[
Trump also killed federal affirmative action.
Christopher Caldwell says this is way bigger than people may think. Excerpt:
Quote:
Trump's decision to repeal it is the most significant policy change of this centurymore significant than the Affordable Care Act of 2010 or anything done about Covid. How can people be talking about anything else? Yet major news outlets treat Trump's bold move as a detail of personnel management: "Distress and Fury as Trump Upends Federal Jobs," headlined The New York Times.
Somewhere along the line, the Trump administration came to understand in a sophisticated way how the enforcement of civil rights actually works. Not many Americans doand it's worth reviewing.
It really is worth reading Caldwell's analysis. Conclusion:
Quote:
It was possible to believe at the time of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that a good-faith moral commitment would suffice to remedy the devilish racial antagonism that had beset the country since its founding. That that wouldn't work became obvious very quickly. Barely a year later, at the start of the summer of 1965, President Johnson argued before a Howard University graduating class that it's not fair to make a runner "who, for years, has been hobbled by chains" compete with others.
It sounded generous. But it was dark. Three months later, Johnson would issue Executive Order 11246, realizing that it was possible to remedy a racist system only by favoring the victim race, in doses of remedial racism, or what the British-apparently a more straightforward people than we are-call "reverse racism."
This was a course that the public could not tolerate and neither government nor business could avow. A climate of dishonesty was the result. Affirmative action was a big factor- perhaps the biggest- in convincing about half of Americans never to trust anything any person of authority said.
Ten presidents managed to insulate affirmative action from public accountability. Then it became obvious to the public that changing anything would require dismantling everything.
Trump is doing it. God bless him, he's doing it. No more of these squish Republicans saying they're against what the left-liberal state is doing, but barely lifting a finger to stop it, because they were afraid of being called racist. The Big Orange Honey Badger don't care. And lo, the people like it!
In the past couple of days, I've heard from
military friends telling me that DEI in the armed forces is a lot worse than most people think. No doubt this is because the media think it's a great thing, and never report on its down sides.
Madeleine Rowley in The Free Press has a stunning report on what DEI has done to the armed forces. She starts with the testimony of a retired Air Force Brigadier General, Christopher Walker, who says he was roped into DEI programs because it was assumed that being black, he supported them. He didn't. But he took notes on what he likens to "Soviet indoctrination." In the story, he chooses to be referred to as "Mookie," his pilot call sign:
Quote:
In 2022, Mookie recalls attending a training course at Georgetown University for Air Force generals and senior officers called "Managing for Inclusion." The professor, he said, informed the group that white people were oppressors and black and Hispanic people were the oppressed, so they couldn't be racist. The professor also taught the class how to ask someone for their pronouns at the beginning of a conversation.
"The whole thing was old-fashioned propaganda," Mookie said. "But there were generals, including Lt. General Mary O'Brien [now retired] and Lt. General Leah Lauderback, and higher-ranked people within this course who were going along with it, clapping like trained seals."
With the arrival of Donald Trump as president and Pete Hegseth as the new secretary of defense, the days of asking soldiers for their preferred pronouns appear to be over. Immediately after taking office, Trump signed an executive order putting an end to all DEI programs in the federal government. On Monday evening, he announced that he would issue another series of executive orders that would include the elimination of critical race theory and "transgender ideology" from the military.
I urge you strongly to read the whole thing, to take in some of the concrete examples of what DEI did to the military, an organization whose purpose is to fight and win wars, and which depends on unit cohesion to do so. One of a number of examples:
Quote:
In 2022, General C.Q. Brown, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs who was then chief of staff of the Air Force, co-authored a memo that set "aspirational" race and gender quotas for Air Force officer applicants: He sought an Air Force that was 36 percent female, 67.5 percent white, 13 percent black, and 10 percent Asian. A subsequent lawsuit filed by the Center to Advance Security in America uncovered slides showing that the Air Force planned to achieve these quotas in part by making changes to its qualifying test to achieve the "desired end-state" of increasing the number of Hispanics in the Air Force. One would be hard-pressed to think of anything more corrosive to an organization that views itself as merit-based.
It's gone now, at least on paper. Now the Trump Administration has to dismantle and destroy the entire infrastructure. God help them. This is a Herculean task. Pete Hegseth isn't my ideal Defense Secretary, but it is likely the case that it takes an outsider like him to have the gumption to implement these radical reforms. A more conventional establishment figure would probably behave like most pre-Trump Republicans: as a figure of the controlled opposition, more concerned with what the media and Respectable People think than doing the hard but necessary things.] -Rod Dreher