Trump's first 100 days

604,011 Views | 11894 Replies | Last: 54 min ago by Assassin
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


You can never trust China. Too many chiefs... and they don't communicate
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:


You can never trust China. Too many chiefs... and they don't communicate
time to shut them dudes down........

- el KKM

now - your toaster might cost $3 more and your crappy assemble at home particle board what ever might also go up.

BUY AMERICAN!

EAT ARBYS!!

D!!!
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Great! Trump has said repeatedly this is Biden's economy
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

boognish_bear said:




Great! Trump has said repeatedly this is Biden's economy


I think he said the bad stuff is Biden's and the good stuff is his. So today must be a Trump economy day.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


I'll bet anyone a taco platter this doesn't last long. At least he has a union talking point for his Pittsburgh rally,
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

boognish_bear said:



It's yet another case of Trump making an outlandish claim nobody should take seriously, and somehow his zealot supporters not just entertaining it,but swallowing it whole and defending it to the death.
LOL you should familiarize yourself with CBO scoring rules. i..e not a terribly good indicator of how things are going to play out.

At this point I wonder how many would kill themselves if he said to. It is more than 0. If he gets his 3rd term whiterock wants so badly, I think it will head into real death cult territory.
LOL how delicious to see lefties get unhinged by Trump's trollilng.

If the trade deals continue to go well, it will be very difficult to know the scope of the damage from the tax cuts.
LOL tax cuts are alway stimulative. The only question is by how much.
Already there is a ton of foreign investment promised, and if it actually happens, I'm sure the tax cuts will be credited for it.
Cause effect error. The tax cuts are part of the inducement to make the investments. I mean, you don't even understand how tax cuts work to stimulate the economy. You cut the rate a little bit to spur more economic activity, which creates more taxable events. But we do understand that lefties hate "smaller bites of a bigger pie" thinking in any of its forms. (leftism only makes sense in zero-sum arguments.)

Of course the reality is that this foreign investment should be credited to incredible abuse of power, one man declaring economic war on the entire world.
Economies compete, internally and externally. Managing the external portion is a core Article II power of POTUS. He won the popular vote promising to do exactly what he's done. If the American people don't like it, they can use the mid-terms to put Democrats in power to check him, or elect a globalist POTUS in 2028. That's the system we have. You just don't like it.

It is incredible that it is working so well, just shows you how much leverage we have.
Exactly. No reason for us to be running escalating structural trade deficits which reshape our economy in ways that weaken us. We can and should forge new agreements better serve the interests of the American people, particularly blue collar workers who bore the brunt of the costs of Cold War globalism. (your inattention to that particular dynamic is why Trump has twice been elected POTUS.)
For example, tariffs alone are not enough to get the EU where it wants, so we float the idea of walking away from the defense of Europe. Throwing a continent to the wolves is what zealots think a more prosperous economy is worth. It's just incredible.
So incredibly blind. The US Navy had to reopen the Red Sea shipping lanes closed by Houthi rocket attacks against shipping, because the European powers were completely unable to do it on their own. The Red Sea is only critical to Europe. It does not figure prominently in our supply chains. So how does it matter if European states are our "allies" if they cannot offer anything of substance to the military alliance? Every American president in my lifetime has made that complaint. Trump is the first to actually force the problem to a head. You should thank him. It is not our job to defend Europe, but to help Europe defend itself.
And I think it just might work. Right or wrong be damned, let's make some money!
Now you're talking!
Why would you oppose all that if it "might work?"
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Meanwhile, we keep chugging along......

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Porteroso said:

boognish_bear said:



It's yet another case of Trump making an outlandish claim nobody should take seriously, and somehow his zealot supporters not just entertaining it,but swallowing it whole and defending it to the death.
LOL you should familiarize yourself with CBO scoring rules. i..e not a terribly good indicator of how things are going to play out.

At this point I wonder how many would kill themselves if he said to. It is more than 0. If he gets his 3rd term whiterock wants so badly, I think it will head into real death cult territory.
LOL how delicious to see lefties get unhinged by Trump's trollilng.

If the trade deals continue to go well, it will be very difficult to know the scope of the damage from the tax cuts.
LOL tax cuts are alway stimulative. The only question is by how much.
Already there is a ton of foreign investment promised, and if it actually happens, I'm sure the tax cuts will be credited for it.
Cause effect error. The tax cuts are part of the inducement to make the investments. I mean, you don't even understand how tax cuts work to stimulate the economy. You cut the rate a little bit to spur more economic activity, which creates more taxable events. But we do understand that lefties hate "smaller bites of a bigger pie" thinking in any of its forms. (leftism only makes sense in zero-sum arguments.)

