Trump's first 100 days

1,317,273 Views | 18882 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by boognish_bear
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

I went back for my MBA after working for 13 years. There were a few of us who sat together in the classes, having a good chuckle at some of the things professors sold as the coming trend in Management, Logistics and Supply.

The kiddos who went for their MBA right after getting their Bachelors' would ask us what was so funny. We'd just tell them 'wait and see'. A lot of things sold as new and groundbreaking in class had been tried and failed by real businesses years before.

That's not to say we didn't learn some useful tools, but a grain of salt is an important part of any scholarly diet.


My niece is 20. Graduated last week in Accounting. Has an offer at PWC in New York. Can get Dallas next year. She's decided to get her MBA. I wanted her to wait five years and land at Wharton or Chicago. I understand why she's doing what she's doing but as you know, the experience matters.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
Minnesota fraud mastermind gets nearly 42 years in prison in massive $250M 'Feeding Our Future' scheme
DOJ called the operation the 'single largest COVID-19 fraud scheme in the country,' with dozens convicted
Alexandra Koch By Alexandra Koch Fox News
Published May 21, 2026 3:03pm EDT

The former leader of a Minnesota nonprofit was reportedly sentenced Thursday to nearly 42 years in prison for orchestrating a $250 million pandemic relief fraud scheme.

Aimee Bock, who headed the nonprofit "Feeding Our Future," was convicted last year on charges of conspiracy, fraud and bribery.

While the organization claimed to be feeding millions of needy children during the pandemic, the Justice Department described the operation as the "single largest COVID-19 fraud scheme in the country," The Associated Press reported.

Prosecutors told the court the nonprofit functioned as a "cash pipeline," relying on a web of fake distribution sites, fabricated lists of children and kickbacks.

Bock and her co-conspirators funneled the stolen taxpayer funds into lavish personal purchases, including real estate, luxury cars and international travel, the outlet reported.

During sentencing, Bock told the federal court, "I understand I failed. I failed the public, my family, everyone

Her attorney, Kenneth Udoibok, argued she should serve no more than three years, insisting she provided critical information to investigators and was unfairly scapegoated, the AP reported.

Former lead prosecutor Joe Thompson countered that Bock "did everything she could to earn this long sentence" and that the case "changed our state forever."
<<
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
this week, in a rarity in G.O.P. politics, Mr. Trump's taunts, bullying and threats have backfired, at least for now. Senate Republicans, after the president targeted two of their own, stood up to Mr. Trump on two of his biggest priorities: money for his White House ballroom, and a $1.8 billion fund to reward Trump supporters who claim political persecution by Democrats, such as the rioters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

"So the nation's top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops?" said Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky. "Utterly stupid, morally wrong take your pick."

Thune acknowledged Thursday that Trump's role in Cornyn's and Cassidy's races inflamed the reaction to the fund.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.

I agree and safeguards should be put in to make sure that it never happens again. Personally on the surface, I feel the govt shouldn't have settled under these terms but I was not involved with the deliberations.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.

I agree and safeguards should be put in to make sure that it never happens again. Personally on the surface, I feel the govt shouldn't have settled under these terms but I was not involved with the deliberations.

None of us were involved with the deliberations, which were between Trump and his personal attorney who was given the power of the Attorney General. That alone should present enough conflict of interest, but the fact that such an agreement was reached is so egregious that Congress should remove him, if they had any balls.
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.

I agree and safeguards should be put in to make sure that it never happens again. Personally on the surface, I feel the govt shouldn't have settled under these terms but I was not involved with the deliberations.

None of us were involved with the deliberations, which were between Trump and his personal attorney who was given the power of the Attorney General. That alone should present enough conflict of interest, but the fact that such an agreement was reached is so egregious that Congress should remove him, if they had any balls.

Our government and in this case legal system is a mess. Both sides do it.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/26/politics/peter-strzok-lisa-page-fbi-settlement-doj
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“The more you open yourself up to the possibility that good things will happen the higher probability is that good things will in fact happen.”
— Jordan Peterson
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????


