Europe, your turn

3,058 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by LIB,MR BEARS
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

"At the core of it, it is in our best interest to give Ukraine guarantees. "

That's a real good way to make the war permanent.

This war is no good for anyone.

Putin needs an out so he can rebuild his army and his economy.

Zelensky needs to understand no one is going to flood Ukraine with soldiers in the foolish hope they can force Russia out of the territory the Russians holds. Ukraine cannot win an outright campaign with Russia, the Russians simply have so many men and Ukraine so few that Ukraine needs a deal to survive as a nation.

Trump wants a peace deal for a number of reasons, but Putin and Zelensky need to understand that Trump does not need to accept a deal which he does not believe will last or give stability to the region.

The Rare Metals deal is one Zelensky should take, because among other things it will create an American interest in Ukraine that Putin will understand he does not want to affect, and it will provide incentive for US companies to help Ukraine rebuild after the war. Because side from everything else, Ukraine is in ruins and needs foreign investment to have any chance of being a viable nation.

That Zelensky could come here and lecture Vance instead of grasping the situation, not only insults everyone on the US side but demonstrates an incredibly foolish arrogance by Zelensky.
We should either stay out of it completely, or make sure peace lasts. I think the ship has sailed on staying out of it completely. I'm talking about making peace permanent, you're the only one talking about making war permanent.

Also he did not lecture Vance, he told him that he needs more than diplomacy and words. Why would he not? Do you really think he should have said "yeah a few words to Putin is fine. No guarantees needed."

And he will sign the deal. He has no other choice. Europe is who he should be signing with, but Europe is 30 times of effed right now. We are the only ones that give him hope. He will sign it before leaving the country. Let him get some words out of his mouth, and stand up for his country.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Married A Horn said:

Porteroso said:

I'm pretty disappointed with Vance. From the transcript, Vance basically stepped in and tried to power play Zelensky. Just dumb, and of course Trump wants to be worshipped, not told that if Russia keeps invading, the US will "feel influenced." Trump responds with "We are going to feel very good and very strong." and it just devolves from there.

You know what though, let me post the transcript. You guys just read it for yourself. I think it's embarrassing. This isn't the time to hold Zelensky to account, it's the time to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's ok if Zelensky says a few words, he's about to hand over 50% of Ukraine's rare earths to the United States.

I don't think this is the full transcript, but sections, from the AP.

Quote:

Vance: "For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States' words mattered more than the president of the United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what President Trump is doing."

Zelenskyy: "Can I ask you?"

Vance: "Sure. Yeah."

Zelenskyy: "OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the --"

Trump: "2015?"

Zelenskyy: "2014."

Trump: "Oh, 2014? I was not here."

Vance: "That's exactly right."

Zelenskyy: "Yes, but during 2014 'til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?"

Vance: "I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelenskyy: "Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?"

Vance: "I have been to "

Zelenskyy: "Come once."

Vance: "I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems, bringing people into your military?"

Zelenskyy: "We have problems "

Vance: "And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning."

Vance: "Sure."

Zelenskyy: "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless "

Trump: "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not telling you. I am answering on these questions."

Trump: "Because you're in no position to dictate that."

Vance: "That's exactly what you're doing."

Trump: "You are in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good."

Zelenskyy: "You will feel influenced."

Trump: "We are going to feel very good and very strong."

Zelenskyy: "I am telling you. You will feel influenced."

Trump: "You're, right now, not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position "

Zelenskyy: "From the very beginning of the war "

Trump: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not playing cards. I'm very serious, Mr. President. I'm very serious."

Trump: "You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War III."

Zelenskyy: "What are you speaking about?"

Trump: "You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have."

Vance: "Have you said thank you once?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of times. Even today."

Vance: "No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."

Zelenskyy: "No."

Vance: "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country."

Zelenskyy: "Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can "

Trump: "He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "Can I answer "

Trump: "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "I know. I know."

Trump: "You're not winning. You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us."

Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks."

Trump: "If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."

Zelenskyy: "In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days."

Trump: "Maybe less. It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: "Just say thank you."

Zelenskyy: "I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people."

Vance: "Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong."

Trump: "But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful."

Zelenskyy: "I'm thankful."

Trump: "You don't have the cards. You're buried there. People are dying. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.' Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

Zelenskyy: "Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees."

Trump: "Are you saying you don't want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."

Zelenskyy: "Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think."

Trump: "That wasn't with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person."

Zelenskyy: "This is your president. It was your president."

Trump: "Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You've got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don't have any cards."





We're not surprised you're disappointed at Vance. Post when you actually say something that will surprise us.


Zelensky just had to keep his mouth shut after Vance said Trump was a strong actions president. But no, Zelensky just had to try and pander to the media. Then instead of just shutting up and politely relent and move behind closed doors, he had to argue.

I guarantee he and his advisors saw Macron's visit and they thought he should stand up to Trump and be tough on TV. Clearly he got bad advice.

