Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

273,040 Views | 3371 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by Realitybites
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

historian said:

That makes no sense. Your reaction is more likely to be antisemitic than my post.

I'm proud of my ethnicity" while sometimes leaving unsaid (but not always) a hatred or disdain for others.

this is anti semitic trope. Do better.

What a dumb post.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

historian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

historian said:

Tucker is no longer a Republican. If he talks and acts like a Dem / fascist, he probably is a Dem / fascist.


You Boomercons have lost your minds.


This is my head canon for what historian looks like irl:




Historian is a typical boomer era ziocon. Beck has become a clown. I let my Blaze subscription lapse.

This is a report from a Jewish source.

U.S. pro-Israel groups failed to disclose grants from Israeli government

Mothra's head is going to explode.


I'm not bothered by this in the least. I don't want Israel dictating our foreign policy.

The difference between us is, I don't hate Jews. My thoughts are not all consumed by them. But I'm not an identity politics guy like you are but a traditional conservative. Boomers and Hebes are your thing.

Of course, I'm talking to a guy who actually thinks Candace Owens is a credible source. That really says all one needs to know about your reasoning abilities.


I dont like Israel dictating our government policy but i'm not going to get mad over a report clearly showing Israel dictating our government policy...

How many crayons did you eat this morning?


Who's mad over this report? As I said above, not me. I think you're projecting.

The fact of the matter is you get more worked up over the Jews than any poster in this board. You are constantly getting your panties in a wad. Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're a woman.


Because Jews and their Boomer supporters are a bunch of bullies and I refuse to be intimidated into silence while they steal everything that isnt embedded into the earth's crust and ship it off to enrich Israel


You're projecting again. The only one who acts like a bully on this board is yourself. You are constantly integrating people groups because of your identity politics. That's real bullying behavior.


Its hard for me to take you seriously on "identity politics" when you hold the belief that white Americans shouldn't be proud of their racial identity.

Regardless, unlike Jews and Boomers I dont have the power to debank, censor, or deplatform anyone even if I wanted to... so if I am a bully, i'm a pretty feeble one.


I would submit it's hard to take anyone seriously that is proud because of the color of their sin. It's such an odd thing to be "proud" of one of your immutable traits.

You'd be right at home with the NAACP and southern poverty law center that interject race into everything. It's like I said, you guys share lots of similar characteristics. . None of them are conservative.

Having pride in one's skin color is a form of racism. It says, "I'm proud of my ethnicity" while sometimes leaving unsaid (but not always) a hatred or disdain for others. That's racism. Of course it doesn't make sense because bigotry is always irrational.


Depends how you're using the word "pride", as it's one of the deadly sins.

But there is nothing wrong with embracing and celebrating white heritage. Our people are incredibly impressive.

What is white heritage? You're not suggesting all whites look the same or come from the same ethnic background, right?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

As far as Candace Owens goes, here's Shawn Ryan's interview.



Your hero! I love how she said Tyler Robinson was never on campus the day of the killing, only for the prosecution to display video after video of him on campus that day. Must all be AI.

Sad to see her Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories being reduced to rubble the last couple of days, and for her to look like the dumbass she is. Sean Ryan might be the only person dumber than she is. That must be hard for you.

This guy nails the interview. Hilarious:

https://www.tiktok.com/@aj_comedy/video/7658928599419997470
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

historian said:

That makes no sense. Your reaction is more likely to be antisemitic than my post.

I'm proud of my ethnicity" while sometimes leaving unsaid (but not always) a hatred or disdain for others.

this is anti semitic trope. Do better.

Wrong. No idea how you get to that claim from a perfectly valid statement.

historian already answered, but felt I should enter my vote.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

historian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

historian said:

Tucker is no longer a Republican. If he talks and acts like a Dem / fascist, he probably is a Dem / fascist.


You Boomercons have lost your minds.


This is my head canon for what historian looks like irl:




Historian is a typical boomer era ziocon. Beck has become a clown. I let my Blaze subscription lapse.

