Racist Biden Admin is Building the Border Wall

3,852 Views | 44 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by JXL
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Surely, the MSM and Biden's colleagues won't stand for this. I mean, we've been told for years that walls can't (and shouldn't) keep out brown people...

https://apnews.com/article/border-wall-biden-immigration-texas-rio-grande-147d7ab497e6991e9ea929242f21ceb2

Biden administration waives 26 federal laws to allow border wall construction in South Texas

McALLEN, Texas (AP) The Biden administration announced it waived 26 federal laws in South Texas to allow border wall construction on Wednesday, marking the administration's first use of a sweeping executive power employed often during the Trump presidency.

The Department of Homeland Security posted the announcement on the U.S. Federal Registry with few details outlining the construction in Starr County, Texas, which is part of a busy Border Patrol sector seeing "high illegal entry." According to government data, about 245,000 illegal entries have been recorded so far this fiscal year in the Rio Grande Valley Sector which contains 21 counties.

"There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States in the project areas," Alejandro Mayorkas, the DHS secretary, stated in the notice.

The Clean Air Act, Safe Drinking Water Act and Endangered Species Act were some of the federal laws waived by DHS to make way for construction that will use funds from a congressional appropriation in 2019 for border wall construction. The waivers avoid time-consuming reviews and lawsuits challenging violation of environmental laws.

Starr County's hilly ranchlands, sitting between Zapata and McAllen, Texas, is home to about 65,000 residents sparsely populating about 1,200 square miles (3,108 square kilometers) that form part of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge.

Although no maps were provided in the announcement, CBP announced the project in June and began gathering public comments in August when it shared a map of the additional construction that can add up to 20 miles (32 kilometers) to the existing border barrier system in the area. Starr County Judge Eloy Vera said it will start south of the Falcon Dam and go past Salineño, Texas.

"The other concern that we have is that area is highly erosive. There's a lot of arroyos," Eloy Vera, the county judge said, pointing out the creeks cutting through the ranchland and leading into the river.

Concern is shared with environmental advocates who say structures will run through public lands, habitats of endangered plants and species like the Ocelot, a spotted wild cat.

"A plan to build a wall through will bulldoze an impermeable barrier straight through the heart of that habitat. It will stop wildlife migrations dead in their tracks. It will destroy a huge amount of wildlife refuge land. And it's a horrific step backwards for the borderlands," Laiken Jordahl, a southwest conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Wednesday afternoon.

During the Trump administration, about 450 miles (724 kilometers) of barriers were built along the southwest border between 2017 and January 2021. Texas Governor Greg Abbott renewed those efforts after the Biden administration halted them at the start of his presidency.

The DHS decision on Wednesday contrasts the Biden administration's posturing when a proclamation to end the construction on Jan. 20, 2021, stated, "building a massive wall that spans the entire southern border is not a serious policy solution."

In a statement Wednesday, CBP said the project is consistent with that 2021 proclamation. "Congress appropriated fiscal year 2019 funds for the construction of border barrier in the Rio Grande Valley, and DHS is required to use those funds for their appropriated purpose," the statement said. "CBP remains committed to protecting the nation's cultural and natural resources and will implement sound environmental practices as part of the project covered by this waiver."

The announcement prompted political debate by the Democratic administration facing an increase of migrants entering through the southern border in recent months, including thousands who entered the U.S. through Eagle Pass at the end of September.

"A border wall is a 14th century solution to a 21st century problem. It will not bolster border security in Starr County," U.S. Representative Henry Cuellar said in a statement. "I continue to stand against the wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars on an ineffective border wall."

Political proponents of the border wall said the waivers should be used as a launching pad for a shift in policy.
"After years of denying that a border wall and other physical barriers are effective, the DHS announcement represents a sea change in the administration's thinking: A secure wall is an effective tool for maintaining control of our borders," Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said in a statement. "Having made that concession, the administration needs to immediately begin construction of wall across the border to prevent the illegal traffic from simply moving to other areas of the border."




KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Walls don't work if you invite illegals through the front door with promises of free food, lodging, and medical care.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Won't hear a word from all the "walls don't work!" folks that were so vociferous during Trump's term in office.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The goal must be to make sure MS-13 cannot leave now that they are here.

Are feds still cutting our razor wire and demanding we remove the floating barrier?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
According to Chris Christie, Mexico would have gladly paid for the amount of Wall Trump put up.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
Not directly, but eventually through reduced remittances from people who would have but did not make it over because of the wall, yes.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?


So if Mexico doesn't pay for additional sections of the border wall they shouldn't be constructed ?
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?


So if Mexico doesn't pay for additional sections of the border wall they shouldn't be constructed ?
I think he is being sarcastic. Boog is right of center.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
"When you hear these lunatics back there," he said, pointing at the news media, "say, 'Trump didn't get anything from Mexico,' well, you know, there was no legal mechanism. I said they're going to help fund this wall, but there was no legal mechanism. How do you go to a country, you say, 'By the way I'm building a wall, hand us a lot of money.'"
geewago
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not opposed to building a wall but I feel it's a waste of money just like almost everything else the government does. How many times have tunnels been discovered that had been used for years ? Unless the wall is 50' deep and a 100 feet high I doubt it stops very many. Just dig a tunnel, buy a ladder, cut a hole in it, or fly over.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poland shoots attempted entrants with water cannons and it seems pretty effective.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
geewago said:

I'm not opposed to building a wall but I feel it's a waste of money just like almost everything else the government does. How many times have tunnels been discovered that had been used for years ? Unless the wall is 50' deep and a 100 feet high I doubt it stops very many. Just dig a tunnel, buy a ladder, cut a hole in it, or fly over.