Plus this guy came and effectively campaigned against Trump. Seems like he'd have been a better guest.
Consider what they're talking about, what this proposed deal is. I haven't followed it too closely, but it seems Trump wants natural resources in return for nothing more than talking to Putin and getting a cease fire, then he wants to do "diplomacy" and negotiate a long term peace deal.

So the very last thing any Ukranian would do would be to say "oh sure, let me keep my mouth shut when they talk about strong action." Because there were already documents signed after Crimea, and guess what happened? There is no trusting Russia's word, and it remains to be seen even how much sway Trump has over Putin. That's what this is boiling down to.

I just think it's embarrassing. Zelensky is trying to get peace for his war torn nation, and Vance is counting how many times he says thank you per conversation. How you could support that is just insane.

The US has zero at stake in Ukraine. By have the minerals the US then has a stake
Gkelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.


They're taking volunteers.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Married A Horn said:

Porteroso said:

I'm pretty disappointed with Vance. From the transcript, Vance basically stepped in and tried to power play Zelensky. Just dumb, and of course Trump wants to be worshipped, not told that if Russia keeps invading, the US will "feel influenced." Trump responds with "We are going to feel very good and very strong." and it just devolves from there.

You know what though, let me post the transcript. You guys just read it for yourself. I think it's embarrassing. This isn't the time to hold Zelensky to account, it's the time to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's ok if Zelensky says a few words, he's about to hand over 50% of Ukraine's rare earths to the United States.

I don't think this is the full transcript, but sections, from the AP.

Quote:

Vance: "For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States' words mattered more than the president of the United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what President Trump is doing."

Zelenskyy: "Can I ask you?"

Vance: "Sure. Yeah."

Zelenskyy: "OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the --"

Trump: "2015?"

Zelenskyy: "2014."

Trump: "Oh, 2014? I was not here."

Vance: "That's exactly right."

Zelenskyy: "Yes, but during 2014 'til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?"

Vance: "I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelenskyy: "Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?"

Vance: "I have been to "

Zelenskyy: "Come once."

Vance: "I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems, bringing people into your military?"

Zelenskyy: "We have problems "

Vance: "And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning."

Vance: "Sure."

Zelenskyy: "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless "

Trump: "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not telling you. I am answering on these questions."

Trump: "Because you're in no position to dictate that."

Vance: "That's exactly what you're doing."

Trump: "You are in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good."

Zelenskyy: "You will feel influenced."

Trump: "We are going to feel very good and very strong."

Zelenskyy: "I am telling you. You will feel influenced."

Trump: "You're, right now, not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position "

Zelenskyy: "From the very beginning of the war "

Trump: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not playing cards. I'm very serious, Mr. President. I'm very serious."

Trump: "You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War III."

Zelenskyy: "What are you speaking about?"

Trump: "You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have."

Vance: "Have you said thank you once?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of times. Even today."

Vance: "No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."

Zelenskyy: "No."

Vance: "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country."

Zelenskyy: "Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can "

Trump: "He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "Can I answer "

Trump: "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "I know. I know."

Trump: "You're not winning. You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us."

Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks."

Trump: "If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."

Zelenskyy: "In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days."

Trump: "Maybe less. It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: "Just say thank you."

Zelenskyy: "I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people."

Vance: "Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong."

Trump: "But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful."

Zelenskyy: "I'm thankful."

Trump: "You don't have the cards. You're buried there. People are dying. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.' Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

Zelenskyy: "Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees."

Trump: "Are you saying you don't want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."

Zelenskyy: "Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think."

Trump: "That wasn't with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person."

Zelenskyy: "This is your president. It was your president."

Trump: "Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You've got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don't have any cards."





We're not surprised you're disappointed at Vance. Post when you actually say something that will surprise us.


Zelensky just had to keep his mouth shut after Vance said Trump was a strong actions president. But no, Zelensky just had to try and pander to the media. Then instead of just shutting up and politely relent and move behind closed doors, he had to argue.

I guarantee he and his advisors saw Macron's visit and they thought he should stand up to Trump and be tough on TV. Clearly he got bad advice.

Plus this guy came and effectively campaigned against Trump. Seems like he'd have been a better guest.
Consider what they're talking about, what this proposed deal is. I haven't followed it too closely, but it seems Trump wants natural resources in return for nothing more than talking to Putin and getting a cease fire, then he wants to do "diplomacy" and negotiate a long term peace deal.

So the very last thing any Ukranian would do would be to say "oh sure, let me keep my mouth shut when they talk about strong action." Because there were already documents signed after Crimea, and guess what happened? There is no trusting Russia's word, and it remains to be seen even how much sway Trump has over Putin. That's what this is boiling down to.

I just think it's embarrassing. Zelensky is trying to get peace for his war torn nation, and Vance is counting how many times he says thank you per conversation. How you could support that is just insane.
The US has zero at stake in Ukraine. By have the minerals the US then has a stake
When war involving a nuclear power is involved, we have some inherent stake. When we've promised to defend a country, we have at stake, our promise. When we give a bunch of bullets, shells, bombs, that are used to kill Russians, we have a further stake. When we helped start the war by pushing Ukraine towards NATO, we have a stake.

