Harrison Bergeron said:

---

This question ran of TexasAnti-science and tends to shut down most TDSers ...

What policies of Trump's are remotely "radical" or "extreme."

So far he has:
- Removed racism from hiring
- Removed men from women's sports
- Removed violent criminals from vulnerable communities
- Created a cease fire in Gaza and freed hostages
- Slowed human trafficking
- Slowed fentanyl trafficking
- Ensured our tax dollars are being spend aligned with our values

What exactly is there that a sane person could oppose?

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

What's so bad about checking non binary?

You got to be kidding. You've seen the tragic and comedic results play out in real time. You lived with this insanity any you have the gall (or stupidity) to ask what's so bad about it. Write this down for your next dumb post "IT NEVER ENDS WITH JUST CHECKING A BOX."

Also, society has only two male/female. The rest are playing make believe and/or have mental problems. So yeah, it's just stupid and it empowers groomers to willfully confuse children.

So much dumb in "why not add a non binary checkbox". The West is going to fall and be replaced by a dystopia if we keep growing these idiot relatavists.

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

I'm not equating the 2 billionaires, but presenting a theoretically similar situation where a billionaire hated by one side or the other gets the keys to the Treasury Department. Surely you can see how some would see it as a legitimate problem?

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Musk wasnt gonna get the keys to the treasury. It would be like an accountant doing the audit of your books. They don't get to write checks out of your bank account.

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

I'm not equating the 2 billionaires, but presenting a theoretically similar situation where a billionaire hated by one side or the other gets the keys to the Treasury Department. Surely you can see how some would see it as a legitimate problem?

---

But they are hated for different actions, as explained above. One fought the fair elections all across the us by pouring money into his favored candidates and outspending the local voters. The other exposed and stopped government censorship of millions of Americans.

---

Assassin said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

I'm not equating the 2 billionaires, but presenting a theoretically similar situation where a billionaire hated by one side or the other gets the keys to the Treasury Department. Surely you can see how some would see it as a legitimate problem?

---

But they are hated for different actions, as explained above. One fought the fair elections all across the us by pouring money into his favored candidates and outspending the local voters. The other exposed and stopped government censorship of millions of Americans.

---

One donated big to the left, the other big to the right. That's all it takes to be hated. Obviously there are differences, but what I said is true, clear as day.

---

No, it's not. George Soros is the most evil man the world has ever known. He has killed more people that Hitler ever did. By a lot of multiples. Do some homework: https://www.newsweek.com/we-are-jews-against-soros-opinion-1805473

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

I'm not equating the 2 billionaires, but presenting a theoretically similar situation where a billionaire hated by one side or the other gets the keys to the Treasury Department. Surely you can see how some would see it as a legitimate problem?

---

But they are hated for different actions, as explained above. One fought the fair elections all across the us by pouring money into his favored candidates and outspending the local voters. The other exposed and stopped government censorship of millions of Americans.

---

One donated big to the left, the other big to the right. That's all it takes to be hated. Obviously there are differences, but what I said is true, clear as day.

---

Like I said, only an idiot would try to equate Musk with Soros.

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Only idiots equate all billionaires because they are billionaires. Soros has a history of directly and indirectly influencing elections for far left ideals. Musk bought Twitter and exposed leftist censorship and collusion with the US government to do so. They are simply not the same.

---

I'm not equating the 2 billionaires, but presenting a theoretically similar situation where a billionaire hated by one side or the other gets the keys to the Treasury Department. Surely you can see how some would see it as a legitimate problem?

---

But they are hated for different actions, as explained above. One fought the fair elections all across the us by pouring money into his favored candidates and outspending the local voters. The other exposed and stopped government censorship of millions of Americans.

---

One donated big to the left, the other big to the right. That's all it takes to be hated. Obviously there are differences, but what I said is true, clear as day.

---

Like I said, only an idiot would try to equate Musk with Soros.

---

Read what I said, zealot.

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

What's so bad about checking non binary?

You got to be kidding. You've seen the tragic and comedic results play out in real time. You lived with this insanity any you have the gall (or stupidity) to ask what's so bad about it. Write this down for your next dumb post "IT NEVER ENDS WITH JUST CHECKING A BOX."

Also, society has only two male/female. The rest are playing make believe and/or have mental problems. So yeah, it's just stupid and it empowers groomers to willfully confuse children.

So much dumb in "why not add a non binary checkbox". The West is going to fall and be replaced by a dystopia if we keep growing these idiot relatavists.

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Again, the thread has been hijacked. I am asking TDSers on the forum what policy of Trump's is "extreme?"

