Harrison Bergeron said:FLBear5630 said:GrowlTowel said:FLBear5630 said:GrowlTowel said:FLBear5630 said:canoso said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Are we at the point where immigration has become a net negative?
On the plus side, you get good and talented people from other nations.
On the down side, it brings tremendous costs to health care, education, social services, etc.
It pushes down wages.
It inflates housing costs.
An economist could never do a real study for fear of being called names but I am sure we should continue to encourage it.
"On the down side, it brings tremendous costs to health care, education, social services, etc."
Only if the US constitution continues to be abrogated as far as specifying only very limited functions as federal matters is concerned. There isn't a word, or even an idea, in that document about healthcare, social services, or education, which can only be added through amendment, of which none yet exists. Not saying they can't be, just that they have not been, as much as many want to pretend they have, or simply ignore the document, whichever gets the desired result.
That is what the Necessary and Proper Clause is for. ACA was done under that and ACTUALLY passed. There is legislation for it that Congress passed. I think it is more than an iota.
Health care is becoming something only the Government will be able to manage. We have ACA on the books, either we reform it or leave it. I don't see the GOP having the votes to kill it.
. . . in the dead of night on Christmas Eve without a single member of Congress having read the bill and without a single vote from the opposition party.
It passed 60-39. They got the 60 votes needed. Are you saying they should have not used the majority to pass a bill they wanted? Would the GOP not use a 60 vote majority on what they wanted? I am confused to why you are shocked and disgusted.
McConnell took a Supreme Court justice from Obama by using the rules in place, was that OK? I fail to see your point.
The ACA was designed to decrease the number of uninsured, it did that by 51%. That is a fact. Was it sustainable? No. Was it efficient? No. Which leads us to now. WHAT DO YOU HAVE THAT WILL:So far I see nothing. All I see is *****ing over Obamacare, GOP NEEDS to come up with something or it will kill them in the midterms. Give the Dems 60 votes and see what happens. Well? Now is the time...
- Decrease the number of uninsured
- Cost less
- Be sustainable
- Increase efficiency
I apologize. I did not realize you were not aware how the bill escaped the House.
I do not know why we are stuck on ancient history. GOP needs something on health care, especially if they let the subsidies expire. This is not a debate on the quality of Obamacare, EVERYONE agrees it needs to change. It is about not getting skewered by it in the mid-terms. Even Trump and many of the GOP see that.
Dude. We know you're a shill for Big Insurance. Stop pretending. You schtick is stupid at this point - you want the working class to subsidize billionaire CEOs of insurance companies.
There you go again. WHAT DO YOU HAVE BESIDES LEAVING 23 MILLION WITHOUT HEALTH COVERAGE?
Once again, nothing. Free market. Right? How is that going to help ANYONE on January 3rd?
Come on, CHAMPION of the WORK CLASS. What is your solution when premiums triple on January 1st? How does the working man get his appendicitis covered? How does he pay for chemo? Pro Bono? Emergency Room?