Any way you look at it, we have a stake. I know it seems to conservatives to not matter whether Russia keeps expanding, but political memory is just that short. It used to matter very much to conservatives.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?


Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Gkelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.


Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.


You think America should guarantee with soldiers Ukraine safety, effectively putting them in NATO?

Trump was giving them economic security. Zelensky took bad advice because he's used to politicians rewarding his behavior.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.
You think America should guarantee with soldiers Ukraine safety, effectively putting them in NATO?

Trump was giving them economic security. Zelensky took bad advice because he's used to politicians rewarding his behavior.
We already promised them security, it was just so long ago that we now feel it's optional. Any deal with Russia will mean permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO, but yes someone has to do something to make further invasion problematic for Russia. If, after supporting Ukraine for this long, we let Russia roll over them because we don't want to be in WWIII, what will happen when they invade a NATO country? We let it happen because we don't want to be in WWIII?

Peace is achievable, but it will have to be a deal Russia can live with. For all I know, publicly dressing down Zelensky in the Oval office was a premeditated way to save Russia some face. I bet I know exactly what the Russian state media is saying about it.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

At the core of it, it is in our best interest to give Ukraine guarantees.
Absolute ****ing bull*****

There is not ONE member of this board who is willing to enlist and fight for Ukraine.

The American people are not even remotely willing to be drafted and fight for Ukraine.

It has NEVER been in the strategic intersts of the US to guarantee Ukranian security.



Take a step back and just imagine the reaction if Trump or any other US prisedent went to war over Ukraine and as a result re esteblished the draft.

Good grief it would be a nightmare.
Either walk away, or give guarantees. I'm saying we cannot demand the rare earths without guarantees.

And of course Zelensky will want guarantees. And we don't even have to put Americans in harm's way. Germany and France have a much deeper interest in no more war, and both are thinking of actually joining the fight. But... America "promised" to defend Ukraine from invasion, all those years ago... our word isn't going to be good enough this time.


' We don't even have to put Americans in harm's way'

So naive.


You just live in a fantasy world. Reality has no place in your bubble.

The AMERICAN PEOPLE are not willing to guarantee Ukranian security.

Period

Neither France nor England will go to war with Russia over Ukraine.

And for the exact same reason.

Their people will not support it.
The American people have voted to spread freedom and democracy all over the world for a long, long time. We want to be in NATO. And we cannot be isolationist in this world. We already took sides in this war, we supported Ukraine like we promised. We have to see this through. We don't have to invade Russia, we just have to stop the killing, and make sure Russia doesn't go right back to it in 3 years.

Zelensky is right that if Russia is allowed to just invade any country it wants, America will face pressure too.
More childish platitudes.

You are not willing to fight.

Only mouth the words to feel 'special' from the safety of your keyboard.

Americans are no longer willing to die for Europe.


Dumb. There are ways to ensure peace without going to war. If things were as simple as you say, you would want to remove all foreign military bases, right? Because Americans don't want to die anywhere except America?
You dont know jack *****

Unless you are willing to go to war.....you don't play around arming others with weapons. You don't put military units in a position where an 'incident' can escalate into war.

And bubble clowns like you are never actually willing to risk their precious fat ass. Much safer to hope others will die for you.


TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.
You think America should guarantee with soldiers Ukraine safety, effectively putting them in NATO?

Trump was giving them economic security. Zelensky took bad advice because he's used to politicians rewarding his behavior.
We already promised them security, it was just so long ago that we now feel it's optional. Any deal with Russia will mean permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO, but yes someone has to do something to make further invasion problematic for Russia. If, after supporting Ukraine for this long, we let Russia roll over them because we don't want to be in WWIII, what will happen when they invade a NATO country? We let it happen because we don't want to be in WWIII?

Peace is achievable, but it will have to be a deal Russia can live with. For all I know, publicly dressing down Zelensky in the Oval office was a premeditated way to save Russia some face. I bet I know exactly what the Russian state media is saying about it.


The mineral agreement was one step of many that need to happen for the US. Pretty clear Trump agrees that lasting peace is the goal, and assurances are part of the final outcome. But if we give "NATO like" security assurance to Ukraine, it's effectively just another NATO. Good luck with that. Europe will do token actions but really do diddly and then rely on the US fully. US bears the brunt of the risk. Trump is smart enough to see Europe for the sham it is.

Economic investment was a really smart idea, and a great plan to tie the countries together. Again, Trump is smart, smarter than all of you Dems put together.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.



Your final paragraph says we shouldn't support Ukraine or Russia as neither has free and fair elections
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso: "Consider what they're talking about, what this proposed deal is. I haven't followed it too closely, but it seems Trump wants natural resources in return for nothing more than talking to Putin and getting a cease fire, then he wants to do "diplomacy" and negotiate a long term peace deal."

