Mothra said:

---

Lots of blowback for Tucker, and his attempts to normalize the Hitler apologist, Holocaust denier, Stalin lover and white supremacist. Couldn't believe the softball questions he was serving.

I am curious how the Tucker defenders feel about the interview. What say you? Think this is going to win the Republicans more votes?

https://nypost.com/2025/11/03/opinion/conservatives-must-reject-hate-spewer-nick-fuentes-and-his-allies/

---

Tucker has always been a head scratcher to me.

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Republican Rep. Randy Fine says that Tucker Carlson is “the most dangerous anti-Semite in America” and “the leader of a modern day Hitler Youth.” pic.twitter.com/S4dbSDbhTm

— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) November 2, 2025

You guys should call him a Nazi and encourage someone to kill Tucker like you did with Charlie Kirk... the only dangerous people in this country are you people... the left.

---

You mean, kind of like how Nick Fuentes encouraged someone to kill Charlie Kirk, groyper?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1ngg7qs/nick_fuentes_explicitly_attacking_charlie_kirk/

You and your ilk aren't conservative, groyper. Sorry.

---

They don't kill you because you're a Nazi, they call you a Nazi so they can kill you.
-Ted Cruz

I'm an American First conservative... you might not like it... but that is reality.

I am more America First than you on every issue.

I'm not a Fuentes supporter... but I am a Tucker supporter. And the only thing the leftist/Israel First coalition will achieve is helping more Mamdani types continue to get elected across the country.

Tucker has been self destructing for at least 18 months.

Screaming louder and louder just to be noticed.

Needs to take his money and disappear.

... and NF sounds like a *****.

Ixnay Icknay.

- uncle fred

D!

Viva Trumpata!!

{ sipping coffee }

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Republican Rep. Randy Fine says that Tucker Carlson is “the most dangerous anti-Semite in America” and “the leader of a modern day Hitler Youth.” pic.twitter.com/S4dbSDbhTm

— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) November 2, 2025

You guys should call him a Nazi and encourage someone to kill Tucker like you did with Charlie Kirk... the only dangerous people in this country are you people... the left.

---

You mean, kind of like how Nick Fuentes encouraged someone to kill Charlie Kirk, groyper?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1ngg7qs/nick_fuentes_explicitly_attacking_charlie_kirk/

You and your ilk aren't conservative, groyper. Sorry.

---

They don't kill you because you're a Nazi, they call you a Nazi so they can kill you.
-Ted Cruz

I'm an American First conservative... you might not like it... but that is reality.

I am more America First than you on every issue.

I'm not a Fuentes supporter... but I am a Tucker supporter. And the only thing the leftist/Israel First coalition will achieve is helping more Mamdani types continue to get elected across the country.

---

You don't support Fuentes, just the guy who gives him a platform to soft pedal him and allow him say heinous things.

You aren't America anything.

---

First you decided who was or wasnt a Christian.

Now you decide who is or isnt an American.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Fascist movements always end up scapegoating Jews. The new GOP will be no exception.

---

What kinda movement slaughters 40,000 kids in Gaza?

OsoCoreyell said:

---

Tucker - Softballs Putin, Hugs up to the Iranian Mullahs then tries to foist Nick Fuentes off as a normal conservative.

I don't know what team Tucker is on, but it isn't mine and it isn't most conservatives.

---

And don't forget about Alex Jones and Candace Owens as well.

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Republican Rep. Randy Fine says that Tucker Carlson is “the most dangerous anti-Semite in America” and “the leader of a modern day Hitler Youth.” pic.twitter.com/S4dbSDbhTm

— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) November 2, 2025

You guys should call him a Nazi and encourage someone to kill Tucker like you did with Charlie Kirk... the only dangerous people in this country are you people... the left.

---

You mean, kind of like how Nick Fuentes encouraged someone to kill Charlie Kirk, groyper?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1ngg7qs/nick_fuentes_explicitly_attacking_charlie_kirk/

You and your ilk aren't conservative, groyper. Sorry.

---

They don't kill you because you're a Nazi, they call you a Nazi so they can kill you.
-Ted Cruz

I'm an American First conservative... you might not like it... but that is reality.

I am more America First than you on every issue.