Of course the reality is that this foreign investment should be credited to incredible abuse of power, one man declaring economic war on the entire world.
Economies compete, internally and externally. Managing the external portion is a core Article II power of POTUS. He won the popular vote promising to do exactly what he's done. If the American people don't like it, they can use the mid-terms to put Democrats in power to check him, or elect a globalist POTUS in 2028. That's the system we have. You just don't like it.

It is incredible that it is working so well, just shows you how much leverage we have.
Exactly. No reason for us to be running escalating structural trade deficits which reshape our economy in ways that weaken us. We can and should forge new agreements better serve the interests of the American people, particularly blue collar workers who bore the brunt of the costs of Cold War globalism. (your inattention to that particular dynamic is why Trump has twice been elected POTUS.)
For example, tariffs alone are not enough to get the EU where it wants, so we float the idea of walking away from the defense of Europe. Throwing a continent to the wolves is what zealots think a more prosperous economy is worth. It's just incredible.
So incredibly blind. The US Navy had to reopen the Red Sea shipping lanes closed by Houthi rocket attacks against shipping, because the European powers were completely unable to do it on their own. The Red Sea is only critical to Europe. It does not figure prominently in our supply chains. So how does it matter if European states are our "allies" if they cannot offer anything of substance to the military alliance? Every American president in my lifetime has made that complaint. Trump is the first to actually force the problem to a head. You should thank him. It is not our job to defend Europe, but to help Europe defend itself.
And I think it just might work. Right or wrong be damned, let's make some money!
Now you're talking!
Why would you oppose all that if it "might work?"
If removing all the Jews on the planet would result in a more prosperous economy, why oppose what might work?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


So far, nothing significant has been saved. Only if the small savings that haven't already been rolled back make it into future years, will the billions start to add up. If the deficit was just a trillion, sure, it would be significant, but when viewed in light of the actual deficit, not to mention the exaggeration, what DOGE has done so far is not all that much. And I think Congress might look at the savings and just spend that same money somewhere else.

Still, I'm grateful for DOGE! They made a lot of mistakes, were ignorant of so much, didn't save Americans nearly what they said they did, but we've got to start somewhere. It's a great start.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.


It is forcing those agencies who were "autonomous" to have fiscal oversight. That's a real plus.

Also, when it rains, it rains a drop at a time. It is a shame how we pfffft at $150B of government spending. That's how we got here.

I'm with you on wanting to see deeper cuts in spending. I'm hoping there will be more done over the next year.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

nein51 said:

It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.


It is forcing those agencies who were "autonomous" to have fiscal oversight. That's a real plus.

Also, when it rains, it rains a drop at a time. It is a shame how we pfffft at $150B of government spending. That's how we got here.

I'm with you on wanting to see deeper cuts in spending. I'm hoping there will be more done over the next year.

150B of 6.75T is 2%

That's $2,000 on $100,000
$20,000 on $1,000,000
$200,000 on $10,000,000

I bet most on here make at least $100,000 a year. That's a monthly savings of $166. I'm not saying that's nothing but I spent at least that much at Torchys on lunch for 8 today.

That's the literal millennial joke about your $5 a day Starbucks habit because $166 a month is $5 a day.

It's meaningless in the grand scheme of a budget.

You're right that every dollar counts but if you're going to upheave everything in your life it better be for a lot more than $5 a day.

If you announce to your family and friends you're going to cut everything you would get laughed at if all you did was cut $166 a month because it would be laughable.

I'm with you. I want real, serious, meaningful cuts and I damned sure wouldn't have spent political clout for $150B.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

nein51 said:

It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.


It is forcing those agencies who were "autonomous" to have fiscal oversight. That's a real plus.

Also, when it rains, it rains a drop at a time. It is a shame how we pfffft at $150B of government spending. That's how we got here.

I'm with you on wanting to see deeper cuts in spending. I'm hoping there will be more done over the next year.

150B of 6.75T is 2%

That's $2,000 on $100,000
$20,000 on $1,000,000
$200,000 on $10,000,000

I bet most on here make at least $100,000 a year. That's a monthly savings of $166. I'm not saying that's nothing but I spent at least that much at Torchys on lunch for 8 today.

That's the literal millennial joke about your $5 a day Starbucks habit because $166 a month is $5 a day.

It's meaningless in the grand scheme of a budget.

You're right that every dollar counts but if you're going to upheave everything in your life it better be for a lot more than $5 a day.

If you announce to your family and friends you're going to cut everything you would get laughed at if all you did was cut $166 a month because it would be laughable.

I'm with you. I want real, serious, meaningful cuts and I damned sure wouldn't have spent political clout for $150B.
I think you are missing the importance of attitude in this matter.

You may have heard about tremendous credit card abuse by government employees.

Some $60 Billion in entertainment, sex sites, and other unapproved and completely useless expenses.

https://www.perplexity.ai/page/government-credit-card-misuse-2INS3i6mQ5qt3zLXoIs_lw

This is actually not a new problem, but one which has gone on for decades

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/new-reports-find-government-credit-card-abuse-air-force-personnel

The DOGE effort called attention to a problem that pretty much everyone can agree needs to be corrected, and the means are simple and readily available.

