nein51 said:
EatMoreSalmon said:
nein51 said:
It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.
It is forcing those agencies who were "autonomous" to have fiscal oversight. That's a real plus.
Also, when it rains, it rains a drop at a time. It is a shame how we pfffft at $150B of government spending. That's how we got here.
I'm with you on wanting to see deeper cuts in spending. I'm hoping there will be more done over the next year.
150B of 6.75T is 2%
That's $2,000 on $100,000
$20,000 on $1,000,000
$200,000 on $10,000,000
I bet most on here make at least $100,000 a year. That's a monthly savings of $166. I'm not saying that's nothing but I spent at least that much at Torchys on lunch for 8 today.
That's the literal millennial joke about your $5 a day Starbucks habit because $166 a month is $5 a day.
It's meaningless in the grand scheme of a budget.
You're right that every dollar counts but if you're going to upheave everything in your life it better be for a lot more than $5 a day.
If you announce to your family and friends you're going to cut everything you would get laughed at if all you did was cut $166 a month because it would be laughable.
I'm with you. I want real, serious, meaningful cuts and I damned sure wouldn't have spent political clout for $150B.
I think you are missing the importance of attitude in this matter.
You may have heard about tremendous credit card abuse by government employees.
Some $60 Billion in entertainment, sex sites, and other unapproved and completely useless expenses.
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/government-credit-card-misuse-2INS3i6mQ5qt3zLXoIs_lwThis is actually not a new problem, but one which has gone on for decades
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/new-reports-find-government-credit-card-abuse-air-force-personnelThe DOGE effort called attention to a problem that pretty much everyone can agree needs to be corrected, and the means are simple and readily available.
The reason I mentioned this, is because government spending has become obscene because we have allowed it to grow without even comment much less opposition. By simply calling attention to the problem, DOGE started a movement to cut obvious waste, and in so doing created pressure for Congress to do something about the waste and fraud.
In 2020,
Forbes produced a list of Trillions of dollars in pork and completely useless spending.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2020/09/30/wheres-the-pork-us-taxpayers-funded-a-lot-of-wasteful-spending-2017-2019/The amount varies according to analyst, but no one disputes that tighter oversight and proactive restrictions are clearly needed and could save Trillions.
It all starts by creating an attitude of catching waste early and calling out those responsible. Simply requiring the financial codes which
already exist for federal spending, and requiring monthly approval on all credit card spending creates a culture which warns government agents they face accountability for spending decisions. In the same manner, making clear that pretty much all agencies will see headcount cuts of around 5%-10% a year, with cuts determined by effectiveness (
or lack thereof) would certainly create a better attitude towards actually
doing the job they hold.
Just saying, you got to start somewhere, and the alternative seems to be to just continue ignoring the problem and seeing how much worse these gerbil-dropping-brains can make things.