trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Oh but I did not, zealot. You are thinking of your counterpart zealots on the left. I knew there were government assets present as soon as I knew of the militias involved, and plans to have guns present. Thank goodness it didn't turn out worse than it did.

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Oh but I did not, zealot. You are thinking of your counterpart zealots on the left. I knew there were government assets present as soon as I knew of the militias involved, and plans to have guns present. Thank goodness it didn't turn out worse than it did.

---

There were actual FBI assets in the crowd, despite your previous assertions that Jan 6th was all Trump worshippers doing his bidding. In fact, there were more FBI assets in the crowd than there were firearms.

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Oh but I did not, zealot. You are thinking of your counterpart zealots on the left. I knew there were government assets present as soon as I knew of the militias involved, and plans to have guns present. Thank goodness it didn't turn out worse than it did.

---

There were actual FBI assets in the crowd, despite your previous assertions that Jan 6th was all Trump worshippers doing his bidding. In fact, there were more FBI assets in the crowd than there were firearms.

---

See if you can read this: Where did I make this assertion?

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Oh but I did not, zealot. You are thinking of your counterpart zealots on the left. I knew there were government assets present as soon as I knew of the militias involved, and plans to have guns present. Thank goodness it didn't turn out worse than it did.

---

There were actual FBI assets in the crowd, despite your previous assertions that Jan 6th was all Trump worshippers doing his bidding. In fact, there were more FBI assets in the crowd than there were firearms.

---

See if you can read this: Where did I make this assertion?

---

You zealots made all those assertions and more when it was discussed over the last 4 years. Why, a mere couple posts ago you even tried to differentiate between FBI assets and FBI agents when excusing their previously denied presence at the event. Don't try to play dumb now.

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Just to recap. I read you guys saying there were hundreds of FBI agents instigating J6, now you say there were 0, and instead about 20 informants or such? And others say they did not instigate J6 but were there collecting data?

---

Odd, you forgot the part where you and your ilk claimed there were zero FBI assets/agents were in the crowd.

---

Oh but I did not, zealot. You are thinking of your counterpart zealots on the left. I knew there were government assets present as soon as I knew of the militias involved, and plans to have guns present. Thank goodness it didn't turn out worse than it did.

---

There were actual FBI assets in the crowd, despite your previous assertions that Jan 6th was all Trump worshippers doing his bidding. In fact, there were more FBI assets in the crowd than there were firearms.

---

See if you can read this: Where did I make this assertion?

---

You zealots made all those assertions and more when it was discussed over the last 4 years. Why, a mere couple posts ago you even tried to differentiate between FBI assets and FBI agents when excusing their previously denied presence at the event. Don't try to play dumb now.

---

Oh, summer child, but I did not.

And are you saying you don't understand the difference between an FBI agent and someone they pay for information?

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

do you really believe any organization in Biden's administration? The guy weaponized everybody. Easily the worst Admin since Jimmy Carter. He may take the crown from the peanut farmer

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

do you really believe any organization in Biden's administration? The guy weaponized everybody. Easily the worst Admin since Jimmy Carter. He may take the crown from the peanut farmer

---

There are a couple of things there. Worst, like Carter in terms of nightmare for Nation I agree.

Weaponizing? I disagree. Carter was not competent as a President but was a good man. I don't think he would weaponize Govt. Biden is a scumbag, I can't put him and Carter as same. Biden weaponize, I agree.

Do I believe IG? Yes, more than if it was just internal investigation. IGs typically are independent, outside Chain of Command.

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

do you really believe any organization in Biden's administration? The guy weaponized everybody. Easily the worst Admin since Jimmy Carter. He may take the crown from the peanut farmer

---

There are a couple of things there. Worst, like Carter in terms of nightmare for Nation I agree.

Weaponizing? I disagree. Carter was not competent as a President but was a good man. I don't think he would weaponize Govt. Biden is a scumbag, I can't put him and Carter as same. Biden weaponize, I agree.

Do I believe IG? Yes, more than if it was just internal investigation. IGs typically are independent, outside Chain of Command.

---

My personal experience with Carter painted him as anything but a good man. I helped out at Habitat for Humanity three times when Carter was there. All three times he treated people like crap. I was expecting this cool, pleasant ex-POTUS - and he was anything but. Spoiled my view of him forever

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

do you really believe any organization in Biden's administration? The guy weaponized everybody. Easily the worst Admin since Jimmy Carter. He may take the crown from the peanut farmer

---

There are a couple of things there. Worst, like Carter in terms of nightmare for Nation I agree.

Weaponizing? I disagree. Carter was not competent as a President but was a good man. I don't think he would weaponize Govt. Biden is a scumbag, I can't put him and Carter as same. Biden weaponize, I agree.

