first American pope

68,842 Views | 965 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Assassin
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He wasn't my first choice, but I didn't get a vote.

I'm not going make any judgements on his papacy until he's had time to do something. It's not fair to judge the man without giving him a change.

The Leonine name carries a heavy burden to live up to. He chose it for a reason.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?



LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:



If this is true then he may be ok.

LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Sox?
Cubs?





He'd better be Cubs!
I heard he was one of the few Cardinals


ba-dum
tsssss
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearmanly said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Conservative?
Liberal?
Too conservative for liberals (anti lgbtq and anti women ordination)
Too liberal for conservatives (more like Pope Francis in pretty much everything else)

I'd say it's a stability choice.
I'm not knocking you, mind you, but JPII all but said ex cathedra that women can't be ordained.

People fighting for their ordination don't understand that the priesthood is not an occupation, it's a vocation.

Even though Jesus had many women in his inner circle (his mother, Mary of Magdalene, and Mary of Bethany) he only chose 12 men to be his apostles.

His choice was not a "culture of the times" choice. Jesus didn't care about upsetting cultural norms. Also, many other religions had priestesses at that time. It would not have been completely out of the norm to do so.

Finally, those same people don't understand that Christ is the Bridegroom and his Church is the bride. Irrespective of Obergfell vs Hodges, a woman (priest) cannot marry another woman (the Church.)
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Conservative?
Liberal?
I think by American standards he is going to be a lib.
Damn, I could swear that he is the Pope that represents ALL Catholics in the WORLD. Who cares what you or the Mercan definition is. Why do you people have to put every single thing in a binary choice? Small minded. The world is a big place. You may want to get out of Merca from time to time.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Subtle factors proved decisive. The activism of New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, who acted as a kingmaker, was pivotal. Dolan quickly backed an unconventional figure at the intersection of diverse cultures: a man with French and Italian heritage and a Spanish mother. Prevost's missionary zeal, combined with his deep roots in the United States, further strengthened his candidacy.

Many observers believe Dolan successfully rallied voters from North and South America, particularly English speaking cardinals, especially those tied to the Commonwealththe remnants of the old British Empire, spanning South Africa, India, and the Tonga Islands."
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His brother's interview was awesome. I just imagine Bob getting ready to go into the Conclave texting his brother the answer to the day's Wordle. I know all pope's are men and most - in the last few hundred years - probably lived a pretty humble life before taking the cloth - but pretty funny thinking about the new pope waking up, checking the White Sox box score and sending his brother the Wordle.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

His brother's interview was awesome. I just imagine Bob getting ready to go into the Conclave texting his brother the answer to the day's Wordle. I know all pope's are men and most - in the last few hundred years - probably lived a pretty humble life before taking the cloth - but pretty funny thinking about the new pope waking up, checking the White Sox box score and sending his brother the Wordle.

Has a pope ever thrown out a ceremonial first pitch
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

His brother's interview was awesome. I just imagine Bob getting ready to go into the Conclave texting his brother the answer to the day's Wordle. I know all pope's are men and most - in the last few hundred years - probably lived a pretty humble life before taking the cloth - but pretty funny thinking about the new pope waking up, checking the White Sox box score and sending his brother the Wordle.

Has a pope ever thrown out a ceremonial first pitch
Hope bout one that could throw the first punch? Until he acknowledges the Muslim problem in the EU, the Catholics are on the downslope
"An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




He is a White Sox fan to boot, working class guy.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cheers against the Astros. That will win the hearts of all Catholics in MLB towns except Houston

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16G47HpFf5/?mibextid=UalRPS
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mixed bag


On the one hand, it's nice that the new pope might actually believe the Bible on a few things.

