Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

BluesBear said:

---

Liberalism is a disease and those people either need to be put in institutions or put under ground.

---

So people that dont vote like you should be locked up or assassinated?

---

People that call for the murder of their political opposition or even slightly insinuate and or justify it should be criminally charged.

Many politicians and media figures have done such.

---

So what you seem to be saying is...words = violence?

---

No I'm saying incitement can equal violence.

Explicitly calling for or justifying someone's murder is incitement, and that's already a crime, even if no one acts on it.

---

Well, which is it? First you said even slightly insinuating, now you're saying explicitly calling for. And since when is justifying the same as inciting? By that standard many posters here incited J6.

---

Both explicit calls and justifications that create a permissive environment for violence fall under incitement. The law already recognizes that encouraging, glorifying, or justifying violence against specific people can be prosecutable.

"Insinuating" means laying the groundwork, aka conditioning an audience to view violence as acceptable. "Explicit" is the end stage. Both are on the same spectrum, and both are dangerous.

As for J6: yes, people who explicitly or implicitly encouraged storming the Capitol were guilty of incitement. You're actually proving my point.

What's Going On With Teachers Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Death? Twitchy

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

BluesBear said:

---

Liberalism is a disease and those people either need to be put in institutions or put under ground.

---

So people that dont vote like you should be locked up or assassinated?

---

People that call for the murder of their political opposition or even slightly insinuate and or justify it should be criminally charged.

Many politicians and media figures have done such.

---

So what you seem to be saying is...words = violence?

---

No I'm saying incitement can equal violence.

Explicitly calling for or justifying someone's murder is incitement, and that's already a crime, even if no one acts on it.

---

Well, which is it? First you said even slightly insinuating, now you're saying explicitly calling for. And since when is justifying the same as inciting? By that standard many posters here incited J6.

---

Both explicit calls and justifications that create a permissive environment for violence fall under incitement. The law already recognizes that encouraging, glorifying, or justifying violence against specific people can be prosecutable.

"Insinuating" means laying the groundwork, aka conditioning an audience to view violence as acceptable. "Explicit" is the end stage. Both are on the same spectrum, and both are dangerous.

As for J6: yes, people who explicitly or implicitly encouraged storming the Capitol were guilty of incitement. You're actually proving my point.

---

You're all over the map here. No one's talking about encouraging violence against specific people. The point about J6 had to do with justifying, not implicitly encouraging, but by your new standard Trump would be guilty of inciting it as well. And being "dangerous" isn't the same as being a chargeable offense.

Does calling a racist a racist mean you have blood on your hands, as Stephen Miller and/or his wife would have us believe?

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

BluesBear said:

---

Liberalism is a disease and those people either need to be put in institutions or put under ground.

---

So people that dont vote like you should be locked up or assassinated?

---

People that call for the murder of their political opposition or even slightly insinuate and or justify it should be criminally charged.

Many politicians and media figures have done such.

---

So what you seem to be saying is...words = violence?

---

No I'm saying incitement can equal violence.

Explicitly calling for or justifying someone's murder is incitement, and that's already a crime, even if no one acts on it.

---

Well, which is it? First you said even slightly insinuating, now you're saying explicitly calling for. And since when is justifying the same as inciting? By that standard many posters here incited J6.

---

Both explicit calls and justifications that create a permissive environment for violence fall under incitement. The law already recognizes that encouraging, glorifying, or justifying violence against specific people can be prosecutable.

"Insinuating" means laying the groundwork, aka conditioning an audience to view violence as acceptable. "Explicit" is the end stage. Both are on the same spectrum, and both are dangerous.

As for J6: yes, people who explicitly or implicitly encouraged storming the Capitol were guilty of incitement. You're actually proving my point.

---

You're all over the map here. No one's talking about encouraging violence against specific people. The point about J6 had to do with justifying, not implicitly encouraging, but by your new standard Trump would be guilty of inciting it as well. And being "dangerous" isn't the same as being a chargeable offense.