The reason I mentioned this, is because government spending has become obscene because we have allowed it to grow without even comment much less opposition. By simply calling attention to the problem, DOGE started a movement to cut obvious waste, and in so doing created pressure for Congress to do something about the waste and fraud.

In 2020, Forbes produced a list of Trillions of dollars in pork and completely useless spending.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2020/09/30/wheres-the-pork-us-taxpayers-funded-a-lot-of-wasteful-spending-2017-2019/

The amount varies according to analyst, but no one disputes that tighter oversight and proactive restrictions are clearly needed and could save Trillions.

It all starts by creating an attitude of catching waste early and calling out those responsible. Simply requiring the financial codes which already exist for federal spending, and requiring monthly approval on all credit card spending creates a culture which warns government agents they face accountability for spending decisions. In the same manner, making clear that pretty much all agencies will see headcount cuts of around 5%-10% a year, with cuts determined by effectiveness (or lack thereof) would certainly create a better attitude towards actually doing the job they hold.

Just saying, you got to start somewhere, and the alternative seems to be to just continue ignoring the problem and seeing how much worse these gerbil-dropping-brains can make things.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure "it could save trillions"…

Look I love cutting expenses but I want real serious, painful cuts.

Call a spade a spade. Be honest. These are token cuts at very best.

Cutting off government employees OF subs is good; fire them too while you're at it…but we are working with a $6.5T dollar budget. You're not going to get meaningful cuts that way.

I want massive spending cuts. 2% just doesn't move the needle for me and it definitely doesn't move the needle for the amount of political capital that was spent.

If you're Musk he could have given the government $150B and been better off than he ended up. That's not ok.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Sure "it could save trillions"…

Look I love cutting expenses but I want real serious, painful cuts.

Call a spade a spade. Be honest. These are token cuts at very best.

Cutting off government employees OF subs is good; fire them too while you're at it…but we are working with a $6.5T dollar budget. You're not going to get meaningful cuts that way.

I want massive spending cuts. 2% just doesn't move the needle for me and it definitely doesn't move the needle for the amount of political capital that was spent.

If you're Musk he could have given the government $150B and been better off than he ended up. That's not ok.
You miss my point.

Government has known about the waste for a very long time. Remember Proxmire's 'Golden Fleece' awards?

There was no mood to stop it until now, and more than a little evidence that the current Congress has spines of macaroni.


if nothing else, DOGE has opened the discussion, and put pressure on Congress to follow the leads given to it.

Musk never had unilateral power to make the cuts you want. This is all about forcing Congress to get off it's ass.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Translation: Trump knows how to negotiate far better than anyone at the EU.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

nein51 said:

It's a literal portion of a drop in the bucket. It's why all the disruption and chaos made no sense. There was never going to be any real savings here.


It is forcing those agencies who were "autonomous" to have fiscal oversight. That's a real plus.

Also, when it rains, it rains a drop at a time. It is a shame how we pfffft at $150B of government spending. That's how we got here.

I'm with you on wanting to see deeper cuts in spending. I'm hoping there will be more done over the next year.

150B of 6.75T is 2%

That's $2,000 on $100,000
$20,000 on $1,000,000
$200,000 on $10,000,000

I bet most on here make at least $100,000 a year. That's a monthly savings of $166. I'm not saying that's nothing but I spent at least that much at Torchys on lunch for 8 today.

That's the literal millennial joke about your $5 a day Starbucks habit because $166 a month is $5 a day.

It's meaningless in the grand scheme of a budget.

You're right that every dollar counts but if you're going to upheave everything in your life it better be for a lot more than $5 a day.

If you announce to your family and friends you're going to cut everything you would get laughed at if all you did was cut $166 a month because it would be laughable.

I'm with you. I want real, serious, meaningful cuts and I damned sure wouldn't have spent political clout for $150B.

The upheaval might still be worthwhile if:

1. Every govt agency now thinks that it will now no longer be business as usual. If they will no longer get automatic budget increases but now have to justify all of their spending every year

2. The cuts become permanent and are only a start. DOGE revealed a whole lot more cuts that heed to be made & that Trump wants to make. Also, DOGE is continuing their efforts. They didn't shut down just because Musk left to focus on Tesla, SpaceX, etc.

3. DOGE's efforts are codified by Congress. Many people ard disappointed that the "Big Beautiful Bill" did not include that. The pressure is now on Congress to do their job, what they were did elected to do. I read somewhere that Speaker Johnson has promised to work on that starting next week. It was always contingent on Congress doing what oriole voted for. This'd who don't will likely be primaries next year: such as Sen John Cornyn.

We shall see.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?



First Page Last Page
Page 155 of 340
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.