Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

296,879 Views | 3559 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:




TPUSA died with Charlie Kirk...but that was the point. Now it is just bureaucratic inertia for those making money of it and the slow learners in the general population who still support it.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


He brags about a story where some kids were disparaging Israel in the football locker room and his son walked up to them and beat the **** out of all of them... its amazing his son wasnt expelled for that! (But Mothra is also full of **** so I put the odds of that story really happening around < 0.000001


lol. I never said anything of the sort.

You guys are absolute clowns. Try to get a girlfriend and move out. It will be good for you
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


Projection is all ya got little buddy
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:




TPUSA died with Charlie Kirk...but that was the point. Now it is just bureaucratic inertia for those making money of it and the slow learners in the general population who still support it.


And they killed Charlie Kirk, of course.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent? Was it a single parent home? Or perhaps they were also morally bankrupt?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander


He's not a hate-filled person... unless you are a white kid and dont support the nation state of Israel... then he has been indoctrinated to be triggered and physically assault you like a rapid Pitbull...
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:




TPUSA died with Charlie Kirk...but that was the point. Now it is just bureaucratic inertia for those making money of it and the slow learners in the general population who still support it.


And they killed Charlie Kirk, of course.


I'm glad you've finally gotten to the point where you're willing to identify the culprits as a "they" rather than a "he".

Maybe you can give Kash Patel a call and generate some interest in finding out who the "they" might actually be.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander


You're referrring to my 17 year old. Don't know that he's ever been in a fight. I do know he's a heck of a debater. When the other kids on the youth team did the Nazi salute last year, he certainly pushed back rhetorically. But it, of course never came to blows. That's just a lie spread by you and barbarian.

He'd run circles around the two of you imbeciles.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander


You're referrring to my 17 year old. Don't know that he's ever been in a fight. I do know he's a heck of a debater. When the other kids on the youth team did the Nazi salute last year, he certainly pushed back rhetorically. But it, of course never came to blows. That's just a lie spread by you and barbarian.

He'd run circles around the two of you imbeciles.


That's cute. He probably made that up so you'd raise his allowance. He knows his old man is a sucker for Zionism.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

The_barBEARian said:




TPUSA died with Charlie Kirk...but that was the point. Now it is just bureaucratic inertia for those making money of it and the slow learners in the general population who still support it.


And they killed Charlie Kirk, of course.


I'm glad you've finally gotten to the point where you're willing to identify the culprits as a "they" rather than a "he".

Maybe you can give Kash Patel a call and generate some interest in finding out who the "they" might actually be.



Yes, I have swallowed the Candace Kool-Aid. It was definitely TPUSA, the French government, the Egyptian government, the FBI, the US government, state and local authorities and his own wife. You and Candace have convinced me!

I think if we tune in next episode, she'll use astral projection to determine who the killer was don't you think?

I'm laughing my ass off at what you find a credible source
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander


You're referrring to my 17 year old. Don't know that he's ever been in a fight. I do know he's a heck of a debater. When the other kids on the youth team did the Nazi salute last year, he certainly pushed back rhetorically. But it, of course never came to blows. That's just a lie spread by you and barbarian.

He'd run circles around the two of you imbeciles.


That's cute. He probably made that up so you'd raise his allowance. He knows his old man is a sucker for Zionism.


The damnedest thing is he doesn't even have an allowance. He's been a lifeguard in our neighborhood for the past two years and doesn't need the money.

I guess he's just a good person in general.

How much is your allowance currently? Do Mom and Dad know that you're a racist who hates the jews or have you hidden that from them?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

It was definitely TPUSA, the French government, the Egyptian government, the FBI, the US government, state and local authorities and his own wife.


That's a remarkably disjointed and strange list of suspects you have put together.

Let's start with the basics. Do you believe that there are entities/movements (plural) that would have gained significant benefits from Charlie Kirk's death?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

muddybrazos said:




I have to give it to Fishback bc he is based and not afraid to tell the truth. We need more people standing up and committing to stopping teen takeovers and black violence in our cities.


He's a good man. Black crime is major taboo topic to discuss, we need more honest leaders who aren't afraid to confront the issue.


