Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading misinformation

4,527 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by boognish_bear
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
81 million people! LOL!!!!!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get the dam shot
drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deny election results is anti democracy!!!!

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Undermine the vote of the people....I'm literally shaking!!!!!

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stop feeding the tribal troll.
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damnt TS. You posted an article with links that proved what was saying. This board is always griping about the liberal press, and rightly so
They give a free pass to gateway. Epoch. OAN etc.

People get the news they want

Prepare for namecalling
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will mean something when I see Left Wing disinformation punished. Which we all know will never happen.

Sure the right publishes some very questionable stuff, as does the left.

Until they are punished equally for suspected disinformation I will consider this the continuation of Democrat targeting and lawfare, which may end up actually getting Trump elected.

The obvious unfairness in what is going on tends to piss off the common man, because they know it easily could be them.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

It will mean something when I see Left Wing disinformation punished. Which we all know will never happen.

Sure the right publishes some very questionable stuff, ad does the left.

Until they are punished equally for suspected disinformation I will consider this the continuation of Democrat targeting and lawfare, which may end up actually getting Trump elected.

The obvious unfairness in what is going on tends to piss off the common man, because they know it easily could be them.
As usual........Forest nails it.

+ 1
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

It will mean something when I see Left Wing disinformation punished. Which we all know will never happen.

Sure the right publishes some very questionable stuff, as does the left.

Until they are punished equally for suspected disinformation I will consider this the continuation of Democrat targeting and lawfare, which may end up actually getting Trump elected.

The obvious unfairness in what is going on tends to piss off the common man, because they know it easily could be them.
Ah but it is the common man.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me correct the headline for you:

American Junta Shuts Down Opposition Media Outlets Before Election
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Let me correct the headline for you:

American Junta Shuts Down Opposition Media Outlets Before Election


Exactly

And few Americans even notice.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The gaslighting from the left is astonishing.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.

Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Left wing media reckoning

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People are just tuning into entertainment media like CNN and fox. One day they will rebrand as such and be immune to this type of lawsuit. I used to think it would he a good thing, for them not not pretend to try to report facts, but people just don't care. Being shocked, outraged, dazzled, donating is the cycle people prefe r to facts.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
That's right, and you can take that first step by reviewing the documents produced in Dominion vs. Fox. Admission of disinformation is exposed and displayed in the texts and emails produced.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

People are just tuning into entertainment media like CNN and fox. One day they will rebrand as such and be immune to this type of lawsuit. I used to think it would he a good thing, for them not not pretend to try to report facts, but people just don't care. Being shocked, outraged, dazzled, donating is the cycle people prefe r to facts.

To a certain extent Media has always been entertainment.

The purpose of the first newspapers was of course to make money.

Only as a secondary aspect was "reporting the truth" a concern.

In other countries....like the UK and Japan the link between Media/Newspapers and political parties was more out-front and honest.

[The five leading national daily newspapers in Japan are the Asahi Shimbun, Mainichi Shimbun, the Yomiuri Shimbun, Sankei Shimbun and the Nikkei Shimbun. The first two are considered liberal/left-leaning while the latter three are considered conservative/right-leaning.]
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[url=https://www.politico.com/news/national-security][/url]
Quote:

NATIONAL SECURITY
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son.




More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, pictured here, "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

By NATASHA BERTRAND
10/19/2020 10:30 PM EDT

More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden's son "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

The letter, signed on Monday, centers around a batch of documents released by the New York Post last week that purport to tie the Democratic nominee to his son Hunter's business dealings. Under the banner headline "Biden Secret E-mails," the Post reported it was given a copy of Hunter Biden's laptop hard drive by President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who said he got it from a Mac shop owner in Delaware who also alerted the FBI.
Amazing how everything was "Russian Disinformation" for so long, falsely reported, and nobody has been taken to task for it.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.

He makes money playing a character on radio/tv

Is that evil worse than what Howard Stern and people like him did for decades?

Or what about the doctors making money cut off children sexual organs?

Or the elites in DC who start foreign wars that get hundreds of thousands of people killed?

I am trying to figure out how we classify his mean spirited entertainment shtick as a "special kind of evil"
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.
This is true. He is also an idiot.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.
This is true. He is also an idiot.

Up until he ran afoul of the law on the Sandy Hook thing he had created a "shock jock" style media company that made him worth in excess of $20 million dollars.

He may be detestable but he is certainly not stupid.

He created a character that made him money and all he had to do was act it out for a hour a day on tv/radio.

Beats working for a living I guess
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

It will mean something when I see Left Wing disinformation punished. Which we all know will never happen.