This is a report from a Jewish source.

U.S. pro-Israel groups failed to disclose grants from Israeli government

Mothra's head is going to explode.


I'm not bothered by this in the least. I don't want Israel dictating our foreign policy.

The difference between us is, I don't hate Jews. My thoughts are not all consumed by them. But I'm not an identity politics guy like you are but a traditional conservative. Boomers and Hebes are your thing.

Of course, I'm talking to a guy who actually thinks Candace Owens is a credible source. That really says all one needs to know about your reasoning abilities.


I dont like Israel dictating our government policy but i'm not going to get mad over a report clearly showing Israel dictating our government policy...

How many crayons did you eat this morning?


Who's mad over this report? As I said above, not me. I think you're projecting.

The fact of the matter is you get more worked up over the Jews than any poster in this board. You are constantly getting your panties in a wad. Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're a woman.


Because Jews and their Boomer supporters are a bunch of bullies and I refuse to be intimidated into silence while they steal everything that isnt embedded into the earth's crust and ship it off to enrich Israel


You're projecting again. The only one who acts like a bully on this board is yourself. You are constantly integrating people groups because of your identity politics. That's real bullying behavior.


Its hard for me to take you seriously on "identity politics" when you hold the belief that white Americans shouldn't be proud of their racial identity.

Regardless, unlike Jews and Boomers I dont have the power to debank, censor, or deplatform anyone even if I wanted to... so if I am a bully, i'm a pretty feeble one.


I would submit it's hard to take anyone seriously that is proud because of the color of their sin. It's such an odd thing to be "proud" of one of your immutable traits.

You'd be right at home with the NAACP and southern poverty law center that interject race into everything. It's like I said, you guys share lots of similar characteristics. . None of them are conservative.

Having pride in one's skin color is a form of racism. It says, "I'm proud of my ethnicity" while sometimes leaving unsaid (but not always) a hatred or disdain for others. That's racism. Of course it doesn't make sense because bigotry is always irrational.


Depends how you're using the word "pride", as it's one of the deadly sins.

But there is nothing wrong with embracing and celebrating white heritage. Our people are incredibly impressive.

What is white heritage? You're not suggesting all whites look the same or come from the same ethnic background, right?


Nope. I was using "white heritage" as an umbrella term to cover the various cultures of Europe.

There's Anglo-Saxons (which are Germanic), Celts, Scandinavians, Slavs, Latin peoples, etc.
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

historian said:

Tucker is no longer a Republican. If he talks and acts like a Dem / fascist, he probably is a Dem / fascist.


You Boomercons have lost your minds.


This is my head canon for what historian looks like irl:




Historian is a typical boomer era ziocon. Beck has become a clown. I let my Blaze subscription lapse.

This is a report from a Jewish source.

U.S. pro-Israel groups failed to disclose grants from Israeli government

Mothra's head is going to explode.


I'm not bothered by this in the least. I don't want Israel dictating our foreign policy.

The difference between us is, I don't hate Jews. My thoughts are not all consumed by them. But I'm not an identity politics guy like you are but a traditional conservative. Boomers and Hebes are your thing.

Of course, I'm talking to a guy who actually thinks Candace Owens is a credible source. That really says all one needs to know about your reasoning abilities.


I dont like Israel dictating our government policy but i'm not going to get mad over a report clearly showing Israel dictating our government policy...

How many crayons did you eat this morning?


Who's mad over this report? As I said above, not me. I think you're projecting.

The fact of the matter is you get more worked up over the Jews than any poster in this board. You are constantly getting your panties in a wad. Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're a woman.


Because Jews and their Boomer supporters are a bunch of bullies and I refuse to be intimidated into silence while they steal everything that isnt embedded into the earth's crust and ship it off to enrich Israel


You're projecting again. The only one who acts like a bully on this board is yourself. You are constantly integrating people groups because of your identity politics. That's real bullying behavior.