BTW ... https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

This question ran of TexasAnti-science and tends to shut down most TDSers ...

What policies of Trump's are remotely "radical" or "extreme."

So far he has:
- Removed racism from hiring
- Removed men from women's sports
- Removed violent criminals from vulnerable communities
- Created a cease fire in Gaza and freed hostages
- Slowed human trafficking
- Slowed fentanyl trafficking
- Ensured our tax dollars are being spend aligned with our values

What exactly is there that a sane person could oppose?

---

J.R. said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

This question ran of TexasAnti-science and tends to shut down most TDSers ...

What policies of Trump's are remotely "radical" or "extreme."

So far he has:
- Removed racism from hiring
- Removed men from women's sports
- Removed violent criminals from vulnerable communities
- Created a cease fire in Gaza and freed hostages
- Slowed human trafficking
- Slowed fentanyl trafficking
- Ensured our tax dollars are being spend aligned with our values

What exactly is there that a sane person could oppose?

---

No TDSr as that is the dumbest moniker ever. I'd say buying Gaza and turning into Trump World is very extreme . Suggesting Canada sb the 51st state is extreme and just stupid. taking over Panama Canal is also extreme .

---

contrario said:

---

Porteroso wasn't saying they are the same. He's saying they are billionaires from opposite ends of the political spectrum. If Musk was a democrat, you would be hating on him as well.

To word what Porteroso said a different way, if Musk was a big time democrat donor and was given the access he has been given in the Trump administration, all of the republicans on here would be complaining about it.

---

contrario said:

---

Porteroso wasn't saying they are the same. He's saying they are billionaires from opposite ends of the political spectrum. If Musk was a democrat, you would be hating on him as well.

To word what Porteroso said a different way, if Musk was a big time democrat donor and was given the access he has been given in the Trump administration, all of the republicans on here would be complaining about it.

---

jbbear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

They are simply being fed lies and altered versions of the truth. So are the right wing zealots on this board.

What they are upset about is Elon helping to buy, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the election, and then being handed the keys to the Treasury, shutting down foreign aid to countries who seem to depend on it.

If the tables were turned and this was Soros, you bet Republicans would react the same way, right? Soros simply donates to Democrat politicians and we have posters claiming he is ultimately responsible for the rise in violence in lib cities with lib DAs he donated to. Don't even for a second pretend you are better than the people complaining about Elon.

And there are other things. It's one thing to ban men in women's sports, great. Good. But only recognize 2 genders? What is so bad about someone checking "identifies as non-binary" on a government form? It is simply antagonistic. Repubs might not feel like non-binary genders exist, but it is very real to these people. Why take away their ability to identify themselves on government forms as they wish? Comes down to feelings, doesn't it? Repubs feel better when the world is as simple as male and female.

I could go on but that seems to be the 2 biggest complaints I view as legitimate.

---

Hate to break it to you, but Soros's fingerprints are all over the disgusting USAID.
The fact you're arguing for more than 2 genders shows your godless views. Where in the Bible does it discuss non-binary? Please explain the science behind non-binary. BTW, how do they decide when to identify as a women vs. a man? Since they can identify as both, they obviously know there is a difference between the genders. So, on "man" days, do they scratch their crotch and whistle at women? On "women" days, do they congregate in the bathroom longer? Can't wait for your progressive BS answer.

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

contrario said:

---

Porteroso wasn't saying they are the same. He's saying they are billionaires from opposite ends of the political spectrum. If Musk was a democrat, you would be hating on him as well.

To word what Porteroso said a different way, if Musk was a big time democrat donor and was given the access he has been given in the Trump administration, all of the republicans on here would be complaining about it.

---

Depends, if a democrat was exposing blatant corruption, I wouldn't care, I'd support him. I may not like him, but I wouldn't be upset that he was finding taxpayer waste.

---

Porteroso said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

contrario said:

---

Porteroso wasn't saying they are the same. He's saying they are billionaires from opposite ends of the political spectrum. If Musk was a democrat, you would be hating on him as well.

To word what Porteroso said a different way, if Musk was a big time democrat donor and was given the access he has been given in the Trump administration, all of the republicans on here would be complaining about it.

---

Depends, if a democrat was exposing blatant corruption, I wouldn't care, I'd support him. I may not like him, but I wouldn't be upset that he was finding taxpayer waste.

---

Would you though? If your preferred media source and all the other Republicans were going on about security clearance and private information and look at these children being handed the keys to the Treasury... You'd have to really do your own digging to even get to the point where you realized they were actually finding corruption. And then you'd have to accept that people you hate might actually do some good from time to time.

It's just too much to ask of the typical zealot on either side.

---