Sure the right publishes some very questionable stuff, as does the left.

Until they are punished equally for suspected disinformation I will consider this the continuation of Democrat targeting and lawfare, which may end up actually getting Trump elected.

The obvious unfairness in what is going on tends to piss off the common man, because they know it easily could be them.
Bingo. That's the irony of the OP. The TDS is so strong with him, he can't see that the left wing media has been doing this for years.

Hello, Russian collusion anyone? Remember that one?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.
This is true. He is also an idiot.

Up until he ran afoul of the law on the Sandy Hook thing he had created a "shock jock" style media company that made him worth in excess of $20 million dollars.

He may be detestable but he is certainly not stupid.

He created a character that made him money and all he had to do was act it out for a hour a day on tv/radio.

Beats working for a living I guess
Well, I would say him putting himself in his current position may be proof otherwise.

Charlatans come in all shapes and sizes. I remember the TV evangelist Robert Tilton, he amassed a small fortune on unwitting rubes willing to pay him money as a result of his direct line to God. Guy eventually had the Feds after him and lost his empire.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Alex Jones is a special kind of Evil.
This is true. He is also an idiot.

Up until he ran afoul of the law on the Sandy Hook thing he had created a "shock jock" style media company that made him worth in excess of $20 million dollars.

He may be detestable but he is certainly not stupid.

He created a character that made him money and all he had to do was act it out for a hour a day on tv/radio.

Beats working for a living I guess
He's not even really detestable and certainly not stupid. The guy has a crazy good memory. He is kind of a caricature of himself and is like a WWF wrestler persona but he is right about 99% of things. They wouldnt be going to so much trouble to shut him up if he was just some Howard Stern or shock jock. He definitely has changed his tune somewhat and would never criticize "the Zionists" like he did way back when in the days of 9/11. He wouldnt be allowed to have credit card processing or a supplement supplier if he did that.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
That's right, and you can take that first step by reviewing the documents produced in Dominion vs. Fox. Admission of disinformation is exposed and displayed in the texts and emails produced.
What do you think about this disinformation:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-when-russian-hackers-targeted-the-u-s-election-infrastructure/

The difference between many on the left and the right is that folks like me are not blind to disinformation coming from fringe sources. What you and other regressive-TDSers are blind to is the disinformation coming from so-called "mainstream," corporate left-wing "news." You still believe the Russia Hoax was real and Hunter's laptop was fake. The butthurt over the 2020 election is an eye-roller when LWNJ were parroting a stolen 2016 election for four years. You're too low-EQ to notice your gaslighting and hypocrisy.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
That's right, and you can take that first step by reviewing the documents produced in Dominion vs. Fox. Admission of disinformation is exposed and displayed in the texts and emails produced.
What do you think about this disinformation:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-when-russian-hackers-targeted-the-u-s-election-infrastructure/

The difference between many on the left and the right is that folks like me are not blind to disinformation coming from fringe sources. What you and other regressive-TDSers are blind to is the disinformation coming from so-called "mainstream," corporate left-wing "news." You still believe the Russia Hoax was real and Hunter's laptop was fake. The butthurt over the 2020 election is an eye-roller when LWNJ were parroting a stolen 2016 election for four years. You're too low-EQ to notice your gaslighting and hypocrisy.
Your mind is so cluttered with disinformation that you can't see straight. Of course there is misinformation on both sides. So far, most mainstream media has tried to maintain some journalistiThere is a steady diet of misinformation from the far right, mixed with some truth, because it sells to their audience (per Fox admissions). It's clear Russia, and other bad actors have attempted to influence our elections, and it's clear Russian hacked the DNC. I've never said Hunter's laptop was fake. I'm "butthurt" over the 2020 election because Rs were too stupid not to get rid of Trump. Anyone else would have beaten Biden, and anyone else would beat him this time.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
That's right, and you can take that first step by reviewing the documents produced in Dominion vs. Fox. Admission of disinformation is exposed and displayed in the texts and emails produced.
What do you think about this disinformation:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-when-russian-hackers-targeted-the-u-s-election-infrastructure/

The difference between many on the left and the right is that folks like me are not blind to disinformation coming from fringe sources. What you and other regressive-TDSers are blind to is the disinformation coming from so-called "mainstream," corporate left-wing "news." You still believe the Russia Hoax was real and Hunter's laptop was fake. The butthurt over the 2020 election is an eye-roller when LWNJ were parroting a stolen 2016 election for four years. You're too low-EQ to notice your gaslighting and hypocrisy.
Your mind is so cluttered with disinformation that you can't see straight. Of course there is misinformation on both sides. So far, most mainstream media has tried to maintain some journalistiThere is a steady diet of misinformation from the far right, mixed with some truth, because it sells to their audience (per Fox admissions). It's clear Russia, and other bad actors have attempted to influence our elections, and it's clear Russian hacked the DNC. I've never said Hunter's laptop was fake. I'm "butthurt" over the 2020 election because Rs were too stupid not to get rid of Trump. Anyone else would have beaten Biden, and anyone else would beat him this time.

