I wonder if the fake Indian visits reservations on the weekend?
Elizabeth Warren Exposes RFK, Jr. - WSJ article
6,565 Views |
143 Replies |
Last: 10 min ago by Sam Lowry
Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
It has to do with evidence and new studies doofus. There is NO proof and never has been.Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
Ah, what new studies have debunked the study from 2010 pray tell?Tempus Edax Rerum said:It has to do with evidence and new studies doofus. There is NO proof and never has been.Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
BTW, there's a whole host of others on the NIH website.
It’s hard to be shocked, but this is one of the most jaw dropping statements a modern Senator has ever made.
— Calley Means (@calleymeans) February 15, 2025
We have a mental health catastrophe, and you’re worried that Bobby is being too hard on SSRI’s - which have been a cautostauphic failure as a catchall treatment for…
I have my reservations about that.ScottS said:
I wonder if the fake Indian visits reservations on the weekend?
I see what you did there!
Back to the topic, I don't see why we wouldn't want doctors and scientists to continually review medications to ensure they're safe and effective. Science should always be challenged and refined so we have the best treatments available and fully understand any potential side effects. I haven't seen RFK Jr. say he would ban them, only that they should be scrutinized like any other medical intervention.
Think the fake Indian drinks firewater?
Your statement is complete horse ****Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
Ok, moron, notice the Andrew Wakefield study was withdrawn TWELVE YEARS after it was published. That's what the age of the study has to do with it you obtuse lawyer.Mothra said:Ah, what new studies have debunked the study from 2010 pray tell?Tempus Edax Rerum said:It has to do with evidence and new studies doofus. There is NO proof and never has been.Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
BTW, there's a whole host of others on the NIH website.
dont believe NIH and pubmed.. trust youtube doctors!Tempus Edax Rerum said:Your statement is complete horse ****Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
https://quackwatch.org/autism/4th and Inches said:dont believe NIH and pubmed.. trust youtube doctors!Tempus Edax Rerum said:Your statement is complete horse ****Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
lol, good ole Stephen BarrettTempus Edax Rerum said:https://quackwatch.org/autism/4th and Inches said:dont believe NIH and pubmed.. trust youtube doctors!Tempus Edax Rerum said:Your statement is complete horse ****Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
What evidence do you have that the study I linked has been debunked, **** for brains? Please feel free to post it.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Ok, moron, notice the Andrew Wakefield study was withdrawn TWELVE YEARS after it was published. That's what the age of the study has to do with it you obtuse lawyer.Mothra said:Ah, what new studies have debunked the study from 2010 pray tell?Tempus Edax Rerum said:It has to do with evidence and new studies doofus. There is NO proof and never has been.Mothra said:Actually there are quire a few on the NIH website. I am surprised you were unaware of them.Tempus Edax Rerum said:A study from 2010? That's hilarious. Got anything new?Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
But what does the age of the study have to do with the price of tea in China? These vaccines have had the same ingredients for well more than a decade.
Look, I understand why a pun cushion vaccine pusher such as yourself has a problem with the study, as it does not fit your narrative.
BTW, there's a whole host of others on the NIH website.
Good luck! We know you're going to need it!
Calley Means Stuns CNN Viewers With Two Devastating Takedowns Live on Air
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 19, 2025
Paul Offit and Pamela Brown came prepared for a debate. What they received was a reckoning.
🧵 THREAD pic.twitter.com/iUBRquJ8Hf
No video?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
it's in the threadhistorian said:
No video?
Calley Means (@CalleyMeans), ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic, came out swinging on CNN Wednesday in a fiery debate against infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Paul Offit.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 19, 2025
Offit thought he could call RFK Jr. an anti-vaxxer without his own financial ties to the pharmaceutical… pic.twitter.com/zcEKp6sR2r
Milli where did you disappear to little guy? Still waiting for that evidence debunking the articles I posted. Cat got your tongue?
Obviously I missed that. I'm not sure how.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Invalid opinion. An assertion without evidence.historian said:
It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
Waco1947 ,la
Please don't do this to yourself any more. I mean it.Waco1947 said:Invalid opinion. An assertion without evidence.historian said:
It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
Waco1947 said:Invalid opinion. An assertion without evidence.historian said:
It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
You are describing most of your own posts!
Also, you clearly do not understand what fascism is. That's deliberate: you have been educated repeatedly by me and others. Willful ignorance is very sad.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Elizabeth W speaks the truth about RFK and all ya'll got is ad hominin attacks. What a sad lot you guys are.
Waco1947 ,la
Elizabeth Warren is nothing more than a fake Indian.
That is what all of your posts are.Waco1947 said:Invalid opinion. An assertion without evidence.historian said:
It's totally true. It's funny that you cannot see it.
Waco1947 said:
Elizabeth W speaks the truth about RFK and all ya'll got is ad hominin attacks. What a sad lot you guys are.
Elizabeth Warren speak with fork tongue
Speak truth about RFK jr like EW
Waco1947 ,la
Fake Indian thread
Can you Speak truth about RFK jr.
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947 said:
Can you Speak truth about RFK jr.
Gary
Gary
Gary
So sad
Waco1947 said:
Can you Speak truth about RFK jr.
There is plenty in the thread on RFK Jr. But if fake Indian is the one bringing things against him then she deserves what she deserves. And, if she brings enough evidence, he won't get confirmed......oh wait.
This article was vigorously debunked when it came out. It was written by a non-scientist, and among other flaws it fails to distinguish between autism and speech or language impairments.Mothra said:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15287394.2011.573736?scroll=top&needAccess=trueTempus Edax Rerum said:Yet you have no response to the videos I posted from various experts that state children can easily handle all the vaccines recommended and I am supposed to believe you Dr. Google. Just stop with your nonsense. Just admit you are clueless.Mothra said:Proving you a fool is so easy...Tempus Edax Rerum said:Such BSMothra said:I would venture to say I know a damn sight more than you do about it, but why don't you enlighten us with statistics. If you were born pre-1986, you had around 4-6 vaccines total. Now it's around 70 jabs.ron.reagan said:If you think the vaccine schedule for children is absurd you should see the schedule of deaths without them. Just because you lost the lottery doesn't mean the rest of us want our children to die because you are scaredMothra said:He doesn't believe vaccines are bad for you. He believes that some vaccines are bad for some people, and that the vaccine schedule for children is absurd.ron.reagan said:
If you truly believe Vaccines are bad for you then he is the guy for the job. If you believe that vaccines are saving millions of lives it seems like an unnecessary gamble to put in a guy that changes his position on vaccines depending on his audience to be in charge
Tell us what the mortality rate for children was both before and after 1986 for the diseases kids are being vaccinated for today?
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/antivaccine-propaganda-in-baltimore-sun/