A Prayer Of Salvation

25,564 Views | 483 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by xfrodobagginsx
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

It's easy to see your comment as saying Nestorianism is correct, but I can see what you mean now that you explain it. Interpretive issues are pesky, aren't they?

His charge was that my comment was not just saying "Nestorianism is correct", but that he was correct simply on the basis that he agreed with me, suggesting that I considered myself as the standard. That is completely and profoundly different from what I actually said. The only way one "easily" interprets it that way is when one already has a heart to accuse and deceive. There just isn't any intellectually honest way to interpret it that way.

Yes, interpretive issues can be pesky..... but notice we didn't need an infallible office to be able to hammer it out.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

It's easy to see your comment as saying Nestorianism is correct, but I can see what you mean now that you explain it. Interpretive issues are pesky, aren't they?

His charge was that my comment was not just saying "Nestorianism is correct", but that he was correct simply on the basis that he agreed with me, suggesting that I considered myself as the standard. That is completely and profoundly different from what I actually said. The only way one "easily" interprets it that way is when one already has a heart to accuse and deceive. There just isn't any intellectually honest way to interpret it that way.

Yes, interpretive issues can be pesky..... but notice we didn't need an infallible office to be able to hammer it out.

I guess y'all are good then.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

RB is one of the better theological posters here.


He's about as clueless as you are on theological matters, so I get your support.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hope you all had a great weekend
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hope you all had a great weekend
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We heard ya.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

We heard ya.


Great
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1 John 2:14 NIV
[14] I write to you, dear children, because you know the Father. I write to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning. I write to you, young men, because you are strong, and the word of God lives in you, and you have overcome the evil one.

xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A PRAYER OF SALVATION: If you have any doubts about whether or not you are going to heaven, YOU COULD HUMBLY PRAY SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO GOD FROM YOUR HEART IN FAITH:

"Dear Lord Jesus I know that I am a sinner and need you to save me. I believe that You are the Lord and believe in my heart that You died on the Cross and Rose from the dead, shedding your blood as the Sacrifice for my sins. I turn to You as the only way of Salvation, I submit my life to you, I submit my will to yours, I place my Faith and Trust in You alone as Lord of my life, Please save me and I thank You for it, in Jesus holy name, Amen."

If you have truly placed your faith in Jesus Christ as your Lord, submitting your life to Him, you can know that you are a child of God and on your way to heaven. Now that you are on your way to heaven, you should attend a bible believing Church and follow in baptism.

Studying The Bible Is Essential To Christians Growth. Click Here To Walk Through The Bible Verse By Verse From The Beginning, In 25 Minute Lessons:

https://www.lesfeldick.org/
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please take the time to read this first post if you haven't yet
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
....
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stay warm out there. Right now it is -5 below zero and falling.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hope you all had a great weekend
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Obviously, there aren't Bible believing churches...the UMC, ELCA, PCUSA, UCC, Episcopalians, Anglicans come to mind. They aren't "bible believing" given their wholesale abandonment of orthodox (little o) dogma.

The question is whether the term is intended to throw shade at liturgical high church worship in general.


It's intended to mean that we should obey Scripture, God's Word over Church, Tradition, Popes, Priests, Pastors, Bishops, ect.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.

The righteousness of Jesus is imputed to us by our faith in him, not by any work. This is literally the teaching of the apostle Paul.

And I wonder if the apostles ever envisioned crediting Mary for our salvation and bowing and praying to images of people.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.

The righteousness of Jesus is imputed to us by our faith in him, not by any work. This is literally the teaching of the apostle Paul.

And I wonder if the apostles ever envisioned crediting Mary for our salvation and bowing and praying to images of people.
Mere acknowledgment that Christ is Lord doesn't defeat temptation.

Victory over sin requires dying to the self and turning the will toward Christ in the very moment temptation arises.
That is what we mean by works…not earning salvation, but cooperating with grace. Repentance, self-denial, and resistance to temptation all require the active participation of the will.
Dying to the self isn't automatic, it requires real effort and synergy with God. It's extraordinarily difficult.

Expecting God to do all the work while refusing to struggle is not faith, its sloth dressed up as piety.

God is always there, victory comes when you finally turn toward Him. Grace is like a socket that already has power. God is always present and always supplying the power, and if you want that power, you have to plug into it.

If your definition of faith excludes the real involvement of the will, then it's not apostolic faith, but assent without obedience.
When you're confronted with temptation, do you think your will plays any real role in whether you sin or resist?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.

The righteousness of Jesus is imputed to us by our faith in him, not by any work. This is literally the teaching of the apostle Paul.

And I wonder if the apostles ever envisioned crediting Mary for our salvation and bowing and praying to images of people.

Mere acknowledgment that Christ is Lord doesn't defeat temptation.