I'm not a Fuentes supporter... but I am a Tucker supporter. And the only thing the leftist/Israel First coalition will achieve is helping more Mamdani types continue to get elected across the country.

---

You don't support Fuentes, just the guy who gives him a platform to soft pedal him and allow him say heinous things.

You aren't America anything.

---

First you decided who was or wasnt a Christian.

Now you decide who is or isnt an American.

---

Not sure what you're talking about. God decides who is Christian, but of course, we have a pretty good indicator by examining the person's life, beliefs and conduct.

As for me getting to decide who isn't American, that comment is ironic given I was responding to a post in which you implied you're more American than me

Sam Lowry said:

---

Fascist movements always end up scapegoating Jews. The new GOP will be no exception.

---

I am surprised at this stance, since you seem to hold a lot of the same controversial beliefs as Fuentes.

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Lots of blowback for Tucker, and his attempts to normalize the Hitler apologist, Holocaust denier, Stalin lover and white supremacist. Couldn't believe the softball questions he was serving.

I am curious how the Tucker defenders feel about the interview. What say you? Think this is going to win the Republicans more votes?

https://nypost.com/2025/11/03/opinion/conservatives-must-reject-hate-spewer-nick-fuentes-and-his-allies/

---

Didn't Fox and CNN both dump Tucker at some point.

I don't think main stream Republicans or main stream anybody listens to Tucker much.

I never hear him any longer anywhere, and that is fine with me, he adds little.

---

And MSNBC.

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Its the lack of self-awareness and hypocrisy that I find comical.... the Kosher Right - Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Randy Fine, Ted Cruz - all praise and attempt to white wash Netanyahu and his heinous policies, but you didnt have a problem with that.

Netanyahu has killed more children than anyone else in the 21st century.

If it wasnt for Trump at least offering a thimble of resistance, he would have already killed everyone in Gaza and the West Bank.

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

---

As you said, Tucker can interview anyone he likes. That is all that matters.

Mothra said:

---

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

---

So Tucker is a soft interviewer in your opinion because he wanted to focus on certain things and not others. So what? Tucker asked him about the issues that Tucker was interested in. Tucker asked him:
1. Nick's origin story going from Cruz campaigner to America First.
2. Tucker asked Nick about young people and how they feel about certain issues (marriage, porn, etc.)
3. He asked Nick about his views of America First and the nation of Israel.

Mothra said:

---

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

---

A 25 year old with a podcast isn't the same as a 54 year old seasoned Senator.

Mothra said:

---

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Again, so what? The real reason you feel threatened by Fuentes is because you recognize that he can be persuasive and you fear he will persuade others. Fuentes speaks out of a disenchanted group of young people who have seen their country ravaged thru greed, selfishness and virtue signaling via the boomer generation's influence on society. Fix that issue and his support will dwindle. Ignore it, and his support will grow.

Say what you will about Tucker but he has a heart for young people as this interview shows. If you watch it again, you will see Tucker trying to breath life into Nick especially with regard to marriage. You seem to want Nick (and those who follow him) destroyed but Tucker wants them redeemed.

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Its the lack of self-awareness and hypocrisy that I find comical.... the Kosher Right - Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Randy Fine, Ted Cruz - all praise and attempt to white wash Netanyahu and his heinous policies, but you didnt have a problem with that.

Netanyahu has killed more children than anyone else in the 21st century.

If it wasnt for Trump at least offering a thimble of resistance, he would have already killed everyone in Gaza and the West Bank.

---

Don't listen to any of those guys, and likely don't agree with many of their views on Israel. While I don't subscribe to the ridiculous replacement theology, I also don't believe Israel should be allowed to operate unchecked. I suffer under no delusion that Netanyahu is a good dude.

What I don't subscribe to is the idea that because Netanyahu may be bad, other bad actors are somehow good. For instance, I suffer under no delusion that the terrorists and sympathizers in the Gaza strip would like nothing more than the destruction of Israel, the destruction of the US, and the destruction of western values in general. We see it in all of the polling. I also don't subscribe to the absurd conspiracy theories of you groypers - that the Jews are responsible for every bad thing in the world.

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

---

As you said, Tucker can interview anyone he likes. That is all that matters.