Does calling a racist a racist mean you have blood on your hands, as Stephen Miller and/or his wife would have us believe?

---

I've not heard people justify violence on J6.
I have heard people justify walking into the building because they were escorted inside by the capital police.

No one has justified an act of murder on J6.... because there were no murders on J6.

No one justified the breaking of windows or property on J6 either.

You are grasping at straws.
Your desperation is very sad.

ShooterTX said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

BluesBear said:

---

Liberalism is a disease and those people either need to be put in institutions or put under ground.

---

So people that dont vote like you should be locked up or assassinated?

---

People that call for the murder of their political opposition or even slightly insinuate and or justify it should be criminally charged.

Many politicians and media figures have done such.

---

So what you seem to be saying is...words = violence?

---

No I'm saying incitement can equal violence.

Explicitly calling for or justifying someone's murder is incitement, and that's already a crime, even if no one acts on it.

---

Well, which is it? First you said even slightly insinuating, now you're saying explicitly calling for. And since when is justifying the same as inciting? By that standard many posters here incited J6.

---

Both explicit calls and justifications that create a permissive environment for violence fall under incitement. The law already recognizes that encouraging, glorifying, or justifying violence against specific people can be prosecutable.

"Insinuating" means laying the groundwork, aka conditioning an audience to view violence as acceptable. "Explicit" is the end stage. Both are on the same spectrum, and both are dangerous.

As for J6: yes, people who explicitly or implicitly encouraged storming the Capitol were guilty of incitement. You're actually proving my point.

---

You're all over the map here. No one's talking about encouraging violence against specific people. The point about J6 had to do with justifying, not implicitly encouraging, but by your new standard Trump would be guilty of inciting it as well. And being "dangerous" isn't the same as being a chargeable offense.

Does calling a racist a racist mean you have blood on your hands, as Stephen Miller and/or his wife would have us believe?

---

I've not heard people justify violence on J6.
I have heard people justify walking into the building because they were escorted inside by the capital police.

No one has justified an act of murder on J6.... because there were no murders on J6.

No one justified the breaking of windows or property on J6 either.

You are grasping at straws.
Your desperation is very sad.

---

If Harry's answer is "BUT JANUARY 6" he's already lost the argument.

boognish_bear said:

---

Hopefully these are false reports

🚨#BREAKING: A active shooter is being reported at the U.S. Naval Academy with Gunshots have been fired with injuries are being reported
⁰📌#Annapolis | #Maryland⁰⁰At this time, there are reports of an active shooter at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland.… pic.twitter.com/bPlKS5m2ld

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 11, 2025

WATCH: People seen evacuating UMass Boston in Massachusetts amid reports of shots fired. pic.twitter.com/ApD1kLLSul

— Moshe Schwartz (@YWNReporter) September 11, 2025

---

This was down the Navy thread

From the Commandant:
1. Concerns of the active shooter started on Yodel, an anonymous chat platform. The threat was traced to the IP address of an issued laptop belonging to a separated midshipman. He was confirmed to be in his parents house in the Midwest. No active shooter is believed to have been on the yard.
2. One midshipman was injured after mistaking law enforcement for the shooter due to misinformation of the shooter posing as law enforcement. Midshipman clubbed base security in the head with his parade rifle, was shot in the arm. Both are stable and receiving treatment.
3. The threat is a part of multiple false reports of active shooters today across the nation, FBI is opening an investigation.
4. Misinformation was the biggest threat today
5. Everyone is safe, the yard is undergoing a final sweep, lockdown will lift shortly

Press conference not encouraging. "Please pay close attention to the massive glare blocking your view of the suspect's face on our video monitor."

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Not merely shot, he was assassinated. The left will not use that term for obvious reasons. Conservative news will get it right, but here's the headlines from our top fake news

CNN: Conservative activist Charlie Kirk killed in shooting on Utah campus
MSNBC: Trump says conservative influencer Charlie Kirk is dead after shooting at Utah university
BBC: Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot dead at campus event in Utah

Not hijacking the other thread started by our resident radical progressive. Just making sure we recognize the left's continual downplay of violence and constant wordplay.

