Charlie Kirk Shot

36,872 Views | 621 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by Assassin
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:




Tempus, I still feel like there's a gap here. I asked you two or three times to please explain exactly what you meant by posting that, and I'm not sure why you won't do it.

I listened to that whole clip and thought he was quite reasonable and candid, while showing a real desire to decrease gun deaths.

Again, feel free to use short words for those of us who do not speak Latin. Thanks in advance for your time and attention to this matter.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hodedofome said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

I'm absolutely infuriated right now. Reading some of the frivilous, almost cheerful comments from the leftists here who are trying their hardest to hide their glee isn't helping either. The glee form the left is beyond disgusting. You're going to see that making Charlie Kirk a martyr is only going to make his influence stronger than ever.

Charlie Kirk was a man of God, sent her for a short time to accomplish his will. The Lord has now called him home. But his influence is going to continue, and be more powerful than it ever was.


Let's at least get our theology right. God didn't call him home. He died at the hands of sinners, and is now home. Gods ultimate will is not that anyone is murdered.

God is sovereign over everything. HIs Son Jesus also died at the hands of sinners, and it was entirely His will. Charlie Kirk lived as long as God planned for him. There's not a single bullet from any assassin that could ever thwart God's will.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These are incredibly hard to watch tonight. A father, a husband, a son murdered for no ****ing reason other than his opinions
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they know exactly where he fired from they should have him in custody. He had to enter and exit somewhere. Somebody seen him
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

If they know exactly where he fired from they should have him in custody. He had to enter and exit somewhere. Somebody seen him


Indeed. Like I said. Time to exercise your second amendment rights, every day, everywhere.

Be the civilizing force for your immediate environment that you are hoping will ride to the rescue.'

That is the American way.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is he talking about the 1st guy (the older guy) - or the 2nd person taken into custody?

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a real pastor, not a fake like C.Jordan


"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

historian said:


This is liberalism:
1. tolerance
2. limited government
3. indIvidual liberty & moral responsibility
4. free markets
5. "All men are created equal."
etc


That is not liberalism.

That is libertarianism.

Liberalism is iconoclasm initially, idolatry when it is fully realized and the icons have been replaced with its idols.

No that is the classical, 18th century, definition of liberalism. Representative govt is the political manifestation of it and capitalism is the economic one. It involves all those ideas and more. America was partly founded in these ideas. The Declaration of Independence is quite clear about that.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...



Again, he has no idea what "hate speech" is. He is either as delusional as he talks, or he is a propagandist, brainwashed or trying to brainwash.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...



Again, he has no idea what "hate speech" is. He is either as delusional as he talks, or he is a propagandist, brainwashed or trying to brainwash.


Hate speech can now mean:

"There are two genders"

"Women should prioritize a family over their career"

"Children should not take gender hormones or surgeries"

"I support Israel"

etc...
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...




" why do you make me hurt you?"

Ie "please stop using your words to make us shoot you"
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...



Again, he has no idea what "hate speech" is. He is either as delusional as he talks, or he is a propagandist, brainwashed or trying to brainwash.


Van Jones said this. Is this hate speech and should he "get what's coming to him" OR do we debate our viewpoints rationally...

muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very tragic loss. This is like the boomer equivalent of O'reilly or Hannity getting shot. I was never a huge fan of Charlie bc I thought he was too zio but theres no doubt he helped bring a lot of younger people to the GOP. Now he himself was never far right enough for me but he was better than nothing. Very tragic loss at such a young age.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

Oh goodie, Matthew Dowd gets to play God and determine who is awful and deserves to die...



Again, he has no idea what "hate speech" is. He is either as delusional as he talks, or he is a propagandist, brainwashed or trying to brainwash.


Van Jones said this. Is this hate speech and should he "get what's coming to him" OR do we debate our viewpoints rationally...



Or he could be treated like a lot of people treated all of CNN, just not listen to him any more. That easy.

The rage against opposing opinions - particularly from the left these days - is not sane. Social media seems to elongate mob mentality moments into new belief systems.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf said:

I would implore anyone who think Charlie use "hate speech" to find that video and post it.

Exactly. If they are honest, they will realize that Charlie did nothing of the kind. But the Left cannot be honest. They think anything they don't like must be hate speech. The fascists are moronic in their illogical thinking.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



This kind of behavior is pure evil. Maybe even demonic. I wonder if the shooter might be one of these people. At least the FBI might want to be aware of people who celebrate assassination.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

cms186 said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Robert Wilson said:

ParadeOfBears said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Democrat politicians, left wing media and their rhetoric are once again responsible for another shooting.

Charlie knew the risk. He spent his life antagonizing people. That's certainly not a justification for murder but this risk was always there.

I always liked him but poking the liberal bear was always a recipe for disaster. Sort of surprised it didn't happen sooner.

What a sad state of our "civilization" that we expect violence to anyone who exercises their right to free speech or holds an opposing opinion. Your complacency is equally disturbing.

