Trump's first 100 days

595,745 Views | 11844 Replies | Last: 22 min ago by J.R.
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 2:32p, 10/17/25
Assassin said:


Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 3:32p, 10/17/25
boognish_bear said:


What is he talking about? Lots of presidents have ended wars. Either ones we were in or negotiated ones between other countries.
Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 3:33p, 10/17/25
Jack Bauer said:



Just stupid. Open borders are a nightmare. That would be called one world government. Which I guess some of them want anyways.

She does realize basically every country on earth, even many of the poorest, have laws about entering their country illegally right?
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:36p, 10/17/25
First time we've had a US President drop an F-bomb while speaking in an official capacity?

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 10/17/25
Reply Quote
whitetrash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 3:44p, 10/17/25
boognish_bear said:
First time we've had a US President drop an F-bomb while speaking in an official capacity?


Only because there aren't recordings of Truman, LBJ or Nixon speaking in cabinet meetings.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:12p, 10/17/25
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 4:56p, 10/17/25
cowboycwr said:
Jack Bauer said:



Just stupid. Open borders are a nightmare. That would be called one world government. Which I guess some of them want anyways.

She does realize basically every country on earth, even many of the poorest, have laws about entering their country illegally right?


A classic upper class white liberal sheltered from any dangers. Reminds me of the liberals in Martha's Vineyard:

"We love immigrants, just not here!!"


Reply Quote
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whitetrash • 5:23p, 10/17/25
whitetrash said:
boognish_bear said:
First time we've had a US President drop an F-bomb while speaking in an official capacity?


Only because there aren't recordings of Truman, LBJ or Nixon speaking in cabinet meetings.


True

But it still doesn't make it right.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:34p, 10/17/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:37p, 10/17/25
Reply Quote
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 5:54p, 10/17/25
Jack Bauer said:
cowboycwr said:
Jack Bauer said:



Just stupid. Open borders are a nightmare. That would be called one world government. Which I guess some of them want anyways.

She does realize basically every country on earth, even many of the poorest, have laws about entering their country illegally right?


A classic upper class white liberal sheltered from any dangers. Reminds me of the liberals in Martha's Vineyard:

"We love immigrants, just not here!!"




Rich liberals but especially the rich white liberals are the most two faced group ever. They want to use everyone else's money but no theirs to fix problems as long as the fix is not near their houses and doesn't impact their gated armed guard communities
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:21p, 10/17/25
Seems like this has come up more often lately about Trump being worried about getting into heaven. It's always hard to tell with him when he's joking or being serious.

Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 7:52p, 10/17/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.

Reply Quote
1 edit
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 7:55p, 10/17/25
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 8:07p, 10/17/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.
Reply Quote
1 edit
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 9:00p, 10/17/25
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 9:35p, 10/17/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:09p, 10/17/25
boognish_bear said:

That is huge!
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:12p, 10/17/25
Sam has been in mourning ever since the shooting stopped.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whitetrash • 10:12p, 10/17/25
whitetrash said:
boognish_bear said:
First time we've had a US President drop an F-bomb while speaking in an official capacity?


Only because there aren't recordings of Truman, LBJ or Nixon speaking in cabinet meetings.

"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
Redbrickbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 10:22p, 10/17/25
Assassin said:
whitetrash said:
boognish_bear said:
First time we've had a US President drop an F-bomb while speaking in an official capacity?


Only because there aren't recordings of Truman, LBJ or Nixon speaking in cabinet meetings.



Seems like a real recording of LBJ….but he didn't drop an N-word in there so I am not sure
Reply Quote
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:30p, 10/17/25
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.

Dude! When have you EVER posted accurate data about anything here? You are a pure far-left-wing liberal
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
ATL Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 10:33p, 10/17/25
boognish_bear said:
Have to protect the Trump Plaza Jeddah project…
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 10:37p, 10/17/25
Assassin said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.

Dude! When have you EVER posted accurate data about anything here? You are a pure far-left-wing liberal

Non sequitur.
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ATL Bear • 10:43p, 10/17/25
ATL Bear said:
boognish_bear said:


We need to hope that there is some manner of stopping Muslim infiltration of everywhere but the Middle East. What the Saudis say holds a lot of weight in the way the Middle East goes. There are over 50 Muslim countries and we need to get these repatriated to their homes
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
EatMoreSalmon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 11:38p, 10/17/25
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.

You haven't been accurate for some time. You have no reliable data about the state of the residents of Gaza. Just like everyone else. And you have no credibility on understanding meanings and situations right now. Other reliably sober posters have pointed out your failings over the past few years. For now, shalom and good luck with your thoughts.
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 11:43p, 10/17/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.

