Tucker's attempt to normalize Nick Fuentes

312,922 Views | 3825 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

Franco won the Spanish Civil War with aid from Hitler & Mussolini. He created his own fascist dictatorship although remained neutral in WWII.


So now you're upset the commies lost the Spanish Civil War?

Its amazing how labyrinthine your loyalties become when your ultimate allegiance is to Jewish Supremacy and the genocide of all European nations.

I stated facts. You're the only ranting and raving like a lunatic.


You of all people calling anyone else a lunatic is peak irony.

You may not agree with historian on everything, but at least he can speak calmly, cogently and rationally on a subject matter - something you completely lack.

I don't know if lunatic is the correct term to describe you, but 1) emotional; 2) unhinged; 3) easily triggered could all describe your posts.

I will be honest, I've come to the conclusion that you are likely not a male, but a single, middle-aged woman.


I lose my temper sometimes... it comes with having high levels of testosterone bud.

I know with age low T becomes an issue for men so its no shade at you.

They have TRT injections you can take.

historian is a religious fanatic... he has a sycophantic loyalty to Israel. You are only about one notch below him in your own zealotry so I get why you'd defend his insanity.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.

You could have just not said anything at all... or capitulated that Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini defeating the communists was a good thing.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.

You could have just not said anything at all... or capitulated that Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini defeating the communists was a good thing.


Indeed, communism is the ultimate evil.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or could have provided historical context for better understanding. Socialism, in all its forms, is a great evil: communism, fascism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, etc. There are many variations and they are evil.

Bigotry is also evil.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

Franco won the Spanish Civil War with aid from Hitler & Mussolini. He created his own fascist dictatorship although remained neutral in WWII.


So now you're upset the commies lost the Spanish Civil War?

Its amazing how labyrinthine your loyalties become when your ultimate allegiance is to Jewish Supremacy and the genocide of all European nations.

I stated facts. You're the only ranting and raving like a lunatic.


You of all people calling anyone else a lunatic is peak irony.

You may not agree with historian on everything, but at least he can speak calmly, cogently and rationally on a subject matter - something you completely lack.

I don't know if lunatic is the correct term to describe you, but 1) emotional; 2) unhinged; 3) easily triggered could all describe your posts.

I will be honest, I've come to the conclusion that you are likely not a male, but a single, middle-aged woman.


I lose my temper sometimes... it comes with having high levels of testosterone bud.

I know with age low T becomes an issue for men so its no shade at you.

They have TRT injections you can take.

historian is a religious fanatic... he has a sycophantic loyalty to Israel. You are only about one notch below him in your own zealotry so I get why you'd defend his insanity.

I don't think its high levels of testosterone. I've never met a man who acts as much like a woman as you. It might be high levels of estrogen, and low levels of testosterone, which can absolutely make one moody, emotional and easily triggered.

You actually might need some testosterone, if you're near the menopause stage, which is what it appears. Or if you are a man, I suspect you probably have a large set of man boobs.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.

You could have just not said anything at all... or capitulated that Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini defeating the communists was a good thing.


Indeed, communism is the ultimate evil.

There are a lot of ideas that are evil. I would submit Islam is even more evil than communism. It's led millions of people to Hell. And in terms of destruction, fascism ranks right behind communism.

Yeah, communism is evil, but "ultimate" evil? I am not so sure.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Or could have provided historical context for better understanding. Socialism, in all its forms, is a great evil: communism, fascism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, etc. There are many variations and they are evil.

Bigotry is also evil.

Yes, but they're not going to call evil ideas they believe in or actions that they engage in, of course.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

historian said:

Or could have provided historical context for better understanding. Socialism, in all its forms, is a great evil: communism, fascism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, etc. There are many variations and they are evil.

Bigotry is also evil.

Yes, but they're not going to call evil ideas they believe in or actions that they engage in, of course.

You mean like... Zionism?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.

You could have just not said anything at all... or capitulated that Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini defeating the communists was a good thing.


Indeed, communism is the ultimate evil.

There are a lot of ideas that are evil. I would submit Islam is even more evil than communism. It's led millions of people to Hell. And in terms of destruction, fascism ranks right behind communism.

