Post Reply
1 of 1
Anyone with half a brain knew covid wasn't a lab creation.
1,220 Views |
14 Replies |
Last: 24 days ago by historian
Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/new-genetic-analysis-animals-wuhan-market-2019-find-113846992
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Correct, and anyone with an intact brain knows that it was created in a lab. Questions about medicine and health shouldn't be answered by the lobotomized.
LOL. From your very own article: "Scientists say they may never know for sure where exactly the virus came from."Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/new-genetic-analysis-animals-wuhan-market-2019-find-113846992
and
"This does shift the dial more in favor of an animal origin," Woolhouse, who was not connected to the research, said. "But it is not conclusive."
Reading comprehension isn't your strongpoint, is it? Next thing you know, you're going to tell us MD's, and not microbiologists, are "experts" on vaccines.
Wait...
Is there a difference between:
Created in a lab
vs
Weaponized by a lab?
Created in a lab
vs
Weaponized by a lab?
I read that, but again I trust Dr. Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, actual experts in the field, than some doofus like you that has no clue what he's talking about.Mothra said:LOL. From your very own article: "Scientists say they may never know for sure where exactly the virus came from."Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/new-genetic-analysis-animals-wuhan-market-2019-find-113846992
and
"This does shift the dial more in favor of an animal origin," Woolhouse, who was not connected to the research, said. "But it is not conclusive."
Reading comprehension isn't your strongpoint, is it? Next thing you know, you're going to tell us MD's, and not microbiologists, are "experts" on vaccines.
Wait...
Says the doofus who thinks MD's are vaccine experts.Tempus Edax Rerum said:I read that, but again I trust Dr. Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, actual experts in the field, than some doofus like you that has no clue what he's talking about.Mothra said:LOL. From your very own article: "Scientists say they may never know for sure where exactly the virus came from."Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/new-genetic-analysis-animals-wuhan-market-2019-find-113846992
and
"This does shift the dial more in favor of an animal origin," Woolhouse, who was not connected to the research, said. "But it is not conclusive."
Reading comprehension isn't your strongpoint, is it? Next thing you know, you're going to tell us MD's, and not microbiologists, are "experts" on vaccines.
Wait...
LMAO. Such a stupid sheep.
https://pauloffit.substack.com/p/lab-leak-mania
Dr. Paul Offit Lab Leak Mania. Read it and learn, don't believe the dumb conspiracy theories
Dr. Paul Offit Lab Leak Mania. Read it and learn, don't believe the dumb conspiracy theories
No one is arguing an animal origin of the base coronavirus that became COVID 19. No one is arguing that the Wuhan market was not the initial Super spreader event, although cases from around the area also occurred.
The actions of the Chinese government and the existence of gain of function research at the Wuhan facility are the factual realities of understanding what happened. Not only did they delete their information immediately, and refuse to share it broadly, they even had a contractor redo the ventilation system immediately. They've stonewalled from the outset, and those with a relationship with the Wuhan lab have been dodgy at best. The lack of mass infection of the same strain of COVID 19 that impacted humans in the wild is another strange missing piece.
So your article does nothing to disprove the lab leak theory, only that we might know which strain of animal coronavirus was modified (gain of function) to add the key enzymatic and genetic pieces to better infect humans.
The actions of the Chinese government and the existence of gain of function research at the Wuhan facility are the factual realities of understanding what happened. Not only did they delete their information immediately, and refuse to share it broadly, they even had a contractor redo the ventilation system immediately. They've stonewalled from the outset, and those with a relationship with the Wuhan lab have been dodgy at best. The lack of mass infection of the same strain of COVID 19 that impacted humans in the wild is another strange missing piece.
So your article does nothing to disprove the lab leak theory, only that we might know which strain of animal coronavirus was modified (gain of function) to add the key enzymatic and genetic pieces to better infect humans.
Let us know when you find the animal that has the ronas.
ATL Bear said:
No one is arguing an animal origin of the base coronavirus that became COVID 19. No one is arguing that the Wuhan market was the initial Super spreader event, although cases from around the area also occurred.
The actions of the Chinese government and the existence of gain of function research at the Wuhan facility are the factual realities of understanding what happened. Not only did they delete their information immediately, and refuse to share it broadly, they even had a contractor redo the ventilation system immediately. They've stonewalled from the outset, and those with a relationship with the Wuhan lab have been dodgy at best. The lack of mass infection of the same strain of COVID 19 that impacted humans in the wild is another strange missing piece.
So your article does nothing to disprove the lab leak theory, only that we might know which strain of animal coronavirus was modified (gain of function) to add the key enzymatic and genetic pieces to better infect humans.
You can't be that obtuse.
IronicalTempus Edax Rerum said:ATL Bear said:
No one is arguing an animal origin of the base coronavirus that became COVID 19. No one is arguing that the Wuhan market was the initial Super spreader event, although cases from around the area also occurred.
The actions of the Chinese government and the existence of gain of function research at the Wuhan facility are the factual realities of understanding what happened. Not only did they delete their information immediately, and refuse to share it broadly, they even had a contractor redo the ventilation system immediately. They've stonewalled from the outset, and those with a relationship with the Wuhan lab have been dodgy at best. The lack of mass infection of the same strain of COVID 19 that impacted humans in the wild is another strange missing piece.
So your article does nothing to disprove the lab leak theory, only that we might know which strain of animal coronavirus was modified (gain of function) to add the key enzymatic and genetic pieces to better infect humans.
You can't be that obtuse.
Lol OP, apparently the CIA considered it the most likely case.
Tough week for Milli.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Lol OP, apparently the CIA considered it the most likely case.
Bitcoin, $Trumpcoin, or $Fartcoin? That is the question.
No way the Wuhan coronavirus was created in the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab. It has the name on the building in English!
No one who uses their brain will dismiss the obvious because of dubious propaganda.
No one who uses their brain will dismiss the obvious because of dubious propaganda.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36