State Attorney Generals going after Fauci

914 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by Tempus Edax Rerum
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Evidence suggesting Fauci worked to discredit the "lab leak" theory, despite evidence supporting it.
Accusations that Fauci allegedly provided false testimony to Congress about the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Evidence NIH allegedly mismanaged taxpayer funds by failing to properly oversee grants to EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled funding to the Wuhan lab.
Evidence that prominent scientists who raised concerns about vaccine risks were allegedly silenced, ultimately limiting debate and public awareness."

Basically this:
Fauci funded gain of function (illegal) without congressional oversight (illegal) which caused the faucivirus that killed millions (mass killing is illegal.) Then he profitted off the force death-jab (illegal) and silenced any opposition to that jab (illegal.)

In otherwords: fauci killed millions and took away our 1st amendment rights to make who knows how much $$. He needs to face a firing squad. I hope they put a mask on him when they do.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/07/republican-attorneys-general-seek-to-bypass-biden-pardon-investigate-fauci-on-state-level/

This man is so evil. With USAID line items confirming 'gain of function' funding for Wuhan Lab, its time to go after Fauci. The Feds cant because of the last second Pardon. But states can!
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love there following another Democrat precedent.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Karma?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The pattern repeats constantly ... the Democrats break norms and protocol to cheat and then feign outrage when the GOP does the exact same thing.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Send him to Gitmo.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Send him to Gitmo.


THIS
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

"Evidence suggesting Fauci worked to discredit the "lab leak" theory, despite evidence supporting it.
Accusations that Fauci allegedly provided false testimony to Congress about the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Evidence NIH allegedly mismanaged taxpayer funds by failing to properly oversee grants to EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled funding to the Wuhan lab.
Evidence that prominent scientists who raised concerns about vaccine risks were allegedly silenced, ultimately limiting debate and public awareness."

Basically this:
Fauci funded gain of function (illegal) without congressional oversight (illegal) which caused the faucivirus that killed millions (mass killing is illegal.) Then he profitted off the force death-jab (illegal) and silenced any opposition to that jab (illegal.)

In otherwords: fauci killed millions and took away our 1st amendment rights to make who knows how much $$. He needs to face a firing squad. I hope they put a mask on him when they do.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/07/republican-attorneys-general-seek-to-bypass-biden-pardon-investigate-fauci-on-state-level/

This man is so evil. With USAID line items confirming 'gain of function' funding for Wuhan Lab, its time to go after Fauci. The Feds cant because of the last second Pardon. But states can!


Now add up how many gays he killed with AZT and the deaths caused by Anthony Faucci are approaching like Hitler type levels.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh yeah. I forgot all about that.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I doubt most of that. I can believe that we specified to not fund gain of function research, however we probably did not do our due diligence and ensure the company would not be doing gain of function research next door to the research we funded. The company puts the money into a bank, same as the other money, so you really have to just not fund them if they are doing research you at all disagree with.

But still, this was a novel virus, and what seems so obvious now, was not then. I think Fauci probably put the time and effort into that funding that he put into all other funding; we fund a lot, and it's a little ridiculous to expect 1 man to know every single thing being researched at every single lab receiving US funds.

So when he claimed to not have funded gain of function research, I think it's ok. We did not knowingly do that, even if, in practice, we did. He is not the monster you guys make him out to be. As we are finding out, if he got rich off of vaccines, which I also doubt, it is just the way D.C. works.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

I doubt most of that. I can believe that we specified to not fund gain of function research, however we probably did not do our due diligence and ensure the company would not be doing gain of function research next door to the research we funded. The company puts the money into a bank, same as the other money, so you really have to just not fund them if they are doing research you at all disagree with.

But still, this was a novel virus, and what seems so obvious now, was not then. I think Fauci probably put the time and effort into that funding that he put into all other funding; we fund a lot, and it's a little ridiculous to expect 1 man to know every single thing being researched at every single lab receiving US funds.

So when he claimed to not have funded gain of function research, I think it's ok. We did not knowingly do that, even if, in practice, we did. He is not the monster you guys make him out to be. As we are finding out, if he got rich off of vaccines, which I also doubt, it is just the way D.C. works.


So basically everything wrong with this post. But I'm not going to bother.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

I doubt most of that. I can believe that we specified to not fund gain of function research, however we probably did not do our due diligence and ensure the company would not be doing gain of function research next door to the research we funded. The company puts the money into a bank, same as the other money, so you really have to just not fund them if they are doing research you at all disagree with.

But still, this was a novel virus, and what seems so obvious now, was not then. I think Fauci probably put the time and effort into that funding that he put into all other funding; we fund a lot, and it's a little ridiculous to expect 1 man to know every single thing being researched at every single lab receiving US funds.

So when he claimed to not have funded gain of function research, I think it's ok. We did not knowingly do that, even if, in practice, we did. He is not the monster you guys make him out to be. As we are finding out, if he got rich off of vaccines, which I also doubt, it is just the way D.C. works.


Clearly hasn't read the book and trusts the letter agencies. Avoid at all costs.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

But still, this was a novel virus, and what seems so obvious now, was not then.


It was obvious to a lot of people. However, the federal government used authoritarian tactics and conspired with social media companies to silence dissent.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Quote:

But still, this was a novel virus, and what seems so obvious now, was not then.


It was obvious to a lot of people. However, the federal government used authoritarian tactics and conspired with social media companies to silence dissent.

What I was referring to was going to significant lengths to make sure labs we funded would not do gain of function research. Nothing like this had ever happened before.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We should just start referring to the ronas as Fauci Virus.
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

"Evidence suggesting Fauci worked to discredit the "lab leak" theory, despite evidence supporting it.
Accusations that Fauci allegedly provided false testimony to Congress about the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Evidence NIH allegedly mismanaged taxpayer funds by failing to properly oversee grants to EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled funding to the Wuhan lab.
Evidence that prominent scientists who raised concerns about vaccine risks were allegedly silenced, ultimately limiting debate and public awareness."

Basically this:
Fauci funded gain of function (illegal) without congressional oversight (illegal) which caused the faucivirus that killed millions (mass killing is illegal.) Then he profitted off the force death-jab (illegal) and silenced any opposition to that jab (illegal.)

In otherwords: fauci killed millions and took away our 1st amendment rights to make who knows how much $$. He needs to face a firing squad. I hope they put a mask on him when they do.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/07/republican-attorneys-general-seek-to-bypass-biden-pardon-investigate-fauci-on-state-level/

This man is so evil. With USAID line items confirming 'gain of function' funding for Wuhan Lab, its time to go after Fauci. The Feds cant because of the last second Pardon. But states can!
Good luck with that.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.