Yeah, communism is evil, but "ultimate" evil? I am not so sure.


Well I was speaking in hyperbole. Islam is evil, so is Mormonism, and truly any religion that leads you away from the Holy Trinity.

But I've met some fine Muslims over the years, but can't say I've ever met a communist who wasn't a total lunatic.

I would say that's because communists tend to be atheist with no moral compass. At least muslims share somewhat similar morals as Christians.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

historian said:

Or could have provided historical context for better understanding. Socialism, in all its forms, is a great evil: communism, fascism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, etc. There are many variations and they are evil.

Bigotry is also evil.

Yes, but they're not going to call evil ideas they believe in or actions that they engage in, of course.

You mean like... Zionism?

There's nothing inherently evil about wanting a homeland or sovereign country in the land of your ancestors. I think most of us want the same thing.

Where it could cross over into evil is in how you go about doing it. And indeed, there have been some bad actors over the years who have shed blood in pursuit of that goal (though, I suppose, one could argue that some of the American revolutionaries engaged in similar conduct). But the idea in and of itself, isn't inherently evil, certainly not in the same line as communism, Islam, and Fascism.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Mothra said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

The_barBEARian said:

historian said:

I did say "like a lunatic". Reading comprehension is useful.

You could have just not said anything at all... or capitulated that Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini defeating the communists was a good thing.


Indeed, communism is the ultimate evil.

There are a lot of ideas that are evil. I would submit Islam is even more evil than communism. It's led millions of people to Hell. And in terms of destruction, fascism ranks right behind communism.

Yeah, communism is evil, but "ultimate" evil? I am not so sure.


Well I was speaking in hyperbole. Islam is evil, so is Mormonism, and truly any religion that leads you away from the Holy Trinity.

But I've meant some fine Muslims over the years, but can't say I've ever met a communist who wasn't a total lunatic.

I would say that's because communists tend to be atheist with no moral compass. At least muslims share somewhat similar morals as Christians.

I figured as much.

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mothra said:

historian said:

Or could have provided historical context for better understanding. Socialism, in all its forms, is a great evil: communism, fascism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, etc. There are many variations and they are evil.

Bigotry is also evil.

Yes, but they're not going to call evil ideas they believe in or actions that they engage in, of course.

You mean like... Zionism?

There's nothing inherently evil about wanting a homeland or sovereign country in the land of your ancestors. I think most of us want the same thing.

Where it could cross over into evil is in how you go about doing it. And indeed, there have been some bad actors over the years who have shed blood in pursuit of that goal (though, I suppose, one could argue that some of the American revolutionaries engaged in similar conduct). But the idea in and of itself, isn't inherently evil, certainly not in the same line as communism, Islam, and Fascism.


Its not the land of their ancestors.

The real biblical Jews got wiped out by the Romans and miscegenated. The Romans did that to a lot of people.

But even if I accept the idea they are real jews and it is their ancestral land... why was it bad when the Germans invaded Poland or France to reclaim their lost territory.... but when Jews travel to Palestine and do it, its completely acceptable?

Why is Nazism bad? But Zionism is good? They are both ethnonationalist movements centered around the belief that their people are the chosen people and a revanchist cause to reclaim lost territory.


Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.

So the logical conclusion from this post is that you would agree that "Jews" have no right to Palestine?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the Roman's destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple and slaughtered thousands (I think Josephus said it was 150,000) the surviving Jews were dispersed throughout the empire and beyond. They survived and eventually many prospered. Despite the genocidal attempt, the Jews were not wiped out completely. A small number even managed to remain in their homeland.

Israel still is their historic homeland and always will be. God's covenant with Abraham and his descendants still stands. The Lord God even said it was eternal. The Book of Revelation confirms that with prophecies of restoration and renewal and a role to be played by Israel in the end times. When Chapter 21 describes the Holy City descending from heaven it's a new Jerusalem, not Rome, Byzantium (Constantinople, Istanbul), London, Washington, or any other city.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is no such place as Palestine. There is the state of Israel, however. It is real and always will be no matter how many people hate it.

Bigotry remains irrational
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

God's covenant with Abraham and his descendants still stands.