Yes, let's discuss the deal. It's smarter than you seem to realize.

All the adults want to end the war, and understand that whatever is resolved now needs something to keep the peace. Something not dependent on emotion or politics of the moment. Zelensky wants US troops, but he's never going to get that for what should be obvious reasons. Putin wants to keep the US out and guarantees of territorial control, but he's not going get that, again for reasons which should be obvious. Trump has heard from a lot of voters fed up with the flood of money sent to Zelensky with no accounting at all for where it went, and no sign it made a difference.

What this deal means is several things. It sends the message that unconditional support for Zelensky is over, that American taxpayers get an assurance that Zelensky has a motive to end the war rather than just keep it going because he personally benefits, but it also puts a US strategic value in Ukraine, adding pressure to Putin to end the conflict and limiting his choices, while giving him no US troops to attack.

It also offers a way for Ukraine to rebuild after the war is over, by providing credible incentive for companies to help Ukraine rebuild their nation.

It's a good deal.





Porteroso: "So the very last thing any Ukranian would do would be to say "oh sure, let me keep my mouth shut when they talk about strong action." Because there were already documents signed after Crimea, and guess what happened? There is no trusting Russia's word, and it remains to be seen even how much sway Trump has over Putin. That's what this is boiling down to."

That's not the average Ukranian position you are channeling, it's the Never-Trump position.

Ukrainians want the war over, as do most Russians. The problem is Zelensky and Putin, not only getting them to agree to end the war (both have personal emotional reasons to keep going) but also prevent the thing from starting up again a few years from now.

Trump appears to understand Putin better than other Presidents, judging from the actual history of Russian aggression during their terms. And putting a trade deal into Ukraine instead of committing US troops or escalating weapon types is a much smarter play than what we saw before now.




Porteroso: "I just think it's embarrassing. Zelensky is trying to get peace for his war torn nation, and Vance is counting how many times he says thank you per conversation. How you could support that is just insane."

You misconvey the landscape here. Zelensky has turned down opportunities to end the war before now, so it really comes down to why Zelensky won't make a deal.

There is no reality where Ukraine forces Russia out in abject defeat. Russia, for all its losses, is too big and has too many men and weapons to lose to Ukraine. The only tactics or weapons which could destroy the Russian control would most likely provoke a major escalation to WMD by Putin

For all their chirping, there is no single European country able to change things very much in Ukraine, and a European alliance with enough force to make a difference would be considered a de facto NATO force by Putin, with grisly and predictable results.

A negotiated settlement which gives something to both sides and leaves both sides something to lose if the war starts up again, is the only sane option.

Putin knows this.
Trump knows this.

Zelensky is in denial. This is obvious, because if he was going to refuse the deal he should never have made the trip to the White House. Instead, from his choice of clothing to choice of words and posture, Zelensky showed he has no clue that Biden is no longer President, and fewer and fewer people are confusing him for some Baltic Churchill.


Zelensky needs to make the deal.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Married A Horn said:

Porteroso said:

I'm pretty disappointed with Vance. From the transcript, Vance basically stepped in and tried to power play Zelensky. Just dumb, and of course Trump wants to be worshipped, not told that if Russia keeps invading, the US will "feel influenced." Trump responds with "We are going to feel very good and very strong." and it just devolves from there.

You know what though, let me post the transcript. You guys just read it for yourself. I think it's embarrassing. This isn't the time to hold Zelensky to account, it's the time to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's ok if Zelensky says a few words, he's about to hand over 50% of Ukraine's rare earths to the United States.

I don't think this is the full transcript, but sections, from the AP.

Quote:

Vance: "For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States' words mattered more than the president of the United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what President Trump is doing."

Zelenskyy: "Can I ask you?"

Vance: "Sure. Yeah."

Zelenskyy: "OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the --"

Trump: "2015?"

Zelenskyy: "2014."

Trump: "Oh, 2014? I was not here."

Vance: "That's exactly right."

Zelenskyy: "Yes, but during 2014 'til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?"

Vance: "I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelenskyy: "Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?"

Vance: "I have been to "

Zelenskyy: "Come once."

Vance: "I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems, bringing people into your military?"

Zelenskyy: "We have problems "

Vance: "And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning."

Vance: "Sure."

Zelenskyy: "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless "

Trump: "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not telling you. I am answering on these questions."

Trump: "Because you're in no position to dictate that."

Vance: "That's exactly what you're doing."

Trump: "You are in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good."

Zelenskyy: "You will feel influenced."

Trump: "We are going to feel very good and very strong."

Zelenskyy: "I am telling you. You will feel influenced."

Trump: "You're, right now, not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position "

Zelenskyy: "From the very beginning of the war "

Trump: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not playing cards. I'm very serious, Mr. President. I'm very serious."

Trump: "You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War III."

Zelenskyy: "What are you speaking about?"

Trump: "You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have."