I don't think we expect anyone who says "protect trans kids" or "all whites are racist" to be shot. Doesn't seem like that is happening at a high rate of speed.


Our 5 year olds get shot in school. Why do you think it'll be different for people you like?

Easiest way to prevent that is for liberals to not be allowed guns, have kids, teach kids, etc.

They and you are with the party of hate, lies, angst and murder. They breed mental illness and discontentment.



we're only just over a month removed from the targeted shooting of a Minnesota Democratic politician by a Trump supporter. The Assassination of Kirk is a disgusting act that no sane member of either Political Party supports or wishes for, but trying to pretend that its only the left that commits these horrible acts is just lying to yourself, its this type of argument that leads to these acts in the first place.


I hear what you're saying but I think you're missing the elephant in the room here. Charlie Kirk was brutally murdered to shut him up, not simply because someone has a political axe to grind. It was the end result of years of left wing ideology that has dehumanized conservatives, branding them as racists, hate-mongers and bigots - unworthy of life. We see it online. We see it at political rallies. We see it at speeches on college campuses. For years your brethren on the left have exhibited a disdain for free speech, and a lack of respect for human life. And it's one sided. Liberals don't have to worry about security while attending a political rally. They don't have to worry about security at a college talk. Conservatives do.

And this has become the norm for conservatives. The left, a willing Democrat party and a complicit media has fomented such hatred for conservatives that this is now the norm.

The Dems are fascists. This culture of violence and disregard for legal norms are key features of historic fascism.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Jack Bauer said:

MSNBC justifying violence against Charlie Kirk, Matt Walsh, Steven Crowder, Riley Gaines for their "hate speech".

F'off



Once he said it could be a shooter firing of a round in celebration, he lost all credibility for being a realist. He has no idea what "hate speech" is.

His idiotic take on the assassination is actually a good example of hate speech.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 years ago Riley Gaines was attacked by mob for the wild opinion that men should not compete in women's sports. They held her captive for 3 hours in a bathroom and the University President apologized to the STUDENTS for her presence.

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:




Tempus, I still feel like there's a gap here. I asked you two or three times to please explain exactly what you meant by posting that, and I'm not sure why you won't do it.

I listened to that whole clip and thought he was quite reasonable and candid, while showing a real desire to decrease gun deaths.

Again, feel free to use short words for those of us who do not speak Latin. Thanks in advance for your time and attention to this matter.

I can think of three possibilities:
1. He's trying to point out the irony of Charlie being an advocate of gun rights and accepting that there will be some gun deaths being murdered by an assassin with a gun.
2. He's implying that there is some form of cosmic justice in Charlie being murdered this way after making that argument. "Cosmic" might not be the proper word since IIRC hd doesn't believe in any divine power. I cannot think of another term.
3. His reason is so convoluted or evil that he fears we won't comprehend it or the moderators might be justified in banning him.

I hope it's the first and not one of the others. There might be other possibilities, I can only speculate.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't believe this one bit...I've never heard somene CHEER a car chase


Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Robert Wilson said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:




Tempus, I still feel like there's a gap here. I asked you two or three times to please explain exactly what you meant by posting that, and I'm not sure why you won't do it.

I listened to that whole clip and thought he was quite reasonable and candid, while showing a real desire to decrease gun deaths.

Again, feel free to use short words for those of us who do not speak Latin. Thanks in advance for your time and attention to this matter.

I can think of three possibilities:
1. He's trying to point out the irony of Charlie being an advocate of gun rights and accepting that there will be some gun deaths being murdered by an assassin with a gun.
2. He's implying that there is some form of cosmic justice in Charlie being murdered this way after making that argument. "Cosmic" might not be the proper word since IIRC hd doesn't believe in any divine power. I cannot think of another term.
3. His reason is so convoluted or evil that he fears we won't comprehend it or the moderators might be justified in banning him.

I hope it's the first and not one of the others. There might be other possibilities, I can only speculate.


Let's let him answer.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

I don't believe this one bit...





Nobody believes that. Block all their feeds and boycott their sponsors.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess they got their trajectory back on the shot. Definitely from the rooftop
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

Is he talking about the 1st guy (the older guy) - or the 2nd person taken into custody?



Considering the later hour of the tweet, I'd say he was talking about the second one. Hopefully, their investigation is making progress and they will soon have the real shooter.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Jacques Strap said:

Is he talking about the 1st guy (the older guy) - or the 2nd person taken into custody?



Considering the later hour of the tweet, I'd say he was talking about the second one. Hopefully, their investigation is making progress and they will soon have the real shooter.

If this was truly a professional hit, we may never know
"One kills a man, one is an assassin; one kills millions, one is a conqueror".
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Here's a real pastor, not a fake like C.Jordan




I think he is expressing the emotions of a lot of us.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

I don't believe this one bit...I've never heard somene CHEER a car chase





TMZ has always been a trash bottom feeder media outlet. I don't know how they have an audience.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.