GOP response to SOTU

5,935 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by FLBear5630
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?
IDK if its Haley i would be very disappointed and pretty much disgusted.
mcleod66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
His pick of a DeSantis or Tim Scott over an obscure unknown or Yes Man (Or Yes Woman) could mean the difference between winning and losing.


Doesn't matter. he's not going to win and Repubs should be ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate.
Are you serious? How bout dems being ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate? You've really got to be kidding with that statement.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


Exactly


As anyone with half a brain and a serious political future isn't going to ruin his career playing a yes man for Donald Trump.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


Exactly


As anyone with half a brain and a serious political future isn't going to ruin his career playing a yes man for Donald Trump.
Gonna take a strong personality to be Trump's VP. Ron DeSantis seems to me the only man up to the task. I love Tim Scott, but not sure he has the cajones and temperament to challenge Trump when he is wrong.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mcleod66 said:

trey3216 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
His pick of a DeSantis or Tim Scott over an obscure unknown or Yes Man (Or Yes Woman) could mean the difference between winning and losing.


Doesn't matter. he's not going to win and Repubs should be ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate.
Are you serious? How bout dems being ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate? You've really got to be kidding with that statement.

Why can't both parties be embarrassed? Oh I forgot, the fact that each wants to win at the expense of America. No room to be embarrassed when you want to end the nation.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

'The border crisis. We're all gonna die. Our streets are unsafe we're all gonna die. Food prices are too high. We're all gonna die."
And NOT one policy idea.
And PS we are all gonna die


That is because it is too late for policy responses to change our fate.

That was terrible. I don't know who was responsible for selecting her for the GOP response, but the thinking was probably something like let's put someone out there that suburban women can identify with? A trial balloon for leadership?

It is obvious why her husband married her, but how in the world did she even get to the place where she could be elected to the senate?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


When both major parties have nominated guys that will be 82 and 85 at the end of their term (if they live that long) the VP choice for the ticket is really important.

RFK 2024.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


Exactly


As anyone with half a brain and a serious political future isn't going to ruin his career playing a yes man for Donald Trump.
Gonna take a strong personality to be Trump's VP. Ron DeSantis seems to me the only man up to the task. I love Tim Scott, but not sure he has the cajones and temperament to challenge Trump when he is wrong.
Not sure what world you live in, but in the real one people who challenge Trump get fired.

Since Trump can't fire an elected VP -- I wonder if he even knows that -- it could get interesting. SEAL Team 6 may get involved.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

fubar said:

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


When both major parties have nominated guys that will be 82 and 85 at the end of their term (if they live that long) the VP choice for the ticket is really important.

RFK 2024.

RFK? Eff that. Willie Nelson 2024, that f*cker just won't die. Don't need to worry about Willie's VP pick.

All kidding aside, RFK Jr. isn't a bad choice. Don't agree with him on somethings, but if I could vote for him. Especially if the GOP can prevent Trump from being the nominee and they slide in Nikki Haley.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


Exactly


As anyone with half a brain and a serious political future isn't going to ruin his career playing a yes man for Donald Trump.
Gonna take a strong personality to be Trump's VP. Ron DeSantis seems to me the only man up to the task. I love Tim Scott, but not sure he has the cajones and temperament to challenge Trump when he is wrong.
Not sure what world you live in, but in the real one people who challenge Trump get fired.

Since Trump can't fire an elected VP -- I wonder if he even knows that -- it could get interesting. SEAL Team 6 may get involved.
President could could make the VP's work like a living hell until they resign. Force them to watch old Joe Biden speeches over and over and over and over and over
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash said:

Waco1947 said:

Her response was weird and sexist. "Kitchen table"?
Her speech went like this: 'The border crisis. We're all gonna die. Our streets are unsafe we're all gonna die. Food prices are too high. We're all gonna die."
And NOT one policy idea.
And PS we are all gonna die
And she still did better than the amphetamine-laced angry corpse.
How sweet!
Waco1947 ,la
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

mcleod66 said:

trey3216 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
His pick of a DeSantis or Tim Scott over an obscure unknown or Yes Man (Or Yes Woman) could mean the difference between winning and losing.