Its hard for me to take you seriously on "identity politics" when you hold the belief that white Americans shouldn't be proud of their racial identity.

Regardless, unlike Jews and Boomers I dont have the power to debank, censor, or deplatform anyone even if I wanted to... so if I am a bully, i'm a pretty feeble one.


I would submit it's hard to take anyone seriously that is proud because of the color of their sin. It's such an odd thing to be "proud" of one of your immutable traits.

You'd be right at home with the NAACP and southern poverty law center that interject race into everything. It's like I said, you guys share lots of similar characteristics. . None of them are conservative.


Everyone notice how he doesn't call out the ADL.... sheer cowardice.
Well, Jewish isn't a race. So there's that.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

historian said:

Tucker is no longer a Republican. If he talks and acts like a Dem / fascist, he probably is a Dem / fascist.


You Boomercons have lost your minds.


This is my head canon for what historian looks like irl:




Historian is a typical boomer era ziocon. Beck has become a clown. I let my Blaze subscription lapse.

This is a report from a Jewish source.

U.S. pro-Israel groups failed to disclose grants from Israeli government

Mothra's head is going to explode.


I'm not bothered by this in the least. I don't want Israel dictating our foreign policy.

The difference between us is, I don't hate Jews. My thoughts are not all consumed by them. But I'm not an identity politics guy like you are but a traditional conservative. Boomers and Hebes are your thing.

Of course, I'm talking to a guy who actually thinks Candace Owens is a credible source. That really says all one needs to know about your reasoning abilities.


I dont like Israel dictating our government policy but i'm not going to get mad over a report clearly showing Israel dictating our government policy...

How many crayons did you eat this morning?


Who's mad over this report? As I said above, not me. I think you're projecting.

The fact of the matter is you get more worked up over the Jews than any poster in this board. You are constantly getting your panties in a wad. Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're a woman.


Because Jews and their Boomer supporters are a bunch of bullies and I refuse to be intimidated into silence while they steal everything that isnt embedded into the earth's crust and ship it off to enrich Israel


You're projecting again. The only one who acts like a bully on this board is yourself. You are constantly integrating people groups because of your identity politics. That's real bullying behavior.


Its hard for me to take you seriously on "identity politics" when you hold the belief that white Americans shouldn't be proud of their racial identity.

Regardless, unlike Jews and Boomers I dont have the power to debank, censor, or deplatform anyone even if I wanted to... so if I am a bully, i'm a pretty feeble one.


I would submit it's hard to take anyone seriously that is proud because of the color of their sin. It's such an odd thing to be "proud" of one of your immutable traits.

You'd be right at home with the NAACP and southern poverty law center that interject race into everything. It's like I said, you guys share lots of similar characteristics. . None of them are conservative.


Everyone notice how he doesn't call out the ADL.... sheer cowardice.

Well, Jewish isn't a race. So there's that.


Not according to Mothra (one of the few things I actually agree with him on)
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boomers will see this and then tell us we are the ones obsessed with Israel w/ a straight face

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

historian said:

Tucker is no longer a Republican. If he talks and acts like a Dem / fascist, he probably is a Dem / fascist.


You Boomercons have lost your minds.


This is my head canon for what historian looks like irl:




Historian is a typical boomer era ziocon. Beck has become a clown. I let my Blaze subscription lapse.

This is a report from a Jewish source.

U.S. pro-Israel groups failed to disclose grants from Israeli government

Mothra's head is going to explode.


I'm not bothered by this in the least. I don't want Israel dictating our foreign policy.

The difference between us is, I don't hate Jews. My thoughts are not all consumed by them. But I'm not an identity politics guy like you are but a traditional conservative. Boomers and Hebes are your thing.

Of course, I'm talking to a guy who actually thinks Candace Owens is a credible source. That really says all one needs to know about your reasoning abilities.


I dont like Israel dictating our government policy but i'm not going to get mad over a report clearly showing Israel dictating our government policy...

How many crayons did you eat this morning?


Who's mad over this report? As I said above, not me. I think you're projecting.

