The rising star of James Talarico

17,069 Views | 331 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by historian
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!
Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!
Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy and we just can't trust our eyes. I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



I'm not sure what to say in response to this. Now you believe the UN when it says human rights atrocities are occurring in Ukraine? How about the Red Cross? Believe them as well?

I guess it just depends on whose ox is being gored, eh Sam?

Assaulting and killing of white people is cool, as long as it's liberals and Russians doing it. Killing of brown people is always bad, of course, even when they are militants. U.S. and the west is the bad guy. Despots, dictators and militant islamists the good guys.

Sam's song, 1000th verse.

No idea whether the UN is always correct but I know what the video shows..



Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



I'm not sure what to say in response to this. Now you believe the UN when it says human rights atrocities are occurring in Ukraine? How about the Red Cross? Believe them as well?

I guess it just depends on whose ox is being gored, eh Sam?

Assaulting and killing of white people is cool, as long as it's liberals and Russians doing it. Killing of brown people is always bad, of course, even when they are militants. U.S. and the west is the bad guy. Despots, dictators and militant islamists the good guys.

Sam's song, 1000th verse.

No idea whether the UN is always correct but I know what the video shows..





It's too early for this gibberish, to be honest. I may try to translate it after coffee.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


define overhaul the supreme court
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



I'm not sure what to say in response to this. Now you believe the UN when it says human rights atrocities are occurring in Ukraine? How about the Red Cross? Believe them as well?

I guess it just depends on whose ox is being gored, eh Sam?

Assaulting and killing of white people is cool, as long as it's liberals and Russians doing it. Killing of brown people is always bad, of course, even when they are militants. U.S. and the west is the bad guy. Despots, dictators and militant islamists the good guys.

Sam's song, 1000th verse.

No idea whether the UN is always correct but I know what the video shows..





It's too early for this gibberish, to be honest. I may try to translate it after coffee.


How do you drink coffee with your head up your ass?

Bye bye Russian cuck.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



I'm not sure what to say in response to this. Now you believe the UN when it says human rights atrocities are occurring in Ukraine? How about the Red Cross? Believe them as well?

I guess it just depends on whose ox is being gored, eh Sam?

Assaulting and killing of white people is cool, as long as it's liberals and Russians doing it. Killing of brown people is always bad, of course, even when they are militants. U.S. and the west is the bad guy. Despots, dictators and militant islamists the good guys.

Sam's song, 1000th verse.

No idea whether the UN is always correct but I know what the video shows..





It's too early for this gibberish, to be honest. I may try to translate it after coffee.


How do you drink coffee with your head up your ass?

Bye bye Russian cuck.

You might want to try decaf.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Robert Wilson said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Robert Wilson said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

I do not know a ton about him, but what he says seems to resonate with me. I would prefer him over Paxton.

I appreciate the trying to be faithful to Jesus, but too often it becomes a servant of the (radical left) Culture.

It's a terrible dilemma, but I think we need to be very careful with someone who claims to be Christian and attempts to use those beliefs to justify progressive positions.

But I'll have more on that later.

1. He is not primarily trying to be faithful to Jesus. He's trying to be a successful politician.

2. This guy's mis-quoting and mis-reading of Scripture is pretty blatant and transparent, but a lot of conservative politicians do things along the same line. Beware of anyone who pretends to have Jesus's view of contemporary American politics.

please point out a misquoting of scripture. Thanks in advance

I will let you do your own research. Hint: you can just start on this thread and maybe use a little google to help with the Bible stuff.

I understand you dont agree with some of his interpretations of scripturre. That happens all time.
It's a big reason why there are so many denominations. I did not find any instance of him misquoting scripture. I figured since you made the claim you would be happy to document it.

Let's take the easiest one from early in this thread

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"
(Thanks Mothra)

Money is not the root of evil. Money is a very useful thing.

"The LOVE of money"….. is the quote he misused. That's the quick and easy one. You can research others with very little difficulty.

We'll all patiently wait for your findings I'm sure.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Robert Wilson said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Robert Wilson said:

Mothra said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

I do not know a ton about him, but what he says seems to resonate with me. I would prefer him over Paxton.

