Breaking: Trump was told an attack on Iran wouldn't guarantee the collapse of the regime, and that the U.S. needed more firepower in the region. https://t.co/XQaBfUwMxN

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) January 15, 2026

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

I highly doubt that. That sounds like some propaganda or wmd type intel to get us into a war for "our greatest ally".

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

That is Israeli propaganda.

Iran never sent kill teams to America to assassinate the President.

Only an absolute rube would believe such nonsense.

Has the window passed for the Iranian people?

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Has the window passed for the Iranian people?

---

Yes

Well, some just never learn, I guess. Hard line cleric must feel somewhat safe to say this out loud…

https://apnews.com/article/iran-protests-us-trump-khatami-0934b4a569a3f6c60c9706b1d8a40287

muddybrazos said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

I highly doubt that. That sounds like some propaganda or wmd type intel to get us into a war for "our greatest ally".

---

I know you need your statement to be true in order to feel the way you want to feel, but....alas.....it did appear to happen.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/08/donald-trump-iran-assassination-plot-00188498

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

That is Israeli propaganda.

Iran never sent kill teams to America to assassinate the President.

Only an absolute rube would believe such nonsense.

---

as is often the case, you are profoundly ignorant of a great many things, to include current affairs.

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

muddybrazos said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

I highly doubt that. That sounds like some propaganda or wmd type intel to get us into a war for "our greatest ally".

---

LOL. The Jews again.

You should change your name to Johnny One Note.

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

Link?

Mothra said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

I highly doubt that. That sounds like some propaganda or wmd type intel to get us into a war for "our greatest ally".

---

LOL. The Jews again.

You should change your name to Johnny One Note.

---

Tell that to Ted Cruz.

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

Link?

---

"Last year, 58-year-old Routh told the New York Times he was willing "to fight and die in Ukraine" in a comment for an article about American volunteers aiding Ukraine's war effort against Russian President Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion.

Routh also filmed videos on Ukraine's Independence Square, presenting himself as a recruiter for the International Ukrainian Military Intelligence unit for volunteer fighters, calling for more foreigners to join the Ukrainian army.

Ukraine's military wanted to make clear Monday morning that it had no association with Routh.
"American citizen Ryan Routh has never served in the International Legion and has no relation to the unit. Rumors disseminated in certain media are not true," Ukraine's International Legion said in a statement, distancing itself from the failed assassin.

The FBI said Sunday night it is "investigating what appears to be an attempted assassination," after the Secret Service opened fire on the gunman who was lying in wait for Republican presidential candidate Trump near the former president's golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida."

Read between the lines.

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

Link?

---

Read between the lines.

---

Don't we always, to reach such conclusions?

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

We all know Zelensky wants Vance to be president,the guy that literally said "I don't care what happens to Ukraine". lmao

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

That is Israeli propaganda.

Iran never sent kill teams to America to assassinate the President..

---

Brother I'm no Israel lover…I think they must stand on their own two feet without us

But let's not pretend the Islamists in Tehran would not do us harm if they could.

They have almost certainly tried to send kill teams here…and everywhere else…and if they failed it's evidence of their incompetency

Not evidence that the regime in Iran is "reasonable"

Let's not let Israel critique become current iran support.

It's not the same thing

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

If Libya, Syria, and the Arab Spring should have taught us anything it's that, that approach doesn't work either. Especially in the Islamist ME.

boognish_bear said:

---

Breaking: Trump was told an attack on Iran wouldn't guarantee the collapse of the regime, and that the U.S. needed more firepower in the region. https://t.co/XQaBfUwMxN

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) January 15, 2026

---

We drew down the firepower to fight the cocaine/oil war.

Redbrickbear said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

In the wake of U.S. threats of military action against Iran if protesters there are killed while demonstrating against the Iranian government, 70% of voters think the U.S. should not get involved, while 18% think the U.S. should take military action…https://t.co/BPd2RBdEk3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

Count me in the 70%

---

For me it depends on how involved we are talking.

Bush era land wars and regime change occupations that take a decade and costs trillions? Heck no

Trump type shock attack or special operations night abduction with some kind of missile strike on leadership to destabilize the Regime? Far more open to that kind of limited intervention

---

It may be a golden opportunity to take care of a wart on the ass of humanity.

Some well placed bombs by CIA/Mossad assets and a few tomahawks could go a long way.

I'm definitely not in favor of anything large scale.

---

Why?

Why do we give a **** who is in charge of Iran?

The more I think about Greenland... the more I support a military intervention there if it leads to the destruction of NATO, the EU, and the left wing, globalist authoritarian governments all across Europe who are ethnically replacing the native people.

If war in Greenland precipitated a well-spring of nationalist, pro-native populations of Europe uprisings and regime changes - I would fully support it.

