Married A Horn said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Think anyone from this board is in those parades?

Waco1947, JR, Quash, Porteroso, Mitch, etc?

---

You guys are tribal zealots, not fascists. If you ever hear a chant about zealots you'll know I'm on board.

---

Was your boyfriend in that women's march?

---

You constantly going on about my boyfriend is amusing. It it reminiscent of about 5th grade, when you really got someone good and all they could do is call you gay.

Thanks for bringing back the memories! I don't interact with anyone so dumb in real life, so it's a real gift you give me every time you post.

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

A violent insurrection.

---

Are they doing anything to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power? Are they assaulting officers en masse?

---

the second part isnt applicable to an insurrection..

It is applicable to a riot which is what happened. Thanks for acknowledging that..

---

Consider the language you used in conjunction with the dictionary, and you'll find that violence is "applicable to an insurrection," and explicitly mentioned in the various definitions.

From google:

Quote:

---

a violent uprising against an authority or government.

---

From ole Webby:

Quote:

---

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Think anyone from this board is in those parades?

Waco1947, JR, Quash, Porteroso, Mitch, etc?

---

You guys are tribal zealots, not fascists. If you ever hear a chant about zealots you'll know I'm on board.

---

Was your boyfriend in that women's march?

---

You constantly going on about my boyfriend is amusing. It it reminiscent of about 5th grade, when you really got someone good and all they could do is call you gay.

Thanks for bringing back the memories! I don't interact with anyone so dumb in real life, so it's a real gift you give me every time you post.

---

You go girl!

KaiBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Think anyone from this board is in those parades?

Waco1947, JR, Quash, Porteroso, Mitch, etc?

---

You guys are tribal zealots, not fascists. If you ever hear a chant about zealots you'll know I'm on board.

---

Always amusing to see an under employed mediocrity attempt to act superior to others via the anonymous confines of the internet.

---

What is amusing to me, is you being completely ignorant of who I am, yet making constant attempts to trash who I am, in order to avoid engaging me on issues I'm right about and you're wrong about.

In this case it's clear, you guys are trying to paint peaceful protesters as being similar to the Capitol rioters. As if holding signs is interrupting the peaceful transfer of power. It's so ridiculous, but that's the right wing zealotry for you. Screw facts dictionaries logic, we're against these people!

Assassin said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Think anyone from this board is in those parades?

Waco1947, JR, Quash, Porteroso, Mitch, etc?

---

You guys are tribal zealots, not fascists. If you ever hear a chant about zealots you'll know I'm on board.

---

Was your boyfriend in that women's march?

---

You constantly going on about my boyfriend is amusing. It it reminiscent of about 5th grade, when you really got someone good and all they could do is call you gay.

Thanks for bringing back the memories! I don't interact with anyone so dumb in real life, so it's a real gift you give me every time you post.

---

You go girl!

---

I think that was 2nd grade. You called boys girls to gettim good, I don't think I even knew about the gays yet.

Thanks!

Porteroso said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

A violent insurrection.

---

Are they doing anything to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power? Are they assaulting officers en masse?

---

the second part isnt applicable to an insurrection..

It is applicable to a riot which is what happened. Thanks for acknowledging that..

---

Consider the language you used in conjunction with the dictionary, and you'll find that violence is "applicable to an insurrection," and explicitly mentioned in the various definitions.

From google:

Quote:

---

a violent uprising against an authority or government.

---

From ole Webby:

Quote:

---

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

---

---

your own citations are your downfall..

Now google riot and see your failings

Apply it to what people were ACTUALLY charged with..

You are welcome

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Think anyone from this board is in those parades?

Waco1947, JR, Quash, Porteroso, Mitch, etc?

---

You guys are tribal zealots, not fascists. If you ever hear a chant about zealots you'll know I'm on board.

---

Always amusing to see an under employed mediocrity attempt to act superior to others via the anonymous confines of the internet.

---

What is amusing to me, is you being completely ignorant of who I am, yet making constant attempts to trash who I am, in order to avoid engaging me on issues I'm right about and you're wrong about.

In this case it's clear, you guys are trying to paint peaceful protesters as being similar to the Capitol rioters. As if holding signs is interrupting the peaceful transfer of power. It's so ridiculous, but that's the right wing zealotry for you. Screw facts dictionaries logic, we're against these people!

---

Glad you're amused.

Living in your little fantasy internet land where you get to insult individuals far more successful and established.

In reality you are totally clueless on at least 80% of the topics discussed on this free message board.

Honestly can't recall anyone batting such a low percentage other than 47, Jinxy and ( of course ) cinque.

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

A violent insurrection.

---

Are they doing anything to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power? Are they assaulting officers en masse?

---

the second part isnt applicable to an insurrection..

It is applicable to a riot which is what happened. Thanks for acknowledging that..

---

Consider the language you used in conjunction with the dictionary, and you'll find that violence is "applicable to an insurrection," and explicitly mentioned in the various definitions.

From google:

Quote:

---

a violent uprising against an authority or government.

---

From ole Webby:

Quote:

---

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

---

---

your own citations are your downfall..

Now google riot and see your failings

Apply it to what people were ACTUALLY charged with..

You are welcome

---

I'm not doing this again. It fits the dictionary definition. Almost nobody in our history has been convicted of insurrection though, because legal terms, definitions, laws, often are beyond the scope of common language. The bar to be convicted of insurrection is extremely high. However, multiple judges have called it insurrection during sentencing. And it certainly fits the common understanding and technical dictionary definition.

As you point out, it was also a riot. Thanks!

Porteroso said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

A violent insurrection.

---

Are they doing anything to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power? Are they assaulting officers en masse?

---

the second part isnt applicable to an insurrection..

It is applicable to a riot which is what happened. Thanks for acknowledging that..

---

Consider the language you used in conjunction with the dictionary, and you'll find that violence is "applicable to an insurrection," and explicitly mentioned in the various definitions.

From google:

Quote:

---

a violent uprising against an authority or government.

---

From ole Webby:

Quote:

---

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

---

---

your own citations are your downfall..

Now google riot and see your failings

Apply it to what people were ACTUALLY charged with..

You are welcome

---

I'm not doing this again. It fits the dictionary definition. Almost nobody in our history has been convicted of insurrection though, because legal terms, definitions, laws, often are beyond the scope of common language. The bar to be convicted of insurrection is extremely high. However, multiple judges have called it insurrection during sentencing. And it certainly fits the common understanding and technical dictionary definition.

As you point out, it was also a riot. Thanks!

---

not also, only a riot

Good thing Biden pardoned all those involved after they destroyed the evidence

It was a protest turned riot, its just that simple. The rest is political theater to which you have bought a front row ticket