I appreciate the trying to be faithful to Jesus, but too often it becomes a servant of the (radical left) Culture.

It's a terrible dilemma, but I think we need to be very careful with someone who claims to be Christian and attempts to use those beliefs to justify progressive positions.

But I'll have more on that later.

1. He is not primarily trying to be faithful to Jesus. He's trying to be a successful politician.

2. This guy's mis-quoting and mis-reading of Scripture is pretty blatant and transparent, but a lot of conservative politicians do things along the same line. Beware of anyone who pretends to have Jesus's view of contemporary American politics.

please point out a misquoting of scripture. Thanks in advance

I will let you do your own research. Hint: you can just start on this thread and maybe use a little google to help with the Bible stuff.

I understand you dont agree with some of his interpretations of scripturre. That happens all time.
It's a big reason why there are so many denominations. I did not find any instance of him misquoting scripture. I figured since you made the claim you would be happy to document it.

"The LOVE of money"….. is the quote he misused. That's the quick and easy one. You can research others with very little difficulty.

Crucial point, since obviously no one in a boardroom loves money. No telling what JT was thinking with that one.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

boognish_bear said:



define overhaul the supreme court

Always agree with Democrats.

You know he's lying because he deleted the "Republican" in front of all of those ... for example, he does not want to ban gerrymandering, he wants to ban Republicans from gerrymandering. He does not want to ban Super PACs, he wants to ban Republican Super PACs.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Welp, that's it...Talarico just came out against summary execution of American citizens on the streets. Obviously the man is not a real Christian.




Good news is it sounds like you have somebody to vote for this election cycle!

I wonder if he also supports Russia's bombing of civilian centers and the killing of Ukrainian citizens?

Then he'll have your full throated support!

Dems have always loved Zelensky and his propaganda…at least you two will have that in common!


Lol. Ah yes, zelensky's trick photography. He really has the UN and Red Cross fooled.

It's all a big conspiracy but I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us it ain't real.

Next thing you know you'll tell us all those Russian dissidents really are simply tripping and falling out of tall buildings, and planes are merely malfunctioning.

Wait…you already have!

I'm not really sure what to say to that. You've repeatedly cited UN figures for civilian casualties in Ukraine, which I don't dispute. I've only pointed out that they're remarkably low for a war of this scale and duration. When I cite UN sources on Gaza, you scoff with utter contempt and swear that you've never lent credence to anything that came from such a corrupt and politicized organization. Now, lo and behold, here you are once again like Moses descending from the mountain with UN statistics in hand. I can't tell what's authoritative today as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. Maybe it's a Protestant thing...anyway, I'll agree to accept UN statistics if you will.



I'm not sure what to say in response to this. Now you believe the UN when it says human rights atrocities are occurring in Ukraine? How about the Red Cross? Believe them as well?

I guess it just depends on whose ox is being gored, eh Sam?

Assaulting and killing of white people is cool, as long as it's liberals and Russians doing it. Killing of brown people is always bad, of course, even when they are militants. U.S. and the west is the bad guy. Despots, dictators and militant islamists the good guys.

Sam's song, 1000th verse.

No idea whether the UN is always correct but I know what the video shows..





It's too early for this gibberish, to be honest. I may try to translate it after coffee.


How do you drink coffee with your head up your ass?

Bye bye Russian cuck.

You might want to try decaf.


What's the point?
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




"Welcome Matt out front"... this guy is totally clueless! If he were running for mayor of Martha's Vineyard, he would have a chance. The vast majority of Texans are happy to have the borders closed and zero illegals crossing over.
ShooterTX
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.

This guy is dangerous because he's a radical extremist but is smart enough to be clever about it. He seems to be serous about his radical extremism and not just LARPing for social media.

While it would be funny if he rid the world of that idiot Crockett, if Republicans are stupid enough to vote for Paxton in the primary he has a real shot of beating Paxton.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


I'm not a "Christian conservative." I tend to be repulsed by pro life people who pay for their girlfriend's abortion. Or anti gay rights men who go on Grindr dates when out of town.