Victory over sin requires dying to the self and turning the will toward Christ in the very moment temptation arises.
That is what we mean by works…not earning salvation, but cooperating with grace. Repentance, self-denial, and resistance to temptation all require the active participation of the will.
Dying to the self isn't automatic, it requires real effort and synergy with God. It's extraordinarily difficult.

Expecting God to do all the work while refusing to struggle is not faith, its sloth dressed up as piety.

God is always there, victory comes when you finally turn toward Him. Grace is like a socket that already has power. God is always present and always supplying the power, and if you want that power, you have to plug into it.

If your definition of faith excludes the real involvement of the will, then it's not apostolic faith, but assent without obedience.
When you're confronted with temptation, do you think your will plays any real role in whether you sin or resist?

Defeating temptation, victory over sin, dying to self... those are all good things that true Christians strive for. The "will" to be good is the fruit of salvation and the Holy Spirit entering you. But Scripture is crystal clear that your faith is what determines your salvation, not your level of "goodness" in these areas.

"Faith" is defined in Scripture - it's the assurance of things hoped for, and the conviction of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). Scripture is telling you that faith does not involve works, but is something that is within your heart.

It's really simple. You can accept what Jesus says through Scripture, or you can reject it and rely on your ability to be "good" in order to be saved.

It's not faith + works = salvation;
It's faith = salvation + works.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.

The righteousness of Jesus is imputed to us by our faith in him, not by any work. This is literally the teaching of the apostle Paul.

And I wonder if the apostles ever envisioned crediting Mary for our salvation and bowing and praying to images of people.

Mere acknowledgment that Christ is Lord doesn't defeat temptation.

Victory over sin requires dying to the self and turning the will toward Christ in the very moment temptation arises.
That is what we mean by works…not earning salvation, but cooperating with grace. Repentance, self-denial, and resistance to temptation all require the active participation of the will.
Dying to the self isn't automatic, it requires real effort and synergy with God. It's extraordinarily difficult.

Expecting God to do all the work while refusing to struggle is not faith, its sloth dressed up as piety.

God is always there, victory comes when you finally turn toward Him. Grace is like a socket that already has power. God is always present and always supplying the power, and if you want that power, you have to plug into it.

If your definition of faith excludes the real involvement of the will, then it's not apostolic faith, but assent without obedience.
When you're confronted with temptation, do you think your will plays any real role in whether you sin or resist?

Defeating temptation, victory over sin, dying to self... those are all good things that true Christians strive for. The "will" to be good is the fruit of salvation and the Holy Spirit entering you. But Scripture is crystal clear that your faith is what determines your salvation, not your level of "goodness" in these areas.

"Faith" is defined in Scripture - it's the assurance of things hoped for, and the conviction of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). Scripture is telling you that faith does not involve works, but is something that is within your heart.

It's really simple. You can accept what Jesus says through Scripture, or you can reject it and rely on your ability to be "good" in order to be saved.

It's not faith + works = salvation;
It's faith = salvation + works.


I'm not arguing for pelagianism which says man supplies the power.

Do I believe I can defeat sin without God? No.
Do I believe grace is optional? No.
Do I believe effort earns salvation? No.
Do I believe effort is required to participate in Grace? Yes.

You need to read the rest of Hebrews, where acts of faith (like Abraham obeying) are listed as evidence that true faith acts.

We can figure this out between Paul and James:
Paul and James aren't contradicting each other, they're addressing different questions.

Paul's question: How does a guilty sinner stand justified before a holy God?
His answer: Through faith alone, apart from works of the Jewish law. The sinner brings nothing. Christ brings everything. Faith receives what grace provides.
James's question: What kind of faith actually saves? How can you tell genuine faith from mere intellectual agreement?
His answer: By its fruit. Saving faith produces works. Faith that doesn't transform behavior isn't real faith at all, it's dead faith, empty profession, intellectual assent without heart transformation. He says this because in order to have these fruits, it requires your effort to cooperate with God.

The fruit doesn't make the tree alive. But if there's no fruit, the tree is dead.
Effort is required to participate in Grace.

If I'm separating faith from behavior then I would have to argue that intellectual assent without heart transformation saves. As soon as you say "you can't live like a demon, or you faith isn't real", then you're smuggling behavior back in. Its a broken axiom.

You being confronted with temptation and relying on Jesus to flee from it is a work. That would be evidence of fruit and that your faith is legit. Its also evidence that you used your willpower so that God can work through you. That's dying to yourself, its a work, its extremely difficult and we shouldn't do everything we can to make sure people know this and can't escape it by pushing sola fide to the extreme.