Response: This is a strawman. Nobody said or suggested Tucker couldn't interview anyone he likes.

Mothra said:

---

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

---

So Tucker is a soft interviewer in your opinion because he wanted to focus on certain things and not others. So what? Tucker asked him about the issues that Tucker was interested in. Tucker asked him:
1. Nick's origin story going from Cruz campaigner to America First.
2. Tucker asked Nick about young people and how they feel about certain issues (marriage, porn, etc.)
3. He asked Nick about his views of America First and the nation of Israel.

Response: I am glad you went on record as saying you take no issue with Tucker interviewing a Holocaust denier, Hitler sympathizer, Stalin lover, minority hater, and women loather. This was the point of my post, to find out where the groypers stand on such issues. Noted.

Mothra said:

---

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

---

A 25 year old with a podcast isn't the same as a 54 year old seasoned Senator.

Response: Agreed they're not the same. Other areas where they differ? Cruz isn't a white supremacist, woman hating racist.

Mothra said:

---

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Again, so what? The real reason you feel threatened by Fuentes is because you recognize that he can be persuasive and you fear he will persuade others. Fuentes speaks out of a disenchanted group of young people who have seen their country ravaged thru greed, selfishness and virtue signaling via the boomer generation's influence on society. Fix that issue and his support will dwindle. Ignore it, and his support will grow.

Saw what you will about Tucker but he has a heart for young people as this interview shows. If you watch it again, you will see Tucker trying to breath life into Nick especially with regard to marriage. You seem to want Nick (and those who follow him) destroyed but Tucker wants them redeemed.

---

See above and below.

Response: An even bigger issue is the sad, disenfranchised young and awkward white males always looking for a bogeyman to blame for their impotence. The answer is not to find the bogeyman. The answer is to point them to the truth. And the truth is, the Jews aren't responsible for their sad lot in life or the reason they can't get laid.

And yes, it does concern me that a racist, white supremacist, hate-monger is gaining such a foothold in the Republican party. That should concern anyone, because we need to look no further than the Democrats to find where that path leads. When you let the fringe elements speak loudest, and give credence to and a platform for their views, you are going to have a very hard time winning future elections. And that is absolutely what will happen to the Republicans if it allows groypers to gain control of the party. Kiss future elections goodbye.

So if we want to lose elections, we should absolutely take your advice, because that's the surest way to assure defeat.

As for Nick, I don't want him destroyed. I want him to repent and see the light. The way to do that is not by tossing him softballs, failing to challenge his extremists views, or giving him a platform to spew garbage. Sorry.

---

Sorry, I am not a Groyper but we see now why you made this post. Are you a boomer or Gen X because you are showing a contempt for young white males who don't have the same advantages you had? Your generation has no moral high ground if they did not give up their own jobs for racial harmony but rather forced the next generation to give up theirs and pulled up the ladder from them.

Also, if you really care about Nick, you could reach out to him. What is stopping you from doing that?

If Shapiro knew he could defeat Nick in a debate then he wouldve already done that. Anyone who has watched any of Nicks content can tell that the kid is crazy smart and has some well thought out positions. The zionists are scared to death of him bc they have lost their grip of control over the GOP and anyone under 40 mostly agrees with Nick. Screaming racist and antisemite doesnt work any more. They used that strategy on Pat Buchanan and he was the best candidate the GOP ever had to offer but these are different times. Everyone coming up these days can see that our country is a shell of what it once was and both parties care more about Israel than they do actual Americans.

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

---

As you said, Tucker can interview anyone he likes. That is all that matters.

Response: This is a strawman. Nobody said or suggested Tucker couldn't interview anyone he likes.

Mothra said:

---

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

---

So Tucker is a soft interviewer in your opinion because he wanted to focus on certain things and not others. So what? Tucker asked him about the issues that Tucker was interested in. Tucker asked him:
1. Nick's origin story going from Cruz campaigner to America First.
2. Tucker asked Nick about young people and how they feel about certain issues (marriage, porn, etc.)
3. He asked Nick about his views of America First and the nation of Israel.

Response: I am glad you went on record as saying you take no issue with Tucker interviewing a Holocaust denier, Hitler sympathizer, Stalin lover, minority hater, and women loather. This was the point of my post, to find out where the groypers stand on such issues. Noted.

