Trump's first 100 days

807,017 Views | 14662 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Assassin
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Try reading what I actually wrote next time?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did you even read what I actually wrote on the post he mocked?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:




Elon is wrong

You want liberals to return us to Biden's morals? Criminal illegal aliens carrying the votes for Democrats?


Sorry, there has to be something between Biden's progressive malaise and Trump's authoritarian ego trip.

Start by stepping back and taking off the filters.

Every President in my life has had flaws, and most have had good qualities as well.

Most here seem unaware of these points.


We get it you love Trump. Can do no wrong, well documented. His Agents literally shot people in the street, he tariffed the whole world, started a war with Iran, threatened to take Greenland, and is literally turning Gaza into a real estate project for his son in law and you are good. Can't be more pro-Donald than that


If you really believe all this you should vote straight Dem in 2028.


I just want a real choice. It has been over ten years since an election wasn't a response to an over the top bad candidate.

It would be nice to vote for someone, rather than having to say at least he's better than Biden, Harris, Clinton...

I get Trump has warts, and up until this year he was a better choice than Biden. Iran, may be pushing that analysis to its extremes. We can't keep having this turmoil every month.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:




Elon is wrong

You want liberals to return us to Biden's morals? Criminal illegal aliens carrying the votes for Democrats?


Sorry, there has to be something between Biden's progressive malaise and Trump's authoritarian ego trip.

Start by stepping back and taking off the filters.

Every President in my life has had flaws, and most have had good qualities as well.

Most here seem unaware of these points.

and your hero Fat Trump's good qualities are?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
her is to hoping we can get a traditional R candidate for POTUS. No MAGA. No Trumpians. nothing would cleanse the good ole US as it desperately needs it.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

her is to hoping we can get a traditional R candidate for POTUS. No MAGA. No Trumpians. nothing would cleanse the good ole US as it desperately needs it.

I agree. A good example is the Hegseth "No Quarter" comments.

They have us arguing whether that is a lawful order, one side saying it is and the other saying it is not it is rhetoric. I agree it is rhetoric coming from a podium, same with Kelly's video. He is not giving an order.

What no one is discussing is should the Sec of Defense be using this type of rhetoric in media speeches? It doesn't have to be illegal to be wrong. Can anyone remember an Administration that turned the US Government into a reality show more than this one? I can't remember one SecDef going on about no quarter, no mercy or war ethos. I get it teaching that in Officer Basic Course, but at the podium as SecDef?

Maybe Chuck Hagel? But I think his context was for controlled measured responses, not indiscriminate use of force. I may be wrong. Just seem the messaging coming from Sec of Def is a bit bombastic, versus controlled.

So, I agree I don't think it is prosecutable. Is that the bar of acceptance?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



screw Levin and his ilk.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

J.R. said:

her is to hoping we can get a traditional R candidate for POTUS. No MAGA. No Trumpians. nothing would cleanse the good ole US as it desperately needs it.

I agree. A good example is the Hegseth "No Quarter" comments.

They have us arguing whether that is a lawful order, one side saying it is and the other saying it is not it is rhetoric. I agree it is rhetoric coming from a podium, same with Kelly's video. He is not giving an order.

What no one is discussing is should the Sec of Defense be using this type of rhetoric in media speeches? It doesn't have to be illegal to be wrong. Can anyone remember an Administration that turned the US Government into a reality show more than this one? I can't remember one SecDef going on about no quarter, no mercy or war ethos. I get it teaching that in Officer Basic Course, but at the podium as SecDef?

Maybe Chuck Hagel? But I think his context was for controlled measured responses, not indiscriminate use of force. I may be wrong. Just seem the messaging coming from Sec of Def is a bit bombastic, versus controlled.

So, I agree I don't think it is prosecutable. Is that the bar of acceptance?

I gotta be honest with you. I cannot for the life of of me understand why we as a people don't call total BS. How is it we just let Piggy freelance with no freaking plan. No plan. Trump has FUBAR'd the heck out of our country. Time to move on Piggy. I really think he is losing it. It think senility has come home to roost. Thanks MAGA
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Jack Bauer said:



screw Levin and his ilk.


The list of people you hate grows day by day.

So why now do you hate Levin ?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are unhinged lol Lay off this forum, and reddit for a bit.

Good thing you do not live in this country anymore!
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

You are unhinged lol Lay off this forum, and reddit for a bit.

Good thing you do not live in this country anymore!

now Danny jackass. don't do reddit, but own the stock. you are right. I'm happy to be the eff out of there with you MAGGOT Rednecks FUBARing everything. go back to you backwater double wide in VanZant county with your meth lab, punk azz
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:




I'm getting to the point where I am considering voting Democrat so they impeach Trump and JD Vance becomes President.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Jack Bauer said:



screw Levin and his ilk.