Vance: "Have you said thank you once?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of times. Even today."

Vance: "No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."

Zelenskyy: "No."

Vance: "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country."

Zelenskyy: "Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can "

Trump: "He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "Can I answer "

Trump: "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "I know. I know."

Trump: "You're not winning. You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us."

Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks."

Trump: "If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."

Zelenskyy: "In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days."

Trump: "Maybe less. It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: "Just say thank you."

Zelenskyy: "I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people."

Vance: "Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong."

Trump: "But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful."

Zelenskyy: "I'm thankful."

Trump: "You don't have the cards. You're buried there. People are dying. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.' Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

Zelenskyy: "Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees."

Trump: "Are you saying you don't want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."

Zelenskyy: "Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think."

Trump: "That wasn't with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person."

Zelenskyy: "This is your president. It was your president."

Trump: "Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You've got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don't have any cards."





We're not surprised you're disappointed at Vance. Post when you actually say something that will surprise us.


Zelensky just had to keep his mouth shut after Vance said Trump was a strong actions president. But no, Zelensky just had to try and pander to the media. Then instead of just shutting up and politely relent and move behind closed doors, he had to argue.

I guarantee he and his advisors saw Macron's visit and they thought he should stand up to Trump and be tough on TV. Clearly he got bad advice.

Plus this guy came and effectively campaigned against Trump. Seems like he'd have been a better guest.

It's not his job to be Trump's *****. He represents Ukraine, an invaded country. With Trump it doesn't matter if you sing his praises or push back.

What we are seeing is too many elected officials bending the knee instead of representing their people. Mitch McConnell trying to look tough and principled? Too late.

When the doll house starts to crumble, then people will grow a spine. Too late.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Married A Horn said:

Porteroso said:

I'm pretty disappointed with Vance. From the transcript, Vance basically stepped in and tried to power play Zelensky. Just dumb, and of course Trump wants to be worshipped, not told that if Russia keeps invading, the US will "feel influenced." Trump responds with "We are going to feel very good and very strong." and it just devolves from there.

You know what though, let me post the transcript. You guys just read it for yourself. I think it's embarrassing. This isn't the time to hold Zelensky to account, it's the time to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's ok if Zelensky says a few words, he's about to hand over 50% of Ukraine's rare earths to the United States.

I don't think this is the full transcript, but sections, from the AP.

Quote:

Vance: "For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States' words mattered more than the president of the United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what President Trump is doing."

Zelenskyy: "Can I ask you?"

Vance: "Sure. Yeah."

Zelenskyy: "OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the --"

Trump: "2015?"

Zelenskyy: "2014."

Trump: "Oh, 2014? I was not here."

Vance: "That's exactly right."

Zelenskyy: "Yes, but during 2014 'til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?"

Vance: "I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelenskyy: "Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?"

Vance: "I have been to "

Zelenskyy: "Come once."

Vance: "I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems, bringing people into your military?"

Zelenskyy: "We have problems "

Vance: "And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning."

Vance: "Sure."

Zelenskyy: "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless "

Trump: "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not telling you. I am answering on these questions."

Trump: "Because you're in no position to dictate that."

Vance: "That's exactly what you're doing."

Trump: "You are in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good."

Zelenskyy: "You will feel influenced."

Trump: "We are going to feel very good and very strong."

Zelenskyy: "I am telling you. You will feel influenced."

Trump: "You're, right now, not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position "

Zelenskyy: "From the very beginning of the war "

Trump: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not playing cards. I'm very serious, Mr. President. I'm very serious."

Trump: "You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War III."

Zelenskyy: "What are you speaking about?"

Trump: "You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have."

Vance: "Have you said thank you once?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of times. Even today."

Vance: "No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."

Zelenskyy: "No."

Vance: "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country."

Zelenskyy: "Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can "

Trump: "He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "Can I answer "

Trump: "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "I know. I know."

Trump: "You're not winning. You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us."

Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks."

Trump: "If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."

Zelenskyy: "In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days."

Trump: "Maybe less. It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: "Just say thank you."

Zelenskyy: "I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people."

Vance: "Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong."

Trump: "But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful."

Zelenskyy: "I'm thankful."

Trump: "You don't have the cards. You're buried there. People are dying. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.' Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

Zelenskyy: "Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees."

Trump: "Are you saying you don't want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."

Zelenskyy: "Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think."

Trump: "That wasn't with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person."

Zelenskyy: "This is your president. It was your president."

Trump: "Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You've got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don't have any cards."





We're not surprised you're disappointed at Vance. Post when you actually say something that will surprise us.


Zelensky just had to keep his mouth shut after Vance said Trump was a strong actions president. But no, Zelensky just had to try and pander to the media. Then instead of just shutting up and politely relent and move behind closed doors, he had to argue.

I guarantee he and his advisors saw Macron's visit and they thought he should stand up to Trump and be tough on TV. Clearly he got bad advice.

Plus this guy came and effectively campaigned against Trump. Seems like he'd have been a better guest.