Edit:
If you haven't watched some of CK's reels, please do so. He was someone who gets where we are at in society and isn't playing make believe. He wanted those kids to be better and have productive and healthy lives. I actually didn't agree with him on everything, but he was generally well versed and on point regarding political matters and religious matters as well.

---

Very sad day someone should not be killed because of thier views without a doubt. I wish there was a way to get reports on the other 996 people who were murdered on the same day across the world. I wish there was a way for humans to behave better. however as history has shown us we are violent mammals willing to kill for many reasons, different views especially. Islam and Chirstianity would not exist today without the millions of people murdered by them because others did not belive in their doctrines. This is nothing new.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Press conference not encouraging. "Please pay close attention to the massive glare blocking your view of the suspect's face on our video monitor."

---

In agreement on this. Terrible not providing the video to the networks ahead of time so we had to stare at a video of a TV screen. And then really told us nothing new. All of the still shots had already been released.

Seemed to be an unnecessary press conference designed to get the governor of Utah in front of a TV camera.

Discouraging that we haven't ID'd this guy.

joseywales said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Not merely shot, he was assassinated. The left will not use that term for obvious reasons. Conservative news will get it right, but here's the headlines from our top fake news

CNN: Conservative activist Charlie Kirk killed in shooting on Utah campus
MSNBC: Trump says conservative influencer Charlie Kirk is dead after shooting at Utah university
BBC: Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot dead at campus event in Utah

Not hijacking the other thread started by our resident radical progressive. Just making sure we recognize the left's continual downplay of violence and constant wordplay.

Edit:
If you haven't watched some of CK's reels, please do so. He was someone who gets where we are at in society and isn't playing make believe. He wanted those kids to be better and have productive and healthy lives. I actually didn't agree with him on everything, but he was generally well versed and on point regarding political matters and religious matters as well.

---

Very sad day someone should not be killed because of thier views without a doubt. I wish there was a way to get reports on the other 996 people who were murdered on the same day across the world. I wish there was a way for humans to behave better. however as history has shown us we are violent mammals willing to kill for many reasons, different views especially. Islam and Chirstianity would not exist today without the millions of people murdered by them because others did not belive in their doctrines. This is nothing new.

---

I wish there was a way to get reports on the other 996 people who were murdered on the same day across the world when George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose.

Left-wing ideology would not exist today without the millions of people murdered by them because others did not believe in their doctrines. This is nothing new.

Stephen King Butt's In

joseywales said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Not merely shot, he was assassinated. The left will not use that term for obvious reasons. Conservative news will get it right, but here's the headlines from our top fake news

CNN: Conservative activist Charlie Kirk killed in shooting on Utah campus
MSNBC: Trump says conservative influencer Charlie Kirk is dead after shooting at Utah university
BBC: Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot dead at campus event in Utah

Not hijacking the other thread started by our resident radical progressive. Just making sure we recognize the left's continual downplay of violence and constant wordplay.

Edit:
If you haven't watched some of CK's reels, please do so. He was someone who gets where we are at in society and isn't playing make believe. He wanted those kids to be better and have productive and healthy lives. I actually didn't agree with him on everything, but he was generally well versed and on point regarding political matters and religious matters as well.

---

Very sad day someone should not be killed because of thier views without a doubt. I wish there was a way to get reports on the other 996 people who were murdered on the same day across the world. I wish there was a way for humans to behave better. however as history has shown us we are violent mammals willing to kill for many reasons, different views especially. Islam and Chirstianity would not exist today without the millions of people murdered by them because others did not belive in their doctrines. This is nothing new.

---

The ironic thing is Atheism has killed far more people in modern times than either Islam or Christianity. Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - killed millions.

But you are right - that is indeed human nature.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Words aren't violence, except when the left says the words "words are violence."

So when the right says the words "words are violence when and only when the left says the words 'words are violence,'" then are the right's words violence?

---

When the Left says "words are violence" they mean people who say a man cannot become a woman and should never be allowed in woman's spaces.