The list of people you hate grows day by day.

So why now do you hate Levin ?

because he's a bomb thrower. Way too niche and way to pro Izzy. Eff Izz. I like...Charlie Kirk (always good for sympathy)..seemed like a good dude. Not too many politicians or political commentators I respect or like. Gonna keep the positivity going...I do like/respect....Rand Paul, Massie, Khana, Bessent if he could run his own show and wasn't such a meow. He is a lot smarter than Piggy. Unfortunately R's are a bunch of meows and cowards. She cray, but Maggs Greene nutted up. I like Klobachar. They rest ...Rs and Ds =meh
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:




I'm getting to the point where I am considering voting Democrat so they impeach Trump and JD Vance becomes President.

You really don't understand how the impeachment trial works.

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Jack Bauer said:



screw Levin and his ilk.


The list of people you hate grows day by day.

So why now do you hate Levin ?


How could anyone not like Mark Levin!?!?

whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:




I'm getting to the point where I am considering voting Democrat so they impeach Trump and JD Vance becomes President.

You really don't understand how the impeachment trial works.



Not surprised. He doesn't understand a lot of things.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Jack Bauer said:



screw Levin and his ilk.


The list of people you hate grows day by day.

So why now do you hate Levin ?

because he's a bomb thrower. Way too niche and way to pro Izzy. Eff Izz. I like...Charlie Kirk (always good for sympathy)..seemed like a good dude. Not too many politicians or political commentators I respect or like. Gonna keep the positivity going...I do like/respect....Rand Paul, Massie, Khana, Bessent if he could run his own show and wasn't such a meow. He is a lot smarter than Piggy. Unfortunately R's are a bunch of meows and cowards. She cray, but Maggs Greene nutted up. I like Klobachar. They rest ...Rs and Ds =meh

Yeah, Levin is a bit of a bomb thrower.

Although I agree with many of his positions, Lenin's intensity is very difficult to listen to for more than 5 minutes.

Surprised he has been on the air this long.

I do not particularly like any political commentator as they are all paid mouth pieces.

The only Dem I like is Fetterman.

The only Republicans I like are Rubio, Bessent and Desantis.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:




Elon is wrong

You want liberals to return us to Biden's morals? Criminal illegal aliens carrying the votes for Democrats?


Sorry, there has to be something between Biden's progressive malaise and Trump's authoritarian ego trip.
There is. It's known as a Mexican standoff.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:




Elon is wrong

You want liberals to return us to Biden's morals? Criminal illegal aliens carrying the votes for Democrats?


Republicans will be in the minority someday, and they will need the filibuster to fend off statehood for DC & Puerta Rico

But why in the world would anyone other than a liberal Democrat suport not showing approved ID when they vote. Some 83% of America supports a voter ID
“May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears.” Nelson Mandela
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
{ eating billy paultz }

{ sipping cola }

{ wearing BK King Hat }



- UF

D!

Go Bears!!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Trumps Venezuela strike is clearly paying immediate benefits.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:




Trumps Venezuela strike is clearly paying immediate benefits.
lets see.. we can add Greeenland, Alberta Canada, and Cuba as new states..
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:

Osodecentx said:

Assassin said:




Elon is wrong

You want liberals to return us to Biden's morals? Criminal illegal aliens carrying the votes for Democrats?


Republicans will be in the minority someday, and they will need the filibuster to fend off statehood for DC & Puerta Rico

But why in the world would anyone other than a liberal Democrat suport not showing approved ID when they vote. Some 83% of America supports a voter ID
Can't think of a good reason
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Did he beat his chest during that spiel?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Thomas Massie just declared: "This government is under siege."

And he exposed Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi for taking "millions of dollars from Bayer."

"All three branches of this government are under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer."

"They spent over $9 million lobbying … so that they don't have to be liable for any damages their herbicide Roundup causes."

"The Constitution guarantees people a trial if they've been harmed."

"Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution?"

"The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages."

"By the way, the President's Chief of Staff and the President's Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that's received millions of dollars from Bayer."

"Maybe that's why we've seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority."

"And we know why they're doing that."

"It's to keep them from having any liability."

"This is wrong."

"We shouldn't succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress."
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



What this really highlights is the ridiculous voting pattern of most Jews which is very heavily skewed Democrat. I'm not sure any group has so consistently voted against their own interests.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:



What this really highlights is the ridiculous voting pattern of most Jews which is very heavily skewed Democrat. I'm not sure any group has so consistently voted against their own interests.


Most Democrat Jews I know aren't religious. I've found only the religious ones care about Israel
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
First Page
Page 418 of 419
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.