Well except for shacking up with teenagers and having restraining orders filed against you and all.


There's nothing wrong with two consenting adults in a romantic relationship. You're reaching as per usual, because you have nothing else


Ah so you see nothing wrong with a teacher who claims to be a purported Christian grooming his underage student and then moving in with her as soon as she turns 18 while he's almost 10 years older? That's just two "consenting adults" and evidence that said teacher is a "good man"?

Lol. I guess you put your purported Catholic faith on pause when it suits your purposes.

You're an absolute joke.


She wasn't his student, she worked for the organization. I don't recall the biblical teaching that says an employee can't be in a relationship with his/her employer.

Why are you so dishonest?

You state these kind of half-truths and allege others are dishonest? Remarkable.

Keinah Fort wasn't a mere employee of Fishback's organization. She was a student at the high school who partnered with Fishback's organization. She was on the debate team in high school, and she was trained by Fishback and his organization (i.e. his student). She later joined the organization as a student-employee. She alleges that the romantic relationship began when she was only 17, which makes sense given they moved into together about 2 weeks after she turned 18. She later filed a TRO against him for stalking behavior. The judge ultimately denied the TRO but warned him to stay away from the teen.

But regardless of the seediness of the relationship, what Catholic doctrine and all Christian doctrine teaches is that fornication, or sex with someone before marriage, is sexual sin. Shacking up with someone who isn't your wife, regardless of her age, is sin. It's just more seedy and sick in this case, given how the relationship began and the age of the parties.

I truly can't believe I am having to explain these simple truths about sin to you. You should know these things already.

You have much to learn.


You said she was his student, that was wrong. Now you're saying that they were having sex, how do you know that? There's no definitive proof of that.

And for what it's worth, every man sins. Doesn't mean they're necessarily a bad person.

I can't believe I have to continue cleaning up after you. It's become a second full-time job for me.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said they had sex. I said they had a romantic relationship and shacked up. These are undisputed facts.

Your idea that they were living together and not having sex is your assumption. I believe what she said in her lawsuit - that the relationship was sexual and began when she was 17. If you want to believe the relationship wasn't sexual, well, ok. Even Fishback, while denying he began sleeping with her when she was 17, hasn't gone that far.

Personally, I don't know of any adult men who shacked up with a girl two weeks after she turned 18, against her parents' wishes. I also don't know too many who've had TROs filed against them for stalking. And I've known some pretty sinful dudes over the years, before they met Christ.

But if you want to believe Fishback is a "good" person, ok.

And indeed, she was his student - she was learning debate tactics under his tutelage. I never said that was a public teacher-student relationship. Again, reading comprehension...


Then why would you bring up the fact that fornication is a sin if you weren't insinuating that they were having sex? Constantly moving the goal posts over here hahaha

What are you, a public defender?

So, fornication is defined in scripture as ANY form of sexual contact, not simply sex or intercourse. So if you're fooling around with someone not your wife, you are engaged in fornication.

Regardless, Fort confirmed the relationship was sexual, and Fishback confirmed he was "engaged" to her and moved in with her 2 weeks after she turned 18, so the idea that they weren't have some sexual contact is just stupid.

Do you always play dumb, or only when it suits your purposes - kind of like your Catholcism?


The Greek word for fornication translates to "porneia", which can mean premarital sex, prostitution, adultery, or other illicit sexual acts.

Living with someone out of wedlock doesn't necessarily equate to "porneia". Fort says they were engaging in sexual acts but that's all he said/she said.

They were engaged early on in their relationship, and Fishback married his current wife after a short time. Perhaps he gets engaged after a short time because he doesn't want to engage in premarital fornication?

The fact of the matter, I may play dumb but you're just plain dumb.

I am glad you were able to admit that fornication includes sexual acts other than just sex or intercourse - just like I explained to you. That must have been a blow to your massive ego. Perhaps next time you will read a little closer, instead of mischaracterizing my comments.

As for Fort, Fishback never denied the allegation they were having sex. He merely said it was consensual. He admitted to shacking up with her when she turned 18. So, what we have is undisputed (if not confirmed) fornication on the part of Fishback. And it's seedy at that, followed by harassment, and allegations of physical abuse.