Access to God through the Abrahamic covenant today is through Christ. Not through descent. Not through Judaism. That is the Israel of God, not the UN founded state in the middle east. Think about it historian. Your theology is based on a UN decree. No Christian for the first 1900 years of Christianity believed or taught what you are saying until Darby came along.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

There is no such place as Palestine. There is the state of Israel, however. It is real and always will be no matter how many people hate it.

Bigotry remains irrational


Speaking of irrational, prove to me the Abrahamic God of the Bible is real and not fiction like Zeus, Odin, the Monkey King, Krishna, or the White Buffalo Woman.

Follow the scientific method and show me empirical evidence that had been unbiasedly validated.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.

So the logical conclusion from this post is that you would agree that "Jews" have no right to Palestine?


Israel was and is a nation. Palestine,nope.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.

So the logical conclusion from this post is that you would agree that "Jews" have no right to Palestine?


Israel was and is a nation. Palestine,nope.


Germany was and is a nation. Poland, nope.


... your hypocrisy is glaring.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poland is a nation. They are also an ally of the US.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.

So the logical conclusion from this post is that you would agree that "Jews" have no right to Palestine?


Israel was and is a nation. Palestine,nope.


Germany was and is a nation. Poland, nope.


... your hypocrisy is glaring.

Poland has been a nation for over a thousand years. The Piast dynasty emerged in the 10th century, with Duke Mieszko I adopting Christianity in 966, marking the foundation of the Polish state.

Germany as a nation state is much younger, dating back only to 1871 when Prussia established the government.

Israel is unique in that it existed in two different periods, from roughly 1300 BC to 70 AD, when Rome destroyed the kingdom and scattered the people. Israel became a nation state again in 1948, and has been a nation state ever since.

Palestine, for its part, has never existed as a nation state. The United Nations offered to create a Palestinian state in 1947, but the offer was not accepted, the region exploding into a war against the Jewish state of Israel.

People sometimes confuse the British term 'Palestine', which referred to a large territory controlled by Britain prior to 1948 and which included all people in the area, including Arabs, Jews and various other cultures.

I am no hypocrite. And you very obviously skipped History class as much as you could.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

From the BarB dictionary:

Lost Territory (noun) - a term used to describe land you don't own or have a right to, but you want so you make up an excuse.

So the logical conclusion from this post is that you would agree that "Jews" have no right to Palestine?


Israel was and is a nation. Palestine,nope.


Germany was and is a nation. Poland, nope.


... your hypocrisy is glaring.

Poland has been a nation for over a thousand years. The Piast dynasty emerged in the 10th century, with Duke Mieszko I adopting Christianity in 966, marking the foundation of the Polish state.

Germany as a nation state is much younger, dating back only to 1871 when Prussia established the government.

Israel is unique in that it existed in two different periods, from roughly 1300 BC to 70 AD, when Rome destroyed the kingdom and scattered the people. Israel became a nation state again in 1948, and has been a nation state ever since.

Palestine, for its part, has never existed as a nation state. The United Nations offered to create a Palestinian state in 1947, but the offer was not accepted, the region exploding into a war against the Jewish state of Israel.

People sometimes confuse the British term 'Palestine', which referred to a large territory controlled by Britain prior to 1948 and which included all people in the area, including Arabs, Jews and various other cultures.

I am no hypocrite. And you very obviously skipped History class as much as you could.


Israel is in fact not unique whatsoever but you are a Jewish supremacist. So when Jews reclaim "lost" territory its somehow legitimate but when the Germans did it during WW2 it isnt. There is no logical rational given for why... just oldbear said so!

Half of modern Poland is historically German territory.



Based upon your specious "two periods" argument there would be over a dozen other former owners who could claim the territory know colloquially as "Palestine" or "Judea" as their own.

Now that you've lost this argument I am curious do you believe in a two-state solution?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BarB sure loves him some bad fiction ...
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:



Mothra, historian, and oldbear's collective reaction to this speech:

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:



Dan Crenshaw turned out to be the worst kind of ******bag after he got elected to congress. Embraced the swamp lifestyle immediately.
First Page Last Page
Page 108 of 110
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.