Trump's first 100 days

763,166 Views | 14026 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by KaiBear
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Everytime I am unsure of a foreign policy topic…I just wait for Nikki to spout off and then I go with the opposite

It usually ends up being the correct call
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




Everytime I am unsure of a foreign policy topic…I just wait for Nikki to spout off and then I go with the opposite

It usually ends up being the correct call

Post of the Month.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Albert Einstein; "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving"
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Jack Bauer said:

Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:



He wants Iran to have nuclear weapons. All the time the world has proven that standing aside and letting them do what they want is not going to work in Iran. Guess he doesnt get it. Neither he nor Massie is the sharpest tool in the shed


I thought we "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program with our strike last year???!!

We did. Now they are trying to restart it. You cant exactly defend that until you change the folks at the top

The problem is that Iran very well knows the basic science of nuclear enrichment.

They have been seriously trying to build - and use - a nuclear weapon since 1980.

I mean, when Saudi Arabia cooperates with US intelligence to find and remove enrichment labs, you're not talking about normal defense programs.

cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:

Long...but interesting take



This happens for every deployment of military personnel. Whether a normal length or extended. Every branch.
Untrue. You must not have read the details.


It absolutely is true. Military personnel on deployment miss things all the time and have for decades.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Assassin said:

Jack Bauer said:

Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:



He wants Iran to have nuclear weapons. All the time the world has proven that standing aside and letting them do what they want is not going to work in Iran. Guess he doesnt get it. Neither he nor Massie is the sharpest tool in the shed


I thought we "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program with our strike last year???!!

We did. Now they are trying to restart it. You cant exactly defend that until you change the folks at the top

They have been seriously trying to build - and use - a nuclear weapon since 1980.


LOL
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam confirms on record he finds the idea of Iran nuking someone to be funny.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam confirms on record he finds the idea of Iran nuking someone to be funny.


No, just laughing at you guys changing positions at Donalds rant du jour to show he is right.

Remember, obliterated best airstrike ever, will never be able to threaten the world with Nukes again 10 months ago. So they dug out,, rebuilt and restarted a nuclear program in 10 months? So either the strike was not as successful as we were told or ???

I find it funny that you are now agreeing with Nickey Haley who you said was an idiot and Neocon.

The problem is not bombing Iran, but we never know what the truth is from this Administration. Nothing ever adds up and you guys will do whatever math Donald wants you to do.

Actually thinking it through, you are right it isnt funny, it is sad and scary. We have no idea of the truth and will not get it as we saw Tuesday night. It is all a rally and reality show.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go find a military friend, ask him about the strikes.

They were impressive on many points, including our air supremacy, Intel on location and construction, and importance to Iran's intentions.

Iran is now trying to rebuild those facilities, dumping massive resources their people need into a program which can have only disastrous outcomes.

Still chuckling?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Go find a military friend, ask him about the strikes.

They were impressive on many points, including our air supremacy, Intel on location and construction, and importance to Iran's intentions.

Iran is now trying to rebuild those facilities, dumping massive resources their people need into a program which can have only disastrous outcomes.

Still chuckling?

Once again, you run to the strikes. Has nothing to do with the strikes.

IT HAS TO DO WITH WHAT THIS WHITE HOUSE TELLS US AND HOW THEY TELL US.


The strike was fine, it accomplished what it did and stopped the immediate threat. IT WAS NOT TOLD TO THE US PUBLIC AS THAT. GET IT.

Nothing that comes from this White House is credible, we have no idea because it is all a show based on Donald's ego. That is the problem. He makes **** up.

But, keep focusing on everything else. It is all a shell game and you guys keep believing what he says.

By the way, here is an objective view of the program and airstrike. The truth is that the airstrike dealt with an immediate threat, but further work was always necessary. This is not classified information, it is published by people that do nothing but monitor and give information to both sides. Nothing partisan, the point is to be non-partisan. We were always going back if we wanted to destroy the program, we knew that in July.

