Trump's first 100 days

1,293,054 Views | 18723 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by cowboycwr
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You have simply kept repeating debunked claims. We get it.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one ever argued on this thread against fruits and vegetables being available. Ever. You keep beating a dead unicorn that does not exist. You must at least try to be honest. It wouldn't hurt to be a normal human being and admit you made a mistake.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

Absolutely.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

No one ever argued on this thread against fruits and vegetables being available. Ever. You keep beating a dead unicorn that does not exist. You must at least try to be honest. It wouldn't hurt to be a normal human being and admit you made a mistake.


So, what was wrong with the school lunch program providing only healthy food, besides it being from Obama?

Please fill me in on how that is bad. If it is not, why the reference besides Michelle Obama?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

You are missing the point. Some schools have banned many items or even any outside food from being brought.

For example, schools have said you cannot bring sodas. You cannot bring PBJ. ETc.

So they are limiting the options.

The problem is in the waste. But I guess you like waste and money being literally thrown away.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

And once again, that is the point. Obama's regime restricted what students were allowed to bring if they didn't want the mystery crap plate. And every student got a veggie even if they just threw it away.

You keep ignoring those parts when they are the problem, mister.


If you want to throw it away that is a personal choice. The school should provide healthy meals, the school's job is to teach, not win a popularity contest.

If this was Trump, you would be crowing how great he is and he is fixing school lunches. It was Obama it is bad, period. ODS- Obama Derangement Syndrome. Obama cant have done anything right.

Think about it, you are arguing against providing kids with fruits and vegetables in school lunches because it was Michelle Obama. Really????

Get it.

No sorry but you are still missing the two key words and their basic definitions.

It is not about providing. It is the difference between FORCING and OFFERING.

Look up those two words and get back to me once you understand the difference.

Would you be ok with schools FORCING students to run and exercise? I mean it is healthy for you. We as a country of lots of overweight and obese kids. Perhaps we should stop giving them the OPTION to run at recess/PE and start FORCING them to do so.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Flooneybear still trying to cover for race baiting Barry and his husband
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

No one ever argued on this thread against fruits and vegetables being available. Ever. You keep beating a dead unicorn that does not exist. You must at least try to be honest. It wouldn't hurt to be a normal human being and admit you made a mistake.


So, what was wrong with the school lunch program providing only healthy food, besides it being from Obama?

Please fill me in on how that is bad. If it is not, why the reference besides Michelle Obama?

1. She was the one who championed/pushed for the new program so it was seen as her lunch program. Sort of the same way health care was not called by the bill's name but Obama Care.

2. It was being forced. Not just an option but forced.

3. It lead to documented massive amounts of waste.

4. This led to higher costs in terms of food bought (that was wasted), and trash pick up.

5. The money and food could have been better used in other programs to feed poor/homeless.

6. So it was a massive waste program.

Again look up the two key words and understand those.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Back to the BOOM BOOM days!!!!



- UF

D!
Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
@ICEgov
This criminal illegal alien is in Carter County, Tenn., custody following an investigation into a social media livestream that allegedly showed him sexually exploiting a child.

Carter County Sheriff's Office investigators arrested P**** A********-R* G888888Aug. 2 and charged him with especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor following a joint investigation with ICE HSI Johnson City.

ICE lodged an immigration detainer with local officials following his arrest. When he's released from jail, ICE will assume custody pending his removal proceedings.

The investigation, which remains ongoing, began with a cyber tip.
<<
Go Bears!
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
but the left wants to "abolish ice"

How brain dead are they
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

You are missing the point. Some schools have banned many items or even any outside food from being brought.

For example, schools have said you cannot bring sodas. You cannot bring PBJ. ETc.

So they are limiting the options.

The problem is in the waste. But I guess you like waste and money being literally thrown away.

I agree with that at a public school. Waste? Throwing out too many peas? With all the stuff we have money going to,kids throwing away their vegetables is the line in the sand? Yeah, that never happened before Obama.