Every accusation is a confession. It's amazing how TS ignores actually facts and just screams the same talking points.

I could ask for five examples of knowing posted by Fox News, but we know he runs from specifics.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-wing-fact-checker-admits-trump-never-called-charlottesville-neo-nazis-very-fine-people-blow-biden

TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

drahthaar said:

TexasScientist said:


Right-wing media reckoning: Some outlets pay a price after spreading 2020 election misinformation

Ahead of another contentious presidential election, media companies that promoted false claims four years ago are filing for bankruptcy, issuing apologies or settling lawsuits.

June 8, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT
By Erik Ortiz

Right-wing media that became purveyors of misinformation and amplified false claims as Donald Trump undermined the results of the 2020 election are finding themselves on the losing end of legal challenges or facing new ones.
In just a few months, a handful of high-profile fringe media operations have been hit with courtroom losses.

The Gateway Pundit, an influential far-right news site, filed for bankruptcy in April in the wake of defamation lawsuits that said the company suggested election workers committed fraud during the previous presidential election. That same month, voting machine company Smartmatic reached a confidential settlement in its defamation suit against One America News Network, which allowed false election fraud claims on air, while its pending defamation litigation based on similar vote-rigging allegations continues against Newsmax as well as Fox News, which is being sued for $2.7 billion. Both Newsmax and Fox News deny Smartmatic's allegations.
Fox News last year paid another company, Dominion Voting Systems, $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The network did not admit to any specific claims.

In May, "2000 Mules," a book and film by right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza, was pulled by the publisher, Salem Media Group, and the company issued a public apology to a Georgia man who is suing the author and publisher on defamation claims after he was accused of ballot stuffing. That case is still ongoing.
Other conservative media outlets that had promoted right-wing misinformation in the 2020 election are facing financial troubles unrelated to those events. This week, conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones agreed to sell off his assets to satisfy $1.5 billion in defamation judgments related to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Jones earlier warned his company could shut down.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors allege a top executive of The Epoch Times laundered millions of dollars.
The Justice Department said the charges against Weidong "Bill" Guan, the company's chief financial officer, are unrelated to its newsgathering activities, and an Epoch Times spokesperson said it plans to "fully cooperate with any investigation dealing with the allegations." Still, the indictment brings scrutiny to one of the most popular pro-Trump outlets. Guan has pleaded not guilty, and a request for comment to a public defender appointed to his case was not immediately returned.

"Right-wing media has finally faced the consequences of running disinformation campaigns," said Yunkang Yang, an assistant professor of communication at Texas A&M University. "Some of them are finally being held accountable for the lies they spread."

Yotam Ophir, an associate professor of communication at the University at Buffalo who studies misinformation and extremism, said he's encouraged by repercussions when "misinformation contaminates our information environment, leads to real harms to people, and erodes trust in institutions and the government."

"The recent lawsuits against those who made a career out of spreading lies and falsehoods will hopefully help limit the spread and amplification of some of the misinformation we can expect in 2024," he said.
But whether that translates to a change in coverage of the November election and post-Election Day results remains to be seen, researchers say.

Trump in recent interviews and at rallies has aired his grievances about the 2020 election, saying it's necessary to challenge election results when the process isn't fair. At a Michigan campaign rally last month, the former president falsely said, "Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020," adding that "we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election" in 2024.

But as for companies that would want to avoid further litigation, Yang said, "If Trump loses again, and denies the election again, if that might happen, I think they'll be more careful."
However, "right-wing media doesn't have to say the election was stolen," Yang added, "but they can let the readers say the quiet part out loud."

He said that's already happening on certain right-wing sites, writing in a 2023 report that they "rely on a small group of highly active commenters to instigate online discussion, draw attention to conspiratorial comments, reinforce conspiratorial beliefs, and drive the sharing of propaganda content on social media."
Amid their legal issues, some sites are hitting back, suggesting to their audiences they're being unfairly targeted because of their ideologies.

Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit, blamed "progressive liberal lawfare attacks" for leading the outlet to file for bankruptcy, and said doing so did not indicate "an admission of fault or culpability" in the lawsuits.