It's not his job to be Trump's *****. He represents Ukraine, an invaded country. With Trump it doesn't matter if you sing his praises or push back.

What we are seeing is too many elected officials bending the knee instead of representing their people. Mitch McConnell trying to look tough and principled?

Trump just won a election by the voice of the American people

He got 77 million votes

You think preventing the President from carrying out his political program and stifling democracy is the thing to do?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't realize that was the visit. Zelensky was in the UK today. We will just have to see what he does. I wonder if nothing was hammered out at all, and Trump was trying to pressure Zelensky into a bad deal by claiming it was a near certainty.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.



His soldiers are fighters....he hid in a bunker in Kyiv (possibly fled to Poland to a NATO base in the first few hours)

Lets not engage in to much hero worship and mythology of the guy

He is a comedian turn politician....and we know both professions are full of liars and narcissists
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.



His soldiers are fighters....he hid in a bunker in Kyiv (possibly fled to Poland to a NATO base in the first few hours)

Lets not engage in to much hero worship and mythology of the guy

He is a comedian turn politician....and we know both professions are full of liars and narcissists

Not worshipping him, just saying that characterizing Zelensky as an obstacle to peace is missing the point. Yeah he wants to win, and without that there would be no country.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.






Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.









There is no good guy in this fight. A bigger bad guy bullying on a smaller one.

Translation: stop sending my $ over there (especially when half comes back to democrats' bank accounts.)
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

muddybrazos said:

Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.









There is no good guy in this fight. A bigger bad guy bullying on a smaller one.

Translation: stop sending my $ over there (especially when half comes back to democrats' bank accounts.)
I'm not a Ukraine/Russia expert but I dont really see it exactly that way. Ukraine had a color revolution done to them by the US and the west to overthrow their Russia friendly govt and replace it with a Euro friendly puppet govt. If that didnt happen then all of this war and civil war in Donbas wouldnt have happened. The regime war people have had a hard on for detroying Russa for a long time. If Hillary had won in 16 I have no doubt we would be in a hot war with Russia.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Married A Horn said:

muddybrazos said:

Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.









There is no good guy in this fight. A bigger bad guy bullying on a smaller one.

Translation: stop sending my $ over there (especially when half comes back to democrats' bank accounts.)
I'm not a Ukraine/Russia expert but I dont really see it exactly that way. Ukraine had a color revolution done to them by the US and the west to overthrow their Russia friendly govt and replace it with a Euro friendly puppet govt. If that didnt happen then all of this war and civil war in Donbas wouldnt have happened. The regime war people have had a hard on for detroying Russa for a long time. If Hillary had won in 16 I have no doubt we would be in a hot war with Russia.


I dont really consider Euro friendly to be a good guy.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.









I'd imagine one of the worst things for a parent is having their soldier son killed in a foreign land, defending a country that is one of the corruptest countries in Europe, with the stated purpose of bleeding Russia into submission.

I'm usually more on the hawkish side, but I like Ukraine only an ounce or so more than Russia, and I'm no fan of Russia.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGoxNaaSgAc/?igsh=MXV5Y3Vva2VkZGd0aw==
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

At the core of it, it is in our best interest to give Ukraine guarantees.
Absolute ****ing bull*****

There is not ONE member of this board who is willing to enlist and fight for Ukraine.

The American people are not even remotely willing to be drafted and fight for Ukraine.

It has NEVER been in the strategic intersts of the US to guarantee Ukranian security.



Take a step back and just imagine the reaction if Trump or any other US prisedent went to war over Ukraine and as a result re esteblished the draft.

Good grief it would be a nightmare.
We don't have to send troops, doofus.
If you're talking about security guarantees, you are talking about potentially sending American troops. That's what it means.

It is not in our best interest, and no one here actually wants to do it. We are virtue signaling our way into war without any thought about the consequences.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Which Zelensky made clear he is not willing to do.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
Well, you can't do both.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gkelly said:

Look, I'm not here to minimize or emasculate anyone's opinion. For now, we're all entitled to our own and I'd like to think that when push comes to shove Americans will channel Voltaire's commitment to free speech and to free thought and rally around the mantra, "I may not agree with a word you say, but I'll fight to my death you're right to say it" (as summarized by Evelyn Hall).

I received a grant from the US State Dept to fund part of my education. I studied Russian and minored in Russian and East European Studies. I've been to the USSR and to Russia multiple times. The Ukrainian/Russian relationship is a complicated one. History has taught Russia to build barricades, wall itself off from potential invaders. WWII taught the Russians they need a viable buffer zone to control the approximately 7-9 land invasion routes into Russia. It's been ruled from the jump by autocrats.

Ukraine, meaning "on the border", was never intended to be an independent state. It was an artificial construct of the Soviet Union as one of the 15 republics that comprised the USSR. It's considered the birthplace of Russian Orthodoxy.

All to say, it's complicated, nuanced issue. But at the end of the day, I'm for anyone who chooses democracy over autocracy and my hope of the United States is we promote democratic values and provide smart security guarantees to promote those values.