Mothra said:

---

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

---

A 25 year old with a podcast isn't the same as a 54 year old seasoned Senator.

Response: Agreed they're not the same. Other areas where they differ? Cruz isn't a white supremacist, woman hating racist.

Mothra said:

---

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Again, so what? The real reason you feel threatened by Fuentes is because you recognize that he can be persuasive and you fear he will persuade others. Fuentes speaks out of a disenchanted group of young people who have seen their country ravaged thru greed, selfishness and virtue signaling via the boomer generation's influence on society. Fix that issue and his support will dwindle. Ignore it, and his support will grow.

Saw what you will about Tucker but he has a heart for young people as this interview shows. If you watch it again, you will see Tucker trying to breath life into Nick especially with regard to marriage. You seem to want Nick (and those who follow him) destroyed but Tucker wants them redeemed.

---

See above and below.

Response: An even bigger issue is the sad, disenfranchised young and awkward white males always looking for a bogeyman to blame for their impotence. The answer is not to find the bogeyman. The answer is to point them to the truth. And the truth is, the Jews aren't responsible for their sad lot in life or the reason they can't get laid.

And yes, it does concern me that a racist, white supremacist, hate-monger is gaining such a foothold in the Republican party. That should concern anyone, because we need to look no further than the Democrats to find where that path leads. When you let the fringe elements speak loudest, and give credence to and a platform for their views, you are going to have a very hard time winning future elections. And that is absolutely what will happen to the Republicans if it allows groypers to gain control of the party. Kiss future elections goodbye.

So if we want to lose elections, we should absolutely take your advice, because that's the surest way to assure defeat.

As for Nick, I don't want him destroyed. I want him to repent and see the light. The way to do that is not by tossing him softballs, failing to challenge his extremists views, or giving him a platform to spew garbage. Sorry.

---

Sorry, I am not a Groyper but we see now why you made this post. Are you a boomer or Gen X because you are showing a contempt for young white males who don't have the same advantages you had? Your generation has no moral high ground if they did not give up their own jobs for racial harmony but rather forced the next generation to give up theirs and pulled up the ladder from them.

Also, if you really care about Nick, you could reach out to him. What is stopping you from doing that?

---

Lol. Always humorous to me when misguided young folk suffer under the delusion that their generation has it so much harder than the last. Yes, millennial, you've been so oppressed as compared to us Gen Xers.

I'm curious what made you so bitter? Did you lose an IT job to an Indian dude?

It should be a bad thing to want anyone who holds racist, supremacist or racist views to have a say in anything. But we live in interesting times where you guys and the wokesters share much in common.

Robert Wilson said:

---

The only good thing about the anti-Jew movement is
It groups the identity politics imbeciles on the left and right together.

So Sam and Barbearian get to smooch.

---

Indeed. And the usual suspects are coming out in force on this thread. I've predicted everyone of them so far, but we are still missing one of them.

muddybrazos said:

---

If Shapiro knew he could defeat Nick in a debate then he wouldve already done that. Anyone who has watched any of Nicks content can tell that the kid is crazy smart and has some well thought out positions. The zionists are scared to death of him bc they have lost their grip of control over the GOP and anyone under 40 mostly agrees with Nick. Screaming racist and antisemite doesnt work any more. They used that strategy on Pat Buchanan and he was the best candidate the GOP ever had to offer but these are different times. Everyone coming up these days can see that our country is a shell of what it once was and both parties care more about Israel than they do actual Americans.

---

Here's another one of them. As expected a big Nick Fuentes fan.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Fascist movements always end up scapegoating Jews. The new GOP will be no exception.

---

jete ad absurdum..............

- uncle fred

D!

Robert Wilson said:

---

The only good thing about the anti-Jew movement is
It groups the identity politics imbeciles on the left and right together.

So Sam and Barbearian get to smooch.

---

Funny coming from the guy who supports Texans signing loyalty oaths to Israel before Texans can receive disaster relief with their own tax dollars.

Most rational people agree you are insane and should consider moving to Israel since they hold your primary loyalty.

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

---

As you said, Tucker can interview anyone he likes. That is all that matters.

Response: This is a strawman. Nobody said or suggested Tucker couldn't interview anyone he likes.

