Positives and Negatives for The Replacement Options

2,511 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Cobretti
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

KaiBear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Democrats would do well to energize women and to protect the rust belt. Dream ticket-

Gretchen Whitmer for President/Michelle Obama for VP.


LOL

Good grief this is your most revealing post ever.

Thank you.


Would that ticket fare better than Biden/ Harris?


No
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sicem2471 said:

Wisconsin has a law that says a candidate cannot be replaced unless death. Democrats might have to JFK Biden
That only applies to candidates already on the ballot. Biden isn't on the ballot until he wins the nomination at the convention. The Democrats are having a virtual convention this year ahead of the big one to make sure that the process is complete by Ohio's deadline. The big problems would come if he is nominated at that virtual convention.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Frank Galvin said:

KaiBear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Democrats would do well to energize women and to protect the rust belt. Dream ticket-

Gretchen Whitmer for President/Michelle Obama for VP.


LOL

Good grief this is your most revealing post ever.

Thank you.


Would that ticket fare better than Biden/ Harris?


No
Well we disgaree about that. This election is all about motivating the base. The ticket I proposed would definitely do that for the Democrats; today's outcry shows that the current ticket will not.
sicem2471
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, thanks for clarifying. Seems like republicans could still probably block new candidates on ballots in other states or atleast slow it down and waste resources
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sicem2471 said:

Ok, thanks for clarifying. Seems like republicans could still probably block new candidates on ballots in other states or atleast slow it down and waste resources
Last is defintely true. But it would not matter much (except to down ballot races) in many states-does not matter who is on the Democratic ballot, they are not winning Idaho, North Dakota, Mississippi, etc.

JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gavin Newsomt campaign slogan: "We'll make the whole country just like California!"
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JXL said:

Gavin Newsomt campaign slogan: "We'll make the whole country just like California!"


Most women voting for Newsom wouldn't understand the significance of the slogan.

And the few that did wouldn't care.

Newsom is the US version of Trudeau.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Michelle Obama

Gavin Newsome

Kamala Harris

Hillary Clinton

Other

What say you?


Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.

Although Newsome's lackluster debate with DeSantis did expose his many weaknesses.
Makes sense if you're a Dumbocrat....his state has massive debt, homeless everywhere, illegals not only allowed but welcomed, trans/gay everything, anti-police, pro-criminal, abortion anytime anywhere, massive inflation, businesses and people moving out in droves. Sounds like the perfect Dumbocrat candidate.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Michelle Obama

Gavin Newsome

Kamala Harris

Hillary Clinton

Other

What say you?


Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.

Although Newsome's lackluster debate with DeSantis did expose his many weaknesses.


Total failure in California

But if Biden can get 81m mail in votes etc, any democrat can win. And hilarious the Dems will trot out….yet another white dude they hate so much lol

Hell, i still think Biden wins by 8m while most all y'all (American people in general) go Broker every month under the Marxist democrats

Also hilarious:

Racist aoc…married or whatever to….a ginger (old white dude)

The other racist…married to a…..old white dude
Daveisabovereproach
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh man, I hope they try to do something like this. Only person that might remotely have a chance is Newsom, and he's not exactly popular in California since he's turned that state into a hellhole.

Unfortunately, I don't think the Democrats will be that dumb. They will feed Joe some simpler/easier to remember talking points and his handlers will simplify things for him as much as possible.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She's very eloquent


Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

KaiBear said:

Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.


If this is what representative government has been reduced to, it's time to bring back the monarchy.


Time to bring back the Republic established by the Founding Fathers along with their voter qualifications.

Most notably the requirement to own real estate in the community you vote in.

That ain't happening. If it did, they'd redefine property
No argument.

That ship has irrevocably sailed.

But it would fix 90% of our country's problems.


So white land owners only. Wow. Not really surprised

EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Democrat Party should have lost all credibility last night. It proved they were into wanton deception and don't really care who gets to be president as long as the string pullers retain power. It openly proves that Biden was never really in charge and his dementia has been a real problem since 2020 like we thought (knew).

This party should be laid to rest and dumped like a toe-less gym sock. Many "news" shows should be dumped likewise.However, it is hard for Americans to change political habits. It is sad.

Now lets see if the Republicans can actually prove that they are any better.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Frank Galvin said:

KaiBear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Again, we do not live in 1789. The Founding Fathers understood the world would change and provided an amendment process for the Constitution. There is just as much wisdom in the 14th Amendment as there is in the original document.

And FWIW, many of the Founding Fathers considered women and minorites chattel. They were wrong about many things.But wise enough not claim the omnisicience so many now invest them with. Yet, another reason for the amendment process.
Already stated ' that ship has sailed ' so obviously I am aware of the date.

But our country is now a complete mess and the only people who don't acknowledge that reality are those who benefit from the situation.

Or are least think they do.

But popularity contests , increasingly funded by special interests , are the primary cause of our country's decline.
I am not aware of the decliine you talk about. We are the freest, richest. most powerful country ever. That does not guarantee tomorrow but the people who are most likely to screw it up are those who do not understand what makes us exceptional.
You obviously don't do your own grocery showing.

And most Americans don't live in million dollar home neighborhoods.

Most my tenants have lost hope of ever buying their own homes.

They are increasingly angry.
that is good biz, Kai. Our #1 competition is the first time homeowner . Unfortunately , the young folks can't afford a house (many don't want one). Good biz
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
all of the names posted have been polled vs Trump and none run any better than Biden.

think strategically. Given Trump's lead in red-leaning swing states like GA and AZ (and NV), Biden has to win WI and MI and PA....all three of them. So who in those states might help close or reverse the gap. WI offers nothing. But MI has a female Governor who would likely deliver that state. Same for Pa Governor, a Jewish male, who would help with the Jewish vote. Whitmer/Shapiro would be a credible alternative. But how do they get there without alienating the black vote (by bypassing Harris)?