WHY JUST NOT SAY THAT IN JULY? It was still a success. Why does it HAVE to be a lie that is obviously not true? Why can't something add up? But, keep defending him, he depends on enablers.


Damage to Iran's Nuclear ProgramCan It Rebuild?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Take a deep breath, wipe the spittle off your screen and re-read what I posted.

Then maybe we can discuss the issue.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Take a deep breath, wipe the spittle off your screen and re-read what I posted.

Then maybe we can discuss the issue.


As I said, you are talking nuts and bolts. Once again, no-one is disagreeing with you.


Now look at mine. I am not talking mission, I am talking what the American people are being told. It does not match, you can't make the math work.

Funny thing, there seems to be no reason for it. It was positive, why the messaging? I swear he does more damage to himself through self-inflicted comments than anything. That is what I want to discuss? Why? Even the SOTU, the mocking of the opposing Party. Why? All it does is make him look petty and give ammo to his opponents?

And it does matter.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
** sigh **

No FLBear, all you are doing is screaming about Trump. You are flinging rhetorical poo because you remain constantly outraged to the point that you color everything in the assumption that Trump is bad and wrong.


Iran is a genuine threat to the Middle East, and to the world. Stop for just a moment and consider what even a single nuclear detonation would provoke, especially given the presence of American, Chinese, and Russian interests. Iran has never wavered from a deliberate intent to not only create nuclear weapons but use them. Unlike other nations, Iran has always attempted to carry out its threats, and this has been confirmed by contacts in other Middle East nations, particularly Saudi Arabia and Jordan. This was the reason for the strikes last year, and for US concern now.


You don't have to like Trump, or even trust him. You ought to at least consider the opinions of his chief military leaders, and note the responses (and sometimes the silence) of other nations in the region.


FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

** sigh **

No FLBear, all you are doing is screaming about Trump. You are flinging rhetorical poo because you remain constantly outraged to the point that you color everything in the assumption that Trump is bad and wrong.


Iran is a genuine threat to the Middle East, and to the world. Stop for just a moment and consider what even a single nuclear detonation would provoke, especially given the presence of American, Chinese, and Russian interests. Iran has never wavered from a deliberate intent to not only create nuclear weapons but use them. Unlike other nations, Iran has always attempted to carry out its threats, and this has been confirmed by contacts in other Middle East nations, particularly Saudi Arabia and Jordan. This was the reason for the strikes last year, and for US concern now.


You don't have to like Trump, or even trust him. You ought to at least consider the opinions of his chief military leaders, and note the responses (and sometimes the silence) of other nations in the region.




I gave you an answer to your point, I agree with you. The mission by the military was outstanding. Never said otherwise.


You, as usual, give me a lecture on why my concern is not valid and then go back to what I already agreed with you on.

So, you are good with the White House's messaging? You believe they are telling everyone the truth. It is all the best ever. Golden age. That is what you are seeing?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

** sigh **

No FLBear, all you are doing is screaming about Trump. You are flinging rhetorical poo because you remain constantly outraged to the point that you color everything in the assumption that Trump is bad and wrong.


Iran is a genuine threat to the Middle East, and to the world. Stop for just a moment and consider what even a single nuclear detonation would provoke, especially given the presence of American, Chinese, and Russian interests. Iran has never wavered from a deliberate intent to not only create nuclear weapons but use them. Unlike other nations, Iran has always attempted to carry out its threats, and this has been confirmed by contacts in other Middle East nations, particularly Saudi Arabia and Jordan. This was the reason for the strikes last year, and for US concern now.


You don't have to like Trump, or even trust him. You ought to at least consider the opinions of his chief military leaders, and note the responses (and sometimes the silence) of other nations in the region.



Meanwhile the Trump admin is giving nuclear technology to the Saudis... you know, the guys who paid for all the actual Islamic terrorism that occurs in the west.

Saudi Arabia may have uranium enrichment under proposed deal with US, arms control experts warn
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam confirms on record he finds the idea of Iran nuking someone to be funny.