On the other hand, Francis was so blatantly anti-Christ that he drove many good people out of the catholic church and into actual Christianity.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Cheers against the Astros. That will win the hearts of all Catholics in MLB towns except Houston

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16G47HpFf5/?mibextid=UalRPS


Can you believe the strange white Sox fan that is out there going through decades old MLB footage to see if Pope Leo was in the stands…lol
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Cheers against the Astros. That will win the hearts of all Catholics in MLB towns except Houston

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16G47HpFf5/?mibextid=UalRPS


Can you believe the strange white Sox fan that is out there going through decades old MLB footage to see if Pope Leo was in the stands…lol

Here you go:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/713484794352504?fs=e&fs=e
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Redbrickbear said:


So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Good thing being Catholic isn't mandatory.

ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's black.

Maternal grandparents were Creole from New Orleans.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vatican 3 - to beheld at a Chicago area Arby's..............

- el KKM

D!

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.

So, in other words it's NOT something that Catholics believe.

You mention Vatican I, I can only assume (because you're not being specific) that you referring to papal infallibility.

It doesn't mean that they are speaking for God. It means, the Pope exercises infallibility only when he speaks ex cathedra, meaning he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held up by the whole Church. The Holy Spirit protects him error, as promised by Jesus in Matthew 16:18.

It has only been officially used twice in the history of the Church.

With respect to your other "issues", I am happy to discuss them one at a time in any in this thread or by PM. If you're ever in Waco, I'm happy to meet at George's to discuss any of your issues with the Church. Beers will be my treat.

As vulnerable Bishop Fulton J Sheen said, "There are no more than 100 people in the world who truly hate the Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be."
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.



Man such misinformed people. They really should get educated. Theyve been lied to their whole lives it appears.

No Catholic believes the pope is "the leader of the universal church" in place of God.

The internet is educating so many which is causing people that have been lied to and misinformed to question how they got caught up in a distortion of Catholicism 500 years ago and take the opportunity to course correct before it's too late.

God works in mysterious ways.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.



Not remotely accurate.

You are one strange individual.

ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.

So, in other words it's NOT something that Catholics believe.

You mention Vatican I, I can only assume (because you're not being specific) that you referring to papal infallibility.

It doesn't mean that they are speaking for God. It means, the Pope exercises infallibility only when he speaks ex cathedra, meaning he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held up by the whole Church. The Holy Spirit protects him error, as promised by Jesus in Matthew 16:18.

It has only been officially used twice in the history of the Church.

With respect to your other "issues", I am happy to discuss them one at a time in any in this thread or by PM. If you're ever in Waco, I'm happy to meet at George's to discuss any of your issues with the Church. Beers will be my treat.

As vulnerable Bishop Fulton J Sheen said, "There are no more than 100 people in the world who truly hate the Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be."


Let me get this straight.... you never pray the "Queen of Heaven" prayer? If so, I seriously doubt you are an actual Catholic.
Are you also unaware that the catholic Catechism teaches that Mary was born without sin, never had sex, and lived her life without sinning?
The Word of God clearly states that ALL have sinned and there are NONE righteous, no not one.

Please explain exactly what the Vicar of Christ means.
Do the same for the Pontiff of the Universal Church.

In my lifetime, I have never seen a Pope who rejected these titles. Quite the opposite... they were proud to have these titles. Likewise, they were proud to be referred to as "Holy Father"... a title that clearly should only apply to our Father in Heaven.

And back to the original point.... the pope is NEVER infallible. He is a man not God. His words and decrees are NOT the inspired word of God, therefore to declare that he holds the power of infallibility in any way (even only twice in history) is heretical.

You mention Matthew 16:18... are you saying that verse somehow grants infallibility to the pope?

I'm glad that you are at least referring to the Bible... so few Catholics are willing to recognize the authority of scripture.

So long as you are looking at the Bible... please explain the Catholic title for Mary as the "Queen of Heaven" in light of Jeremiah chapter 44.

Edit: in case you are unfamiliar with the Queen of Heaven prayer, I'll copy & paste it for you.

V. Queen of Heaven, rejoice, alleluia.
R. For He whom you did merit to bear, alleluia.
V. Has risen, as he said, alleluia.
R. Pray for us to God, alleluia.
V. Rejoice and be glad, O Virgin Mary, alleluia.
R. For the Lord has truly risen, alleluia.
Let us pray. O God, who gave joy to the world through the resurrection of Thy Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, grant we beseech Thee, that through the intercession of the Virgin Mary, His Mother, we may obtain the joys of everlasting life. Through the same Christ our Lord.