You haven't been accurate for some time. You have no reliable data about the state of the residents of Gaza. Just like everyone else. And you have no credibility on understanding meanings and situations right now. Other reliably sober posters have pointed out your failings over the past few years. For now, shalom and good luck with your thoughts.

I have posted reliable data about famine conditions in Gaza. Feel free to challenge it, and good luck.

Warmongering posters are reliably emotional, if nothing else.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EatMoreSalmon • 11:50p, 10/17/25
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
Sam Lowry said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
boognish_bear said:

Sounds to me like she's saying the Democrat Party is working for those types of people, not that all democrats are those people. Just for clarity.

These subtleties make all the difference when a whole political party is declared a "domestic extremist organization."

in spite of your wish for it to be so, that is obviously not what she meant. (And you know it.)
Leavitt is saying the Democrat Party deems their constituaents to be the people listed, as they are spending all their time and capital on them.

It's a direct quote from Trump's chief advisor and ghost-tweeter, Stephen Miller: "The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization." They mean exactly what they say.

That's not saying what you claim it says.

I'm claiming it says the Democratic Party a domestic extremist organization. What do you think it says?

I'm guessing you don't know the difference between party leadership and people who vote for a party.

People who vote for a party are commonly known as a "constituency."

Very good! And the Democrat Party is concentrating on not very popular parts of their constituency. That is what's being said.

It would be concerning enough if they were only threatening party leaders. What's being said is that the opposition party is now an extremist group and anyone who supports them is an extremist.

Just listen to your fellow posters. They get the message:

historian said:
And yo the extent that constituency favors open borders, leaving crimes unpunished, Bidenflation, mass murder of innocent babies in the womb, poisoning & mutilating children, lying about basic biological facts and then persecuting people for telling the truth, and all the rest of the radical Leftist agenda they are extremists.

If you support terrorist behavior and act as an enabler, you are a terrorist. This is not complicated.



This isn't the football board where you have to over react to all things.

It's not me calling Portland a "war zone" because some protesters dropped a smoke bomb. Or calling the Caribbean a "battlefield" because of a few tuna boats and some blow.


But it is you who want to misrepresent what Leavit said. Which is not surprising after your not understanding what is and isn't propaganda coming from Gaza.

I understand the difference just fine. Posting accurate data about the percentage of Gazans suffering acute malnutrition isn't propaganda. Posting a photo of one fat dude and saying, "See? No starvation!" obviously is. One example among many.

As for Trump and his messengers, don't let the dash of deniability fool you. His people are hearing what he's saying.

You haven't been accurate for some time. You have no reliable data about the state of the residents of Gaza. Just like everyone else. And you have no credibility on understanding meanings and situations right now. Other reliably sober posters have pointed out your failings over the past few years. For now, shalom and good luck with your thoughts.

Sam swears that his far left liberal sources are correct when the evidence right in front of his eyes is telling him that he's full of it.

These are the only Walking Corpses Sam

"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:51p, 10/17/25
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 12:02a, 10/18/25
One Palestinian in a photo = EVERYONE IN GAZA

One Israeli in a photo = THE ONLY ONE IN GAZA

/AssLogic
Reply Quote
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:07a, 10/18/25
October 16, 2025
Michael Mechanic

In an exclusive story on Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported on the Trump administration's plans to weaponize the IRS, much as he has weaponized the Department of Justice, against his perceived enemies.

"Sweeping changes" are planned, the Journal reported, citing anonymous sources, "that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily."

Quote:
A senior IRS official involved in the effort has drawn up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors, some of the people said.

A key aspect of the changes is giving President Donald Trump's political appointees control over the IRS's criminal investigations division. Gary Shapley, an adviser to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, will take the reins, per the Journal. In April, Shapley, a former IRS agent, was named acting commissioner at the behest of Elon Musk, and then fired days later after Bessent objected. He will now reportedly work to weaken the role of career IRS lawyers in investigations, paving the way for politically motivated probes of people and groups Trump and his allies dislike.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/10/wall-street-journal-irs-trump-audits-criminal-investigations-liberal-democrat-groups-weaponization/
Reply Quote
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:39a, 10/18/25
Sam Lowry said:
One Palestinian in a photo = EVERYONE IN GAZA

One Israeli in a photo = THE ONLY ONE IN GAZA

/AssLogic

One gullible poster in a photo = EVERYONE ON SIC'EM365

/Sam the Liberal Logic
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Reply Quote
1 edit
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:21a, 10/18/25
This is of course no surprise… But I had never really even thought about this.

Reply Quote
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Assassin • 11:27a, 10/18/25
Assassin said:
boognish_bear said:

That is huge!

Agreed


Biggest news of the day.
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 281 of 339 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.