Doesn't matter. he's not going to win and Repubs should be ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate.
Are you serious? How bout dems being ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate? You've really got to be kidding with that statement.

Why can't both parties be embarrassed? Oh I forgot, the fact that each wants to win at the expense of America. No room to be embarrassed when you want to end the nation.
Aside from the fact that only a fool would think there is anything close to an equivalence between republicans and democrats and the danger they present to this country...

...it's really strange how you're able to blame both parties for their roles in hurting America - but when it comes to drag queen shows for children you're completely unable to blame both parents and drag queens for their roles in hurting children. There's more consistency in Biden's bowel movements than in your moral standards.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?


Exactly


As anyone with half a brain and a serious political future isn't going to ruin his career playing a yes man for Donald Trump.
Gonna take a strong personality to be Trump's VP. Ron DeSantis seems to me the only man up to the task. I love Tim Scott, but not sure he has the cajones and temperament to challenge Trump when he is wrong.
Not sure what world you live in, but in the real one people who challenge Trump get fired.

Since Trump can't fire an elected VP -- I wonder if he even knows that -- it could get interesting. SEAL Team 6 may get involved.


For sure

Maybe use Seal 6 to raid an ex president's house, arrest old grandmothers for praying silently on a public street, 'suicide' prisoners in federal lookup before embarrassing details can be revealed , attempt to take political opponents off the ballot


Yes sir we should all be so grateful for Dems protecting our democracy……

From the people.


After all, what do they know ?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Jack Bauer said:

She gave SNL an easy skit this week...
The Trump era has been an easy skit for SNL every week.
oh, and the guy who does Trump on SNL is just perfect!
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

mcleod66 said:

trey3216 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
His pick of a DeSantis or Tim Scott over an obscure unknown or Yes Man (Or Yes Woman) could mean the difference between winning and losing.


Doesn't matter. he's not going to win and Repubs should be ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate.
Are you serious? How bout dems being ashamed with the inability to trot out a better platform/candidate? You've really got to be kidding with that statement.

Why can't both parties be embarrassed? Oh I forgot, the fact that each wants to win at the expense of America. No room to be embarrassed when you want to end the nation.
Aside from the fact that only a fool would think there is anything close to an equivalence between republicans and democrats and the danger they present to this country...

...it's really strange how you're able to blame both parties for their roles in hurting America - but when it comes to drag queen shows for children you're completely unable to blame both parents and drag queens for their roles in hurting children. There's more consistency in Biden's bowel movements than in your moral standards.
generally, the Republican response to anything to go to the nation is Biden is responsible and we're all going to die. That response is certainly true you're on this board.
Waco1947 ,la
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Jack Bauer said:

It should have been Vivek

Yep. I voted for him. Most eloquent voice on our side since Reagan. And maybe even better


No way Trump picks him. I think he picks Lake. Same qualifications as Vivek. Better central casting.




ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:





Apparently Doyle doesn't realize a person must be at least 30 to be a Senator.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Mothra said:

ATL Bear said:

Mothra said:

Meh. Let's hope not.

That was not a good speech, or approach. She's sounded like she was whispering to the kids in her kitchen. WTH?

The GOP too often shoots itself in the foot. This was yet another example.
It was not good at all. I kept waiting for the line, "and for just $1 a day you can save a child..."
At one point, I expected her to get up and take some cookies out of the oven.
before or after the dishes were dried?


After
https://www.drnancyoreilly.com/how-to-be-a-good-wife-1950s-style/


Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABC BEAR said:

Redbrickbear said:





Apparently Doyle doesn't realize a person must be at least 30 to be a Senator.

This is the same hysterical overdramatic acting that Michelle Obama does but she's a pro at it.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GOP man….


Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

ABC BEAR said:

Redbrickbear said:





Apparently Doyle doesn't realize a person must be at least 30 to be a Senator.