Show me in the Bible where anyone claimed that Mary is our intercessor? In fact, the scriptures are very clear. There is only ONE intercessor and only ONE who gives eternal life.... and it ain't Mary!


1 Timothy 2:5-6
[5] For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, [6] who gave himself as a ransom for all people. This has now been witnessed to at the proper time.

1 John 2:1-2
[1] My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the FatherJesus Christ, the Righteous One. [2] He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.

Show me in the Word of God where Mary is anything other than a very honorable & blessed woman. Can you do that?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He does list American Southern Negro Urban Vulgate (aka Jive) as one of his Lingua Francas................

- el KKM

D!

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.



Funny clothes? That is your issue?

The Catholic Church has done more good and provides more education, health care and social services than any other organizations. It is not perfect, see the Homosexual issue that they handled horribly

As for doctrine, The Pope sets the direction and rules on the Church's interpretation of doctrine. Not any different than any other religion, there is always a CEO that makes the final call.

ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

ShooterTX said:

Coke Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

So they basically admit that the selection of a Pope is purely political... but the Catholics still believe that this guy speaks on behalf of God??

That is not just pure blasphemy, but outside of Biblical truth and Christian beliefs, it's just logically foolish. How can anyone believe that someone who get elected because of a corrupt political system, is also going to be the highest voice of morality or theology?? Ridiculous!
Please cite from the Catechism where Catholics believe that the pope "speaks on behalf of God."
It's right next to the part in the Catechism which describes the Pope mobile and the funny looking hat that the Pope wears. You might find it next to the part in the Catechism were Mary is stated to be the "Queen of Heaven"... and yet catholics around the globe are very familiar with that as one of her titles.

The reality is that you can fill St. Peter's with all of the Catholic teachings, practices & traditions which are not found in the official Catechism.

If you want to know why Catholics around the globe believe that the Pope speaks on behalf of God, you can simply read about the Vatican I Council and Pope Pius IX.

The reality is that the Pope is just a man. He is no better or worse than any other man on the planet. He may claim to be the leader of the Universal Church... but that just makes him a blasphemer. Jesus Christ is the leader of the Universal Church... not some guy from Chicago!
Likewise, he may claim to be the "Vicar of Christ" but he certainly is not! Christ does not need a human "vicar". We have the Holy Spirit... we do not need a guy in a funny hat to claim that role.



Funny clothes? That is your issue?

The Catholic Church has done more good and provides more education, health care and social services than any other organizations. It is not perfect, see the Homosexual issue that they handled horribly

As for doctrine, The Pope sets the direction and rules on the Church's interpretation of doctrine. Not any different than any other religion, there is always a CEO that makes the final call.



Of course I don't care at all about the funny clothes. Anyone who actually reads my comment above can see that funny clothes is nothing more than a side note.

For example, you stated: "The Pope sets the direction and rules on the Church's interpretation of doctrine. Not any different than any other religion" - this is not true. There is no single person who claims universal authority for such declarations in the Bible or in Protestant denominations. Why? Because such authority is given solely to God. As humans, we are instructed to search the scriptures to know the truth. No single human has the authority to tell the world was is true about Christianity, the church, or doctrine. Only the scriptures have that authority. Everyone else has an opinion about the scriptures. The Pope has claimed an authority that only belongs to God. Also, the fact that the Pope relies upon "church tradition" as much as he does the Word of God when he makes these decisions about doctrine... that is also a massive red flag.

One thing we agree upon is that the Catholic Church has done a lot of good things. Sadly, doing good things doesn't really matter as much as you might think. 22 On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?' 23 And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.' - Matthew 7: 22-23
Those are the words spoken by Jesus. There will be many who claim to do good in the name of Jesus, but never actually knew Him.

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whatever else can be said, Leo is an improvement over Francis.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.