Sam Lowry said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Great, but let’s not concede that there was ever really a “need” for mass immigration. There wasn’t. It was a tool to suppress wages and labour power and a means of social engineering. That was it. https://t.co/6O9cBEJcvE

— RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) January 20, 2026

---

Doesn't that only address one side of the equation - national supply? There may not be a "need" from the State/supply side of the equation, but the reason most come here is for a better life. So, there is a huge demand issue. People don't come here for a worse life, and we definitely are not bringing anyone in. They come because where they leave is worse.

---

But of course we have to ask if bringing in people who have never been able allowed to form proper functional societies is good for us.

---

FIFY

---

This thing that the 14th Amendment is said always to have meant—that children of foreigners born on U.S. soil are automatic citizens—was just not so, in law or practice, for a long time after the 14th Amendment.

We have been making this case at @ClaremontInst for over 30 years. https://t.co/Krk3gGBqhI

— Ryan P. Williams (@RpwWilliams) January 21, 2026

The levels of contemporary migration to the West really are completely nuts - and male in a way no real wave of refugees has ever been, for the 2,000 or do years we've studied. https://t.co/kNAZSqtUm2

— Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) January 21, 2026

New York Times has a long, sad story about a nun who usesd to run a bustling "migrant shelter" in McAllen, Texas. That was under Biden.

Now her shelter is empy, poor thing. pic.twitter.com/bP7aAX5CEV

— Jared Taylor (@RealJarTaylor) January 21, 2026