Iran with a nuclear bomb is his lifelong dream
Albert Einstein; "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving"
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
The Biden Justice Department "invited" Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to apply for a lucrative sole-source grant in 2022 at the same time that she was pursuing an election interference investigation against Donald Trump, the eventual GOP competitor to President Joe Biden, internal correspondence obtained by Just the News reveals.

"I want to document your recognition of our progress and services provided with dynamic partners, as we complete sole source steps for our new grant award, a grant in which you invited us to apply," Willis wrote to Justice Department Senior Policy Advisor Scott Pestridge in the Office of Justice Programs in December 2022.

The district attorney was highlighting the Justice Department's 2022 Office of Justice Programs Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative grant, from which her office ultimately received $2,000,000 to implement its programs, agency records show.

Willis' office given millions by Biden DOJ at the same time she was prosecuting Trump

That award, which was opened in April 2022 as a competitive grant, appears to have been provided to Fulton County as the "sole source," according to the district attorney. The Justice Department defines a sole source procurement as "noncompetitive," meaning no other entity competed against Fulton for the award.

This award, which Willis said her office would use for community programs dedicated to ensure "at-risk" youth do not fall into crime or help them reintegrate into society if they do, was just a fraction of the more than $18,000,000 in funding the Justice Department's Office of Justice Policy gave the Fulton prosecutor's office from the time Willis took office in 2021 until 2024.
...
<<

need to audit this $$$$....

- UF

{ sipping coffee }
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
for those unfamiliar with the term, 'sole source' means there was no competition for the grant, and only the individual designated was able to use the money.

It's cronyism on its face.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Dude had a stroke, which limits some brain function…and he's still smarter on this issue than the overwhelming majority of his Democrat colleagues. Thats insane.

I believe Fetterman is fully recovered from his stroke. I have not seen any sign of reduced mental ability in the past 2+ years. In fact, as you note, he's the one Democrat showing intelligence and sanity most of the time.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

CNN Poll: Majority of Viewers Felt More Optimistic About America's Future After Watching Trump's Speech

Trump gave an epic performance.

However if he leads the US into a wholesale war against Iran his presidency will be effectively over.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's speech writers for these addresses really earned their money. This year, and several other State of the Unions in his first term.

For Trump to improve voters' opinion of him, and the direction of the country, based upon what came out of his mouth, is truly epic.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

ATL Bear said:

cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:

Long...but interesting take



This happens for every deployment of military personnel. Whether a normal length or extended. Every branch.
Untrue. You must not have read the details.


It absolutely is true. Military personnel on deployment miss things all the time and have for decades.
Of course they do. I thought you were saying the deployment extension happens for every deployment and branch.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Assassin said:

CNN Poll: Majority of Viewers Felt More Optimistic About America's Future After Watching Trump's Speech

Trump gave an epic performance.

However if he leads the US into a wholesale war against Iran his presidency will be effectively over.


These are my sentiments.

I thought his state of the union was masterfully delivered... they say it set the record for longest SOTU, but it didnt feel overly verbose or boring. It held my attention for the entire 2 hours.

I just hope they dont throw away this positive momentum from his SOTU by starting an massively unpopular war that will certainly result in American casualties.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WTH?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

WTH?



Okay, I'll say it. The Senate is a dog and pony show.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:

WTH?



Okay, I'll say it. The Senate is a dog and pony show.

They depend on horse ***** Now we know where it comes from.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>

Minnesota woman pleads guilty to stealing millions through Feeding our Future fraud

A Minneapolis woman has pleaded guilty to laundering more than $1 million in federal funds she stole as part of the sprawling Feeding Our Future fraud scheme that exploited a pandemic-era child nutrition program, federal prosecutors said.

Najmo Ahmed, 35, admitted Wednesday that she falsified records and routed illicit proceeds through her personal bank accounts while helping operate Evergreen Grocery and Deli in Minneapolis with her husband, according to the Justice Department. Together, they stole millions of dollars in federal funding through the scheme, prosecutors said.