The fact of the matter is you get more worked up over the Jews than any poster in this board. You are constantly getting your panties in a wad. Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're a woman.


Because Jews and their Boomer supporters are a bunch of bullies and I refuse to be intimidated into silence while they steal everything that isnt embedded into the earth's crust and ship it off to enrich Israel


You're projecting again. The only one who acts like a bully on this board is yourself. You are constantly integrating people groups because of your identity politics. That's real bullying behavior.


Its hard for me to take you seriously on "identity politics" when you hold the belief that white Americans shouldn't be proud of their racial identity.

Regardless, unlike Jews and Boomers I dont have the power to debank, censor, or deplatform anyone even if I wanted to... so if I am a bully, i'm a pretty feeble one.


I would submit it's hard to take anyone seriously that is proud because of the color of their sin. It's such an odd thing to be "proud" of one of your immutable traits.


Norm Macdonald | Gay Pride Parade - YouTube


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:




.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:





.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?

ive never benn in the Israel killed Charlie crowd. I am in the Israel killed JFK crowd bc he wouldnt let them have nukes. They sure got the nukes from LBJ and the JFK files are still redacted.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:





.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?

ive never benn in the Israel killed Charlie crowd. I am in the Israel killed JFK crowd bc he wouldnt let them have nukes. They sure got the nukes from LBJ and the JFK files are still redacted.


Well, good to know you're not completely bat **** crazy.

By the way, what evidence do you have that Israel was responsible for JFK's murder? Just a hunch?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:


Well, Jewish isn't a race. So there's that.


Now you've done it. Welcome to the antisemitism club, ATL Bear.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

As far as Candace Owens goes, here's Shawn Ryan's interview.



Your hero! I love how she said Tyler Robinson was never on campus the day of the killing, only for the prosecution to display video after video of him on campus that day. Must all be AI.

Sad to see her Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories being reduced to rubble the last couple of days, and for her to look like the dumbass she is. Sean Ryan might be the only person dumber than she is. That must be hard for you.

This guy nails the interview. Hilarious:

https://www.tiktok.com/@aj_comedy/video/7658928599419997470


My hero? Hard for me? Nah.

I just prefer to let people speak for themselves rather than running them through the Mothra filter.

What is your explanation for paving over the site of the most high profile assassination in recent history instead of wrapping it in yellow police tape until all forensic investigations were complete?
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:





.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?

ive never benn in the Israel killed Charlie crowd. I am in the Israel killed JFK crowd bc he wouldnt let them have nukes. They sure got the nukes from LBJ and the JFK files are still redacted.


Well, good to know you're not completely bat **** crazy.

By the way, what evidence do you have that Israel was responsible for JFK's murder? Just a hunch?

Yep, you should look into it. LBJ was also a player and helped arm Israel to do the Nakba in 1948.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Many of those antisemites would cheer on Iran if they did assassinate Trump. We have many evil people in the US.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

As far as Candace Owens goes, here's Shawn Ryan's interview.



Your hero! I love how she said Tyler Robinson was never on campus the day of the killing, only for the prosecution to display video after video of him on campus that day. Must all be AI.

Sad to see her Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories being reduced to rubble the last couple of days, and for her to look like the dumbass she is. Sean Ryan might be the only person dumber than she is. That must be hard for you.

This guy nails the interview. Hilarious:

https://www.tiktok.com/@aj_comedy/video/7658928599419997470


My hero? Hard for me? Nah.

I just prefer to let people speak for themselves rather than running them through the Mothra filter.

What is your explanation for paving over the site of the most high profile assassination in recent history instead of wrapping it in yellow police tape until all forensic investigations were complete?

I didn't mention Candace or her theories--you did. So there's no "Mothra filter" involved here.

As for the paving question, you're assuming that because something looks unusual to you, it must indicate a cover-up. What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered? Suspicion isn't evidence. If there is proof that procedures were violated or evidence was destroyed, let's look at it. Otherwise, you're treating an unanswered question as proof of a conspiracy.