You guys are ridiculous. Don't be so gullible, there was never a National ban on PBJ sandwiches at schools and the local ones was based on peanut allergies. If you used a non-nut based spread it is perfectly fine. It was not an Obama thing,

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one ever said it was wrong. They repeatedly said it was wrong for the government to force that on people. This has been explained repeatedly and you keep ignoring that. Do you not have any reading comprehension skills?

You are beating a dead unicorn!
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

You are missing the point. Some schools have banned many items or even any outside food from being brought.

For example, schools have said you cannot bring sodas. You cannot bring PBJ. ETc.

So they are limiting the options.

The problem is in the waste. But I guess you like waste and money being literally thrown away.

I agree with that at a public school. Waste? Throwing out too many peas? With all the stuff we have money going to,kids throwing away their vegetables is the line in the sand? Yeah, that never happened before Obama.

You guys are ridiculous. Don't be so gullible, there was never a National ban on PBJ sandwiches at schools and the local ones was based on peanut allergies. If you used a non-nut based spread it is perfectly fine. It was not an Obama thing,



LOL. You keep moving the goalposts every time you are proven wrong.

Documented evidence has been provided to you that it created more waste.

If you have some that shows it did not then provide that or just admit you are wrong.

I never said there was national ban. So that is a deflection from something that has proven you wrong.

You miss the point on the local bans. Because some kids were allergic they banned it for all students. Because schools could no longer sell sodas they banned it for all kids.

Just admit you were wrong and move on. Stop turning this into an Obama or Trump thing when it is a general bashing of GOVERNMENT waste.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This will be an unpopular opinion on the Right but I think this is kind of dumb, even as a troll. Lake Ontario was given that name on maps by European explorers long before the Canadian province of Ontario was named. There are several cities in America called Ontario -- at least one of them predating the Canadian province by like 100 years -- because the word originates with native tribes in North America. It's not a Canadian invention. Canadians never uniquely owned the lake or the name. So in effect all you're doing here is actually giving them credit for a thing that wasn't theirs to begin with. Yeah it's funny when Canadians are upset I guess or whatever, but Lake Ontario, the name itself, is *American* history dating back many centuries. Not sure how you own Canada by deleting your own history.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

You are missing the point. Some schools have banned many items or even any outside food from being brought.

For example, schools have said you cannot bring sodas. You cannot bring PBJ. ETc.

So they are limiting the options.

The problem is in the waste. But I guess you like waste and money being literally thrown away.

I agree with that at a public school. Waste? Throwing out too many peas? With all the stuff we have money going to,kids throwing away their vegetables is the line in the sand? Yeah, that never happened before Obama.

You guys are ridiculous. Don't be so gullible, there was never a National ban on PBJ sandwiches at schools and the local ones was based on peanut allergies. If you used a non-nut based spread it is perfectly fine. It was not an Obama thing,



LOL. You keep moving the goalposts every time you are proven wrong.

Documented evidence has been provided to you that it created more waste.

If you have some that shows it did not then provide that or just admit you are wrong.

I never said there was national ban. So that is a deflection from something that has proven you wrong.

You miss the point on the local bans. Because some kids were allergic they banned it for all students. Because schools could no longer sell sodas they banned it for all kids.

Just admit you were wrong and move on. Stop turning this into an Obama or Trump thing when it is a general bashing of GOVERNMENT waste.


Admit what as being wrong? Proven wrong on what that schools should require veggies? Guilty. Documented evidence, it is schools requiring you eat a veggie. What waste??? They didnt eat their brussel sprouts? You guys are f-ing nuts.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Sorry, not seeing the issue with a healthy lunch by a public school. See more of a problem with soda, ice cream and fried foods. If they want unhealthy pay for it and get it on their time.

The problem, again, is not providing the option of healthy food. The problem is forcing what people eat, especially given how poorly most schools prepare food.




Once again, the meal is the meal. Dont like it, dont buy lunch that day. We didnt buy everyday. We did every Friday because it was pizza and it came with a salad period. Nobody is being forced, bring lunch.

You are missing the point. Some schools have banned many items or even any outside food from being brought.