The 8,000,000 obiden has brought in so far would have all snuck in thei tunnels?

He's imported an entire NYC because they say the Mexicans here won't do the work the New Mexicans are willing to do (while not mentioning almost none of the people coming in are Mexican but we do know most none are black as that voting block gets smaller every day….sad)
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We should never have paused the building of a wall on the border.

In Reversal, Biden Administration Waives Regulations to Expand Border Wall
The government cited the high numbers of migrants in the Rio Grande Valley in justifying the decision to build barriers along the Southern border.

Confronted with a surge of migrants, the Biden administration has decided to waive more than 20 federal laws and regulations, including environmental ones, to erect barriers along the Southern border.

President Biden had campaigned vociferously against a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, which his predecessor had championed as a key deterrent to unlawful crossings.

Alejandro Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, said that easing the laws was necessary to expedite construction of sections of a border wall in South Texas, where thousands of migrants have been crossing the Rio Grande daily to reach U.S. soil.

A notice published in the Federal Register on Thursday said that the secretary "has determined, pursuant to law, that it is necessary to waive certain laws, regulations, and other legal requirements in order to ensure the expeditious construction of barriers and roads in the vicinity of the international land border in Starr County, Texas."

The U.S. Border Patrol in the Rio Grande Valley had encountered more than 245,000 migrants who had entered the country between ports of entry, or unlawfully, in the 2023 fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the notice said.

"There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States," said Mr. Mayorkas in the notice.

It added that construction would be built with funds appropriated by Congress in 2019 for wall construction in the Rio Grande Valley. That appropriation followed a disaster declaration by the Trump administration amid soaring numbers of border crossers.

Mr. Biden said on Thursday that he had no choice but to use the money for the wall.

"The money was appropriated for the border wall. I tried to get them to reappropriate, to redirect that money. They didn't. They wouldn't," he told reporters, apparently referring to Congress.

Asked whether he thought the border wall was effective, he replied, "no."

In January 2021, on Mr. Biden's first day in office, the administration revoked the disaster declaration and halted construction. In a proclamation, he said that, "Building a massive wall that spans the entire southern border is not a serious policy solution."

Mr. Trump erected some 550 miles of the hulking, rust-colored bollard fence along the border, much of it to replace shorter, older barriers. Still, smugglers have successfully loosened beams to dig holes, or have flung rope-ladders over the structure, that have enabled many migrants to breach the border.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/05/us/biden-border-wall-waiver.html



Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, is Biden's wall meant to keep illegals out or meant to keep Americans in?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
Not directly, but eventually through reduced remittances from people who would have but did not make it over because of the wall, yes.


They'd be happy if we reduced gun traffic from the US I to Mexico.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
Not directly, but eventually through reduced remittances from people who would have but did not make it over because of the wall, yes.


They'd be happy if we reduced gun traffic from the US I to Mexico.
Whatever it takes.
midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing like fixing that barn door once all the horses have left.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midgett said:

Nothing like fixing that barn door once all the horses have left.
Just keep watching.

This administration has no intention of resuming any substantial additions to the Border Wall.

Would only make Trump look like he was right all along while pissing off the woke crowd.



whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the words below were apparently taken out of context

Quote:

There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States

Statement from Secretary Mayorkas

"I want to address today's reporting relating to a border wall and be absolutely clear. There is no new Administration policy with respect to border walls. From day one, this Administration has made clear that a border wall is not the answer. That remains our position and our position has never wavered. The language in the Federal Register notice is being taken out of context and it does not signify any change in policy whatsoever.

"The construction project reported today was appropriated during the prior administration in 2019 and the law requires the government to use these funds for this purpose, which we announced earlier this year. We have repeatedly asked Congress to rescind this money but it has not done so and we are compelled to follow the law.

"This Administration believes that effective border security requires a smarter and more comprehensive approach, including state-of the-art border surveillance technology and modernized ports of entry. We need Congress to give us the funds to implement these proven tools."



Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently it's budgetary law.
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Apparently it's budgetary law.


If it was "budgetary law" from the Trump Administration, why has construction been stopped for three years? Have they been violating the law all that time?
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Were they following "budgetary law" when they sold off (for pennies on the dollar) the stockpiled construction supplies and materials? And where did those pennies go?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JXL said:

Waco1947 said:

Apparently it's budgetary law.


If it was "budgetary law" from the Trump Administration, why has construction been stopped for three years? Have they been violating the law all that time?
Bc Democrats don't believe walls work.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

boognish_bear said:

Is Mexico still gonna pay for it?
Not directly, but eventually through reduced remittances from people who would have but did not make it over because of the wall, yes.


They'd be happy if we reduced gun traffic from the US I to Mexico.
You're a racist. That's the only reason you would bring up something negative about Obama and his Fast and Furious debacle.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.