What other suspicions of Candace do you find persuasive?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:





.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?

ive never benn in the Israel killed Charlie crowd. I am in the Israel killed JFK crowd bc he wouldnt let them have nukes. They sure got the nukes from LBJ and the JFK files are still redacted.


Well, good to know you're not completely bat **** crazy.

By the way, what evidence do you have that Israel was responsible for JFK's murder? Just a hunch?

Yep, you should look into it. LBJ was also a player and helped arm Israel to do the Nakba in 1948.

I actually wouldn't doubt LBJ involvement. But I am asking if you have any evidence. It appears the answer is no.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:

boognish_bear said:





.

Lol. Just like Charlie, right?

ive never benn in the Israel killed Charlie crowd. I am in the Israel killed JFK crowd bc he wouldnt let them have nukes. They sure got the nukes from LBJ and the JFK files are still redacted.


Well, good to know you're not completely bat **** crazy.

By the way, what evidence do you have that Israel was responsible for JFK's murder? Just a hunch?

Yep, you should look into it. LBJ was also a player and helped arm Israel to do the Nakba in 1948.

I actually wouldn't doubt LBJ involvement. But I am asking if you have any evidence. It appears the answer is no.


Look up the "Apollo Affair"... the nuclear material they stole to make bombs were then used to blackmail the Nixon admin during the Yom Kippur war.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Outlaw Criticism of Israel and Jewish Power


In May and June, a bipartisan coalition of 15 House Republicans and 14 Democrats formally sponsored the Jewish American Security Act (JASA), a piece of legislation that if passed would constitute one of the most sweeping attacks on the First Amendment in American history. The bill enjoys practically universal backing from Jewish non-profits and Zionist activist groups.

The new law presents four major demands: the appointment of a specialized Anti-Semitism commissar to manage the Department of Education's campaign combating pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, a $1 billion dollar cash injection to "secure" Zionist non-profits and Jewish houses of worship, mandatory state monitoring of online social media platforms in order to force them to censor "anti-Semitic" political speech on their platforms, and officially reorienting the mission of the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and National Counterintelligence and Security Center as instruments for targeting critics of Jews and Israel as foreign enemy actors and domestic terrorists.

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




wHy ArE yOu sO oBsSeSSed wItH iSrAeL?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The line-up for this conference already looks pretty fire. I though I'd post it here to let people know about it. This is the thread where all the patriots hang out anyway!

Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

As for the paving question, you're assuming that because something looks unusual to you, it must indicate a cover-up. What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered? Suspicion isn't evidence. If there is proof that procedures were violated or evidence was destroyed, let's look at it. Otherwise, you're treating an unanswered question as proof of a conspiracy.


Because reality doesn't work like a TV show.

"For a murder, you're talking about a much more comprehensive and therefore much more time-consuming examination. For a start, everything in the scene is first photographed and videoed. And the scene would extend to all the possible exits, entrances, and routes between.

Then we get down to the details. Every footprint, partial footprint, trace of footprint, must be diagrammed, measured, photographed with scales. Every area of blood has to be assessed is it spatter? Drops? Smears? - measured, diagrammed, and photographed. Blood samples have to be taken from all areas and the exact position must be recorded, both in diagrams and photographs.

You've got several hours work there alone, and not just for one person either. Two CSI's at a minimum, three more likely, and a Crime Scene Manager deciding strategy and directing operations. So far, you haven't even begun on fingerprinting, or recovering items for lab work.

Most murder scenes will take several days to process properly. Quite apart from the work done by the CSI's, outside experts will often be called in. A Pathologist, to look at the body in situ before it's taken for a full post mortem. A Blood Pattern Analysis expert. A Ballistics expert if a gun was involved. If a gun has been left at the scene, that requires special treatment from a Firearms Officer. And so on."
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wHy ArE yOu sO oBsSeSSed wItH iSrAeL?