Good post, although I disagree with the last paragraph because the US has never done that and never will.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.
You think America should guarantee with soldiers Ukraine safety, effectively putting them in NATO?

Trump was giving them economic security. Zelensky took bad advice because he's used to politicians rewarding his behavior.
We already promised them security, it was just so long ago that we now feel it's optional. Any deal with Russia will mean permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO, but yes someone has to do something to make further invasion problematic for Russia. If, after supporting Ukraine for this long, we let Russia roll over them because we don't want to be in WWIII, what will happen when they invade a NATO country? We let it happen because we don't want to be in WWIII?

Peace is achievable, but it will have to be a deal Russia can live with. For all I know, publicly dressing down Zelensky in the Oval office was a premeditated way to save Russia some face. I bet I know exactly what the Russian state media is saying about it.


The mineral agreement was one step of many that need to happen for the US. Pretty clear Trump agrees that lasting peace is the goal, and assurances are part of the final outcome. But if we give "NATO like" security assurance to Ukraine, it's effectively just another NATO. Good luck with that. Europe will do token actions but really do diddly and then rely on the US fully. US bears the brunt of the risk. Trump is smart enough to see Europe for the sham it is.

Economic investment was a really smart idea, and a great plan to tie the countries together. Again, Trump is smart, smarter than all of you Dems put together.
hey dumbass, you do realize said "rare earths" as Trumpy calls them which is incorrect are located in the land that Russia invaded and now controls. So, smart guy, how's that gonna work?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

I'm pretty disappointed with Vance. From the transcript, Vance basically stepped in and tried to power play Zelensky. Just dumb, and of course Trump wants to be worshipped, not told that if Russia keeps invading, the US will "feel influenced." Trump responds with "We are going to feel very good and very strong." and it just devolves from there.

You know what though, let me post the transcript. You guys just read it for yourself. I think it's embarrassing. This isn't the time to hold Zelensky to account, it's the time to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's ok if Zelensky says a few words, he's about to hand over 50% of Ukraine's rare earths to the United States.

I don't think this is the full transcript, but sections, from the AP.

Quote:

Vance: "For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States' words mattered more than the president of the United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what President Trump is doing."

Zelenskyy: "Can I ask you?"

Vance: "Sure. Yeah."

Zelenskyy: "OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the --"

Trump: "2015?"

Zelenskyy: "2014."

Trump: "Oh, 2014? I was not here."

Vance: "That's exactly right."

Zelenskyy: "Yes, but during 2014 'til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?"

Vance: "I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelenskyy: "Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?"

Vance: "I have been to "

Zelenskyy: "Come once."

Vance: "I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems, bringing people into your military?"

Zelenskyy: "We have problems "

Vance: "And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning."

Vance: "Sure."

Zelenskyy: "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless "

Trump: "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not telling you. I am answering on these questions."

Trump: "Because you're in no position to dictate that."

Vance: "That's exactly what you're doing."

Trump: "You are in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good."

Zelenskyy: "You will feel influenced."

Trump: "We are going to feel very good and very strong."

Zelenskyy: "I am telling you. You will feel influenced."

Trump: "You're, right now, not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position "

Zelenskyy: "From the very beginning of the war "

Trump: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards."

Zelenskyy: "I'm not playing cards. I'm very serious, Mr. President. I'm very serious."

Trump: "You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War III."

Zelenskyy: "What are you speaking about?"

Trump: "You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have."

Vance: "Have you said thank you once?"

Zelenskyy: "A lot of times. Even today."

Vance: "No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."

Zelenskyy: "No."

Vance: "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country."

Zelenskyy: "Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can "

Trump: "He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "Can I answer "

Trump: "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble."

Zelenskyy: "I know. I know."

Trump: "You're not winning. You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us."

Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks."

Trump: "If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."

Zelenskyy: "In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days."

Trump: "Maybe less. It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: "Just say thank you."

Zelenskyy: "I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people."

Vance: "Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong."

Trump: "But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful."

Zelenskyy: "I'm thankful."

Trump: "You don't have the cards. You're buried there. People are dying. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.' Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

Zelenskyy: "Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees."

Trump: "Are you saying you don't want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."

Zelenskyy: "Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think."

Trump: "That wasn't with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person."

Zelenskyy: "This is your president. It was your president."

Trump: "Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You've got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don't have any cards."



Agree with this. I thought Vance came off looking like a boot-licker, and quite frankly, it significantly diminished his prospects of ever becoming president in my eyes.

Do I think Zelensky was right to have this debate in front of the press? No. Do I think we have to engage in diplomacy instead of pouring billions into what is going to be a losing effort? Yes. Do I think this war ends with concessions on the part of Ukraine in terms of territory? Yes. But Vance calling him out as disrespectful was ridiculous, and made him look small, not the other way around.