One of the suits involves two former Georgia election workers who were the subject of vote-rigging conspiracy theories that were debunked; the suit is headed toward trial. Another suit, filed in Colorado by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive against Gateway Pundit and other prominent defendants, remains ongoing.

A request for comment from Gateway Pundit about its financial situation prior to filing for bankruptcy was not immediately returned, although Hoft has vowed to continue to publish.
"Despite the radical left's efforts to silence The Gateway Pundit through censorship, de-platforming, de-banking, cut-off from advertisers, and other financial strategies, we will not be deterred from our mission of remaining fearless and being one of the most trusted independent media outlets in America today," Hoft said in a statement.
Such rhetoric is in line with how Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has gone after his political foes as he awaits sentencing on 34 felony counts in his historic hush money trial, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Alabama who focuses on right-wing media.

Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was part of an effort by President Joe Biden's administration to interfere with his election prospects.
The coverage of Trump's trial and the unprecedented verdict notched Fox News a ratings coup over its competitors.

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday forcefully pushed back before a House panel led by Trump's congressional allies, noting how some Republicans are echoing unfounded conspiracy theories.
To claim that a New York jury's verdict was "somehow controlled by the Justice Department" is "an attack on the judicial process itself," Garland said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had called Trump's trial a "sham" and proclaimed a "weaponization" of the justice system against Trump.

With Republican leadership continuing to prop up Trump ahead of the election, Bauer said, the former president doesn't necessarily need those media outlets that can be "loose with the facts" to boost his beliefs.
Bauer said social media users on platforms like X and internet livestreamers who cover Trump's events one prominent YouTube channel, Right Side Broadcasting Network, has more than 1.65 million subscribers represent another form of broadcasting that's developed further since the last presidential election. Trump also started his own social media platform, Truth Social, after he was banned by Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Truth Social reported an accumulated loss of tens of millions of dollars last fall.

In the meantime, conservative and right-wing news sites havereportedly struggled with traffic amid larger financial struggles across the entire legacy and digital news media industry, as once-reliable traffic sources like Facebook and Instagram limit "political content" to users' feeds.

On the flip side, the progressive advocacy website Media Matters for America laid off dozens of staffers last month, with its president blaming a "legal assault on multiple fronts," including a lawsuit filed last fall by X owner Elon Musk over an investigative report about advertising on the social media platform.
"The terrain on which this election is being run is fundamentally, materially different than four years ago," Bauer said.

Ophir, the University at Buffalo researcher, said that while the public's right to free speech and the media's ability to remain independent must be considered, social media companies can also remove "harmful content" and media outlets spreading false propaganda can be held responsible, at least through the courts.
But "without a systematic change," he added, the public "will continue to suffer from the havoc of misinformation in the years to come."



Goody!
Now do the left wing media to be just.
Happy to, as soon as I find a good article.
The first step is you have to understand what disinformation means (hint: it does not mean "disagrees with my tribal POV.")
That's right, and you can take that first step by reviewing the documents produced in Dominion vs. Fox. Admission of disinformation is exposed and displayed in the texts and emails produced.
What do you think about this disinformation:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-when-russian-hackers-targeted-the-u-s-election-infrastructure/

The difference between many on the left and the right is that folks like me are not blind to disinformation coming from fringe sources. What you and other regressive-TDSers are blind to is the disinformation coming from so-called "mainstream," corporate left-wing "news." You still believe the Russia Hoax was real and Hunter's laptop was fake. The butthurt over the 2020 election is an eye-roller when LWNJ were parroting a stolen 2016 election for four years. You're too low-EQ to notice your gaslighting and hypocrisy.
Your mind is so cluttered with disinformation that you can't see straight. Of course there is misinformation on both sides. So far, most mainstream media has tried to maintain some journalistiThere is a steady diet of misinformation from the far right, mixed with some truth, because it sells to their audience (per Fox admissions). It's clear Russia, and other bad actors have attempted to influence our elections, and it's clear Russian hacked the DNC. I've never said Hunter's laptop was fake. I'm "butthurt" over the 2020 election because Rs were too stupid not to get rid of Trump. Anyone else would have beaten Biden, and anyone else would beat him this time.

Every accusation is a confession. It's amazing how TS ignores actually facts and just screams the same talking points.

I could ask for five examples of knowing posted by Fox News, but we know he runs from specifics.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-wing-fact-checker-admits-trump-never-called-charlottesville-neo-nazis-very-fine-people-blow-biden


You can find examples of all you want in the texts, emails and discovery Fox turned over to Dominion. You don't have to fact check that, it's their admission and production. Ultimately, it compelled them to settle for $800 million to avoid publicity and additional production.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.