Did you also hear that he told the black reporter who confronted him on the allegations that he needed to be lynched?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republican-florida-governor-race-tells-191737975.html

He sounds like a real, "great" Christian, that Fishback. Of course, any person who listens to Nick Fuentes lacks the moral compass to make such judgments in the first place.

Son, don't fool yourself - you're as dumb as a box of rocks. You think the word games and intellectual dishonesty you regularly engage in on these boards makes you smart. You're not. My teen has better reasoning skills than you.

The good news, you're young and stupid, instead of just stupid, so there's still hope for you. Don't go the way of barbearian.




Oh man… you and Jasmine Crockett are living proof that anyone can pass the bar exam.

The act of living together is not sexual if you're not having sex, therefore it's not fornication. And it is not certain whether or not they had sex, as he hasn't commented on it so it's not definitive.

Hypothetically, if he did have sex, would that make him a bad person? You voted for Trump and he's the king of fornication lmao! So obviously none of this has to do with pre-martial sex, it's because he's not an Israel-first goyim like yourself.

And ya I saw that clip, it was awesome!


I suspect you got your ass kicked a lot as a younger man. Amiright?




Nope, but watching a grown man fall apart like this is hilarious, your ego is so fragile LOL


I feel bad for his children.

Hopefully they can forgive their father for being a complete fool.


I know one of them is my age. That means he's probably anti-Zionist because I don't know anyone from our generation who isn't lol


Oldest is 20. I believe you're 26.

And no, he doesn't hate Israe, he's not racist and he's not a hate-filled person in general, mad at the world. The kid loves everyone and regularly shares his faith with others. He takes the great commission seriously.

I am thankful he didn't turn out a Nazi youth like you guys. Your parents seriously screwed up. Were they just completely absent?


That's great man. Sounds like he cleaned up his act after trying to fight his teammates over the Israel slander


You're referrring to my 17 year old. Don't know that he's ever been in a fight. I do know he's a heck of a debater. When the other kids on the youth team did the Nazi salute last year, he certainly pushed back rhetorically. But it, of course never came to blows. That's just a lie spread by you and barbarian.

He'd run circles around the two of you imbeciles.


That's cute. He probably made that up so you'd raise his allowance. He knows his old man is a sucker for Zionism.


The damnedest thing is he doesn't even have an allowance. He's been a lifeguard in our neighborhood for the past two years and doesn't need the money.

I guess he's just a good person in general.

How much is your allowance currently? Do Mom and Dad know that you're a racist who hates the jews or have you hidden that from them?


It's pretty good, my company takes care of me! Mom and Dad are good people though, they used to be a little naive towards the Israel situation but they've turned off the Fox News and came to their senses. That's why I still have hope for you.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

It was definitely TPUSA, the French government, the Egyptian government, the FBI, the US government, state and local authorities and his own wife.


That's a remarkably disjointed and strange list of suspects you have put together.

Let's start with the basics. Do you believe that there are entities/movements (plural) that would have gained significant benefits from Charlie Kirk's death?

Is it remarkable? Because each entity on that list is someone your girl, Candy, has pointed the finger at. Do you find her list remarkably disjointed and strange? I know I do.

As for the basics, sure, numerous entities/movements benefited from Charlie's death.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am pleasantly surprised you hold a job. Is it like a car wash or Starbucks?

I am sure you have to keep the racist and hateful views quiet at the office.

Sorry to hear about mom and dad. I hope they find Jesus.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

sure, numerous entities/movements benefited from Charlie's death.


In your opinion, are any of these entities large enough, wealthy enough, connected enough, etc to arrange an assassination attempt?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

I am pleasantly surprised you hold a job. Is it like a car wash or Starbucks?

I am sure you have to keep the racist and hateful views quiet at the office.

Sorry to hear about mom and dad. I hope they find Jesus.


They don't know Jesus because they don't support the modern nation of Israel? Man, you're nuts. It didn't take much to break you and reveal your true colors huh?

I hope your sons turn out to be better men than you, though the bar is in hell.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Quote:

sure, numerous entities/movements benefited from Charlie's death.