If you are going to pride yourself on the ability to debate, as Vance does, then have the balls to debate. Don't call out your opponent's behavior as disrespectful. Engage with him on the subject matters. Refute his words.

Made Vance look like a big fat p_ssy.

And of course, Trump was his typical self, which is good at times, and bad, as here. I think it's a bad look to hold a country over a barrel and demand they enter into a business transaction with you when the alternative is destruction. Made him look like an enormous bully.

Indeed, it was embarrassing.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

At the core of it, it is in our best interest to give Ukraine guarantees. We, the UK, and Russia already convinced Ukraine to not pursue nuclear weapons, in exchange for the 3 countries agreeing to defend Ukraine from invasion... And we did not. Not during the invasion of Crimea, and not during the main invasion 2 years ago.

And then after Crimea, Putin signs a document that he will not further invade, but guess what?

So Trump "persuading" Putin to stop the invasion is simply not good enough. Nobody thinks it is. I don't really have any amount of respect for trying to take Ukraine's natural resources in exchange for what is effectively a temporary cease fire. The United States should be better than that.

If we want the rare earths, we must give guarantees. Maybe it's as simple as an Army base near the rare earths, and having France/Germany have bases near the Russian border as well.

But we cannot let the peace talks fall through because J.D. Vance wants to make Zelensky suck him off. That's the last straw for me. To do that to a man watching his country being burned and destroyed. Goodness.
Nah, can't go this far. As the dad of draft age sons, I don't want to send my kids to spill blood on the other side of the world for a country that has little strategic benefit to us. Gone are the days of neocon foreign policy for me. It has led to nothing but death and destruction.

I am willing to give Ukraine significant weapons, perhaps even nukes, in exchange for a peace deal, which should make Russia think twice about invading again. I am for arming Ukraine's neighbors to the teeth. That is the consequence of Russia's actions.

But making Ukraine a de facto NATO member? Nah, no way.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

At the core of it, it is in our best interest to give Ukraine guarantees.

The American people are not even remotely willing to be drafted and fight for Ukraine..


Even the Europeans living next door are not willing to be drafted to fight for Ukraine

(They don't even care that much about fighting for their own nations)



Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Porteroso said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Gkelly said:

Funny how you speak for all Americans. As a former United States Navy officer, it would be an honor to return to service to help defend Ukraine and to promote democracy.
They're taking volunteers.
It won't take that. And many volunteers already went. Good for them, they took a stance. Now is the time for peace, for negotiating a deal between Ukraine and Russia. You remember, like Trump promised to do?
Trump is doing exactly that. By exposing Zelenskyy as the biggest obstacle to peace. Zelenskyy wants to win outright. And will continue to fight until the situation is worsened and escalated.
I feel for Ukraine, but maybe you have a better alternative to the situation.
Honestly Europe needs to step up. America will help if they do. But they're not willing due to the risks. Tough situation.
Zelensky is a fighter. If he wasn't, there would be no Ukraine.

Now, he is clearly ready for peace, and clearly wants guarantees that this won't happen again. Why would he not ask the US for that? Clearly we are the only entity involved that could guarantee peace. He spent his first meeting making that point. Time will tell whether it altered anyone's perception, or whether it made Trump consider guaranteeing peace in some way, but it was, to me, the only smart thing to do.

In a war that has lasted years, go ahead and spend a day or 2 trying to get the best possible deal for your country. If that fails, take whatever you can get. Just watch, by Monday there will be a deal signed I think.
You think America should guarantee with soldiers Ukraine safety, effectively putting them in NATO?

Trump was giving them economic security. Zelensky took bad advice because he's used to politicians rewarding his behavior.
We already promised them security, it was just so long ago that we now feel it's optional. Any deal with Russia will mean permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO, but yes someone has to do something to make further invasion problematic for Russia. If, after supporting Ukraine for this long, we let Russia roll over them because we don't want to be in WWIII, what will happen when they invade a NATO country? We let it happen because we don't want to be in WWIII?

Peace is achievable, but it will have to be a deal Russia can live with. For all I know, publicly dressing down Zelensky in the Oval office was a premeditated way to save Russia some face. I bet I know exactly what the Russian state media is saying about it.


The mineral agreement was one step of many that need to happen for the US. Pretty clear Trump agrees that lasting peace is the goal, and assurances are part of the final outcome. But if we give "NATO like" security assurance to Ukraine, it's effectively just another NATO. Good luck with that. Europe will do token actions but really do diddly and then rely on the US fully. US bears the brunt of the risk. Trump is smart enough to see Europe for the sham it is.

Economic investment was a really smart idea, and a great plan to tie the countries together. Again, Trump is smart, smarter than all of you Dems put together.
hey dumbass, you do realize said "rare earths" as Trumpy calls them which is incorrect are located in the land that Russia invaded and now controls. So, smart guy, how's that gonna work?


You are the incredible dumb butt who can not even read a map and see that there are plenty of Minerals (including rare earth) located in the 80% of the territory that Ukraine controls




Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.