Naw. My career took perfectly good American manufacturing facilities to Mexico.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't believe he didnt bust out laughing. Clay Davis to the rescue!

“The more you open yourself up to the possibility that good things will happen the higher probability is that good things will in fact happen.”
— Jordan Peterson
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????


Naw. My career took perfectly good American manufacturing facilities to Mexico.

So wait.... were the rivers of fire in Mexico?

I am still curious what an accounting/tax company could have been throwing in these rivers to cause so much pollution to have "rivers of fire"

Then again it was said by AOC so she probably had no clue what she was talking about......
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.

I agree and safeguards should be put in to make sure that it never happens again. Personally on the surface, I feel the govt shouldn't have settled under these terms but I was not involved with the deliberations.

None of us were involved with the deliberations, which were between Trump and his personal attorney who was given the power of the Attorney General. That alone should present enough conflict of interest, but the fact that such an agreement was reached is so egregious that Congress should remove him, if they had any balls.


Trump Collides With GOP Senators Over $1.8 Billion 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund
Sen. Thom Tillis, who is retiring after the president regularly criticized him, called it a 'payout pot for punks'

Senator Thom Tillis during a confirmation hearing.
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, of North Carolina GRAEME SLOAN/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Quick Summary
President Trump and the GOP-controlled Senate collided over a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund," stalling an immigration funding bill.

WASHINGTONSenate Republicans broke with President Trump over his administration's plan to create a $1.8 billion settlement fund to pay people who claim political persecution, with widespread opposition forcing party leaders Thursday to abandon votes on immigration-enforcement funding and send lawmakers home early for their Memorial Day break.

The "anti-weaponization" fund is a Trump priority, after he alleged for years that his supporters, including those prosecuted over the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the Capitol, had been targeted unfairly by the Biden administration. But its creation has run into blowback in the Senate, and the immigration-enforcement bill gave senators leverage to dig in their heels.

"I don't like the fund at all," said Sen. John Curtis (R., Utah), who added he didn't think any guardrails could fix it. Sen. Thom Tillis (R., N.C.), a frequent target of Trump criticism who is retiring, called it a "payout pot for punks."
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????


Naw. My career took perfectly good American manufacturing facilities to Mexico.

So wait.... were the rivers of fire in Mexico?

I am still curious what an accounting/tax company could have been throwing in these rivers to cause so much pollution to have "rivers of fire"

Then again it was said by AOC so she probably had no clue what she was talking about......


Im not sure what that is reference to. I was never an accounting tax professional. I was a manufacturing IT (M&A) professional. I know the firm starred in tax. I'm not that skilled.

I am 100% an accounting idiot.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

BearFan33 said:

Porteroso said:

Yeah, you zealots are really showing your extreme hypocrisy yet again. Had Biden made his personal attorney the AG, then sued the government, then had his personal attorney setup a fund for billions to pay violent criminals, then reached a "deal" that made him, his son, and all businesses, immune from IRS audits forever.... the "whaaaaahhhhh" would be staggering.

But since it's your tribe you just look the other way.

I'm not pleased at all about the "free to cheat" status the IRS settlement give the Trump Org. Terrible precedent. I am reminded though of why was there a settlement in the first place. If the IRS had behaved itself, Trumps suit would have had no grounds. It seems the Trumps wanted protection against future persecution by the IRS. I can't imagine why. This unfortunate situation is a side effect of weaponization of government agencies.

The way to fix government overreach is to fix government overreach. Not give people immunity to tax evasion.

I agree and safeguards should be put in to make sure that it never happens again. Personally on the surface, I feel the govt shouldn't have settled under these terms but I was not involved with the deliberations.

None of us were involved with the deliberations, which were between Trump and his personal attorney who was given the power of the Attorney General. That alone should present enough conflict of interest, but the fact that such an agreement was reached is so egregious that Congress should remove him, if they had any balls.