Mothra said:

---

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

---

So Tucker is a soft interviewer in your opinion because he wanted to focus on certain things and not others. So what? Tucker asked him about the issues that Tucker was interested in. Tucker asked him:
1. Nick's origin story going from Cruz campaigner to America First.
2. Tucker asked Nick about young people and how they feel about certain issues (marriage, porn, etc.)
3. He asked Nick about his views of America First and the nation of Israel.

Response: I am glad you went on record as saying you take no issue with Tucker interviewing a Holocaust denier, Hitler sympathizer, Stalin lover, minority hater, and women loather. This was the point of my post, to find out where the groypers stand on such issues. Noted.

Mothra said:

---

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

---

A 25 year old with a podcast isn't the same as a 54 year old seasoned Senator.

Response: Agreed they're not the same. Other areas where they differ? Cruz isn't a white supremacist, woman hating racist.

Mothra said:

---

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Again, so what? The real reason you feel threatened by Fuentes is because you recognize that he can be persuasive and you fear he will persuade others. Fuentes speaks out of a disenchanted group of young people who have seen their country ravaged thru greed, selfishness and virtue signaling via the boomer generation's influence on society. Fix that issue and his support will dwindle. Ignore it, and his support will grow.

Saw what you will about Tucker but he has a heart for young people as this interview shows. If you watch it again, you will see Tucker trying to breath life into Nick especially with regard to marriage. You seem to want Nick (and those who follow him) destroyed but Tucker wants them redeemed.

---

See above and below.

Response: An even bigger issue is the sad, disenfranchised young and awkward white males always looking for a bogeyman to blame for their impotence. The answer is not to find the bogeyman. The answer is to point them to the truth. And the truth is, the Jews aren't responsible for their sad lot in life or the reason they can't get laid.

And yes, it does concern me that a racist, white supremacist, hate-monger is gaining such a foothold in the Republican party. That should concern anyone, because we need to look no further than the Democrats to find where that path leads. When you let the fringe elements speak loudest, and give credence to and a platform for their views, you are going to have a very hard time winning future elections. And that is absolutely what will happen to the Republicans if it allows groypers to gain control of the party. Kiss future elections goodbye.

So if we want to lose elections, we should absolutely take your advice, because that's the surest way to assure defeat.

As for Nick, I don't want him destroyed. I want him to repent and see the light. The way to do that is not by tossing him softballs, failing to challenge his extremists views, or giving him a platform to spew garbage. Sorry.

---

Sorry, I am not a Groyper but we see now why you made this post. Are you a boomer or Gen X because you are showing a contempt for young white males who don't have the same advantages you had? Your generation has no moral high ground if they did not give up their own jobs for racial harmony but rather forced the next generation to give up theirs and pulled up the ladder from them.

Also, if you really care about Nick, you could reach out to him. What is stopping you from doing that?

---

Lol. Always humorous to me when misguided young folk suffer under the delusion that their generation has it so much harder than the last. Yes, millennial, you've been so oppressed as compared to us Gen Xers.

I'm curious what made you so bitter? Did you lose an IT job to an Indian dude?

It should be a bad thing to want anyone who holds racist, supremacist or racist views to have a say in anything. But we live in interesting times where you guys and the wokesters share much in common.

---

Gen Xers are absolutely the most spoiled generation in American history.

At least the Boomers had to endure the 70ties...

"Don't leave in a huff,







Leave in a huff and half. More room and you can take your time."



- Groucho Marx

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

Mothra said:

---

BaylorFTW said:

---

1. Should he only interview people he agrees with?
2. Does Nick not ask some reasonable questions about the US's involvement with the nation of Israel?
3. Do we no longer accept the democratic marketplace of ideas system and opt for a totalitarian system where only certain views are allowed to be expressed and others are suppressed? And if so, who gets to decide which views rightthink and which are beyond the pale?

---

You seem to be confusing this with a free speech issue. Tucker can interview anyone he likes. And of course, his viewers and sponsors can express their thoughts about who he interviews through their pocketbooks. It's called capitalism. And last I checked, Nick already had a website where he promotes some of his more heinous views. A quick search of google, and you'll find a ton of videos.

---

As you said, Tucker can interview anyone he likes. That is all that matters.

