How the Democrats Lost

4,379 Views | 93 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by Fre3dombear
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

Jack Bauer said:

Yes, this seems to be helping out so much..


Yes......yes....... yes.......... we need to democrats to double down on Hollywood celebs
making their voices heard, and make sure they are always on the D's platform doing it.

This is a winning proposition.
DOOMED!!!

Doomed I tell ya. We're doomed when they all get on board. We've won our last election as republicans. They've figured it out.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

A lot of good observations, but there were ultimately 14 million fewer votes cast this election, and a few that voted for Biden voted for Trump this time around. Harris not only failed to motivate Democrats to vote who voted in 2020 for an old man with dementia, but her main strategy of appealing to independents seemed to be not being named Donald Trump, and backing off entirely on the stances and rhetoric that once got her named the most progressive politician in D.C.

And so she was left with nothing but empty platitudes. An inability to connect with working class America, because in order to be electable, she really had to pretend to be something she wasn't. And American saw right through it.

I still maintain that the race was always hers to lose. She had an incredible amount of built in support. She was running against one of the most hated American politicians ever. The media framed this as a battle of life v death, democracy v fascism. And yet she lost. This will be studied for a long time, because many won't be able to get their heads around Americans voting for women dying and fascism taking over. We can all think of many factors, but in the end, I think all we can say for sure, is Democrats didn't buy into her, and they showed that by not voting; and neither did independents/centrists, and they showed that by breaking out of demographics and class to vote for Trump.
Pretty sure that quote came from MSNBC, not the reality we saw a couple of weeks ago
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

ShooterTX said:

This is a perfect example.
They are arrogant and condescending.... and TOTALLY WRONG!!



I pray that the left never figures it out. The more they push the ****** insanity, the more supporters they will lose.
All these "associations" can say *** they want, if a man went through puberty and fully developed and then becomes a "trans woman" an average one of these folks can knock the crap out of a real girl.

If they were elite for a man, before transition, they will dominate any girl.

There is so much difference in the genders these discussions are just stupid. You can't ever turn a man into a
woman, no matter how much they look like a woman, ain't a woman.

Most fake women are ugly!!!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

ShooterTX said:

This is a perfect example.
They are arrogant and condescending.... and TOTALLY WRONG!!



I pray that the left never figures it out. The more they push the ****** insanity, the more supporters they will lose.


I'll say it... I dont want boys playing against my daughter in college sports.

Call me transphobic, idc. I'll put it on my nametag. That stuff is evil insanity and we should be afraid of it in every way.

There is no such thing as "transphobia". A phobia is an irrational fear. If anyone is afraid that men competing in woman's sports will be dangerous & unfair to women, that fear is very rational & justified. It has been documented repeatedly. For example, the Algerian dude who "won" a gold medal in the Olympics for beating up on women. It was blatant & criminal. It also clearly illustrates what is at stake.

These concerns should be shared by everyone who genuinely respects women and who enjoy sports that do not condone cheating. Supporting the cheating is misogynistic.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Married A Horn said:

ShooterTX said:

This is a perfect example.
They are arrogant and condescending.... and TOTALLY WRONG!!



I pray that the left never figures it out. The more they push the ****** insanity, the more supporters they will lose.


I'll say it... I dont want boys playing against my daughter in college sports.

Call me transphobic, idc. I'll put it on my nametag. That stuff is evil insanity and we should be afraid of it in every way
There is no such thing as "transphobia". A phobia is an irrational fear. If anyone is afraid that men competing in woman's sports will be dangerous & unfair to women, that fear is very rational & justified. It has been documented repeatedly. For example, the Algerian dude who "won" a gold medal in the Olympics for beating up on women. It was blatant & criminal. It also clearly illustrates what is at stake.
Been saying that about homophobia for years. Any of you folk running scared from a "homo" (they picked the moniker homophobia, not I)
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If a president & his policies can result in women dying, then that was happening under Biden. And the Dems are modern fascists.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hodedofome said:

1) They are arrogant and prideful, and believe they are the smartest people in the room

2) They couldn't admit they made a mistake choosing Biden, and waited too late to make a change

3) By the time they realized they couldn't hide Biden's condition any longer, they chose Harris due to the $200 million they had raised for Biden already. Nobody else could tap it.

4) Because they are prideful, it kept them from realizing this is the sunk cost fallacy. It's doomed many before, and they fell right into it. Anyone else would have gotten more votes than her.

