Redbrickbear said:
KaiBear said:
Baylorbears111 said:
Baylor's tuition is absolutely not sustainable in this market. There is greater and cheaper competition in the higher education market, the value of the product (a degree) has been on the decline for 30 years.
Baylor will continue to struggle, but they will survive.
Disagree
Baylor's tuition is not only sustainable……it will continue to increase.
As will the tuitions of SMU, TCU and Trinity.
These schools offer something far more valuable than a mere education.
The dream of rubbing elbows with the 'right' ( rich ) people.
Paying for access to the rich is certainly what SMU is offering. That has kind of always been their thing.
Can TCU say that? Maybe…at best though it would be a secondary SMU
Can Baylor compete being 3rd in line for being the "rich kid school" and also while pretending to take religion seriously?
Again…Baylor does not seem to know what it wants to be or who it wants to compete with
TCU has certainly upgraded its ' rich ' image over the last 20 years.
Though SMU maintains the strongest reputation with those who have the major bucks.
Baylor alterred its course approx 15 years ago. It is after the rich folks now. And it can compete....... beautiful campus, excellent professors, many pretty girls, and Waco has improved in general.
Trinity flys undar the radar....but is also a viable option for the country club set.