This is written by Ryan Williams (A Canadian)
The Canada-U.S. trade deal didn't collapse over bourbon. It collapsed when the fine print got much bigger than the headline.
Here's what we know now.
Trump said Tuesday the two countries had a deal, subject to final documents. Greer said the U.S. was happy with where things landed.
Then Washington's internal divisions surfaced.
The Washington Post reports Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Peter Navarro pushed back against Greer over tariff relief, arguing the U.S. was giving away too much.
By the end, the disputes included:
Heavy trucks: the U.S. sought to exclude vehicles including Ford F-350/F-450 production in Oakville and GM Silverado production from improved tariff treatment.
Future trade deals: Carney says the U.S. wanted terms that would curtail Canada's ability to make new trade agreements and require greater alignment with U.S. policy toward third countries.
Critical minerals: reports say Washington sought preferential access or a right of first refusal. Carney says Canada would "never give exclusive access."
French language, culture and digital policy: Carney says U.S. demands touched subsidies, cultural protections, French-language policy and even information required on Canadian products. That likely included some of the Liberal government's digital and cultural laws, potentially measures like C-18 and streaming/content rules, which Washington has viewed as trade irritants. Some of those changes may actually have been good for Canadians.
CUSMA itself: the new 50% tariffs now hit some goods that previously enjoyed preferential treatment under the existing continental trade agreement.
There is one more important point.
The sovereignty issue is not entirely new.
Back in 2018, under Trudeau and Freeland, Canada already signed CUSMA Article 32.10, which gave the U.S. and Mexico major leverage if Canada pursued a free-trade deal with a so-called non-market country, widely understood to mean China.
So yes, Canada had already accepted some U.S. influence over future trade agreements.
The question is whether Washington wanted to go further this time while still keeping major tariffs on Canadian goods.