Charlie Kirk Assassinated

104,175 Views | 1580 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by Assassin
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




Every day, the democrats prove just how evil they truly are.

They don't just have different ideas or beliefs... they are evil.


The fascists are evil, dishonest, petty, & childish. They prove it almost every day.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How can any white blooded male in America let anyone besmirch Erika

"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

How can any white blooded male in America let anyone besmirch Erika

Freudian slip FTW.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://x.com/i/trending/1971792410163179772
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.


Sam is not anything like "Al Queda." Seriously, that is "Charlie Kirk was a Nazi" territory.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.


Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.


DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.

Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.

DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Like Charlie Kirk, I would rather have a non-DEI Pilot piloting my airplane... don't really care what color or sex that they are, I just want them to have Earned It
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.


Sam is not anything like "Al Queda." Seriously, that is "Charlie Kirk was a Nazi" territory.


The left is literally killing normal Americans in the streets.
The left is 100% like Al Queda.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.

Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.

DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Like Charlie Kirk, I would rather have a non-DEI Pilot piloting my airplane... don't really care what color or sex that they are, I just want them to have Earned It


United Airlines doesn't license pilots. As far as I know (as in I have seen this reported but have not checks primary sources myself) the license requirements from the FAA didn't change. Charlie was wrong on this particular example because the standards didn't actually change, but the basic principle that if you set race or sex quotas you are very likely to end up changing your standards is legitimate. It is just that, in this case, United doesn't set the standards and they were simply virtue signaling. If United wanted more black and female pilots, they would have had to recruit a much higher number of candidates. Their pilots union would probably not have allowed them to pay women and minority trainees more, so they would be left exclusively with recruitment efforts to get to their targets. Of course, if they were successful in getting more Black and female trainees, especially female since the Black population is less than 15 percent and the female population closer to 50 percent, they could control their personnel costs better because they would not need to raise salaries as much to get the number of pilots they need.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:




Charlie Kirk was hateful but we have to defend Jimmy Kimmel if it kills us!!!

ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.


Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.

D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.




She may be a "political figure," but when your criticism is bull****, your criticism is bull**** no matter what she is.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.




Future historians, if there are any, will wonder how this country lost its actual mind. I suppose I'm privileged to have a front-row seat at the event. Good luck fighting those Al Quesos, you warrior of God.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The lefts new message will be that people are "profiting off Charlie Kirks death" by continuing Turning Point USA....when in reality they just want to shut it down.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Assassin said:

D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.

Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.

DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Like Charlie Kirk, I would rather have a non-DEI Pilot piloting my airplane... don't really care what color or sex that they are, I just want them to have Earned It


United Airlines doesn't license pilots. As far as I know (as in I have seen this reported but have not checks primary sources myself) the license requirements from the FAA didn't change. Charlie was wrong on this particular example because the standards didn't actually change, but the basic principle that if you set race or sex quotas you are very likely to end up changing your standards is legitimate. It is just that, in this case, United doesn't set the standards and they were simply virtue signaling. If United wanted more black and female pilots, they would have had to recruit a much higher number of candidates. Their pilots union would probably not have allowed them to pay women and minority trainees more, so they would be left exclusively with recruitment efforts to get to their targets. Of course, if they were successful in getting more Black and female trainees, especially female since the Black population is less than 15 percent and the female population closer to 50 percent, they could control their personnel costs better because they would not need to raise salaries as much to get the number of pilots they need.


You clearly have no clue what been going on in the FAA and other agencies for decades lol
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.




Charlie wasnt killed in front of her and her children
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Jack Bauer said:

The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.




Charlie wasnt killed in front of her and her children


Pretty sure she was not there because she flew down.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Fre3dombear said:

Jack Bauer said:

The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.




Charlie wasnt killed in front of her and her children


Pretty sure she was not there because she flew down.

I seem to remember that she got the "he's dead" news while she was in the air
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.


Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.


DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Who cares about some vague "concept"? DEI as a policy is blatantly discriminatory by using racial quotas. It violates the equal protection clause and the Civil Rights Act. There is no question about it. It fails Biblical ethics for the same reasons. Both the Golden Rule and Christ's two greatest commandments are very clear.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Assassin said:

D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.

Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.

DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Like Charlie Kirk, I would rather have a non-DEI Pilot piloting my airplane... don't really care what color or sex that they are, I just want them to have Earned It


United Airlines doesn't license pilots. As far as I know (as in I have seen this reported but have not checks primary sources myself) the license requirements from the FAA didn't change. Charlie was wrong on this particular example because the standards didn't actually change, but the basic principle that if you set race or sex quotas you are very likely to end up changing your standards is legitimate. It is just that, in this case, United doesn't set the standards and they were simply virtue signaling. If United wanted more black and female pilots, they would have had to recruit a much higher number of candidates. Their pilots union would probably not have allowed them to pay women and minority trainees more, so they would be left exclusively with recruitment efforts to get to their targets. Of course, if they were successful in getting more Black and female trainees, especially female since the Black population is less than 15 percent and the female population closer to 50 percent, they could control their personnel costs better because they would not need to raise salaries as much to get the number of pilots they need.

The airlines Tony license pilots but they do hire them and put them in a position to put lives at risk. Considering how many crashes or near misses in recent years are at least partially attributable to DEI hiring by airlines and air traffic control, that's a hard no for using it anywhere near airplanes. Again, this should be common sense.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.




Future historians, if there are any, will wonder how this country lost its actual mind. I suppose I'm privileged to have a front-row seat at the event. Good luck fighting those Al Quesos, you warrior of God.

Honest historians will conclude that this country "lost its mind", if that's what happened, when they enacted socialist policies. Socialism fails every time it has been tried. It has a 100% track record. On a deeper level, American failures, like every other society, fails when it turns away from God's leadership.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

The lefts new message will be that people are "profiting off Charlie Kirks death" by continuing Turning Point USA....when in reality they just want to shut it down.

The Left always wants to shut down and silence other voices. They are narrow minded bigots completely intolerant of other viewpoints, especially those that honor God.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Assassin said:

D. C. Bear said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Assassin said:

Assassin said:



One of the comments underneath: The Board of Trustees at UM is openly defying the federal government - we dare you to punish us. They get $1.24 Billion per year from the US Government, so the Dept. of Education and DOJ has leverage. Let's see what the Trump Team actually does.

Defund all universities that do stupid DEI stuff and then prosecute or sue for all violations of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe the defunding part should be permanent.

Then you would have to defund Baylor. It's president went to Austin and told legislators to stuff it when they asked BU to stop DEI and racial discrimination

[President Linda Livingstone met with state legislators on Monday in Austin to evaluate the future of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at Baylor after a wave of state-wide bans swept the state of Texas in recent weeks.
LTVN's Marissa Muniz discusses the future of DEI at Baylor.

"You will see us continue to lean into supporting students and faculty from all kinds of backgrounds and experiences," Livingstone said.

Baylor as a private institution is not bound to these state mandates in the same way Texas public universities are.
Despite this, many wonder if Baylor will remain committed to diversity or if they will follow suit with their public counterparts.

"We appreciate that our legislature in Texas values the independence of private institutions in this state and recognizes that the role of the state government in state institutions is different than the role of the government in private institutions like Baylor," Livingstone said.]

If Baylor has blatantly unconstitutional policies like DEI, or anything else that is discriminatory, then it should lose all federal funds too. As a private school, it might be exempt from some federal and state policies, but they are not exempt from the "equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment or the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Put another way, if it's wrong to discriminate against blacks in hiring, admissions, etc. then it's also wrong to discriminate against other groups. As a Christian institution, this never should have been considered because it's also grossly immoral and unethical. the Bible is very clear about God's view about this: He shows no partiality and neither should we.

The only exception I can think of is on the issue of sexual preferences: a Christian school SHOULD discriminate against people making poor sexual choices. That position is also in the Bible.

DEI as a concept is not "unconstitutional." I could fairly easily design a DEI program that would be both constitutional and beneficial. I can find plenty of Biblical support for the concept that we should bring together people of all cultural and ethnic backgrounds and treat each other with love and respect. Of course, many of the DEI training programs have the opposite effect of what I described above. Out of fear of moral (and legal) judgment institutions have handed over power to those who are ill-suited to wield it.