In your opinion, are any of these entities large enough, wealthy enough, connected enough, etc to arrange an assassination attempt?

If a trannie-loving nutjob could pull it off, I'd say any number of leftist groups had the requisite funds to pull it off. It wouldn't take much money, IMO, as it wasn't a difficult kill. I mean, he was outdoors, on a clear day, and anyone who could access that roof (and it sounds like anyone could) that had skill as a hunter could have easily made the shot.

Now, how about an answer to the question you ignored. Do you find Candy's list strange and disjointed?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

I am pleasantly surprised you hold a job. Is it like a car wash or Starbucks?

I am sure you have to keep the racist and hateful views quiet at the office.

Sorry to hear about mom and dad. I hope they find Jesus.


They don't know Jesus because they don't support the modern nation of Israel? Man, you're nuts. It didn't take much to break you and reveal your true colors huh?

I hope your sons turn out to be better men than you, though the bar is in hell.

Um, no.

If they are as hateful and racist as you, they clearly don't know Jesus. There is no evidence whatsoever they love their neighbor and follow Christ's commands. Supporting the modern nation of Israel has nothing to do with it (though I do hope they don't ignore Paul's commands in Romans regarding Jews).
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I definitely think there are o supicious things around Charlies shooting like how they scrubbed the crime scene immdiately how the rifle was supposedly disassembled right away then reassembled. I still think that transtifa guy did it or at least he is the fall guy. I still dont know why Israel would kill Charlie bc he was their best person they had to reach the evangelical youth that they need to hold onto for support. He was starting to crack a little bit on support for them but I still dont think they took him out.

Now I do think Russia hit Lindsey G with the heart attack weapon while he was in Ukraine. He ran his mouth one too many times about having Putin killed.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Quote:

sure, numerous entities/movements benefited from Charlie's death.


In your opinion, are any of these entities large enough, wealthy enough, connected enough, etc to arrange an assassination attempt?

If a trannie-loving nutjob could pull it off, I'd say any number of leftist groups had the requisite funds to pull it off. It wouldn't take much money, IMO, as it wasn't a difficult kill. I mean, he was outdoors, on a clear day, and anyone who could access that roof (and it sounds like anyone could) that had skill as a hunter could have easily made the shot.

Now, how about an answer to the question you ignored. Do you find Candy's list strange and disjointed?



The summary of that long answer sounds like "yes".

So now we have both motive and means for an assassination *plot*.

We're making progress.

Remember, the official story goes something like this: Charlie Kirk was killed by a by a 30.06 round fired by a 23 year old who graduated from high school in 2021 had no prior military or intelligence training. What's more, he carried a disassembled Mauser on to the roof, performed a lateral crawl into position, reassembled the rifle *while in position*, took the shot, ran to the edge of the roof and jumped off. Lone gunman, nothing to see here, move along.

Have you even seen the VHS quality footage that allegedly shows him getting on the roof, moving into position, and "taking the shot"? Because you know what that footage doesn't show? An individual reassembling a 30.06.

As far as Candace Owens, I have no idea what her list looks like.

There are very few people that I will subordinate my own judgement to. She isn't on that list.

But I don't shoot messengers, and I am willing to evaluate evidence as it is presented...and that's because I don't care where the pursuit of the truth leads.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nm.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Quote:

sure, numerous entities/movements benefited from Charlie's death.


In your opinion, are any of these entities large enough, wealthy enough, connected enough, etc to arrange an assassination attempt?

If a trannie-loving nutjob could pull it off, I'd say any number of leftist groups had the requisite funds to pull it off. It wouldn't take much money, IMO, as it wasn't a difficult kill. I mean, he was outdoors, on a clear day, and anyone who could access that roof (and it sounds like anyone could) that had skill as a hunter could have easily made the shot.

Now, how about an answer to the question you ignored. Do you find Candy's list strange and disjointed?



The summary of that long answer sounds like "yes".

So now we have both motive and means for an assassination *plot*.

We're making progress.