I'm sure Paxton has done at least one of these.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.
so much of his gospel was a misquoted or misapplied context wise..

"Love of money"

1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

Judge righteously as you shall be judged as you judge.

Turn the other cheek is so misunderstood. If the Jews, as subjects of Rome, did not comply with a Roman soldier's requests for anything from a drink of water to handing over personal property, a swift backhand to the right cheek was common. To open hand slap is reserved for equals and if they used their left hand, it was considered unclean.

Thus, in giving the other cheek, the jew asserted his humanity in a brave countermove a humble response, yet also an act of courage against the oppressive system.

This is not an act of submission.
Adopt A Bear 2025

94 Palmer Williams

Ray Guy Award Watch List
• Preseason Second-Team All-America (Phil Steele)
• Preseason Third-Team All-America (Athlon)
• Preseason All-Big 12 (Big 12 Media)
• Preseason First-Team All-Big 12 (Athlon, Phil Steele)
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.

Yep. Bout that simple.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn


which one is he? I can't tell.
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn


which one is he? I can't tell.

He is the old, career politician and reliable neoco who pretends to be far more conservative than his voting record would otherwise indicate. In short, the exact kind of person who needs to be voted out of office. Unfortunately, his primary opponent (no disrespect to Wesley Hunt, I just dont think he will do better than a far distance 3rd place in the primary) is a vile human, so if you want to reliability vote R this midterm, your choices all kind of suck.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn


which one is he? I can't tell.

He is the old, career politician and reliable neoco who pretends to be far more conservative than his voting record would otherwise indicate. In short, the exact kind of person who needs to be voted out of office. Unfortunately, his primary opponent (no disrespect to Wesley Hunt, I just dont think he will do better than a far distance 3rd place in the primary) is a vile human, so if you want to reliability vote R this midterm, your choices all kind of suck.

Cornyn is the guy who votes with Trump 99% of the time (but that isn't good enough)
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Y'all don't think Miss Country Day Private School, has a chance against James Talarico.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



He's in hot water over his comments about Collin Allred.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure if this is an accurate description of the Democrat party shifting...and potentially moving away from identity politics



I've had some time to think about the infighting inside the Texas Democratic Party and the increasingly shameless attempts by Crockett's campaign to tear down the opposition.

What's becoming clear to me is that this isn't just petty campaign drama; it's a symptom of a much larger coalition shift underway in the Democratic Party.

Crockett and Allred's attacks on James Talarico rely heavily on identity-politics framing, including accusations of racism and the suggestion that Talarico has crossed some unforgivable moral Rubicon.

Truthfully, this kind of attack (even if based on the same level of unsubstantiated rumors) would have been a death knell in the peak years of Woke 1.0.

And, sure, part of this is likely tactical.

Crockett is trailing Talarico in the polls and can't match his fundraising. But I think it also reflects anxiety from parts of the old Democratic coalition as they watch the ground shift beneath them.

The emerging Democratic coalition will be more ethnically and economically diverse, but less captive to identity politics.

It will include people of color and Hispanic voters alongside a growing bloc of suburban white voters. It will reclaim American iconography and openly embrace things long ceded to the right: Christianity, patriotism, the flag, the Constitution.

I think that causes stress for some people.

But what they're clinging to didn't survive 2024. It's dead for good. The Democratic Party is changing, and the old version isn't coming back.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn


which one is he? I can't tell.

He is the old, career politician and reliable neoco who pretends to be far more conservative than his voting record would otherwise indicate. In short, the exact kind of person who needs to be voted out of office. Unfortunately, his primary opponent (no disrespect to Wesley Hunt, I just dont think he will do better than a far distance 3rd place in the primary) is a vile human, so if you want to reliability vote R this midterm, your choices all kind of suck.


Which one serves Israel less?

That's who is getting my vote.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

303Bear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

So, this guy is my representative in Congress, and he's getting a lot of play right now, mostly because he was on Joe Rogan a few weeks ago. He's a very eloquent speaker, and purports to be a devout Christian and a progressive at the same time. As of late, I have seen a lot of my Christian friends really talking him up. I have one in particular that called him a "true follower of Jesus" who puts into practice Christ's words.