Actually we know why: you are an antisemite who struggles with rational thought.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This could feasibly apply to Tucker Carlson as well.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

The line-up for this conference already looks pretty fire. I though I'd post it here to let people know about it. This is the thread where all the patriots hang out anyway!




If Joel Webbon is there, you know you were going to get some very bad theology that drives people away from Christ.

His tiny congregation just north of Austin has done great damage to the kingdom.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Quote:

As for the paving question, you're assuming that because something looks unusual to you, it must indicate a cover-up. What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered? Suspicion isn't evidence. If there is proof that procedures were violated or evidence was destroyed, let's look at it. Otherwise, you're treating an unanswered question as proof of a conspiracy.


Because reality doesn't work like a TV show.

"For a murder, you're talking about a much more comprehensive and therefore much more time-consuming examination. For a start, everything in the scene is first photographed and videoed. And the scene would extend to all the possible exits, entrances, and routes between.

Then we get down to the details. Every footprint, partial footprint, trace of footprint, must be diagrammed, measured, photographed with scales. Every area of blood has to be assessed is it spatter? Drops? Smears? - measured, diagrammed, and photographed. Blood samples have to be taken from all areas and the exact position must be recorded, both in diagrams and photographs.

You've got several hours work there alone, and not just for one person either. Two CSI's at a minimum, three more likely, and a Crime Scene Manager deciding strategy and directing operations. So far, you haven't even begun on fingerprinting, or recovering items for lab work.

Most murder scenes will take several days to process properly. Quite apart from the work done by the CSI's, outside experts will often be called in. A Pathologist, to look at the body in situ before it's taken for a full post mortem. A Blood Pattern Analysis expert. A Ballistics expert if a gun was involved. If a gun has been left at the scene, that requires special treatment from a Firearms Officer. And so on."


Let me ask again. Maybe I'll get an answer this time.

What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered?

And what other theories of Candace do you find her statements that Charlie visited her in dreams and told her who is killer was persuasive? Do you find her claims shin and having a third eye persuasive?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Quote:

As for the paving question, you're assuming that because something looks unusual to you, it must indicate a cover-up. What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered? Suspicion isn't evidence. If there is proof that procedures were violated or evidence was destroyed, let's look at it. Otherwise, you're treating an unanswered question as proof of a conspiracy.


Because reality doesn't work like a TV show.

"For a murder, you're talking about a much more comprehensive and therefore much more time-consuming examination. For a start, everything in the scene is first photographed and videoed. And the scene would extend to all the possible exits, entrances, and routes between.

Then we get down to the details. Every footprint, partial footprint, trace of footprint, must be diagrammed, measured, photographed with scales. Every area of blood has to be assessed is it spatter? Drops? Smears? - measured, diagrammed, and photographed. Blood samples have to be taken from all areas and the exact position must be recorded, both in diagrams and photographs.

You've got several hours work there alone, and not just for one person either. Two CSI's at a minimum, three more likely, and a Crime Scene Manager deciding strategy and directing operations. So far, you haven't even begun on fingerprinting, or recovering items for lab work.

Most murder scenes will take several days to process properly. Quite apart from the work done by the CSI's, outside experts will often be called in. A Pathologist, to look at the body in situ before it's taken for a full post mortem. A Blood Pattern Analysis expert. A Ballistics expert if a gun was involved. If a gun has been left at the scene, that requires special treatment from a Firearms Officer. And so on."


Let me ask again. Maybe I'll get an answer this time.

What evidence do you have that investigators had not completed the relevant forensic work before the site was altered?



When there is a departure from normal procedure, it is up to the deviant to produce proof. The fact that this procedure normally takes days is proof enough. So, was the scene of the crime tested for explosive residue? Or was it hurriedly paved over to conceal any evidence of an alternative method of Charlie Kirk's assassination?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Hey, Republicans! Tucker Carlson is Your Enemy

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/hey-republicans-tucker-carlson-is-your-enemy/

Still an excellent analysis of the current Tucker phenomenon.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.