Trump's first 100 days

739,242 Views | 13664 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by Redbrickbear
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Jack Bauer said:

boognish_bear said:




Looks like the talking points are out!!

Kinda funny that Trump blows a gasket every time someone mentions the word "affordability". You would think they were saying the " F" word.




Your daily reminder that all these guys are full of ****



Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Narrator: "It won't be 3% and it will be Joe Biden's fault"

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently this 83 year old private citizen is controlling the government even today!

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



That's gonna be interesting. Birthright citizenship is not the global norm. Many countries, particularly in Europe and Asia, follow the principle of jus sanguinis (right of blood), where a child inherits nationality from their parents.
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 cheers for our Congress

RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Oh $ H ! T!!!!!! I am just wondering now when the locusts are going to show up!
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

1929?

.......was not a very good year. We can only hope history doesn't repeat itself.

So you have no problem with Trump's latest business venture, OldBear? A Simple yes or no will be fine.

Refusing to accept anything but 'yes' or 'no' is a dishonest tactic, and by the way has been rejected by courts for a long time now.

It is telling when someone resorts to gotcha tactics in an open forum.

And by the way, 1929? You never did answer that, in the context of your initial use of that number.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wut??? Gotcha tactics? I asked for a simple yes or no answer to a very simple question and you can't do it.

The stock market crash of 1929. Smoot -Hawley was actually passed in 1930. Tariffs. The Great Depression. Trust me, we don't want to go back there.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Wut??? Gotcha tactics? I asked for a simple yes or no answer to a very simple question and you can't do it.

The stock market crash of 1929. Smoot -Hawley was actually passed in 1930. Tariffs. The Great Depression. Trust me, we don't want to go back there.

You are seriously in wacko land if you think tariffs caused the Great Depression (or ignore FDR's contributions to continuing the damn thing).

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you brought up 1929 because the tinfoil hat said to.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

So you brought up 1929 because the tinfoil hat said to.

I look at this thread and don't see where I am the one that brought up 1929. Probably wishful thinking / Freudian slip on your part. That is okay. Old dudes get a pass.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's because you corrected your error from '1929' to '2029' without of course admitting your error in the first place.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

That's because you corrected your error from '1929' to '2029' without of course admitting your error in the first place.

It seems you are much more interested in GOTCHA typos than discussing the topic. You are not alone. You have plenty of company on this board. You never did answer my very simple question. I don't expect anything of substance from you at this point. I will cheer for you and your Donald Trump pom poms!!!! You look really cute in that skirt!

Good luck with your MAGA bull$h!t.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You have become very bitter.

And sorry since it seems to anger you, but it was you who first referred to '1929', and all I did was ask why you did that.

Your response was, as I said, bitter.

I hope whatever is making you so angry gets better, soon.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You have become very bitter.

And sorry since it seems to anger you, but it was you who first referred to '1929', and all I did was ask why you did that.

Your response was, as I said, bitter.

I hope whatever is making you so angry gets better, soon.

Bitter? You have the wrong guy. Every single day is a precious gift. And I am thankful for each and every day.

Yet you cannot answer a very simple question regarding Donald Trump's business ventures while he is President. Kinda sad that you are so beholden to your elected leader. It saddens me to see any man become emasculated. But here you are.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I said, I don't play gotcha games. I don't worship Trump, but I won't help promote TDS either.

I did mean it, I sincerely hope you recover from whatever made you turn nasty and foul.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

As I said, I don't play gotcha games. I don't worship Trump, but I won't help promote TDS either.

I did mean it, I sincerely hope you recover from whatever made you turn nasty and foul.

Ohhhh.....ohhhh....that hurts. That hurts bad. I am pulling for Trump. When it comes to the economy and international trade, I think the man is treading water and he does not realize it. Am sorry you perceive my criticism of his current failures as "nasty and foul". Whatever.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

J.R. said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Assassin said:

whiterock said:

Assassin said:

nein51 said:

Jack Bauer said:

in contrast, here is Helen Mirren at age 65...aging gracefully has its benefits



Yeah but she was so hot in the 60s and 70s. She's still gorgeous at 75 or so. She might have been at her peak in her late 40s which is super rare. Shes 70 in that picture on the right.


She's done a lot of what were considered, "provocative" movies in the late 60s and 70s. "Age of Consent" and "Caligula" were a couple of them where she did full frontals. She kinda got blacklisted by some casting agents for a while

Few women have aged so well.

The gal that played the mom in Partridge Family was also very good looking in her 70s. Shirley Jones



Back in the day when I was a kid, I used to dream of Jeannie. And that's all I'm gonna say about that!

oh my ..Barbara. Man, should would make little JR's pants go crazy! Dame Helen is gorgeous .


Barbara was cute as a button. I wished I could get a genie wish... guess what it would be...

Well lookie there. We found a policy we all agree upon.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Assassin said:

J.R. said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Assassin said:

whiterock said:

Assassin said:

nein51 said:

Jack Bauer said:

in contrast, here is Helen Mirren at age 65...aging gracefully has its benefits



Yeah but she was so hot in the 60s and 70s. She's still gorgeous at 75 or so. She might have been at her peak in her late 40s which is super rare. Shes 70 in that picture on the right.


She's done a lot of what were considered, "provocative" movies in the late 60s and 70s. "Age of Consent" and "Caligula" were a couple of them where she did full frontals. She kinda got blacklisted by some casting agents for a while

Few women have aged so well.

The gal that played the mom in Partridge Family was also very good looking in her 70s. Shirley Jones



Back in the day when I was a kid, I used to dream of Jeannie. And that's all I'm gonna say about that!

oh my ..Barbara. Man, should would make little JR's pants go crazy! Dame Helen is gorgeous .


Barbara was cute as a button. I wished I could get a genie wish... guess what it would be...

Well lookie there. We found a policy we all agree upon.

Ha!
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$250,000,000,000+ in spending this shopping season......

- uncle fred*

... so the Do Nothing Party's attempt to stall the economy looks to have failed - and will likely result in
1,000,000 people dead alive duplicated and what not taken off the SNAP welfare rolls.

LOL......

* chief economist UFRI

D!

{ sipping coffee }
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

You have become very bitter.

And sorry since it seems to anger you, but it was you who first referred to '1929', and all I did was ask why you did that.

Your response was, as I said, bitter.

I hope whatever is making you so angry gets better, soon.

Bitter? You have the wrong guy. Every single day is a precious gift. And I am thankful for each and every day.

Yet you cannot answer a very simple question regarding Donald Trump's business ventures while he is President. Kinda sad that you are so beholden to your elected leader. It saddens me to see any man become emasculated. But here you are.

Baylors Beloved Kubota Ken the Community Club Car Cop.

- uncle fred

D!



arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great news

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By Scott Rasmussen….

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This firm had Harris +5 this fall.
Rasmussen Reports has D+3.
The difference is enthusiasm. Dems have the advantage at this time.



boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Boy, he is getting beat up in the replies.
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:



Boy, he is getting beat up in the replies.


Dude is finished politically.

So he's determined to go out with a bang.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:



Boy, he is getting beat up in the replies.


Dude is finished politically.

So he's determined to go out with a bang.

That would be my take also. Too bad. He just doesnt get it
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
First Page Last Page
Page 327 of 391
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.