Elizabeth Warren Exposes RFK, Jr. - WSJ article

6,539 Views | 142 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Mothra
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shout out to all fake Indians
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

ScottS said:

Waco1947 said:

KaiBear said:

Waco1947 said:

Afterall we are a meritocracy now.
Fortunate for you your subsistence is provided by others.
No, I paid into the Social Security Trust Fund. I paid for grandparents and parents SS Trust Fund as you are doing now. Later the rest of the USA taxpayers will pay for yours, too.
Except Congress reaches into the cookie jar....Correct, Congress does dip into it. but ...
Who pays for our Social security? I paid into the Social Security Trust Fund. I paid for grandparents and parents SS Trust Fund as you are doing now. Later the rest of the USA taxpayers will pay for yours, too.
what you said is exactly right until it isnt.. and one day soon, it wont be
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.
If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scared
I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.

Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
Such BS
Proving you a fool is so easy...


Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

KaiBear said:

Waco1947 said:

Afterall we are a meritocracy now.
Fortunate for you your subsistence is provided by others.
No, I paid into the Social Security Trust Fund. I paid for grandparents and parents SS Trust Fund as you are doing now. Later the rest of the USA taxpayers will pay for yours, too.
We both know you are taking out far more for your subsistence than your little pittance ever put in.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:



https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/san-diego-county-health-officials-urge-flu-vaccinations-after-teen-deaths-020725

I bet these parents wish they had vaccinated their kids.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.
If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scared
I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.

Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
Such BS
Proving you a fool is so easy...


Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.
Hey **** for brains pin cushion. What are you piping up about now, you little bot?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

historian said:



https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/san-diego-county-health-officials-urge-flu-vaccinations-after-teen-deaths-020725

I bet these parents wish they had vaccinated their kids.
From your article:
"Cases of influenza are especially serious for at-risk individuals, such as immunocompromised, elderly, young, pregnant or those who have health conditions such as asthma, diabetes or heart disease."


I believe someone else brought up this info to you in another thread. Now you post an article with the same info. Good for you. Maybe you can actually learn things outside of your dogma.

Also from your article:
"A total of 73 people have died from the flu this season, most of them 50 and older."

People need to consult with their doctors and go through the risks and rewards for the flu vaccine for their own personal case.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

historian said:



https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/san-diego-county-health-officials-urge-flu-vaccinations-after-teen-deaths-020725

I bet these parents wish they had vaccinated their kids.
From your article:
"Cases of influenza are especially serious for at-risk individuals, such as immunocompromised, elderly, young, pregnant or those who have health conditions such as asthma, diabetes or heart disease."


I believe someone else brought up this info to you in another thread. Now you post an article with the same info. Good for you. Maybe you can actually learn things outside of your dogma.

Also from your article:
"A total of 73 people have died from the flu this season, most of them 50 and older."

People need to consult with their doctors and go through the risks and rewards for the flu vaccine for their own personal case.


you are crazy! I get all my medical advice off the internet from Tempus! I mean Joe Rogan!

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/joe-rogan-mocks-anti-vax-172359191.html
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Southtxbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

historian said:



https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/san-diego-county-health-officials-urge-flu-vaccinations-after-teen-deaths-020725

I bet these parents wish they had vaccinated their kids.
There's nothing inherently wrong with most vaccines. My concern is with vaccines that are rushed and haven't been properly researched. The flu vaccine, for example, is based on an educated guessscientists select the strain they believe will be most prevalent each season. I get it annually because it has been around for many years and has proven to be safe. Ultimately, the key point is that vaccination should be a personal choice, not something that leads to job loss for those who opt out.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And no health decisions for any of us should be made by corrupt politicians & bureaucrats getting paid off by Big Pharma. The Leftists ignore that issue all the time although it is what most undermines their credibility.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.
If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scared
I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.

Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
Such BS
Proving you a fool is so easy...


Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.
Hey **** for brains pin cushion. What are you piping up about now, you little bot?
Still can't refute it can you?
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fake Indian alert.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Waco1947 said:

ScottS said:

Waco1947 said:

KaiBear said:

Waco1947 said:

Afterall we are a meritocracy now.
Fortunate for you your subsistence is provided by others.
No, I paid into the Social Security Trust Fund. I paid for grandparents and parents SS Trust Fund as you are doing now. Later the rest of the USA taxpayers will pay for yours, too.
Except Congress reaches into the cookie jar....Correct, Congress does dip into it. but ...
Who pays for our Social security? I paid into the Social Security Trust Fund. I paid for grandparents and parents SS Trust Fund as you are doing now. Later the rest of the USA taxpayers will pay for yours, too.

You and I pay into it and they steal from it.
I agree with you. By stealing do you mean they supposedly borrow from it to pay other bills?
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:



No, there is no evidence that Elizabeth Warren made such a statement. A fact check by Lead Stories, published on February 8, 2025, found no evidence that Warren said, "There is nothing in the constitution that says ordinary Americans have a right to see what we're spending tax dollars on." Searches across news sites, her Senate website, and social media accounts did not yield any results corroborating this quote. Additionally, posts on X (formerly Twitter) mentioning this quote appear to be spreading misinformation, as no credible source confirms Warren expressing this view.
Waco1947 ,la
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You do understand a joke, right?

Whether or not she said those actual words many of us believe that she could have. Those words certainly reflect the kind of thinking common among fascists like her.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

You do understand a joke, right?

Whether or not she said those actual words many of us believe that she could have. Stupid conjecture Those words certainly reflect the kind of thinking common among fascists like her. Wrong she is not a fascist, but more like social democrat
Waco1947 ,la
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All Democrat leaders today are fascists.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

All Democrat leaders today are fascists. Silly conjecture. This opini9n is not valid because it is fact free.
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

All Democrat leaders today are fascists. BTW, the super bowl memes are funny.
Waco1947 ,la
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks. Glad you enjoyed them.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fake Indian alert.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
It's funny how do not produce evidence as to your claim. Tell me about a fascist claim of Democrats
Waco1947 ,la
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've explained it repeatedly on multiple threads. I even created a separate thread on socialism, communism & fascism.

The problem with fascism is that most people don't have an accurate definition of the term. Fascism is not a political movement of the Right, it's a form of socialism. The main difference is that under fascism private property is still allowed. It doesn't matter because the state controls what people can & cannot do with their property. In essence, fascists worship the state and rely on the state for everything. It gives some people lots of power and wealth while oppressing everyone else. Like all other forms of socialism, it ultimately fails.

We have been witnessing all of these aspects of fascism in the US for many years but more dramatically & obviously under Biden.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.
If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scared
I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.

Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
Such BS
Proving you a fool is so easy...


Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=true
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hello to the fake Indian.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

Mothra said:

ron.reagan said:

If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.
If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scared
I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.

Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
Such BS
Proving you a fool is so easy...


Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=true
A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:



That's only the second pic I've ever seen of her where she doesn't look positively apoplectic.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I honestly cannot think of another but I don't look at photos of her often.
Thankfully
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.