As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
It's all cronyism.
There should be no Caucus in Congress for any foreign government!
We have more and more problems and higher debt levels in this country every year and these POS are prioritizing foreign interests...
Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
It's all cronyism.
There should be no Caucus in Congress for any foreign government!
We have more and more problems and higher debt levels in this country every year and these POS are prioritizing foreign interests...
Amazingly, something we agree on.
The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
It's all cronyism.
There should be no Caucus in Congress for any foreign government!
We have more and more problems and higher debt levels in this country every year and these POS are prioritizing foreign interests...
Amazingly, something we agree on.
Good!
You've taken your first step down the long road of realizing what it means to be America First!
Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
It's all cronyism.
There should be no Caucus in Congress for any foreign government!
We have more and more problems and higher debt levels in this country every year and these POS are prioritizing foreign interests...
Amazingly, something we agree on.
Good!
You've taken your first step down the long road of realizing what it means to be America First!
The ironic thing is your misconception. I've always been America first. I simply disagree with you on what that means, and don't have the strong dislike for a group of people based on culture or race.
The other irony is we probably agree 80% of the time. You're just so hyperfocused on one issue, you can't see the forest through the trees.
Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus.
The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:Mothra said:The_barBEARian said:As co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, I was grateful to join American Jewish Committee CEO Ted Deutch and House congressional colleagues in a bipartisan message of solidarity against antisemitism. We stand together with our Jewish friends at home and around the world… pic.twitter.com/iAGyvsXJng
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) December 18, 2025
Why the **** is there a House Republican Israel Caucus !?!?
FUUUU@#@#@##@#KKKK BOOMERS!
Just FYI, there are lots of different caucuses in Congress, including a "friends of Australia Caucus," Vietnam Caucus, Taiwan Caucus, Albanian Issues Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and Congressional Women's Caucus. Not saying it's a good thing, but your outrage at one caucus is interesting.
As best as I can tell, the Israeli caucus is mostly composed of congressmen and women in their 40s, so not exactly "boomers."
It's all cronyism.
There should be no Caucus in Congress for any foreign government!
We have more and more problems and higher debt levels in this country every year and these POS are prioritizing foreign interests...
Amazingly, something we agree on.
Good!
You've taken your first step down the long road of realizing what it means to be America First!
The ironic thing is your misconception. I've always been America first. I simply disagree with you on what that means, and don't have the strong dislike for a group of people based on culture or race.
The other irony is we probably agree 80% of the time. You're just so hyperfocused on one issue, you can't see the forest through the trees.
I'm above all an American revanchist. I want your (presumably white) male sons to have a better future, which is to say the same opportunities you as a young adult Gen Xer had in this country... and not have to experience the more limited opportunities fueled by open anti-white discrimation and abuse of of H1B immigration policies that I as a young adult Millennial had to experience.
I want to stop and reverse the slide towards leftist policies that have happened to this nation... but I also want to stop and reverse the slide towards Jewish supremacist policies that have happened to this nation. Both of these movements are attacking free speech, the one thing that makes Americans more free than any other country in the west, and both movements are also the leading causes fueling our out of control national debt which is the biggest threat to our quality of life and national security.
We both have deep American roots in this country... your Grandfather was a POW.... my grandfather slightly older when he enlisted after Pearl Harbour(meaning he was in his early twenties) and he trained pilots... but he had one cousin who was disfigured for life by a Stielhandgranate and another who got his head chopped off in the Phillipines.
Our ancestors fought a war that was suppose to provide us with a better life... and the Silent Gen, the Boomers, & to a smaller extent Gen-X in their infinite weakness and complacency have given it all away.
I hope we can advance policies that will benefit your children... and my children if I ever have any....I'm in a great mood today and I feel this is a nice conciliatory message to end the year with you on this board after the overly contentious and outright hostile disposition I adopted towards you.
Merry Christimas and Happy New Year!
An IDF sweatshirt was found in the closet of Jeffrey Epstein, per the newly released Epstein files.
— AF Post (@AFpost) December 19, 2025
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/OQWztRuEDR
The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Me Mums A Lampshade - Danny Finkelstein
— Adolf Elmer (@adolfelmer) December 19, 2025
[FULL SONG] pic.twitter.com/dfEpSM169e
boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
Sam Lowry said:I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
Sam Lowry said:I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
BigGameBaylorBear said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
Mothra I have to disagree with you on young men. I won't speak on Protestants but the Catholic Church is flourishing with young men. Young men are seeking traditionalism more than ever. Gen Z is one of the first generations to be more religious than the generation before them and there are plenty of studies to back up that young men are turning to Christ
BigGameBaylorBear said:Sam Lowry said:I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You are correct Sam. Tucker distinctly criticizes the nation of Israel and avoids Jewish people, and he still labels Fuentes as an Anti-Semite
Fuentes focuses on World-Jewry as well as the nation of Israel
Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Those statements are only controversial among pro-Israel partisans. Every objective review of the facts has concluded that they are committing genocide.Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Not at all. One can be critical of Israel and not be antisemitic.
I would suggest delving deeper into some of the things he said. I've mentioned them above. And there are many more.
That said, when he says completed unfounded things like the Israeli government is committing genocide, and you take that statement and put it in context to the other things he said or suggested, it certainly does suggest he's antisemitic.
And I say that is someone who thinks Netanyahu is a despicable person.
