Trump's first 100 days

594,149 Views | 11836 Replies | Last: 4 min ago by FLBear5630
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok...this feels awkward. Can we give the sculptor another try at this?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She seems to be getting more and more critical by the week

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we can't get term limits can we get some clause about politicians need to be able to stay upright while walking to continue to serve in their role?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

From what the Dems have shown, that would appear to be correct. Protecting murderers, rapists and drug dealers, foreign terrorists and domestic terrorists
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted," Assassins Creed
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Noem takes to Portland




"Nothing is true, everything is permitted," Assassins Creed
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:

Noem takes to Portland






We don't need the National Guard to battle homeless camps. That's a red herring.

If so, they should be in downtown Austin yesterday.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Does he even have jurisdiction?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Osodecentx said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Horribly stupid priorities.

**** you Ted Kennedy.


Ted Kennedy?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act_of_1980

1965 Immigration Act too
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:

Noem takes to Portland






We don't need the National Guard to battle homeless camps. That's a red herring.

If so, they should be in downtown Austin yesterday.

Hold that thought.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:





So Trump is going to puss out on Tomahawks for NATO/ Ukraine? WOW! Just Wow!
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:





So Trump is going to puss out on Tomahawks for NATO/ Ukraine? WOW! Just Wow!


Obi Wan Putin

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

boognish_bear said:



Does he even have jurisdiction?

My guess is no, that he is simply stalling. Democrats want to keep as many criminal murderers, rapists, pedophiles and the like, in their area, but not close to their own homes
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted," Assassins Creed
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:





So Trump is going to puss out on Tomahawks for NATO/ Ukraine? WOW! Just Wow!


Brilliant, thought provoking comment.

Would read again.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:





So Trump is going to puss out on Tomahawks for NATO/ Ukraine? WOW! Just Wow!


Brilliant, thought provoking comment.

Would read again.

Have always thought the U.S. should provide the weapons needed for both Israel and Ukraine. Is Trump not backtracking on the Tomahawk missiles? Hope I am wrong and you are right.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

KaiBear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

boognish_bear said:





So Trump is going to puss out on Tomahawks for NATO/ Ukraine? WOW! Just Wow!


Brilliant, thought provoking comment.

Would read again.

Have always thought the U.S. should provide the weapons needed for both Israel and Ukraine. Is Trump not backtracking on the Tomahawk missiles? Hope I am wrong and you are right.

We might need those Tomahawks very shortly in South America.

Suspect Trump is serious about killing off the drug cartels.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.
More Democrat voters are becoming disillusioned by their party leadership.
Once upon a time the Republican Party leaders kept promising to do certain things and then failed to follow through. Hence they experienced an upheaval of leadership.
Democrat voters could very well demand their leadership be dumped for not being responsive to what they really want.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party is a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization.

Do you disagree?
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted," Assassins Creed
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


no reason not to, probably should be anyway
Adopt A Bear 2025

94 Palmer Williams

Ray Guy Award Watch List
• Preseason Second-Team All-America (Phil Steele)
• Preseason Third-Team All-America (Athlon)
• Preseason All-Big 12 (Big 12 Media)
• Preseason First-Team All-Big 12 (Athlon, Phil Steele)
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:



Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 279 of 339
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.