5) Harris is un-electable. Nobody likes her as she is the supreme DEI hire. She never earned anything, just made it through life by knowing and bl*wing the right people. She came from too extreme left of a city and could never appeal to a broader base needed to get elected. She either changes her beliefs and ticks off her left base, or sticks to her extremist guns and ticks off the central base. She was stuck.

6) Having twerking rappers at her rallies didn't help anyone take her seriously

7) Having a lot of people feeling hurt economically and ticked off about men in the girls bathrooms didn't help either


I'd add that they all live in echo chambers and only ever hear people who agree with them and can't imagine anyone with a different viewpoint, won't accept that other viewpoints can exist, or if they do exist they are fueled by hate or an "ism", and think everyone will just listen to them when they say do something, vote this way or think this way.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

ShooterTX said:

This is a perfect example.
They are arrogant and condescending.... and TOTALLY WRONG!!



I pray that the left never figures it out. The more they push the ****** insanity, the more supporters they will lose.
All these "associations" can say *** they want, if a man went through puberty and fully developed and then becomes a "trans woman" an average one of these folks can knock the crap out of a real girl.

If they were elite for a man, before transition, they will dominate any girl.

There is so much difference in the genders these discussions are just stupid. You can't ever turn a man into a
woman, no matter how much they look like a woman, ain't a woman.


They don't even need to be an elite athlete to dominate. They can just be kind athletic and in shape and dominate over women in most sports.
hodedofome
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.


It is complete insanity that we have to put forth these examples. Men have no business being in women's athletics. What I cant understand is why the left chose this position. You know, the left that waves the banner of feminism.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.


Skills vs speed, strength & size. Nobody is saying girls cant be skilled. My girl is insanely skilled at gymnastics - she's 5'0 110 lbs.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

4th and Inches said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.


Skills vs speed, strength & size. Nobody is saying girls cant be skilled. My girl is insanely skilled at gymnastics - she's 5'0 110 lbs.
Absolutely agree.

Another example, Rhonda Rousey could put an armbar on almost any man in the UFC. She grew up in a family where her mom was a Gold Medalist (if memory serves) in Judo in the Olympics. However her demise came as she hated getting hit in the face with a straight right. Sometimes its one piece of the pie that they are good at.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
hodedofome
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.


Yep, there's always Caitlin Clark who can hang or even beat a lot of boys. But she would get destroyed in the NBA, and any NBA player would be the greatest female of all time if he switched.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Jack Bauer said:

They were actually gonna try to let this guy go for another 4 years...


Jill Biden should be thrown in jail for elder abuse
I'm not so sure Jill and Joe and Hunter shouldn't all be in jail.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Married A Horn said:

ShooterTX said:

This is a perfect example.
They are arrogant and condescending.... and TOTALLY WRONG!!



I pray that the left never figures it out. The more they push the ****** insanity, the more supporters they will lose.


I'll say it... I dont want boys playing against my daughter in college sports.

Call me transphobic, idc. I'll put it on my nametag. That stuff is evil insanity and we should be afraid of it in every way.

There is no such thing as "transphobia". A phobia is an irrational fear. If anyone is afraid that men competing in woman's sports will be dangerous & unfair to women, that fear is very rational & justified. It has been documented repeatedly. For example, the Algerian dude who "won" a gold medal in the Olympics for beating up on women. It was blatant & criminal. It also clearly illustrates what is at stake.

These concerns should be shared by everyone who genuinely respects women and who enjoy sports that do not condone cheating. Supporting the cheating is misogynistic.
If it continues at the college level, Title IX should be eliminated.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.


It is complete insanity that we have to put forth these examples. Men have no business being in women's athletics. What I cant understand is why the left chose this position. You know, the left that waves the banner of feminism.
Because progressives are godless pigs. They will take any position that contradicts Jesus.
jbbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.
Come on man!. You know as they age, your example is total BS.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.


It is complete insanity that we have to put forth these examples. Men have no business being in women's athletics. What I cant understand is why the left chose this position. You know, the left that waves the banner of feminism.

The Left defines feminism primarily in terms of killing babies and now men in women's sports. They are misogynists.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leftist policies are a recipe for failure:

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[Yesterday I linked to Armin Rosen's piece about the big New Yorker postelection symposium, in which the liberal essayists blame the corruption of the American electorate for Trump's 2024 victory. Rosen writes:
Quote:

Some of the greatest minds in America have gathered in the pages of the country's leading weekly to declare how little they understand things now, and how little they care to understand them moving forward.
How honest are we about our ignorance? How honest do we want to be? In answer to that eternal question, which isor should beof particular interest to reporters, the 20-page, 12-essay onslaught of postelection "dispatches" that dominates the latest issue of The New Yorker is one of the most honest pieces of magazine publishing we are likely to ever see. Some of the greatest minds in America have gathered in the pages of the country's leading weekly to declare how little they understand things now, and how little they care to understand them moving forward.