Sam Lowry said:Those statements are only controversial among pro-Israel partisans. Every objective review of the facts has concluded that they are committing genocide.Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Not at all. One can be critical of Israel and not be antisemitic.
I would suggest delving deeper into some of the things he said. I've mentioned them above. And there are many more.
That said, when he says completed unfounded things like the Israeli government is committing genocide, and you take that statement and put it in context to the other things he said or suggested, it certainly does suggest he's antisemitic.
And I say that is someone who thinks Netanyahu is a despicable person.
That's funny.Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Those statements are only controversial among pro-Israel partisans. Every objective review of the facts has concluded that they are committing genocide.Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Not at all. One can be critical of Israel and not be antisemitic.
I would suggest delving deeper into some of the things he said. I've mentioned them above. And there are many more.
That said, when he says completed unfounded things like the Israeli government is committing genocide, and you take that statement and put it in context to the other things he said or suggested, it certainly does suggest he's antisemitic.
And I say that is someone who thinks Netanyahu is a despicable person.
Nah. No reasonable body has made that conclusion because there's no valid evidence Israel is targeting civilians.
Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Not at all. One can be critical of Israel and not be antisemitic.
I would suggest delving deeper into some of the things he said. I've mentioned them above. And there are many more.
That said, when he says completed unfounded things like the Israeli government is committing genocide, and you take that statement and put it in context to the other things he said or suggested, it certainly does suggest he's antisemitic.
And I say that is someone who thinks Netanyahu is a despicable person.
Those statements are only controversial among pro-Israel partisans. Every objective review of the facts has concluded that they are committing genocide.
Nah. No reasonable body has made that conclusion because there's no valid evidence Israel is targeting civilians.
That's funny.
Oldbear83 said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:Sam Lowry said:Mothra said:boognish_bear said:The disconnect between Boomers and Gen Z on this is incredible. With the exception of a handful of young men with incredibly low T, basically the entirety of Gen Z supports Tucker. Its really only the Boomers defending Ben. Our country will look very different when we take over. https://t.co/wpbeYVzwlX
— William Branson Donahue (@realwilldonahue) December 19, 2025
Not a surprise. Tucker plays into the grievance culture and identity politics that have taken ahold of young "conservatives," if you can even call them that. Does things the Groypers like, such as minimize Hitler's culpability, and regularly attacks the Jews - their bogeyman, responsible for their lot in life (i.e. inability to find a good wife, afford a house, find a good job, etc.). Sure, Israel is not saint, and there are many things we can justifiably criticize, but young white men have what I believe is a demonically-influenced obsession and hatred for the Jews.
But the real problem here isn't the racism and identity politics that Tucker plays into. It's the lack of faith among this new generation. When I was in school, most of my friends and acquaintances identified as Christian. Certainly, most were not, but they at least had a modicum of respect for Christ's teachings, and purported to adhere to such beliefs.
Few of today's youngsters even claim to be Christians. We attended a large church for a bit in North Austin, and I helped lead some of the high school small groups, and even among those who attended church, few of the teens were Christians. It's even worse in public school of course. There is no reverence or belief in God. So, when you have a group of young men that lack a foundation, and see the chips stacked against them, they find a convenient (albeit, misguided) bogeyman. And I think that hated is guided by spiritual forces, as a believer.
That said, the young man in this post is wrong about how much support people like Tucker have, and how much support people like Shapiro have. Shapiro's main demographic is 40-50 somethings, while Tucker's demographic - at least at the time he left Fox - were indeed boomers, with the largest over 60. No doubt Tucker is now saying some things to capture a younger audience, but his audience is mostly boomers.
As with all things, we always overestimate how many hold our beliefs. I used to be guilty of same. This young man, full of piss and vinegar, is guilty of that.
I've never seen Tucker attacking Jews.
He had the highest rating on Fox among the 25-54 demographic. Most of his viewers were older, but so is the prime time audience in general.
You need to watch him more apparently. He's done so repeatedly and also promotes people who deny or minimize the Holocaust.
Shame on him for promoting Fuentes, but as far as Tucker's own statements, I think you're conflating his criticism of Israel with criticism of Jewish people. That's the same error of which Barbearian is guilty.
Not at all. One can be critical of Israel and not be antisemitic.
I would suggest delving deeper into some of the things he said. I've mentioned them above. And there are many more.
That said, when he says completed unfounded things like the Israeli government is committing genocide, and you take that statement and put it in context to the other things he said or suggested, it certainly does suggest he's antisemitic.
And I say that is someone who thinks Netanyahu is a despicable person.
Those statements are only controversial among pro-Israel partisans. Every objective review of the facts has concluded that they are committing genocide.
Nah. No reasonable body has made that conclusion because there's no valid evidence Israel is targeting civilians.
That's funny.
In no sense of the word is it "funny".
Oldbear83 said:
Mr. Hand was right about you.
The_barBEARian said:Oldbear83 said:
Mr. Hand was right about you.
That's a great movie
HOLY SH*T:
— Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 (@EvanAKilgore) December 20, 2025
Megyn Kelly just told the crowd at @TPUSA's America Fest that she NO LONGER considers Ben Shapiro a friend.
"I resent that he thinks he's in a positipn to decide who must say what, to who, and when."
It seems like EVERYONE is calling @benshapiro for his speech. pic.twitter.com/G3b3TDfg1E
Sam Lowry said:
Just sickening. What's wrong with you?
