boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

We should have kept Bagram Air Base, only 500 miles from China's western border, instead of abandoning it and handing it over to the Taliban.

Of course that little stroke of genius was all on brain-dead Biden.

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

They've finally released the names of the Kings of the No Kings parade of fools. Here ya go. Cant believe Buffett is on that list.

The No Kings financial records have been released and here are the top financier's :

⚫ Arabella: $79M
⚫ Warren Buffet: $16M
⚫Ford: $51M
⚫Rockefeller: $26M
⚫Soros: $72M
⚫Tides: $45M

For a total of :
$294,487,641 MILLION pic.twitter.com/fG9eJdUajD

— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) January 11, 2026

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

Agreed. The 'drug war' is a screen for an ongoing proxy war.

China's expansion plans actually date back to the fall of the Soviet Union. People forget that Moscow and Beijing at one time looked at each other as chief principal opponents, and both worked with the US against each other (while trying to steal American tech and build spy networks in the US).

Clinton, Bush II, and Obama did nothing to really address China's growth into the Southeast Asia region, despite protests from pretty much everyone in the area. During his first term Trump focused on trade with China, but not much on the military threat. He's addressed that more in the new term, but has held off from specifics, I believe at the request of the JC's.

China expanded its logistics chain to include Venezuela, in order to fuel its oil-hungry navy and gain economic leverage over other South-Hemisphere countries. Taking out Maduro, therefore, was an effective way to seriously damage China's expansion in addition to sending a message to Beijing that avoids direct military conflict between USN and PLAN forces.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

---

Correct. What they do is produce drugs (fentanyl) that are sent to our country through puppet countries killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, develop pandemic nano viruses that killed millions, supply hostile countries with military equipment and resources like (North Korea, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, etc... ), buy massive amounts of property in our country (a good deal close to military bases), openly spy on us with balloons floating across our country and over military instillations, set up shadow police departments in our country to intimidate and control Chinese living here, without shame steal our intellectual property...shall I go on?

BearNTex said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

---

Correct. What they do is produce drugs (fentanyl) that are sent to our country through puppet countries killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, develop pandemic nano viruses that killed millions, supply hostile countries with military equipment and resources like (North Korea, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, etc... ), buy massive amounts of property in our country (a good deal close to military bases), openly spy on us with balloons floating across our country and over military instillations, set up shadow police departments in our country to intimidate and control Chinese living here, without shame steal our intellectual property...shall I go on?

---

Of course we don't spy on anyone. We don't do one thing you described. We don't intimidate communities, we don't send support attempts to overthrow democratically elected governments we disagree with.

All we do is get invaded by balloons and fentanyl. Poor us.

You don't seem to be aware of China's actions against Vietnam, South Korea, Singapore, and others.

Odd.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

BearNTex said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

---

Correct. What they do is produce drugs (fentanyl) that are sent to our country through puppet countries killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, develop pandemic nano viruses that killed millions, supply hostile countries with military equipment and resources like (North Korea, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, etc... ), buy massive amounts of property in our country (a good deal close to military bases), openly spy on us with balloons floating across our country and over military instillations, set up shadow police departments in our country to intimidate and control Chinese living here, without shame steal our intellectual property...shall I go on?

---

Of course we don't spy on anyone. We don't do one thing you described. We don't intimidate communities, we don't send support attempts to overthrow democratically elected governments we disagree with.

All we do is get invaded by balloons and fentanyl. Poor us.

---

Ok

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

We should have kept Bagram Air Base, only 500 miles from China's western border, instead of abandoning it and handing it over to the Taliban.

Of course that little stroke of genius was all on brain-dead Biden.

---

.... in addition to the 13 kids killed and the innocent family of 9 offed by 'mistake'.

Ooops Biden.

- UF

D!

{ sipping coffee }

Go Bears!!

Welcome McNeese St FBers!!!

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

---

I hate to admit it, my friend, but you make an excellent point here.

These days when we wake up, I ask my wife, "I wonder who we bombed last night?"

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Respectfully disagree.

The single biggest threat to the people of United States are the drug cartels in Columbia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua and especially……MEXICO.

If Europe and South Korea cannot defend themselves after over SEVENTY years of US aid and protection…..that is their problem .

---

Those are not military threats and, with all due respect, if drug addicts can't stop themselves after 70 years of warnings that is their problem.

But seriously none of those countries have the ability to start a world war. China does.

The minute you leave South Korea and Japan China will take Taiwan regardless of the costs to them (which would be insanely high and incredibly difficult).

Our main disagreement is probably the mission of military. Stopping the inflow of drugs is not a military problem to me. It's a problem for the alphabet agencies.

---

China doesn't start war. We start war. How many countries have they bombed in the last 40 years?

---

You and China define "war" very differently. Unfortunately, you are not alone.

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Tell that to the cartels that run drugs and human smuggling across our border... are you saying we could stop it in a matter of days but the traitors in DC refuse to do it?