"Stunningly, Trump fared better in New York City this year than he did in 2020," writes Jelani Cobb, which is frankly a stunning assessment coming from the dean of the Columbia Journalism School, given Trump's marked improvement in the five boroughs in 2020 and the obvious and extensively documented rightward shift across the metro region over the past decade. "How could Americans be such nice and decent people and support someone so debasing, so deranged, so hate-filled [as Donald Trump]?" asks Adam Gopnik, who makes no attempt to answer these questions, though he clearly wants to be seen as a thoughtful person for asking them.]
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hint: que mala estaba..........

- el KKM

{ tomando cafe }

Andale Osos!!

Are you a man or a mouse!? - F. D.
TrojanMoondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jbbear said:

4th and Inches said:

hodedofome said:

It's not even a discussion regarding men in women's sports. The 8th grade girls soccer team wanted to play against my son's 8th grade soccer team for a scrimmage. There was maybe 1 girl on that team who could run with the boys. They never even got the ball over to the other side of the field. The scrimmage was shut down when it was like 10-0.
to be fair, there are girls individually that can play at that level. Not a whole teams worth. We see girls playing at the select/premiere level on boys teams all the time.

One of the best players this season was a left wing who had better foot skills than anybody else on both teams that game. She was very talented middle school player.
Come on man!. You know as they age, your example is total BS.
I agree.

You drop the best woman in soccer into a game with the best men in soccer, how do we know those men won't feel compelled to pull back a bit so as to make sure they don't hurt her. Which would then possibly give her a little extra space and make her look better than she really is. Men would be tentative rather than going in balls out for fear of harming the chick unintentionally.

Not unlike the "social" experiments and practices of putting a female on a football team. If you tell the boys to go full at it, and tackle her like you would tackle another boy, you're going to put her on a stretcher after one hit. So you think boys aren't going to pull back a bit so as to not hurt her?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fake men & boys on women's teams have no reluctance to play rough against real women resulting in some serious injuries. In one example, a volleyball player had a serious brain injury after a man spiked the ball into her head. The cheater & everyone that allowed him to compete against women should be imprisoned for assault and abuse. This goes for every other instance of man of boys participating in women's or girls sports.

This is a no brainer.
TrojanMoondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The fake men & boys on women's teams have no reluctance to play rough against real women resulting in some serious injuries. In one example, a volleyball player had a serious brain injury after a man spiked the ball into her head. The cheater & everyone that allowed him to compete against women should be imprisoned for assault and abuse. This goes for every other instance of man of boys participating in women's or girls sports.

This is a no brainer.
Which is a travesty. It's disturbing that those men who think they are women, but really aren't, are playing like the men they are, against women. And hurting them.

My example was more about what happens when you drop a real woman into a game full of real men. The men are not going to want to knock her out of commission by hurting her. They will play a little more tentatively. Not a real authentic gauge on how good these women really are when it comes to comparing them with men.

Definitely a no brainer. For those who actually have a brain. Just because a man "feels" like a woman doesn't make him one. And this becomes more than evident when they're in the boxing ring with a real woman. Or spiking the ball over a net at a real woman. And doing so with an intensity and velocity that a man's body is capable of achieving.

Funny though how the liberals love to talk "science" when talking about global warming.

But then they don't buy into science when the facts tell us that a boy who is born with a ***** is male (even if later in life he doesn't "feel" like one), and women are the ones who menstruate (while men, duh, don't).

I'm just curious....if these men who "think" they are women go into a doctor's office and are told they have testicular cancer, do they fight the doctor? Telling said doctor that it's impossible because they are really a woman. The science points to the fact that testicular cancer impacts men. Not women. So is the doctor now forced to play pretend too?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The longer the trans lies continue, the more absurd they get. Fake "women" with prostate cancer, fake "men" who are pregnant, lactating "men", fake "women" trying to breastfeed babies, fake "women" in women's prisons (even serial rapists), and so on. It will continue as long as idiot Leftists in positions of power continue doing these things. And they impose it on society and in blue states or countries (all of Western Europe) they punish people for refusing to repeat the lies. Even the highest courts are caught up in the insanity.

The worst crimes, however, are what they are going to children.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.