Federal prosecutors said the couple enrolled the small storefront in the Federal Child Nutrition Program in April 2020 under the sponsorship of Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit organization at the center of what authorities have described as a $250 million fraud scheme targeting COVID-19 relief funds meant to feed children, which authorities first began investigating during the Biden administration.

According to court documents, Ahmed signed falsified meal count sheets claiming the site served thousands of meals that were never provided. One report dated Dec. 31, 2020, asserted Evergreen Grocery and Deli served 3,250 children twice a day during a single week. Between April 2020 and April 2021, the site claimed to have distributed more than 1.4 million meals.

Those fraudulent claims generated more than $4.2 million in payments from Feeding Our Future, prosecutors said.

Authorities said her husband, Said Ereg, transferred funds from business accounts into personal accounts held by himself and Ahmed, who knew the money represented proceeds of illegal activity. Ahmed then moved at least $1,147,348 to foreign textile and trading companies, including Shaoxing Aifan Textile Co., and spent additional funds on personal luxury purchases from brands such as Burberry, Louis Vuitton, and Canada Goose.

In total, Ahmed laundered $1,381,048 in federal child nutrition funds through her personal accounts, according to prosecutors.

Acting U.S. Attorney Lisa Kirkpatrick said the guilty plea marks another conviction tied to the massive fraud investigation, which has charged dozens of defendants accused of exploiting programs designed to help children during the pandemic.

Ahmed pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota before Judge Nancy Brasel, an appointee of President Donald Trump. A sentencing date has not yet been scheduled.

<<
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

>>

Minnesota woman pleads guilty to stealing millions through Feeding our Future fraud

A Minneapolis woman has pleaded guilty to laundering more than $1 million in federal funds she stole as part of the sprawling Feeding Our Future fraud scheme that exploited a pandemic-era child nutrition program, federal prosecutors said.

Najmo Ahmed, 35, admitted Wednesday that she falsified records and routed illicit proceeds through her personal bank accounts while helping operate Evergreen Grocery and Deli in Minneapolis with her husband, according to the Justice Department. Together, they stole millions of dollars in federal funding through the scheme, prosecutors said.

Federal prosecutors said the couple enrolled the small storefront in the Federal Child Nutrition Program in April 2020 under the sponsorship of Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit organization at the center of what authorities have described as a $250 million fraud scheme targeting COVID-19 relief funds meant to feed children, which authorities first began investigating during the Biden administration.

According to court documents, Ahmed signed falsified meal count sheets claiming the site served thousands of meals that were never provided. One report dated Dec. 31, 2020, asserted Evergreen Grocery and Deli served 3,250 children twice a day during a single week. Between April 2020 and April 2021, the site claimed to have distributed more than 1.4 million meals.

Those fraudulent claims generated more than $4.2 million in payments from Feeding Our Future, prosecutors said.

Authorities said her husband, Said Ereg, transferred funds from business accounts into personal accounts held by himself and Ahmed, who knew the money represented proceeds of illegal activity. Ahmed then moved at least $1,147,348 to foreign textile and trading companies, including Shaoxing Aifan Textile Co., and spent additional funds on personal luxury purchases from brands such as Burberry, Louis Vuitton, and Canada Goose.

In total, Ahmed laundered $1,381,048 in federal child nutrition funds through her personal accounts, according to prosecutors.

Acting U.S. Attorney Lisa Kirkpatrick said the guilty plea marks another conviction tied to the massive fraud investigation, which has charged dozens of defendants accused of exploiting programs designed to help children during the pandemic.

Ahmed pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota before Judge Nancy Brasel, an appointee of President Donald Trump. A sentencing date has not yet been scheduled.

<<

Some follow-up questions are needed. Like were any of the proceeds kicked up to administrators of the program they defrauded. I hope the plea deal includes their cooperation in future prosecutions.
First Page Last Page
Page 397 of 401
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.