happy.

Problem is, God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit have something in common with one another that make them worthy of glory and honor.

Mary on the other hand...
Ave Maria

Hail Mary, full of grace,
the Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou amongst women,
and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary, Mother of God,
pray for us sinners,
now and at the hour of our death. Amen

The Magnificat (Book of Common Prayer, Rite 1)

MY soul doth magnify the Lord, * and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
For he hath regarded * the lowliness of his handmaiden.
For behold, from henceforth * all generations shall call me blessed.
For he that is mighty hath magnified me; * and holy is his Name.
And his mercy is on them that fear him * throughout all generations.
He hath showed strength with his arm; * he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.
He hath put down the mighty from their seat, * and hath exalted the humble and meek.
He hath filled the hungry with good things; * and the rich he hath sent empty away.
He remembering his mercy hath holpen his servant Israel; * as he promised to our forefathers, Abraham and his seed, for ever.

Luke 1:46-55 KJV

And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: For, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; And holy is his name. And his mercy is on them that fear him From generation to generation. He hath shewed strength with his arm; He hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from their seats, And exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things; And the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath holpen his servant Israel, In remembrance of his mercy; As he spake to our fathers, To Abraham, and to his seed for ever.

For the Sola Sciptura or more Protestant among us, what do you make of "from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed"? What in the Ave is blasphemous or heretical?


To answer your question, I make of it exactly what is says. Mary has been blessed, and it's ok to acknowledge that in our discussions. But praying to her or worshipping her? There is no scriptural support for that.

Interestingly, this kind of prayer did not come about until the 1000's, about a millennium after Christ's death. It was not something the early church practiced.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

90sBear said:

You are asking me to judge someone based on their personal prayers to God. I WILL NOT insert my thoughts, beliefs and especially judgement on someone else's personal prayers to God without the knowledge of what is in their heart mind and soul.

My final post on this topic.
But they're NOT praying to God. That's the whole topic!!
The "whole topic" is that requesting intercession is not the same as praying to God.
Eh, I think that's a bit of a distinction without a difference. They ARE praying for intercession to a human being, assuming that human has the capacity to hear their prayers, and then intercede on their behalf, which as pointed out above, has no scriptural support.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.