This is the same hysterical overdramatic acting that Michelle Obama does but she's a pro at it.


And the MSM approves of her overacting because in their mind she is facing off against the mortal enemy of "freedom".
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

KaiBear said:

Since Trump is very unlikely to win the general election; what difference does it make who he picks for his VP or anything else ?
Trump's VP pick is probably the least consequential ... ever.

Who in the world will vote for/against Trump based om his potential VP?
the ones who believe he wont be there very long if he gets in
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABC BEAR said:

Redbrickbear said:






Well at least she got Scarlett Johanson to mock her..

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Her response was weird and sexist. "Kitchen table"?
Her speech went like this: 'The border crisis. We're all gonna die. Our streets are unsafe we're all gonna die. Food prices are too high. We're all gonna die."
And NOT one policy idea.
And PS we are all gonna die
If you are correct, then that would be a winning message. Sadly, you are not correct and the GOP once again snatched failure from the jaws of success. She is handsome, talented, and as a VP nod could pull a percentage point or two in some key races, but was coached by people who had no business coaching such things.

I think it was fubar who said just above something to the effect that Trump's VP pick this go around matters even less than one normally would (inference that they never do much, which is correct).

I think that's not true at all this cycle. We have a very unusual dynamic this cycle.....two incredibly unpopular nominees of the major parties, with what might end up being 5-6 minor party candidates, at least one of which seems likely to pull in double digits of support, with another one or two picking up whole points of votes. The right VP candidate could be the difference in a swing state or three by firing up a demographic or three for a few extra thousands of votes here & there.

And if Dems do try to replace Biden at convention, there will be some splintering of their coalition. Anything goes at that point.

Very interesting cycle shaping up.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Shes a hot mommy but she's just a first term senator. I dont see how he could pick her but she's way better than Kamala, i guess.


Kinda like when they invented the figment called Obama

Trump Can do better. But we have Biden. What more do we need
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

trey3216 said:

Jack Bauer said:

She gave SNL an easy skit this week...
The Trump era has been an easy skit for SNL every week.
oh, and the guy who does Trump on SNL is just perfect!


SNL is still in? And people
Watch it? Lol. Who knew
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn. Why republicans have all the hot womens?

I went and got my binky and took a nap
After 20 seconds of that before shutting it off.

Still hot
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

J.R. said:

trey3216 said:

Jack Bauer said:

She gave SNL an easy skit this week...
The Trump era has been an easy skit for SNL every week.
oh, and the guy who does Trump on SNL is just perfect!


SNL is still in? And people
Watch it? Lol. Who knew
Dude, really? It is great. Weekend update and the Trump and Biden characters are genius.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

trey3216 said:

Mothra said:

ATL Bear said:

Mothra said:

Meh. Let's hope not.

That was not a good speech, or approach. She's sounded like she was whispering to the kids in her kitchen. WTH?

The GOP too often shoots itself in the foot. This was yet another example.
It was not good at all. I kept waiting for the line, "and for just $1 a day you can save a child..."
At one point, I expected her to get up and take some cookies out of the oven.
before or after the dishes were dried?


After
https://www.drnancyoreilly.com/how-to-be-a-good-wife-1950s-style/



If they want to recast the original Omen movie, she's the perfect governess.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




FWIW, don't forget who gave what was generally regarded as the worst political speech of all time:


Arkansas governor Bill Clinton at the 1988 Democratic convention.
ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

ABC BEAR said:

Redbrickbear said:






Well at least she got Scarlett Johanson to mock her..


It did give her a chance to perform with her clothes on.
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
live in front of 30 million people. I'm sure all the condescending Meryl Streep wannabes would do much better. Mock the delivery, but everything she said was true. Rome is burning, but let's focus on critiquing the messenger.
Media Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

She's apparently on Trump's VP short-list.




PLEASE make that happen. It'd take the cray-cray to yet another level … (and to think she's the better of Bama's senatorial representation).
What is, is.
What was, will be.
What will be WAS, but will be again.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.