Do I believe IG? Yes, more than if it was just internal investigation. IGs typically are independent, outside Chain of Command.

---

My personal experience with Carter painted him as anything but a good man. I helped out at Habitat for Humanity three times when Carter was there. All three times he treated people like crap. I was expecting this cool, pleasant ex-POTUS - and he was anything but. Spoiled my view of him forever

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

midgett said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

FBI did not have undercover agents at Jan. 6 riots, watchdog says
Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined whether the FBI appropriately handled and assessed its confidential human sources and intelligence ahead of Jan. 6.

---

Wordplay by the left.

The FBI did not have any FBI AGENTS present at J6.

The FBI did have 26 undercover ASSETS present at J6.

Not only does it involve entrapment, it means they could have prevented the entire event. There were some nut cases that were going to try to go in anyway. Light sentences would suffice.

There were quite a few people who entered and walked around. Some may have thought they weren't doing anything wrong since security were present and not stopping them. I would be ASHAMED and cannot imagine any people with any sense of right and wrong to allow people like that to have their lives ruined. Collateral damage in a desperate attempt to get Trump. THEY should be in prison, too.

---

26 'assets' were not going to prevent anything with as big a crowd as was there.

---

Which is how we know they were placed there to do the opposite.

---

Anyone under the impression that there aren't Bureau or Agency assets at any large gathering of people is a complete idiot. Their being there tells us about as much as what they actually did while down there (which we don't know).

---

You are always extremely comfortable with non-constitutional mandated alphabet agencies spying on the American people

I would love to watch you in a room with the Founding Fathers as you expained the wonders of the FBI

---

there's a big difference betweeen being comfortable with it and acknowledging the reality, as I did.

---

IG report says it was kosher ..

---

Well there you have it…case close

Everyone should stop asking questions

The Regime in DC told us it's all good

---

Like I said. Either you belief the investigation or you don't. Do I believe the IG is covering up? Knowing IGs in Govt, I say No. There is no benefit and huge risk.

But you will believe what you want.

---

Hey even if you believe the IG…you have to ask who is giving the info to the IG

The reports are only as good as the data they are provided

---

At some point you have to either believe the investigation or not. If not, Congress needs to appoint a Special Counsel. But do we believe them? We didn't with Smith?

---

do you really believe any organization in Biden's administration? The guy weaponized everybody. Easily the worst Admin since Jimmy Carter. He may take the crown from the peanut farmer

---

There are a couple of things there. Worst, like Carter in terms of nightmare for Nation I agree.

Weaponizing? I disagree. Carter was not competent as a President but was a good man. I don't think he would weaponize Govt. Biden is a scumbag, I can't put him and Carter as same. Biden weaponize, I agree.

Do I believe IG? Yes, more than if it was just internal investigation. IGs typically are independent, outside Chain of Command.

---

My personal experience with Carter painted him as anything but a good man. I helped out at Habitat for Humanity three times when Carter was there. All three times he treated people like crap. I was expecting this cool, pleasant ex-POTUS - and he was anything but. Spoiled my view of him forever

---

You have the benefit of personal knowledge. He seemed like a good Christian man. Never met him.

---

sombear said:

---

Interesting, the same folks who say J6 wasn't a big deal spend so much time and effort trying to blame the government for how bad it was.

But let's play. Is it possible some assets crossed lines? Of course it is. That happens all the time, whether it be drugs, weapons, counterfeiting, or any other criminal enterprise.

But if you follow this closely, the truth is easy to see. The primary instigators and the folks who attacked cops (which is virtually all on video) were charged, convicted, and incarcerated.

So why would it matter IF there were one, two, or even more CI's who also did those things? It doesn't. J6 defenders are just trying to deflect.

There is no way around the fact that too many Trump supporters did some really bad things that day. That doesn't mean there weren't other bad actors.

---

Wangchung said:

---

We have moved from the "it's not happening" stage and are now in the "okay it's happening but not enough to matter" stage. Next stage they will be saying "yes it happened and it's a good thing it happened."

---

Stephen A Smith is sick of defending Democrats after 'conspiracy theories' continue to come true, like FBI informants instigating violence during January 6th:
"The news comes amidst a bombshell report from the Justice Department that revealed the FBI had at least 26 confidential… pic.twitter.com/q8xskoMp6H

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) December 15, 2024

Wangchung said:

---

sombear said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

We have moved from the "it's not happening" stage and are now in the "okay it's happening but not enough to matter" stage. Next stage they will be saying "yes it happened and it's a good thing it happened."

---

I don't recall anyone saying confidently that there were no CIs there. Anyone who would say that is clueless.

Are you surprised there were CIs there? Do you think that's wrong somehow?

---

You keep trying to label them as CIs when all they've been identified as is FBI assets. You do realize we all know why you're attempting that, right?

---