I'm not talking about bootstrapping as in "I donated money to so and so and now God see's me as righteous".
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:


As you well know, we are arguing semantics. You will tell me that the sacraments, such as baptism, confession, the eucharist, and other good works the Catholics believe are necessary to "attain" (not earn, of course) salvation are not "doing good things." We simply disagree on this point, and I think that position to not be intellectually honest.
I would say that they are necessary to remain "justified/sanctified."

Jesus tells us to do all of those "good works." Why should we disobey him?
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Again, we are arguing semantics. You assume by "Church" that Christ meant the Catholic Church, such as the one you attend. But that is not the Church he was referencing. Instead, he was referring to the body of believers who repented of their sins, put their faith in Christ and became members of the body of Christ. That undoubtedly comprises some Catholics, but it also comprises a number of other people who don't call themselves Catholic and don't adhere to all Catholic beliefs.
Ask yourself, 'who were the body of believers?"

They were members of the original church headed up by Peter, Christ's delegate on earth. After Peter's death, the leadership was bestowed to another, and so on, and so on, for a total of 267 leaders of that same Church.

Along with Jesus bestowing that leadership onto Peter, Jesus' Matthew 16:18 declaration came with the promise of perseverance and the assurance of truth. The Church has certainly persevered through persecution of empires, threats of heresy, and even notoriously bad popes, bishops, and laymen. She is still standing.

The assurance of truth is the difference. Look at something like baptismal regeneration. Baptism is either does something or it's just a symbol. Both can't be right. There is only one truth. How can one claim that the body of believers all have the same truth? We can't. Fundamental differences exist. If the church was just a "body of believers" then she failed because there is no one truth.
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Well, Tertullian was one example. He believed in unforgivable sins (despite no mention of same in scripture), and his position on baptism was of course wrong, among others.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point but Matthew 12:31-32 does speak of the unforgivable sin -

And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.

Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:


Indeed, as I said, this is yet another area in which Catholic doctrine diverges from the great weight of scripture, and demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature and love of God. Anyone who believes a simple act of dunking or sprinkling could be the thing separates the saved man from the man condemned to an eternity in Hell simply doesn't understand God's nature, and ignores the verses to the contrary (including the thief on the cross).
We've been through this before. God can operation outside the sacraments we can't.

Just briefly on St. Dismas, the good thief, he may performed what the Church calls Perfect Contrition.
He rebuked the other thief for mocking Jesus.
He confessed his guilt and acknowledged Jesus as king.
He sought forgiveness, not out of fear of hell, but mercy.

Mothra said:


As for mortal sins, they do not exist. This is another made up term by the Catholics. All of us fall short of God's glory, and there is no sin God won't forgive if we are saved by Christ's grace.

I would submit you're reading theological positions into verses that simply aren't there.
I believe John would disagree with you in 1 John 5:16-17

If you see any brother or sister commit a sin that does not lead to death, you should pray and God will give them life. I refer to those whose sin does not lead to death. There is a sin that leads to death. I am not saying that you should pray about that. All wrongdoing is sin, and there is sin that does not lead to death.

John makes it clear that two types of sin exists the Church calls them mortal in venial sin.

What is your interpretation of this passage? Do you have any historical backing for that interpretation?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Yeah we're meant to have ted talk Bible study sessions every Sunday in multi million dollar churches and kneel before U2 sounding bands, then discuss investment strategies over coffee and remind everyone that righteousness will be imputed on them magically with no willpower on their part.

Definitely what the apostles envisioned.

The righteousness of Jesus is imputed to us by our faith in him, not by any work. This is literally the teaching of the apostle Paul.

And I wonder if the apostles ever envisioned crediting Mary for our salvation and bowing and praying to images of people.

Mere acknowledgment that Christ is Lord doesn't defeat temptation.

Victory over sin requires dying to the self and turning the will toward Christ in the very moment temptation arises.
That is what we mean by works…not earning salvation, but cooperating with grace. Repentance, self-denial, and resistance to temptation all require the active participation of the will.
Dying to the self isn't automatic, it requires real effort and synergy with God. It's extraordinarily difficult.

Expecting God to do all the work while refusing to struggle is not faith, its sloth dressed up as piety.

God is always there, victory comes when you finally turn toward Him. Grace is like a socket that already has power. God is always present and always supplying the power, and if you want that power, you have to plug into it.

If your definition of faith excludes the real involvement of the will, then it's not apostolic faith, but assent without obedience.
When you're confronted with temptation, do you think your will plays any real role in whether you sin or resist?

Defeating temptation, victory over sin, dying to self... those are all good things that true Christians strive for. The "will" to be good is the fruit of salvation and the Holy Spirit entering you. But Scripture is crystal clear that your faith is what determines your salvation, not your level of "goodness" in these areas.

"Faith" is defined in Scripture - it's the assurance of things hoped for, and the conviction of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). Scripture is telling you that faith does not involve works, but is something that is within your heart.