Like Charlie Kirk, I would rather have a non-DEI Pilot piloting my airplane... don't really care what color or sex that they are, I just want them to have Earned It


United Airlines doesn't license pilots. As far as I know (as in I have seen this reported but have not checks primary sources myself) the license requirements from the FAA didn't change. Charlie was wrong on this particular example because the standards didn't actually change, but the basic principle that if you set race or sex quotas you are very likely to end up changing your standards is legitimate. It is just that, in this case, United doesn't set the standards and they were simply virtue signaling. If United wanted more black and female pilots, they would have had to recruit a much higher number of candidates. Their pilots union would probably not have allowed them to pay women and minority trainees more, so they would be left exclusively with recruitment efforts to get to their targets. Of course, if they were successful in getting more Black and female trainees, especially female since the Black population is less than 15 percent and the female population closer to 50 percent, they could control their personnel costs better because they would not need to raise salaries as much to get the number of pilots they need.

https://www.ntd.com/united-airlines-sacrifices-safety-for-diversity-and-inclusion-in-hiring-practices-commercial-pilot_979587.html

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

The left is now breaking down film on how a widow should grieve.



The American regressive-Marxist left is despicable and sub-human. They will do anything for power.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.




Future historians, if there are any, will wonder how this country lost its actual mind. I suppose I'm privileged to have a front-row seat at the event. Good luck fighting those Al Quesos, you warrior of God.

Honest historians will conclude that this country "lost its mind", if that's what happened, when they enacted socialist policies. Socialism fails every time it has been tried. It has a 100% track record. On a deeper level, American failures, like every other society, fails when it turns away from God's leadership.

to understand "how the country lost its mind," all future historians have to do is dig up Sam's commentary on political affairs. It details the pathology very clearly.

St. Sam saved history!
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.




Future historians, if there are any, will wonder how this country lost its actual mind. I suppose I'm privileged to have a front-row seat at the event. Good luck fighting those Al Quesos, you warrior of God.

Honest historians will conclude that this country "lost its mind", if that's what happened, when they enacted socialist policies. Socialism fails every time it has been tried. It has a 100% track record. On a deeper level, American failures, like every other society, fails when it turns away from God's leadership.

to understand "how the country lost its mind," all future historians have to do is dig up Sam's commentary on political affairs. It details the pathology very clearly.

St. Sam saved history!

They should follow up with a chapter on China and the Archimedes Trap, LOL.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Sam Lowry said:

ShooterTX said:

Assassin said:




This is Kryptonite to leftists like Sam. They hate everything that Charlie valued. They hate everything that makes our nation unique and successful.
Just like Al Queda, they are at war with us and we need to recognize that we have an enemy that wants to kill & destroy normal Americans. We cannot continue to ignore their threats & attacks. We must join the war that they started, and start fighting back.

Churchgoing husband, father, and lifelong conservative here. The most violent thing I've done lately was to set a few mousetraps. If I'm the problem, you have a very twisted sense of what's "normal."


You are not a Christian nor a conservative.
You are an open-borders, Hamas supporting libtard.
Stop lying to yourself and the rest of us, you leftist fool.




Future historians, if there are any, will wonder how this country lost its actual mind. I suppose I'm privileged to have a front-row seat at the event. Good luck fighting those Al Quesos, you warrior of God.

Honest historians will conclude that this country "lost its mind", if that's what happened, when they enacted socialist policies. Socialism fails every time it has been tried. It has a 100% track record. On a deeper level, American failures, like every other society, fails when it turns away from God's leadership.

to understand "how the country lost its mind," all future historians have to do is dig up Sam's commentary on political affairs. It details the pathology very clearly.

St. Sam saved history!

Well played!
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, I guess "we have to tone down the rhetoric" stage is over...

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Well, I guess "we have to tone down the rhetoric" stage is over...



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/multiple-people-shot-mormon-church-153629584.html
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who paid for the bullet." Eric Ambler
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.