You Idiots Are Crazy If You Think They Will Let Him Win

5,166 Views | 97 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Porteroso
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
Especially when you look at how Trump won all those bellwethers in 2020 and those had always predicted the winner except this ONE time. Also, a pipe broke in Atlanta so they had to stop counting and they had to put up poster boards over the windows so poll watchers couldnt see counting etc. I think the fact that Ronna Romney had a high pay no show job was another factor bc the repubs were just not really ready and able to do anything about the elections.


I've never found a single Democrat or non conservative willing to say if it had been flipped the other way and republicans did what they were doing behind poster board and had "pipes burst" and magically overcame a biden enormous lead that they'd say well yeah it was fair and that's just the way it goes sometimes *shoulder shrug*

Not a single one

Also never found one that could coherently articulate why they dislike trumps policies. Just racist pumpkin bad

Not a single one that would say man, life is so much better for me now and clearly for most Americans

Not a single one. Just the party of lying liars .
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
it wasnt too big to rig, it was being watched and they honestly thought they had it.. the Dem internal pollsters thought it was tight but she could win

They were caught off guard. RNC pollsters missed as well, Trump team internals were closer than either RNC or DNC/Harris pollsters
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.


Lmao

Memories so short they just elected Hitler a second time in a HISTOTIC LANDSLIDE

I think you make a great reasoned well thought out convincing argument

Would subscribe
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
Math is your friend Big Pharma.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Yeah BLM was somethin eh
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.
If only there was some reason for a historic Democrat hysteria where they all wore two Sexi Mama Walmart masks in their homes and did not leave for three years.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
Math is your friend Big Pharma.

If Kamla had been up in Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania until a 4AM vote dump, the left would be livid.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


The actual insurrection has been ruling the country for four years.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
Right before another 4 years of Trump AND throw in the threat to democracy, I can't understand the "low" turnout.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
Of course they can. Two different elections, two different levels of suspicion, surveillance, and thresholds of detection.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.
Lmao

Memories so short they just elected Hitler a second time in a HISTOTIC LANDSLIDE

I think you make a great reasoned well thought out convincing argument

Would subscribe
That is exactly correct. This wasn't about Trump building a base as much as people just didn't vote this time around. Harris being tied to Biden's horrible 4 years didn't motivate independents and people who don't normally vote, and yes, memory is short. People forgot how much they hated Trump.

If Trump could run for a 3rd term, many of those 20 million would vote in 2028 immediately after a second Trump term. I think many more will probably vote in 2028 anyways, he will inspire so much divisiveness.

And I thank you for the compliments. Yes, my arguments are typically correct and thought out. Have you thought of how to defend your "they forgot to manufacture 20 million votes this time" argument with anything? Evidence, reason, common sense, logic? Some sort of anything?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
Right before another 4 years of Trump AND throw in the threat to democracy, I can't understand the "low" turnout.
Look at the past 4 years. People are really mad, they said the economy and inflation was the #1 issue. And who did the Democrats run, but the Vice President of the administration that presided over the declining economy and rampant inflation, and what plan did she have, other than cackles and word salad?

This is less about Trump, than Biden really screwing over the Democrats by running a second time then dropping out late. They didn't have time to select someone they were excited about, and that could appeal to independents.

It was essentially a historic rejection of what Democrats forced down our throats the past 4 years. Dems tried to make more of the same seem like change, and it didn't work. And a mandate to get it fixed.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just one more thing, and you won't hear this on the networks, but it was also a rejection of the legacy media narrative, that Trump was this awful racist fascist Mini Hitler, and Kamala the great savior and representation of hope and change. As bad of a candidate as Trump was, as many things as he said to do his campaign in, Harris was even worse, and the voters saw it.

The MSM spent countless hours campaigning for Harris, and they all thought it was in the bag. The Harris campaign was absolutely shocked at the result, as were the talking heads of the MSM. They are looking all over for strategies and people to blame, but I think it's simpler. Harris didn't give voters any confidence that she'd do anything different from Biden, and voters saw through the MSM campaign straight through to that truth.

If there was any sense in the MSM, they'd do a bunch of soul searching too. Many Democrats have talked about it, that they spent so much time attacking Trump, they forgot to listen to the voters. They missed the mark big time.

But the MSM needs to soul search too. They thought voters would buy all the horse **** they could put on the market, and it backfired big time.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.


If the American people believed what occurred on January 6th was a legitimate insurrection……there is no way in the world Trump would have won the swing states.

Thankfully the majority of Americans saw through the BS from the legacy media. And as a result legacy media is now officially DEAD.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama was widely loved and Hillary was lauded as one of the best candidates. Harris did about as well as them.

Biden is the extreme outlier and clearly Covid played a role in that. Questionable votes may have as well. The idea that 15 million of lib voters just sat this one out is worth some analytics for sure. Plausible in the that she was a weak candidate, but it's certainly curious how big of an outlier the Covid votes are.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.

Biden didn't need 20 million fake votes inn2020. The number is probably exaggerated. However, either way both can be true. 2020 was clearly stolen whether or not Leftists are willing to admit it. It's obvious. In 2024, Trump won by a large enough margin & Dem fraudulent efforts to steal failed, just like in 2016.

The fact that counting was still happening 24 hours after polls closed makes that clear, along with many other data points.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with "insurrections" made up of unarmed grandparents.

FIFY
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.


Lmao

Memories so short they just elected Hitler a second time in a HISTOTIC LANDSLIDE

I think you make a great reasoned well thought out convincing argument

Would subscribe
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.
If only there was some reason for a historic Democrat hysteria where they all wore two Sexi Mama Walmart masks in their homes and did not leave for three years.

Too many ard still wearing masks!! Even after Dr Fauci (fascisti) admitted that they didn't matter.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.

