Trump's first 100 days

851,880 Views | 15114 Replies | Last: 52 min ago by boognish_bear
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Don't know Mike Benz
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:




Let's see how far the price transparency goes. It needs to go very far in the case of hospitals and surgery centers.

It should work sooo much better than BarryCare which has been a disaster since the moment it started. They will be able to get insurance competing with each other.

Now if he can do something about auto insurance...
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RFK Jr...WTH?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Keyword "wants"

I question the execution
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

ATL Bear said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

KaiBear said:

nein51 said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:




NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.


Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .



Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

Here's the problem with your analysis: It presumes that armed invasion by a peer competitor is our only risk.

Not so......

Never did I say that. I said drugs and prostitution are not the job of the military. And for all of recorded time that has been true.

Personally, neither of those pose a risk to me.

Whoosh again.

It does become a military threat when hookers and drug dealers are running entire countries as a base of operations for unconventional warfare against us in concert with peer competitors. US courts can't fix that. Constrictive diplomacy rarely works in such situations. That leaves us with no option but to either endure the situation or use the military to persuade a "Hookers & Drugs" regime to change policy.

Queue the adage - "warfare is the continuation of policy by other means."



This spin is insane. Venezuela isn't even the world's worst culprit in this. Drugs and the sex trade are the result of insatiable vices of Americans. When is the war on demand going to happen?

the obtusity is outrageous.

It's one thing to have cartels south of our border smuggling drugs into the country. It's quite another for those cartels to influence/control a government and gain statehood status with ability to conduct diplomatic relationships. That's how you end up with Iranian drones being smuggled inside a Venezuelan tanker headed for Russia.....Iranian drones made with the acquiesance of the Venezuelan government, which of course puts the Panama canal under the umbrella of hostile powers. (and that's just one of tentacles of this particular octopus.)

Frigging amazing that you would reduce what's happening in Venezuela to law enforcement overreach.
TDS has fried your brain, friend.
I just can't…That's an absurd take. If the swift removal of Maduro proved anything, it's just how overstated the threat actually was. Furthermore, the "narco-terror" state angle is becoming laughable as Maduro's second in command appears to be the preferred choice of the Trump Administration for Venezuela.

BTW, how are we feeling about there not being an Aircraft carrier group in the Middle East for the first time in half a century, thus limiting our Iranian strike options?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

RFK Jr...WTH?



Rubio could win the general election in 2028.

Vance ....very unlikely.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lol ok buddy (not directed at you. Directed at Canada)
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



very stupid..........

kill the economy so we can have lower inflation.....

dumb.

- UF

D!


input costs are falling -

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating muffin }

Bald Wemby agrees!!

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



So wish Graham would lose his next primary.

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



It's weird. All these so-called experts have been totally wrong about macroeconomics since Trump and Bessent took over. Hard to know what to buy into
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Canada is grasping at straws. They are incredibly weak and this proves it.
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




I'm sure this will make Alberta and Saskatchewan even happier.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:




I'm sure this will make Alberta and Saskatchewan even happier.

might be time for an invasion.........

LIBERATE ALBERTA!!

Free The Saskatoons!!!!

- UF

D!

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.barrons.com/news/trump-says-may-slap-tariffs-on-nations-that-don-t-back-his-greenland-plans-43ae05a4

Putting tariffs on the entire planet because they don't support invading our ally. Brilliant
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump does 'Chair Macarena' during Friday meeting!

developing!!!



Fred's News Service (Huaco, Tx)......

<story to follow as Trump flouts convention yet again>



arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah... unless I am missing something I don't see how this is a good idea. It's just shifting your own money somewhere else.

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Yeah... unless I am missing something I don't see how this is a good idea. It's just shifting your own money somewhere else.



It's the worst solution because you're taking pennys on the dollars as well.

$1 invested in the S&P500 in 1996 is worth $7-$8 now and compounding gets larger as the amount gets larger. $100 invested would be around $1900 now.

So if you're taking $30,000 in 1996 you really took $569,000. It's possible that, if you stayed in that home, it's worth $569,000 now but that assumes you never put a single dollar into it which is unlikely.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:




Sounds like the school counselor did a crappy job in class assignments.
First Page Last Page
Page 364 of 432
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.