Trump's first 100 days

1,251,396 Views | 18405 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by william
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

boognish_bear said:

Yeah..."people keep asking"




It's a shame actress Isabel from the old show The Jeffersons is dead. She could have been a great running mate for Don. They could have been the easy peasy Lemon, Weezy ticket.

They've got millions of dead voters, running her a VP would be nothing
Searching for Lone Star: A Tale of Two Brothers
https://tcupress.tcu.edu/9780875659862/
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TenBears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Great Cheeto Caper may have just delivered his most boring, useless speech ever. And my God that's saying something.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SO NOW WE KNOW WHY BIDEN WON
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
in further Trump Crime Family grift has devolved to. Trump's telepropropter guy made $90K insider trading with Kalshi. Kalshi flagged it. This has gotten down right comical. The freaking Teleprompter guy! lol
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
Key Points
  • Digital forms of theft such as tap-to-pay schemes and app fraud are shaping the next wave of organized retail crime and fueling solo thieves to Chinese gangs, which earn as much as $1 billion annually from the crime, police say.
  • Instead of clearing out shelves inside big box stores, fraudsters are using stolen credit cards and tap-to-pay to purchase gift cards that can be resold at a discount or used to buy high value goods for resale in China.
  • CNBC examined nearly a dozen cases across the country involving a wide array of retailers, including Lowe's and TJX Companies
When a man in a black Air Jordan T-shirt walked up to a self-checkout kiosk at a Louisiana Lowe's last spring, he looked like any other customer.

Over the course of about seven minutes, he methodically rang up different gift cards for $95 each, using his phone to tap-to-pay for each card as a red-vested associate circled nearby, surveillance video showed.

Unknown to the employee, the man was part of a sprawling Chinese crime ring, using stolen credit cards to buy the gift cards while a Southeast Asian scam compound coached him through each transaction through the wireless headphones in his ears, police say.

"We know that there are hundreds of individuals at any one time doing this across the country," said Adam Parks, an assistant special agent in charge with U.S. Homeland Security Investigations, who investigated the case. "Even though you think that's $95 every transaction, that adds up to a lot of money."

After the man left the hardware store, he purchased more gift cards with stolen credit card information at other retailers only to return to the original Lowe's the same day to repeat the act, Parks said. He was not arrested and is still a suspect, he added. Lowe's didn't respond to repeated requests for comment from CNBC.

While credit card theft and fraud isn't new, with the proliferation of tap-to-pay and growing use of retail apps,
these digital thefts are shaping the next wave of organized retail crime and earning Chinese gangs as much as $1 billion annually, police said. Unlike typical retail theft operations - where criminals clear out shelves in big box stores and resell merchandise piece by piece on online marketplaces the crimes can be carried out right under a store employee's nose or from a computer anywhere in the world.

"It's very low risk for the bad actors," said Scott Glenn, vice president of asset protection at The Home Depot. "It's not the same thing as walking into a Home Depot, filling up a cart full of power tools, and then walking out. It's just not as visible, it's not as obvious to what's happening out there and so it's become a more preferred method over the last several years."
<<
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

SO NOW WE KNOW WHY BIDEN WON

Read what he said. He said exposed, potential, could happen... He did not show one bit of proof.

Even 6 years later with his whole Stephen Miller minions looking there is no proof the election was hacked or that fraud played a roll. People just were sick of Trump. He lost. More people voted for whoever was running against him. Get it.

This is not about 2020, this is about 2026 midterms. He is setting up for the loss that is coming.

Just like Epstein, he provided NOTHING new. Nothing that shows election interference. An asteroid could hit earth in the next week. You could win the lottery. Both will probably not happen.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

SO NOW WE KNOW WHY BIDEN WON

Read what he said. He said exposed, potential, could happen... He did not show one bit of proof.

Even 6 years later with his whole Stephen Miller minions looking there is no proof the election was hacked or that fraud played a roll. People just were sick of Trump. He lost. More people voted for whoever was running against him. Get it.

This is not about 2020, this is about 2026 midterms. He is setting up for the loss that is coming.

Just like Epstein, he provided NOTHING new. Nothing that shows election interference. An asteroid could hit earth in the next week. You could win the lottery. Both will probably not happen.


After almost six years of promises to imminently reveal smoking-gun proof of tampering with the 2020 election, President Donald Trump stopped short again on Thursday.
In a prime-time presidential address that the White House and Republican allies said would present bombshell findings from an exhaustive reexamination of law enforcement and intelligence files, Trump never claimed to have any evidence of altered votes or compromised machines.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, we had bombshell disclosures??? China thought about messing with our elections? That was the bombshell? No ****, so did Russia and probably a whole host of nations. You think that is new???? Go on the internet.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why didn't Reagan offer this service?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lets be real, if there were any hard evidence of material or widespread election fraud or vote manipulation by China or any other foreign or domestic person, the FBI/Whitehouse would have released it already. This is the Epstein files all over again.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cabinet talking points are out

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Links to files on whitehouse.gov.

These are zip files for download.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Vulnerabilities-in-Electronic-Voting-and-Ballot-Counting-Systems.zip

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Chinas-Acquisition-and-Exploitation-of-American-Voter-Data.zip

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Michigan-Voter-Registration-Investigation.zip

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Noncitizens-on-State-Voter-Rolls.zip
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And they want weak dems in office
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




This is just a question and not claiming election was fixed conspiracy theory stuff but….. How can they post this as a fact check BEFORE the supposed evidence was presented?

That is like claiming a medicine can help with cancer as false before the study results are released.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought this speech was supposed to be huuuuge? Like the biggest since watergate. Seems like it was a nothing burger.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:




This is just a question and not claiming election was fixed conspiracy theory stuff but….. How can they post this as a fact check BEFORE the supposed evidence was presented?

That is like claiming a medicine can help with cancer as false before the study results are released.

CBS News does not exactly like Donald Trump. So they probably had the "fact check" ready before anything was said by the President.

303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:




This is just a question and not claiming election was fixed conspiracy theory stuff but….. How can they post this as a fact check BEFORE the supposed evidence was presented?

That is like claiming a medicine can help with cancer as false before the study results are released.


That's the current media cycle in a nutshell. Group A makes claim, group B reacts and declares group A wrong, antisemitic, anti American or whatever. And then group A never has to substantiate their original claim.

The reflecting pool is a great example. 0 evidence of a "300 yard cut" in the lining, but twitter is awash with debate back and forth about vandalism everyone knows deep down never happened. It was a ****ty resurfacing job given to a no-bid contractor. Only a scandal if you have spent weeks declaring it something more than that.
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

I thought this speech was supposed to be huuuuge? Like the biggest since watergate. Seems like it was a nothing burger.


Of course it is, but it bought the admin another 4-5 days of anticipation and distraction w/r/t Iran and Epstein. So it served its purpose for them.
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
-- (P.C. 1974)
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Cabinet talking points are out




I don't believe it
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course you don't

Most liberal clowns don't.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not a computer dude, but to mess with the voting machines, don't they have to be connected to the internet?
I do recognize that the software within the individual machines have to be checked and cleared before each election, at least in my state.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

Of course you don't

Most liberal clowns don't.

While you are gullible
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
-- (P.C. 1974)
First Page Last Page
Page 508 of 526
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.