Trans can no longer serve in the military

734 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by BearFan33
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unless we need you


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/transgender-troops-will-removed-military-pentagon-says-rcna194023
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Going forward soldiers will be required to have both a rifle and a gun in order to serve.

Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given that trans is just a made-up social construct, any termination is effectively optional.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Curious how many were actually in combat roles. I suspect most joined to get Uncle Sam to pay for their mutilations.

Good. The military does not need this kind of foolishness. That being said, I don't object to a fully "transitioned" or "real" troon serving. What the military does not need is men that want to prance around in dresses.

Can anyone explain regressives obsession with mentally ill people?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Curious how many were actually in combat roles. I suspect most joined to get Uncle Sam to pay for their mutilations.

Good. The military does not need this kind of foolishness. That being said, I don't object to a fully "transitioned" or "real" troon serving. What the military does not need is men that want to prance around in dresses.

Can anyone explain regressives obsession with mentally ill people?
I'm generally very live-and-let-live. That said, in the military, you need a fair amount of uniformity, no distractions, fewer moving parts. I'm fine saying "if you can't live comfortably in your own skin while creating no significant distractions for your colleagues, this is just one job you can't have." Unfortunately, at this moment in time the trans as a whole have showed us they're not going to accept that. They will, in general, require special treatment.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Curious how many were actually in combat roles. I suspect most joined to get Uncle Sam to pay for their mutilations.

Good. The military does not need this kind of foolishness. That being said, I don't object to a fully "transitioned" or "real" troon serving. What the military does not need is men that want to prance around in dresses.

Can anyone explain regressives obsession with mentally ill people?
I'm generally very live-and-let-live. That said, in the military, you need a fair amount of uniformity, no distractions, fewer moving parts. I'm fine saying "if you can't live comfortably in your own skin while creating no significant distractions for your colleagues, this is just one job you can't have." Unfortunately, at this moment in time the trans as a whole have showed us they're not going to accept that. They will, in general, require special treatment.
100%. I don't think most people have any issues with real trans people, i.e. those that live as women full time and go about there business and don't bother people. That "system" had worked great for decades. They actually had diagnosed gender dysphoria, had undergone years of treatment, and transitioned thoughtfully. They used the women's restrooms and did not bother anyone because no one new - they actually wanted to live like women.

What most oppose is the constant demand for attention and just "becoming trans" overnight for attention, the social contagion aspect. I suppose being just a gay dude became too normal and boring. So now you have the guys with full beards and long nails wearing skirts claiming to be "women" and demanding we all KNEEL BEFORE ZOD.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Unless we need you


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/transgender-troops-will-removed-military-pentagon-says-rcna194023




Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To me it's as simple as it's not safe or an acceptable idea for seriously mentally ill people to be serving in the military. Gender dysphoria is a defined form of mental illness, just like schizophrenia, obsessive/compulsive disorder, personality disorders, etc. Just don't get how it ever became acceptable for seriously mentally disturbed people to serve and even function in leadership positions in the military simply because their form of insanity is "woke approved".
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Curious how many were actually in combat roles. I suspect most joined to get Uncle Sam to pay for their mutilations.

Good. The military does not need this kind of foolishness. That being said, I don't object to a fully "transitioned" or "real" troon serving. What the military does not need is men that want to prance around in dresses.

Can anyone explain regressives obsession with mentally ill people?

Likes attract each other? Much of the Leftist ideology & agenda is highly irrational & downright crazy.

As for fake men & women in the military, I'm glad they will be kicked out. Gender dysphoria is a mental illness and the last thing we need in the military is people with mental problems. If they cannot be honest about who & what they are and have difficulty facing reality, I don't want them anywhere near a military arsenal which includes high explosives & all kinds of other munitions. Also, such people hinder recruitment, as our recent fake president proved, & undermine effectiveness.

There really is no legitimate reason to give such people the privilege of representing the nation in uniform.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like this guy?


“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender


historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's wearing women's clothing and paints his nails.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender





He's the kind of silly, attention-seeking distraction the military does not need.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

He's wearing women's clothing and paints his nails.
Oh, he's gay.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender





He's the kind of silly, attention-seeking distraction the military does not need.

Post military age, but at 6'3"and 240 pounds? D1 Defensive end? and from military family? Fort Hood? He'd have been fine.

Makes me wonder about RD2.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender





He's the kind of silly, attention-seeking distraction the military does not need.

Post military age, but at 6'3"and 240 pounds? D1 Defensive end? and from military family? Fort Hood? He'd have been fine.

Makes me wonder about RD2.
Doubt he'd be willing to break a nail if called on to actually fight.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obviously
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender





He's the kind of silly, attention-seeking distraction the military does not need.

Post military age, but at 6'3"and 240 pounds? D1 Defensive end? and from military family? Fort Hood? He'd have been fine.

Makes me wonder about RD2.
Doubt he'd be willing to break a nail if called on to actually fight.


Man, that dude played defensive line in D1 and takes it in the shorts. He might be the toughest mother****er I've ever seen. All Lawrence Taylor did was cocaine.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

historian said:

Like this guy?





He's not transgender





He's the kind of silly, attention-seeking distraction the military does not need.

Post military age, but at 6'3"and 240 pounds? D1 Defensive end? and from military family? Fort Hood? He'd have been fine.

Makes me wonder about RD2.
Doubt he'd be willing to break a nail if called on to actually fight.


Man, that dude played defensive line in D1 and takes it in the shorts. He might be the toughest mother****er I've ever seen. All Lawrence Taylor did was cocaine.
Doubt he'd be willing to break a nail if called on to actually fight.

At the end of the day, if he really wants to be in the military, he can take off his Lee Press-on Nails and dress. That's the key that none if this hysteric reaction is serious. Any man that likes prancing around in dresses can serve in the military, but the dress and prancing tend to be more important.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now the trannies in the military including the ones in combat roles, will have to be replaced by our gender correct sons, daughters and grandchildren

Good move exlax.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's simple: we don't want people in the military with mental illness. I'm not sure why some people don't understand that concept unless they are the same people who still don't know what a woman is.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Many trans ill people joined the service as it was a know method to get someone else (uncle sam) to pay for your transformation. Think Bradley to Chelsea Manning. That abuse of the taxpayer is now over.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.