When the Right says something like that they are talking about very real crime of inciting violence. Words mean things and context matters.

BREAKING: FBI identifies person of interest in Charlie Kirk shooting



The suspect weighs approximately 50 lbs. and is between 4 and 9 feet tall.

It's disgusting how many Democrats are laughing about it on Facebook

I am heartbroken over the loss of such an accomplished young man yesterday. The many achievements of Charlie Kirk in 31 years on this earth is extraordinary. To start the Turning Point organization from the ground up and make it into such a powerful force that it actually had a large effect on a Presidential Election is something few could do. His tireless efforts in teaching college kids to think for themselves and the positives of conservative beliefs will be noted forever. It is hard for me to believe someone so young could have affected and touched so many lives. But this is not only evident by the leaders of our country's response to his murder but from Prime Ministers and leaders of many countries around the world.

His self discipline in his use of the hours in a day is something we could all learn from. But his first priority was his belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and he lived his life in that example. I think we can all learn from that.

So here's to you Charlie Kirk, Faithful Servant. I know you are with the Angels where you belong for eternity. We Pray for you in your Eternal Location, Heaven, but you sure will be missed here on earth.

God Bless and Rest In Peace

Assassin said:

---

Apparently I’ve lost a lot of friends today since I care about a young man getting killed for his beliefs. Wow.

— PokeNation (@Big12Pokes) September 11, 2025

---

they werent your friends..

Well over 100 million people were killed in the 20th century by atheist socialists. I've seen estimates significantly higher but I don't know where those numbers come from.

As expected at UT

Students at UT Austin are asked their feelings about Charlie Kirk getting k*lled.

Their answers are horrid. One says they’re happy, another says it’s good, one that someone had to do it, and one even says they wouldn’t have saved him.

These students are lost.

(muggedusa on TT) pic.twitter.com/PcV3CRl0YL

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) September 11, 2025

JK Rowling gets it:

https://twitchy.com/amy/2025/09/11/jk-rowling-if-you-believe-free-speech-is-for-you-but-not-your-political-opponents-youre-illiberal-n2418830

Here's someone's response quoted in the article with the note that "might" is a word that does not belong:

If you believe you're a liberal and cheered the death of Charlie Kirk, you might just be the fascist.

— Mrs Slocombe (@Maidinamerica3) September 11, 2025

Regarding the professionalism, or lack thereof, of the shooter, this guy is spot on. The shot looks like an amateur. Getting in and out without being caught is the slick part.

This is an expert sniper. He shares his opinion about the sniper in Charlie’s case. pic.twitter.com/A5pzglMLsL

— Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@KathleenWinche3) September 12, 2025

historian said:

---

JK Rowling gets it:

https://twitchy.com/amy/2025/09/11/jk-rowling-if-you-believe-free-speech-is-for-you-but-not-your-political-opponents-youre-illiberal-n2418830

Here's someone's response quoted in the article with the note that "might" is a word that does not belong:

If you believe you're a liberal and cheered the death of Charlie Kirk, you might just be the fascist.

— Mrs Slocombe (@Maidinamerica3) September 11, 2025

---

Good thread

Assassin said:

---

As expected at UT

Students at UT Austin are asked their feelings about Charlie Kirk getting k*lled.

Their answers are horrid. One says they’re happy, another says it’s good, one that someone had to do it, and one even says they wouldn’t have saved him.

These students are lost.

(muggedusa on TT) pic.twitter.com/PcV3CRl0YL

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) September 11, 2025

---

UT is a scumbag college anyway. Full of druggies, foreigners who don't share western values, and liberals.

But it's truly said and a foreshadowing, that red Texas can't even keep its colleges sane. It's because the left controls academia. It's time that our governor and politicians clean house and remove liberals from leadership and hiring positions. Unfortunately, they don't have the will to do it.