Harris/Whitmer.
Harris/Shapiro.

IF there is a change, those will be people to watch.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

all of the names posted have been polled vs Trump and none run any better than Biden.

think strategically. Given Trump's lead in red-leaning swing states like GA and AZ (and NV), Biden has to win WI and MI and PA....all three of them. So who in those states might help close or reverse the gap. WI offers nothing. But MI has a female Governor who would likely deliver that state. Same for Pa Governor, a Jewish male, who would help with the Jewish vote. Whitmer/Shapiro would be a credible alternative. But how do they get there without alienating the black vote (by bypassing Harris)?

Harris/Whitmer.
Harris/Shapiro.

IF there is a change, those will be people to watch.
Whitmer/Polis

Two youngest Democrat governors.

They could make Harris their press secretary.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

KaiBear said:

Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.


If this is what representative government has been reduced to, it's time to bring back the monarchy.


Time to bring back the Republic established by the Founding Fathers along with their voter qualifications.

Most notably the requirement to own real estate in the community you vote in.

That ain't happening. If it did, they'd redefine property
No argument.

That ship has irrevocably sailed.

But it would fix 90% of our country's problems.


So white land owners only. Wow. Not really surprised




Land owners period.

You added the 'white' and the ultra impressive 'wow'.

The 'white' didn't surprise but the 'wow' is a Pulitzer Prize winner.


Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

KaiBear said:

Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.


If this is what representative government has been reduced to, it's time to bring back the monarchy.


Time to bring back the Republic established by the Founding Fathers along with their voter qualifications.

Most notably the requirement to own real estate in the community you vote in.

That ain't happening. If it did, they'd redefine property
No argument.

That ship has irrevocably sailed.

But it would fix 90% of our country's problems.


So white land owners only. Wow. Not really surprised




Land owners period.

You added the 'white' and the ultra impressive 'wow'.

The 'white' didn't surprise but the 'wow' is a Pulitzer Prize winner.





Actually I think our founding fathers added the word s "white" and "male". I was surprised you would make such a desire known

Hence the wow.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Again, we do not live in 1789. The Founding Fathers understood the world would change and provided an amendment process for the Constitution. There is just as much wisdom in the 14th Amendment as there is in the original document.

And FWIW, many of the Founding Fathers considered women and minorites chattel. They were wrong about many things.But wise enough not claim the omnisicience so many now invest them with. Yet, another reason for the amendment process.


While we do not live in 1789, human nature hasn't changed one bit since then.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

whiterock said:

all of the names posted have been polled vs Trump and none run any better than Biden.

think strategically. Given Trump's lead in red-leaning swing states like GA and AZ (and NV), Biden has to win WI and MI and PA....all three of them. So who in those states might help close or reverse the gap. WI offers nothing. But MI has a female Governor who would likely deliver that state. Same for Pa Governor, a Jewish male, who would help with the Jewish vote. Whitmer/Shapiro would be a credible alternative. But how do they get there without alienating the black vote (by bypassing Harris)?

Harris/Whitmer.
Harris/Shapiro.

IF there is a change, those will be people to watch.
Whitmer/Polis

Two youngest Democrat governors.

They could make Harris their press secretary.
That would be a play for the gay vote, which is already pretty blue. Plus, CO is not a swing state. So I doubt Polis would add much to help in the battleground for this election (Great Lake states).

if you wanted to make the intersectional appeal, Whitmer/Baldwin (or Shapiro/Baldwin) would be a better option.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

KaiBear said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

KaiBear said:

Realitybites said:

KaiBear said:

Gavin Newsome is the only viable choice.

Will make female voters swoon.


If this is what representative government has been reduced to, it's time to bring back the monarchy.


Time to bring back the Republic established by the Founding Fathers along with their voter qualifications.

Most notably the requirement to own real estate in the community you vote in.

That ain't happening. If it did, they'd redefine property
No argument.

That ship has irrevocably sailed.

But it would fix 90% of our country's problems.


So white land owners only. Wow. Not really surprised




Land owners period.

You added the 'white' and the ultra impressive 'wow'.

The 'white' didn't surprise but the 'wow' is a Pulitzer Prize winner.





Actually I think our founding fathers added the word s "white" and "male". I was surprised you would make such a desire known

Hence the wow.



What you 'think' the Founding Fathers associated with land ownership is irrelevant.

And attempting to then link your assumptions as to a 'desire' of mine is dishonest.

But this is a self serving game you love to play.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

whiterock said:

all of the names posted have been polled vs Trump and none run any better than Biden.

think strategically. Given Trump's lead in red-leaning swing states like GA and AZ (and NV), Biden has to win WI and MI and PA....all three of them. So who in those states might help close or reverse the gap. WI offers nothing. But MI has a female Governor who would likely deliver that state. Same for Pa Governor, a Jewish male, who would help with the Jewish vote. Whitmer/Shapiro would be a credible alternative. But how do they get there without alienating the black vote (by bypassing Harris)?

Harris/Whitmer.
Harris/Shapiro.

IF there is a change, those will be people to watch.
Whitmer/Polis

Two youngest Democrat governors.

They could make Harris their press secretary.
That would be a play for the gay vote, which is already pretty blue. Plus, CO is not a swing state. So I doubt Polis would add much to help in the battleground for this election (Great Lake states).

if you wanted to make the intersectional appeal, Whitmer/Baldwin (or Shapiro/Baldwin) would be a better option.
Mainly going for Harris as press secretary. Would make vegans everywhere happy. Salad for all.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.