**** fighting sand people wars in the middle east. Focus on America and the restoring nationalism to Europe and the Anglosphere.

---

Because I'm sick and tired of hearing about the regime's antics and support for global terror networks. They are in a weakened state currently and the time may be right. I have a hard time believing whatever would emerge from there would be worse that what is there now, but I suppose its possible. They currently are a destabilizing force in the ME we always seem to have to worry about.

We have all but declared war on them anyway with the bombing and the such. If Biden was pres, in no way wuld I want any action for fear his administration would find 10 ways to screw it up. Hell, they would probably bail out the regime with taxpayer money. But Trump has shown, in general, to execute sound plans better.

---

Geez the obtusity. They declared war on us the day they came to power. Iran and its proxies have killed thousands of Americans over the years, and dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.


IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

That is Israeli propaganda.

Iran never sent kill teams to America to assassinate the President..

---

Brother I'm no Israel lover…I think they must stand on their own two feet without us

But let's not pretend the Islamists in Tehran would not do us harm if they could.

They have almost certainly tried to send kill teams here…and everywhere else…and if they failed it's evidence of their incompetency

Not evidence that the regime in Iran is "reasonable"

Let's not let Israel critique become current iran support.

It's not the same thing

---

Red, you are one of the best posters on this board so if you can provide evidence Iran sent kill teams to assassinate Trump I'll believe you...

But given the amount of Israeli hasbara that Americans are deluged with (jews control every major media and social media brand with the exception of Twitter) my instincts tell me this is another Israeli lie conjured up so that we fight a war with Iran and do their dirty work for them.

Do I think the Iranian leaders love Americans? No. But I think they are smart enough to realize provoking Americans into war by assasinating a US President is not a smart strategy.

Israeli-American Council to Zionist billionaire Miriam Adelson: How do you buy and exercise influence over politicians in the US?

Adelson: "Can you allow me not to answer? ... I want to be truthful and there are so many things I don't want to talk about." https://t.co/mbweqqPjBJ pic.twitter.com/o2S5WsHLEE

— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) January 18, 2026

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

Link?

---

"Last year, 58-year-old Routh told the New York Times he was willing "to fight and die in Ukraine" in a comment for an article about American volunteers aiding Ukraine's war effort against Russian President Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion.

Routh also filmed videos on Ukraine's Independence Square, presenting himself as a recruiter for the International Ukrainian Military Intelligence unit for volunteer fighters, calling for more foreigners to join the Ukrainian army.

Ukraine's military wanted to make clear Monday morning that it had no association with Routh.
"American citizen Ryan Routh has never served in the International Legion and has no relation to the unit. Rumors disseminated in certain media are not true," Ukraine's International Legion said in a statement, distancing itself from the failed assassin.

The FBI said Sunday night it is "investigating what appears to be an attempted assassination," after the Secret Service opened fire on the gunman who was lying in wait for Republican presidential candidate Trump near the former president's golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida."

Read between the lines.

---

You don't even read THE lines = federal charges filed by Biden Admin.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/08/donald-trump-iran-assassination-plot-00188498

I mean, the willful ignorance of the groyper caucus is astounding.

ron.reagan said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

We all know Zelensky wants Vance to be president,the guy that literally said "I don't care what happens to Ukraine". lmao

---

You are assuming that should that attempt on Trump's life succeeded, that a selected VP candidate who was relatively unknown at the time could have won.

And federal charges filed by the Biden administration aren't exactly a reliable source for anything given their history of lawfare.

Realitybites said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

whiterock said:

---

[nd dispatched a hit squad to kill Trump.

IDGAF who is POTUS. Anyone trying to kill my President gets their country turned to glass.

---

There is no credible evidence that has been provided that Iranian assassins were sent to kill Trump.

However, there's a good likelihood that the assassin in the second assassination attempt had links to the SBU/Zelensky government.

---

We all know Zelensky wants Vance to be president,the guy that literally said "I don't care what happens to Ukraine". lmao

---

You are assuming that should that attempt on Trump's life succeeded, that a selected VP candidate who was relatively unknown at the time could have won.

And federal charges filed by the Biden administration aren't exactly a reliable source for anything given their history of lawfare.

---

lawfare against a regime Democrats have been courting for over a decade with sanctions relief, return of frozen funds, etc....?

on what other occasions did Biden Admin seek to punish people trying to stop Donald Trump?

historian said:

---

Democrats Fear Iranian Love Of Freedom Could Spread To America https://t.co/aOwQ63xh3n pic.twitter.com/yVO1eKug0r

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) January 12, 2026

---

It only needs to spread to the Insurrected States of America. The rest of us are anywhere from average to excellent on freedom.

True. Babylon Bee made their point.