He recently said this at a speaking engagement last week in Austin: "Instead of posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom, why don't they post money is the root of all evil in every boardroom? Why don't they post do not judge in every courtroom? Why don't they post turn the other cheek in the halls of the Pentagon? Or it's easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to get into the kingdom of heaven on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange?"

I have my own thoughts, and some thoughts on this guys politics in general, but before I commented, was curious as to where others stood on this guy.


Where does he stand on the usual moral issues (abortion as birth control, LGBT, no prosecution for criminals, etc) that "progressive Christians" get wrong?

I'm guessing he is far from being an orthodox (little o) Christian on those issues, which means that he's just using Christian terminology to advance a socialism/communism where Caesar replaces Christ.

Big gay rights supporter, and saw a clip from Rogan where he was attempting to argue that abortion is biblical.

But there are a LOT of Christians being fooled by this guy right now. I see it on my Facebook feed. So called committed Christians really touting this guy.

It's not good.


For me, it's easy to see why. Paxton, on the other side, is the candidate many Christians are supporting.

There is no way you can support him. It requires you to twist and turn you long held beliefs.

Fake Christian sorta liberal vs fake Christian sorta conservative.

Who gets your vote.


Cornyn


which one is he? I can't tell.

He is the old, career politician and reliable neoco who pretends to be far more conservative than his voting record would otherwise indicate. In short, the exact kind of person who needs to be voted out of office. Unfortunately, his primary opponent (no disrespect to Wesley Hunt, I just dont think he will do better than a far distance 3rd place in the primary) is a vile human, so if you want to reliability vote R this midterm, your choices all kind of suck.

Cornyn is the guy who votes with Trump 99% of the time (but that isn't good enough)


Was Trump voting to send hundreds of billions of American tax payer dollars to corrupt oligarchs in Ukraine?

That is one of the things Trump has been good on... he cut them off for the most part.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Colin Alred is half black mulatto married to a white woman who is whining about "tearing down black men" over the most banal critique imaginable.

These mulattos are always the most insufferable and obsessed with racial grievances while trying to tone police white people.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Colin Alred is half black mulatto married to a white woman who is whining about "tearing down black men" over the most banal critique imaginable.

These mulattos are always the most insufferable and obsessed with racial grievances while trying to tone police white people.

When it's not enough to hate someone's policies, play the he-ain't-white, race card.



The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

The_barBEARian said:

Colin Alred is half black mulatto married to a white woman who is whining about "tearing down black men" over the most banal critique imaginable.

These mulattos are always the most insufferable and obsessed with racial grievances while trying to tone police white people.

When it's not enough to hate someone's policies, play the he-ain't-white, race card.






Are you a mulatto?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

The_barBEARian said:

Colin Alred is half black mulatto married to a white woman who is whining about "tearing down black men" over the most banal critique imaginable.

These mulattos are always the most insufferable and obsessed with racial grievances while trying to tone police white people.

When it's not enough to hate someone's policies, play the he-ain't-white, race card.






Are you a mulatto?

My wife calls me honey buns sometimes but, I've never been called a cookie.

Are you as racist as your posting egesta makes you look?

For your own health, I'd suggest you alter your outlook on others. That much hatred is going to kill you.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

The_barBEARian said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

The_barBEARian said:

Colin Alred is half black mulatto married to a white woman who is whining about "tearing down black men" over the most banal critique imaginable.

These mulattos are always the most insufferable and obsessed with racial grievances while trying to tone police white people.

When it's not enough to hate someone's policies, play the he-ain't-white, race card.






Are you a mulatto?

My wife calls me honey buns sometimes but, I've never been called a cookie.

Are you as racist as your posting egesta makes you look?

For your own health, I'd suggest you alter your outlook on others. That much hatred is going to kill you.


I dont think you understand what hatred looks like.

You and Collin Alred share a lot of feminine qualities... you project feelings onto others and endlessly piss and moan when people have very mild opinions you dont like.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I still think it is funny that anyone believes the democrats will let a white man beat a black woman in their primary.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.