Remember, the official story goes something like this: Charlie Kirk was killed by a by a 30.06 round fired by a 23 year old who graduated from high school in 2021 had no prior military or intelligence training. What's more, he carried a disassembled Mauser on to the roof, performed a lateral crawl into position, reassembled the rifle *while in position*, took the shot, ran to the edge of the roof and jumped off. Lone gunman, nothing to see here, move along.

Have you even seen the VHS quality footage that allegedly shows him getting on the roof, moving into position, and "taking the shot"? Because you know what that footage doesn't show? An individual reassembling a 30.06.

As far as Candace Owens, I have no idea what her list looks like.

There are very few people that I will subordinate my own judgement to. She isn't on that list.

But I don't shoot messengers, and I am willing to evaluate evidence as it is presented...and that's because I don't care where the pursuit of the truth leads.

I've never suggested that other forces weren't behind Tyler Robinson. Indeed, I don't doubt that he and his trannie-loving cohorts either knew or assisted with the assassination. So I am not sure what "progress" you think you've made.

What I have disputed is your silly parroting of Candace Owens' crackpot conspiracy theories. You've posted videos and theories she's spouted, though it sounds like you must not have watched them, given you were apparently completely ignorant of her list of culprits. Did you really not know she had pointed the finger at all of the parties I mentioned? If so, I am pretty astounded at your ignorance.

With respect to Robinson, let's address some of your claims.

First, you seem to believe that a 23-year-old has to have military or intelligence training to accurately fire a 30.06 round from a Mauser. That's absurd. I was firing a similar rifle accurately when I was 15, deer-hunting with my grandad. The Mauser is a very common hunting rifle. Ironically, my grandad used the exact same rifle to hunt deer for 20 years. It's not some specialized sniper system that requires military or intelligence training. It's a manually operated bolt-action rifle. People have been hunting deer and target shooting with rifles like that for generations without military or intelligence training. The basic operation is not particularly exotic.

As for the claim that he carried a disassembled Mauser on to the roof, performed a lateral crawl into position, reassembled the rifle *while in position*, took the shot, ran to the edge of the roof and jumped, I have not seen that is the "official" position, but again, that ain't difficult for anyone experienced shooting these weapons. I've disassembled and reassembled numerous rifles in my teen years.

Again, what this tells me is you don't have much, if any, experience with rifles. What you are describing isn't particularly difficult.

Moreover, to believe your version, that we aren't getting the full story, one would have to believe that everyone else is lying. I find that position difficult to believe - that federal and state officials, and members of the federal govt. have all conspired on this. That makes literally no sense. Why, and how do you keep something like that under wraps with so many people involved?

The funny thing is, numerous experts tested the lone gunman theory, and determine Lee Harvey was in fact the lone gunman. So, dismissing it out of hand as a lone gunman theory doesn't make your position anymore persuasive.

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:



Joel Webbon in such a bumpkin. His church is a joke here in Georgetown. Has about a hundred members, if that. He's pretty notorious, as are his members. No seminary training whatsoever, which explains why he so badly misreads Romans.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

muddybrazos said:



Joel Webbon in such a bumpkin. His church is a joke here in Georgetown. Has about a hundred members, if that. He's pretty notorious, as are his members. No seminary training whatsoever, which explains why he so badly misreads Romans.

Sounds like you are starting to come around to my view that we should remove the 501(C)(3) tax exemption for "non-profits"...

It really is a joke these churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, and whatever the Scientologists call their buildings are exempted from paying property taxes
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

I am pleasantly surprised you hold a job. Is it like a car wash or Starbucks?

I am sure you have to keep the racist and hateful views quiet at the office.

Sorry to hear about mom and dad. I hope they find Jesus.


They don't know Jesus because they don't support the modern nation of Israel? Man, you're nuts. It didn't take much to break you and reveal your true colors huh?

I hope your sons turn out to be better men than you, though the bar is in hell.

Um, no.

If they are as hateful and racist as you, they clearly don't know Jesus. There is no evidence whatsoever they love their neighbor and follow Christ's commands. Supporting the modern nation of Israel has nothing to do with it (though I do hope they don't ignore Paul's commands in Romans regarding Jews).


Stellar deductive reasoning you've got there….

There's no evidence against it either.

The public defender strikes out again!
First Page
Page 101 of 102
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.