It's really simple. You can accept what Jesus says through Scripture, or you can reject it and rely on your ability to be "good" in order to be saved.

It's not faith + works = salvation;
It's faith = salvation + works.


I'm not arguing for pelagianism which says man supplies the power.

Do I believe I can defeat sin without God? No.
Do I believe grace is optional? No.
Do I believe effort earns salvation? No.
Do I believe effort is required to participate in Grace? Yes.

You need to read the rest of Hebrews, where acts of faith (like Abraham obeying) are listed as evidence that true faith acts.

We can figure this out between Paul and James:
Paul and James aren't contradicting each other, they're addressing different questions.

Paul's question: How does a guilty sinner stand justified before a holy God?
His answer: Through faith alone, apart from works of the Jewish law. The sinner brings nothing. Christ brings everything. Faith receives what grace provides.
James's question: What kind of faith actually saves? How can you tell genuine faith from mere intellectual agreement?
His answer: By its fruit. Saving faith produces works. Faith that doesn't transform behavior isn't real faith at all, it's dead faith, empty profession, intellectual assent without heart transformation. He says this because in order to have these fruits, it requires your effort to cooperate with God.

The fruit doesn't make the tree alive. But if there's no fruit, the tree is dead.
Effort is required to participate in Grace.

If I'm separating faith from behavior then I would have to argue that intellectual assent without heart transformation saves. As soon as you say "you can't live like a demon, or you faith isn't real", then you're smuggling behavior back in. Its a broken axiom.

You being confronted with temptation and relying on Jesus to flee from it is a work. That would be evidence of fruit and that your faith is legit. Its also evidence that you used your willpower so that God can work through you. That's dying to yourself, its a work, its extremely difficult and we shouldn't do everything we can to make sure people know this and can't escape it by pushing sola fide to the extreme.

I'm not talking about bootstrapping as in "I donated money to so and so and now God see's me as righteous".

No one is saying that mere "intellectual assent" saves. What saves is a true belief and trust in Jesus in one's heart. I fully agree with you that works are the fruit and evidence of salvation, not it's requirement. You're explaining Paul and James in the same way I would - and that means that you're essentially explaining "faith alone" - faith alone saves, but a saving faith isn't alone. Faith equals salvation plus works, NOT faith plus works equals salvation.

But here's where your view breaks down, as far as what the Bible teaches: you correctly believe that we are saved by "grace".... but then you hedge on it and tie "grace" to our works, i.e. we must "participate" in grace, thus ultimately making salvation dependent on our works in a roundabout way. Grace ceases to be grace if receiving it depends on our performance (Romans 11:6). For example, you consider water baptism and taking the Eucharist as "participating" with grace -- meaning that if we DON'T do these things, we do not receive grace, and hence are not saved. The Bible clearly teaches that salvation is by "grace through faith", and faith is defined in the Bible as having nothing to do with any performative action on our part, but rather only on that which is within the heart (assurance, conviction - Hebrews 11:1), independent of any action. This is why the thief on the cross was saved, why the sinful woman in Luke 7 was saved, why the house of Cornelius was saved, and why the apostles and Jesus repeatedly said that believing in him is what saves. For your view to be correct, what Jesus said would be false in the case where someone truly believes in their heart but doesn't get water baptized or takes part in the Eucharist. So clearly, that view can't be right.

To "push sola fide to the extreme" to where one can say they have faith, so that it means there is nothing demanded of them and they can sin all they want, is straw manning, in my opinion. What you're describing is someone who doesn't have true faith at all. So this isn't sola fide. As you and I both acknowledge, true faith yields a desire to do obey and "die to oneself", it's the evidence of a saving faith. The mistake, in my opinion, is to promote the idea that you have to perform or be x and y in order for your faith to be a real faith. What this yields is the person asking him/herself "Have I DONE enough to be saved", thus making one's salvation dependent on one's performance, instead of coming empty-handed and putting one's full trust in what JESUS has already done for you to be saved, which you received simply by your belief and trust in him in your heart. If that belief and trust is real, then the works follow.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 Timothy 3:15-17 KJV
[15] and that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. [16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: [17] that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please take the time to read this first post if you haven't yet
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xfrodobagginsx said:

2 Timothy 3:15-17 KJV
[15] and that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. [16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: [17] that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.



This is yet another instance where Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy is in direct contradiction with Scripture. Here, it's CLEARLY saying that Scripture, i.e. the written word of God, is ALL THAT IS NEEDED for a person to be perfect and able to do ALL good works. This clearly indicates that "Tradition" is not necessary. However, Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy hold that Tradition is not only necessary for all good works, it's absolutely necessary for believers to even be saved.

This is as strong of a Biblical support for sola scriptura as it can get.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mark 7:8-9 KJV
[8] For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do. [9] And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.