🚨#BREAKING: Watch as Utah’s Public Safety Commissioner admits and says we have no idea where Charlie Kirk’s killer could be saying we are exploring leads pic.twitter.com/VBgg3olLj0

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 12, 2025

TIME Magazine releases a new cover after Charlie Kirk’s murder pic.twitter.com/zGGGExRMEu

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) September 11, 2025

Flashback:

Why isn't this ******* in jail?

Flashback to Lincoln Project cofounder Rick Wilson in 2023:
"They're still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump."

The mainstream media has the audacity to say that Trump's rhetoric incites violence. pic.twitter.com/8mr21HhgU7

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) July 14, 2024

2018,

Left - "MAGA are literally going to chase down minority children and killl them"

🚨 BREAKING: Enhanced video now shows the exact escape route of Charlie Kirk’s assassin escaping from the back of the building jumping 20 feet down while concealing his rifle. Once back on his feet, he takes off for the nearby woods where he stashes his weapon. The manhunt is on. pic.twitter.com/xmJuKtapq5

— 🔥Fire Newz (@FireNewz) September 12, 2025

BREAKING PHOTOS: Manhunt for Charlie Kirk's killer intensifies

1-800-CALL-FBI pic.twitter.com/oTij5XSxaR

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) September 12, 2025

NEWS

TMZ has obtained a security camera video of the person of interest in the Charlie Kirk assassination.

In the video you can see the man walking towards the campus prior to the shooting. pic.twitter.com/4chQ8QNI0V

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) September 11, 2025

Jack Bauer said:

---

Flashback:

Why isn't this ******* in jail?

Flashback to Lincoln Project cofounder Rick Wilson in 2023:
"They're still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump."

The mainstream media has the audacity to say that Trump's rhetoric incites violence. pic.twitter.com/8mr21HhgU7

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) July 14, 2024

---

I assume it's because the authorities must be focused on his Lincoln Project co-founder grooming young boys for gay sex.

[In January 2021, responding to a magazine article accusing him of sexual misconduct spanning a period of years, Weaver acknowledged having sent inappropriate, unsolicited sexual messages to 21 young men…

According to The New York Times, Weaver offered young men professional support in exchange for sex; that report also accused him of cultivating a online relationship with a 14-year-old boy and then engaging in "sexual banter" with him]

I am sure once they get to Wilson they will find some really dark and twisted stuff hiding under the mattresses…

Apparently 4chan has solved the ID of the suspect...we will see.

The murder of Charlie Kirk is part of a disturbing rise in political violence that threatens to hollow out our public life.

A free society relies on the premise that people can speak out without fear or humiliation.

No more political violence. pic.twitter.com/SR71FJkiDz

— Sen. Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) September 11, 2025

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Assassin said:

---

As expected at UT

Students at UT Austin are asked their feelings about Charlie Kirk getting k*lled.

Their answers are horrid. One says they’re happy, another says it’s good, one that someone had to do it, and one even says they wouldn’t have saved him.

These students are lost.

(muggedusa on TT) pic.twitter.com/PcV3CRl0YL

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) September 11, 2025

---

UT is a scumbag college anyway. Full of druggies, foreigners who don't share western values, and liberals.

But it's truly said and a foreshadowing, that red Texas can't even keep its colleges sane. It's because the left controls academia. It's time that our governor and politicians clean house and remove liberals from leadership and hiring positions. Unfortunately, they don't have the will to do it.

---

The problem is that if we fired all the liberals, we'd have to replace them with conservatives who don't despise higher education...and both of them are already employed in other states.

It is sad and surprising that foreigners don't share our Western values, especially the value of killing and colonizing foreigners. Just goes to show how tight a grip the left has on academia.

boognish_bear said:

---

🚨#BREAKING: Watch as Utah’s Public Safety Commissioner admits and says we have no idea where Charlie Kirk’s killer could be saying we are exploring leads pic.twitter.com/VBgg3olLj0

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 12, 2025

---

As stated in the press conference, "We need all the help we can get." Sure seems like it.

This would be a great time to have a qualified FBI director on board.

Jack Bauer said:

---

Apparently 4chan has solved the ID of the suspect...we will see.

---

Link?