A lot of people were concerned about J6, especially at the time when the propaganda machine was in high gear. As more info has been learned since, many people see it as a big nothing burger. In that sense, it was like the Reichstag fire.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.


If the American people believed what occurred on January 6th was a legitimate insurrection……there is no way in the world Trump would have won the swing states.

Thankfully the majority of Americans saw through the BS from the legacy media. And as a result legacy media is now officially DEAD.
It was NOT an insurrection. It was a riot and breaking/entering. It was bad and illegal. But is was not sedition or an insurrection.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Obama was widely loved and Hillary was lauded as one of the best candidates. Harris did about as well as them.

Biden is the extreme outlier and clearly Covid played a role in that. Questionable votes may have as well. The idea that 15 million of lib voters just sat this one out is worth some analytics for sure. Plausible in the that she was a weak candidate, but it's certainly curious how big of an outlier the Covid votes are.

Hillary was one of the worst candidates ever! In this century, only Biden & Harris were worse. Well, maybe McCain & Romney are in that mix.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only reason the Left uses the word "insurrection" is the 14th amendment. It's one of the few instances they actually care about what is in the constitution because they can twist it dishonestly for their purposes.
Stranger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.


If the American people believed what occurred on January 6th was a legitimate insurrection……there is no way in the world Trump would have won the swing states.

Thankfully the majority of Americans saw through the BS from the legacy media. And as a result legacy media is now officially DEAD.
It was NOT an insurrection. It was a riot and breaking/entering. It was bad and illegal. But is was not sedition or an insurrection.


did any looting or burning businesses take place?
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Fre3dombear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

No, he won fair and square, just like he lost fair and square 4 years ago. Posters like you zealots have enjoyed your victim status for 4 years now, and I know it will be difficult to lay it to rest.

Denial that he won obviously might still happen when you wake up some days. Your brain will likely reset to "them Dems out to cheat another election!" every time you go to sleep.

Don't worry though, many mainstream media outlets will continue to persecute you and Trump. You will have hour opportunities to rage against the machine.
Ya but he didnt lose "fair and square". Tony Blinken recruited 50 former intel agents to lie that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, voting rules and laws were changed due to covid and now we can see that dem turnout was abnormally higher by 20mill votes. Those are actual facts that show that the 2020 election was not actually the most free, fair and secure election that the liars in the MSM have been saying for 4 years.

Right after Trump's 4 years, and covid, you can't understand the high turnout?
When every Democrat was scared to leave the house and wearing two masks while at home, not ... the high turnout seems odd. And it's not "high turnout" - it's 20% higher turnout than the election before and after. That does not really happen.


Familiarize one's self with sigmas for those unbelievers

It exists for a reason.
Exactly. The same candidate runs three times in a row and magically there are 20M additional votes against him in the middle election. Does not past the sigma test.
1. 20 million fake votes in 2020.

2. Too big to rig in 2024.

Both of these can't be true.
it wasnt too big to rig, it was being watched and they honestly thought they had it.. the Dem internal pollsters thought it was tight but she could win

They were caught off guard. RNC pollsters missed as well, Trump team internals were closer than either RNC or DNC/Harris pollsters
There was at least one county that tried to "stop counting" for the night and kick out poll watchers so they could continue behind closed doors, but the Republicans sued and this time a judge ruled they had to stay open and "keep counting." Looks like judges this time around saw what happened last time and didn't want to fan the flames by allowing this to happen again.
Anyone who says what the largest counties in the swing states did in 2020 was normal is a liar. It had never happened in my lifetime that vote counters kicked out poll watchers, boarded up windows to prevent anyone to see inside, kept counting after saying they were closed, and had a huge number of votes tabulated with around 90% going for one candidate. Point me to one example of that happening in key swing state in any other election where it was considered legit.
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.
There was no hysteria over leftists overruning the Senate offices and trying to break into the Senate chamber during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, or when they tried to break down the doors of the Supreme Court during the Roe v Wade riot.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By best - I mean qualifications. Unlike BO and KH, Hillary had actually been a mover and shaker domestically and internationally. Lib Women loved her. Emasculated men loved her.
Keep in mind from a voter perspective she got as many votes as the well loved Obama did. Trump got the electoral wins, not the popular vote.
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

If only there was some reason for a historic and huge turnout, idk like the candidate being DONALD TRUMP and the world being immersed in COVID. Memories are short, but anyone still saying fraud was in a bubble. Anyone outside the bubble knew how ready the country was to move on from Trump.
So what is your explanation?
There are at least 15 million dem voters missing in 2024. They didn't go to Trump... his raw number of votes is essentially the same as 2020.
So where did 15 million voters go?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stranger said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Jack Bauer said:

Remember this in 2016? I hope they try it again!


They have every right to try. The EC is constitutional, unlike riots and insurrections.


Safe to say a majority of Americans aren't too concerned with insurrections made up of unarmed grandparents.


That is not a true statement, if referring to Jan 6th. To say people were not concerned about what happened because some were old is BS. Everyone was concerned about Congress being overrun.

In addition, Trump doesn't overcome that incident if Biden/Harris were the slightest bit competent, had sane policies, or ran a decent candidate. Trump ran a masterful campaign, but the Dems were just as masterfully incompetent.


If the American people believed what occurred on January 6th was a legitimate insurrection……there is no way in the world Trump would have won the swing states.

Thankfully the majority of Americans saw through the BS from the legacy media. And as a result legacy media is now officially DEAD.
It was NOT an insurrection. It was a riot and breaking/entering. It was bad and illegal. But is was not sedition or an insurrection.


did any looting or burning businesses take place?

Or any violence not instigated by the FBI or CIA.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.