Vance with a very strong start. Directly answering questions. A much stronger grasp of the issues.

Gotta say, both these VP candidates come across better than the Prez candidates ,

Moderator needs to stay out of it

Vance comes across really well. Walz is good but his glaring at Vance is not going to come across well when comparing them

I'm going to talk around the issue of lying about being at Tianmen Square.

- Tim Walz

So far Vance is running away with this.

Realitybites said:

---

I'm going to talk around the issue of lying about being at Tianmen Square.

- Tim Walz

---

No kidding. And VERY obvious

Assassin said:

---

Vance comes across really well. Walz is good but his glaring at Vance is not going to come across well when comparing them

---

He looks a little like Don Rickles when he stares but the words that follow his stares are moronic.

Wangchung said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Vance comes across really well. Walz is good but his glaring at Vance is not going to come across well when comparing them

---

He looks a little like Don Rickles when he stares but the words that follow his stares are moronic.

---

That's who I was trying to think of. Thanks

This is probably the first answer Vance has given that could have been stronger.

Yeah, the abortion question was erroneously factchecked by the moderator then it was revealed later Trump had been correct.

Never understood why the right didn't bring up the right of the child. We're somewhere between 40 and 60 million abortions since Roe v Wade. And over 50% of those are black or Hispanic. Seems to me showing the numbers would be pretty impressive. That's a ton of babies!

Vance is a lawyer he should know the Minnesota law on abortion. But he stopped short for some reason. Still he is sharer than Walz Rickles

It is halftime. If this was a football game, Vance 31, Walz 10. Vance +2 in the turnover department.

Rickles misspoke in tiannemen square. Lol

Non defense of the second amendment. Vance gets sacked during a three and out. Walz gets the TD. 31-17.

Realitybites said:

---

Non defense of the second amendment. Vance gets sacked during a three and out. Walz gets the TD. 31-17.

---

Very evident that Vance is holding back to make Walz look ridiculous and dig his own hole. Walz gets that TD

The longest filibuster until you admit you just lied...

JUST IN: Tim Walz turns into a stumbling mess, calls himself a 'knucklehead' after he was confronted about the lie that he was in Hong Kong in 1989 during Tiananmen.

After going on a 2-minute rant about how good of a guy he is, Walz finally answered the question.

Walz has… pic.twitter.com/rJ324rYytH

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 2, 2024

Excellent answer on housing.

38-17.

The more I listen to Walz, the more it feels like he's just vomiting pre-recorded DNC ideas. He keeps avoiding the questions

https://pjmedia.com/liveblog/2024/10/01/live-blog-vance-vs-walz-in-crucial-vp-debate-showdown-n13

Assassin said:

---

The more I listen to Walz, the more it feels like he's just vomiting pre-recorded DNC ideas. He keeps avoiding the questions

---

this is what they both do.. vomit some generalized talking points and hope for the best

The magic DNC machine is at work while people watch the illusionist on stage

Vance is so much better in this setting than he is at rallies. At the rallies he often tries to be funny and give zingers that fall flat. He doesn't have a Trump personality to pull that style off.

He is much better on the debate stage than Trump.

That look when you know you brought a knife …to a gunfight pic.twitter.com/s4yRHWc22Z

— Chris LaCivita (@LaCivitaC) October 2, 2024

Assassin said:

---

Never understood why the right didn't bring up the right of the child. We're somewhere between 40 and 60 million abortions since Roe v Wade. And over 50% of those are black or Hispanic. Seems to me showing the numbers would be pretty impressive. That's a ton of babies!

---

Gonna be a lot of souls to trip over on their way to Heaven that some voters are enabling as they hope to explain to God why it was ok to support democrats murdering helpless babies.

If Trump wins and Reps control Congress, I would hope he puts some kind of law into affect that says that all the major news networks are "Right to Work". Right now they are over 90% Dem/Left/Liberal and members of Unions who control much more than you would expect. And also that if folks give X amount to a political party, they cannot own a network or radio station. Soros just bought several hundred more radio stations.

Not sure how they would do it, but Soros' One World Order is happening right in front of us.

Several police officers died later from thier Jan 6 injuries.. learned something new today

Or it never happened

Fre3dombear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Never understood why the right didn't bring up the right of the child. We're somewhere between 40 and 60 million abortions since Roe v Wade. And over 50% of those are black or Hispanic. Seems to me showing the numbers would be pretty impressive. That's a ton of babies!

---

Gonna be a lot of souls to trip over on their way to Heaven that some voters are enabling as they hope to explain to God why it was ok to support democrats murdering helpless babies.

---

But God, Obama told me it was okay.

4th and Inches said:

---

Several police officers died later from thier Jan 6 injuries.. learned something new today

Or it never happened

---

It must have, Walz said so. And 140 police officers were beaten, don't forget that

Assassin said:

---

If Trump wins and Reps control Congress, I would hope he puts some kind of law into affect that says that all the major news networks are "Right to Work". Right now they are over 90% Dem/Left/Liberal and members of Unions who control much more than you would expect.

---

There's a much more elegant solution. With FTC rulemaking force all content providers (cable companies, satellite TV, streamers) to provide channels a la cart. No bundles. Call it "America's choice in entertainment rule" Then dissolve the white house press corps and go directly to X. The problem will solve itself.

I believe Vance has done well for Trump. I believe Walz is more on the ball than Harris by a mile but Vance is sharper

Realitybites said:

---

Assassin said:

---

If Trump wins and Reps control Congress, I would hope he puts some kind of law into affect that says that all the major news networks are "Right to Work". Right now they are over 90% Dem/Left/Liberal and members of Unions who control much more than you would expect.

---

There's a much more elegant solution. With FTC rulemaking force all content providers (cable companies, satellite TV, streamers) to provide channels a la cart. No bundles. Call it "America's choice in entertainment rule" Then dissolve the white house press corps and go directly to X. The problem will solve itself.

---

I know soooo many folks that simply turn on CNN., CBS or ABC and watch it pretty much all day. They are brainwashed and dont think for themselves. These there are totally biased, especially CNN. Soros (and Hitler's) plan, control the media and you control the country.

STxBear81 said:

---

I believe Vance has done well for Trump. I believe Walz is more on the ball than Harris by a mile but Vance is sharper

---

Pretty dead on. And Vance might be the next POTUS in four years if things work out. I could see that. He is a rising star

Both had decent closing arguments.

Assassin, nailed it, boom!!