Our government and in this case legal system is a mess. Both sides do it.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/26/politics/peter-strzok-lisa-page-fbi-settlement-doj

Immunity from all future IRS audits for yourself your kids and all associated businesses? You are joking. Never even been thought of.

Politicians don't even dream that big when they go to fraud school before they let them into Congress.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????


Naw. My career took perfectly good American manufacturing facilities to Mexico.

So wait.... were the rivers of fire in Mexico?

I am still curious what an accounting/tax company could have been throwing in these rivers to cause so much pollution to have "rivers of fire"

Then again it was said by AOC so she probably had no clue what she was talking about......


Im not sure what that is reference to. I was never an accounting tax professional. I was a manufacturing IT (M&A) professional. I know the firm starred in tax. I'm not that skilled.

I am 100% an accounting idiot.


AOC did an interview recently where she claimed that Deloitte was responsible for polluting rivers to make them be on fire. Even though the company does not do anything that would cause pollution
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

ATL Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Building myths on Politico reports now?



On cue, the janitor of Trumplandia arrives.

Out of curiosity, when did you start letting The View post here for you?

Sick burn…

Admittedly not on the level as your suggestion that my MBA and accounting career only rate a janitor role ...


When I was at Deloitte, I'd always say don't trust them MBAs. How did I know? I was one of them. I had insider information.

Were you helping to dump all that toxic waste that caused rivers to be on fire that AOC talked about?????


Naw. My career took perfectly good American manufacturing facilities to Mexico.

So wait.... were the rivers of fire in Mexico?

I am still curious what an accounting/tax company could have been throwing in these rivers to cause so much pollution to have "rivers of fire"

Then again it was said by AOC so she probably had no clue what she was talking about......


Im not sure what that is reference to. I was never an accounting tax professional. I was a manufacturing IT (M&A) professional. I know the firm starred in tax. I'm not that skilled.

I am 100% an accounting idiot.


AOC did an interview recently where she claimed that Deloitte was responsible for polluting rivers to make them be on fire. Even though the company does not do anything that would cause pollution


Damn, compare her (or any of them) to the likes of any congressman 200 years ago and the difference in intelligence couldn't be more stark.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's not playing golf this weekend, something must be serious...

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“The more you open yourself up to the possibility that good things will happen the higher probability is that good things will in fact happen.”
— Jordan Peterson
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Trump's not playing golf this weekend, something must be serious...




My buddy has a friend who recently got shipped out to the Middle East. I forget what branch he is. He says the conflict is expected to pick back up soon.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Trump's not playing golf this weekend, something must be serious...



who gives 2 chits. Must have had a grift to keep up with.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




https://www.businessinsider.com/new-green-card-rule-wont-affect-immigrants-providing-economic-benefit-2026-5

Update from 5 hours ago.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For you Maga/Trumpians forever. Yall seen the new poll from your Network, Fox. Ole Piggy's approval on the economy is now 29%. That is the worst in recorded history. ah....the Golden Age. No mention of Biden to yalls narrative . 100% Piggy Show! Man, he's great for Merca!
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

For you Maga/Trumpians forever. Yall seen the new poll from your Network, Fox. Ole Piggy's approval on the economy is now 29%. That is the worst in recorded history. ah....the Golden Age. No mention of Biden to yalls narrative . 100% Piggy Show! Man, he's great for Merca!

Starting to wonder if the plan was to crash the whole thing from the start.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:




https://www.businessinsider.com/new-green-card-rule-wont-affect-immigrants-providing-economic-benefit-2026-5

Update from 5 hours ago.

" consistent with long-standing immigration law and immigration court decisions" - so it's not Trump's version of immigration, it's America's version. It's the liberal Democrats and TDS'rs clamoring about it
“The more you open yourself up to the possibility that good things will happen the higher probability is that good things will in fact happen.”
— Jordan Peterson
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 471 of 540
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.