Response: This is a strawman. Nobody said or suggested Tucker couldn't interview anyone he likes.

Mothra said:

---

The main critique of Tucker is the softball questions and soft-pedaling of heinous and racist ideas, as well as giving a platform to same. And that is of course a legitimate critique. It's not just that he chooses to interview evil and despicable (and in some case, murderous) people, it's that he fails to challenge them on those ideas and has a tendency to make them appear sympathetic. Or in some instances, he outright praises them (see Putin).

---

So Tucker is a soft interviewer in your opinion because he wanted to focus on certain things and not others. So what? Tucker asked him about the issues that Tucker was interested in. Tucker asked him:
1. Nick's origin story going from Cruz campaigner to America First.
2. Tucker asked Nick about young people and how they feel about certain issues (marriage, porn, etc.)
3. He asked Nick about his views of America First and the nation of Israel.

Response: I am glad you went on record as saying you take no issue with Tucker interviewing a Holocaust denier, Hitler sympathizer, Stalin lover, minority hater, and women loather. This was the point of my post, to find out where the groypers stand on such issues. Noted.

Mothra said:

---

Unless it's the evil Ted Cruz of course.

---

A 25 year old with a podcast isn't the same as a 54 year old seasoned Senator.

Response: Agreed they're not the same. Other areas where they differ? Cruz isn't a white supremacist, woman hating racist.

Mothra said:

---

As for Nick, I suspect there are a lot of things he and I agree on, just like a lot of people who hold some conservative views. It's the more heinous views on the Holocaust, Hitler, Stalin, minorities and women that are untenable, and the reason I don't listen to a POS like him.

---

Again, so what? The real reason you feel threatened by Fuentes is because you recognize that he can be persuasive and you fear he will persuade others. Fuentes speaks out of a disenchanted group of young people who have seen their country ravaged thru greed, selfishness and virtue signaling via the boomer generation's influence on society. Fix that issue and his support will dwindle. Ignore it, and his support will grow.

Saw what you will about Tucker but he has a heart for young people as this interview shows. If you watch it again, you will see Tucker trying to breath life into Nick especially with regard to marriage. You seem to want Nick (and those who follow him) destroyed but Tucker wants them redeemed.

---

See above and below.

Response: An even bigger issue is the sad, disenfranchised young and awkward white males always looking for a bogeyman to blame for their impotence. The answer is not to find the bogeyman. The answer is to point them to the truth. And the truth is, the Jews aren't responsible for their sad lot in life or the reason they can't get laid.

And yes, it does concern me that a racist, white supremacist, hate-monger is gaining such a foothold in the Republican party. That should concern anyone, because we need to look no further than the Democrats to find where that path leads. When you let the fringe elements speak loudest, and give credence to and a platform for their views, you are going to have a very hard time winning future elections. And that is absolutely what will happen to the Republicans if it allows groypers to gain control of the party. Kiss future elections goodbye.

So if we want to lose elections, we should absolutely take your advice, because that's the surest way to assure defeat.

As for Nick, I don't want him destroyed. I want him to repent and see the light. The way to do that is not by tossing him softballs, failing to challenge his extremists views, or giving him a platform to spew garbage. Sorry.

---

Sorry, I am not a Groyper but we see now why you made this post. Are you a boomer or Gen X because you are showing a contempt for young white males who don't have the same advantages you had? Your generation has no moral high ground if they did not give up their own jobs for racial harmony but rather forced the next generation to give up theirs and pulled up the ladder from them.

Also, if you really care about Nick, you could reach out to him. What is stopping you from doing that?

---

Lol. Always humorous to me when misguided young folk suffer under the delusion that their generation has it so much harder than the last. Yes, millennial, you've been so oppressed as compared to us Gen Xers.

I'm curious what made you so bitter? Did you lose an IT job to an Indian dude?

It should be a bad thing to want anyone who holds racist, supremacist or racist views to have a say in anything. But we live in interesting times where you guys and the wokesters share much in common.

---

Gen Xers are absolutely the most spoiled generation in American history.

At least the Boomers had to endure the 70ties...

---

Poor guy. Did mommy not let you watch Backyardigans as a kid or something? Didn't get the PS2 right when it came out?