For example, schools have said you cannot bring sodas. You cannot bring PBJ. ETc.

So they are limiting the options.

The problem is in the waste. But I guess you like waste and money being literally thrown away.

I agree with that at a public school. Waste? Throwing out too many peas? With all the stuff we have money going to,kids throwing away their vegetables is the line in the sand? Yeah, that never happened before Obama.

You guys are ridiculous. Don't be so gullible, there was never a National ban on PBJ sandwiches at schools and the local ones was based on peanut allergies. If you used a non-nut based spread it is perfectly fine. It was not an Obama thing,



LOL. You keep moving the goalposts every time you are proven wrong.

Documented evidence has been provided to you that it created more waste.

If you have some that shows it did not then provide that or just admit you are wrong.

I never said there was national ban. So that is a deflection from something that has proven you wrong.

You miss the point on the local bans. Because some kids were allergic they banned it for all students. Because schools could no longer sell sodas they banned it for all kids.

Just admit you were wrong and move on. Stop turning this into an Obama or Trump thing when it is a general bashing of GOVERNMENT waste.


Admit what as being wrong? Proven wrong on what that schools should require veggies? Guilty. Documented evidence, it is schools requiring you eat a veggie. What waste??? They didnt eat their brussel sprouts? You guys are f-ing nuts.


3 edits and still missing the point.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Disagreeing is not missing the point. Your point is just wrong and plainly stupid. But, this is America...
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


What the hell are we doing??
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:



What the hell are we doing??

Socialism. State ownership of production. The name has changed from Maduro to Trump.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:



What the hell are we doing??

Socialism. State ownership of production. The name has changed from Maduro to Trump.
It's that or he's trying to resurrect the mercantilism era of the British East India Company.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You must learn to love yourself before you can love others?

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very revealing that he includes FDR & Wilson near the top while leaving out Reagan entirely. Most of all this reveals his narcissism.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:



What the hell are we doing??

Socialism. State ownership of production. The name has changed from Maduro to Trump.

meanwhile, in your Nape of the Bosque.............



- UF

D!


Go Bears!!
Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:



What the hell are we doing??

Socialism. State ownership of production. The name has changed from Maduro to Trump.

It's that or he's trying to resurrect the mercantilism era of the British East India Company.

Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
HOLY CRAP! Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent is reportedly gearing up to REVOKE the tax-exempt status of nonprofits including George Soros' Open Society Foundation, CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and the SPLC NYP

The operation might result in CIVIL PENALTIES too

The move could target MULTIPLE leftist nonprofits because they ABUSE their tax-exempt status.

This is MASSIVELY overdue!

This was made possible by a Trump executive order from last year. Bessent recently said:

"Treasury is expanding its efforts to identify organizations that abuse charitable and nonprofit structures as vehicles for illicit finance."

"We are examining where tax exempt status has been exploited, where charitable entities have become financial conduits for foreign influence activity and how those entrusted with stewardship of these organizations have instead enabled violence, where the evidence leads we will not hesitate to follow and of course we will hold these organizations, officers, directors, accountable and just as financial institution must know their clients they must know their grantees."

"That work is well underway."
<<
Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
Mexican Fentanyl Manufacturer Pleads Guilty to International Drug Trafficking Offenses

"For years, Ojeda Elenes manufactured and imported enormous quantities of fentanyl often using precursor chemicals obtained from China, which contributed to the opioid epidemic poisoning our communities," said
@AAGDuva

. "This case sends a clear message: no matter where they operate, those who manufacture and then traffic deadly drugs into our country will be relentlessly pursued, prosecuted, and brought to justice. To protect the American people, the Criminal Division will continue to use every available tool to dismantle the transnational criminal organizations responsible for this devastation that has occurred in our country."
<<
Go Bears!
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:



What the hell are we doing??

I dunno, but if you figure it out you might give the White House a call.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Disagreeing is not missing the point. Your point is just wrong and plainly stupid. But, this is America...


You aren't disagreeing though. You are missing the key point of words.

My point is based on facts that you have ignored.
First Page Refresh
Page 535 of 535
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.