Oldbear83 said:

---

You don't seem to be aware of China's actions against Vietnam, South Korea, Singapore, and others.

Odd.

---

How do you omit Tibet?

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

There are 0 military threats to our South. We could take all of South and Central America in a matter of days.

South Korea/Japan act as a check on China/Russia.

---

Tell that to the cartels that run drugs and human smuggling across our border... are you saying we could stop it in a matter of days but the traitors in DC refuse to do it?

---

I'm saying that neither of those things are for the military to handle. The reserves in Texas alone could take all of Central and South America by force if needed.

FTR, yes, I believe if there was enough desire the politicians in DC could fix both issue you mentioned.

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

Can a president pull us out of NATO? Does it require Congress too?

Osodecentx said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Q: "Would you pull the U.S. out of NATO?"

Trump: "Maybe. NATO would be upset if I did it…I just wonder whether or not if we needed NATO, would they be there for us? I'm not sure they would."
pic.twitter.com/O6Pliq37eD

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 12, 2026

---

NATO should have been disbanded 30 years ago.
US troops should have been removed from South Korea 20 years ago.

US strategic interests should be focused on central and South America.

---

Can a president pull us out of NATO? Does it require Congress too?

---

If congress formally approved a treaty to join NATO …..I would suspect congressional approval would be required to terminate the treaty.

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

I dont like the FED wasting $2 billion of my tax money....

but I'm also consistent and do not support sending $8 billion of free unaccounted tax payer money a year to Israel....

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! Are you nutz? That would be the death of the USA!

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! That would be the death of the USA!

---

Bcs Boomers have done such a bang-up job....

The_barBEARian said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

You don't seem to be aware of China's actions against Vietnam, South Korea, Singapore, and others.

Odd.

---

How do you omit Tibet?

---

I did mention "others"

The_barBEARian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! That would be the death of the USA!

---

Bcs Boomers have done such a bang-up job....

---

What we really need is a Jewish POTUS. That would be fantastic!

The_barBEARian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! That would be the death of the USA!

---

Bcs Boomers have done such a bang-up job....

---

What is a BCS Boomer? Are they held in higher esteem than FCS Boomers?

This Boomer agrees we need younger leadership. Would love to see age limits for Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court. I think 72 years would be good.

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! That would be the death of the USA!

---

Bcs Boomers have done such a bang-up job....

---

What we really need is a Jewish POTUS. That would be fantastic!

---

Why not?

They have effectively controlled this country through every administration since JFK.

I think some 401(k) plans already utilize crypto don't they?

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senator Elizabeth Warren sends letter to SEC claiming people will "lose big" if crypto is added to 401k retirement plans. pic.twitter.com/wOAKNvi2sT

— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) January 12, 2026

Oldbear83 said:

---

You don't seem to be aware of China's actions against Vietnam, South Korea, Singapore, and others.

Odd.

---

Actually I am. I understand that you have stronger ties to Asia than me, so I'm willing to learn if you're teaching.

From my viewpoint, TPP was designed to thwart China's dominance in the Asia Pacific. We walked away from good foreign policy that not only hurt our friends on Asia but has driven them to form closer ties with China.

I don't have false ideas about the good of China. It just seems that the use influence where we use bombs.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

You don't seem to be aware of China's actions against Vietnam, South Korea, Singapore, and others.

Odd.

---

Actually I am. I understand that you have stronger ties to Asia than me, so I'm willing to learn if you're teaching.

From my viewpoint, TPP was designed to thwart China's dominance in the Asia Pacific. We walked away from good foreign policy that not only hurt our friends on Asia but has driven them to form closer ties with China.

I don't have false ideas about the good of China. It just seems that the use influence where we use bombs.

---

Sinking fishing boats is 'using influence'?

Arresting businessmen to compel them to surrender IP is 'using influence'?

The_barBEARian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Assassin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

nein51 said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

It's amazing how autocracy always follows populism.

---

it's amazing how much money the Fed can waste on vanity projects and play the victim when called out on it.

---

We'll spend more changing stationary, documentation, and building signage to the Department of War, speaking of pet projects.

But hey, let's ignore abuse of power and executive overreach and feign spending concerns.

---

The problem is people here seem not to realize that they are cool with it when Trump does it but they are gonna REALLLLLLLLLLY hate it when the next democrat does it and you better believe they will only more and better because they won't be outdone.

---

I hope after Trump we are done with Boomer Presidents.

We need 35 year old President.

Someone who will have to spend a lifetime living with the decisions they made.

---

God, please no Millennial POTUS! That would be the death of the USA!

---

Bcs Boomers have done such a bang-up job....

---

What we really need is a Jewish POTUS. That would be fantastic!

---

Why not?

They have effectively controlled this country through every administration since JFK.

---

Even better a Black Jewish Millennial POTUS. We can cover all your hate.

BREAKING: Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Sam Altman among billionaires investing in 'Freedom City' to be built on Greenland

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) January 12, 2026